O
ON 190
Guest
kiwifarms.net
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA *deep breath* HAHAHAHAHAHAHA4macie -do you still want to the interview? i will contact you soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA *deep breath* HAHAHAHAHAHAHA4macie -do you still want to the interview? i will contact you soon.
nope, some book from the library is.This thread and your ED article are the first results when Googling your name.
Ah ok, my bad.Sorry, I was talking about other posters, not you.
Marjan can be open to discussion/debate/change of mind. Not much, I know, but you have to have patience with ppl like him.
Some woman being raped and liking it has nothing to do with my personal bias. It's a fact I've seen many times.
Recursion.Reiterating your assertion is not providing empirical proof. But now, you're saying "some" women. Before it was all western women. What exactly are you saying?
1) it isn't.Not really. I challenged Holden once on his vision and method to achieve what he considered to be an ideal society. The problems I addressed were:
1.) Fossil records disprove orthogenesis, but orthogenesis is the pivot point of his plan.
2.) He's not commented on sterilization or executing roughly 75% of the offspring to allow selective breeding and forcing unilinear evolution.
3.) He's failed to address why sluts and rape apes are going to go along with his design.
All he did was say "Read my blog." Besides the fact that it's poorly written and unnecessarily wordy, it didn't answer one thing. Now he doesn't address me.
Holden is not capable of discussion, he's only capable of propagating. And with how uninformed he is on the subject of society, he can't even do that unless he has the means to bar opposition.
Ah ok, my bad.
Edit: Also why not do an interview with Flossy too? I'm personally interested in the idea of two interviews, one from a woman and one from a man, don't you think the difference in questions would be interesting and give you a wider platform to talk about your beliefs?
Yeah, see, I already agreed to that about a week ago. You ignored me, then called my voice "degenerate." As soon as @4Macie mentioned it (within minutes) you sprang into action and started saying you'd do the interview with her and that she should contact you.i'd do an interview with him as well as long as i wouldn't talk or appear onscreen.
Great interview.i'd do an interview with him as well as long as i wouldn't talk or appear onscreen.
i'd do an interview with him as well as long as i wouldn't talk or appear onscreen.
i'd do an interview with him as well as long as i wouldn't talk or appear onscreen.
He'd type via IM while I'd be on my mic.How would you get interviewed then, genius?
You said a bunch of nonsense afterwards so me replying would be a waste of time.
a written interviewHow would you get interviewed then, genius?
Why, would you be crying too much to get a word in?a written interview
Ok go ahead but set the condition that once the interview parameters have been set there is NO changing them. Because I remember you insulting Flossy a lot too and then you ended up on this tirade about 'sane' questions that derailed everything. Just say what you will and won't comfortably talk about, set a date and stick to it. Im sure both Floss and Macie would be happy to agree to those terms if you stopped moving the goalposts.i'd do an interview with him as well as long as i wouldn't talk or appear onscreen.
So then why did you completely ignore the fact that I reneged and decided to accept your original terms, but immediately agreed to do it with @4Macie and wait a week and a half because she was occupied? You have the most bizarre sense of logic.a written interview
a written interview