Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
Not that her looks should matter in the first place, but Rowling looks pretty great for a woman in her 50's. Meanwhile these troons in their 20's and 30's mocking her could make a mirror shatter just by looking into it. I wonder if part of the reason they hate on her in particular so viciously is jealousy. She's a conventionally attractive woman, famous, and is loved and respected by people all across the globe- everything troons want, but will never have.
And someone should tell them that on top of being gross and unnecessary, sexually charged insults are very much a male thing. Even the most dedicated troon enabler would start having second thoughts when Lily Kawaii-Sparkles starts foaming at the mouth and fantasizing about raping a woman because she hurt his feelings.
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
he raped twin boys and a girl, and there was a never-ending stream of child rape stories, children's clothing catalogs, etc., found in his prison cell
the only cure for this guy is to snap his neck
www.queenslandjudgments.com.au
the only cure for this guy is to snap his neck
[2018] QSC 166 - Attorney-General v Anderson
[2018] QSC 166, Attorney-General v Anderson, Jackson J, CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE
www.queenslandjudgments.com.au
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2019
Don't forget the legal system and Hollywood on that guillotine.
queue-anon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
She also sperges out on Twitter about being into BDSM when quite literally no one asked.
While celebrities might leak affairs to the press for attention, they tend to keep their weird sex shit to themselves and for good reason. Wilson was exceptional broadcasting this to the public especially since any fans she might still have remember her as an innocent child actor.
And they weren't killed by the cops either. Most killers of black trannies are black themselves, so good job bringing the conversation back around to black-on-black violence.
These people are also stupid bringing up Tony McDade since she killed a black dude shortly before she committed suicide by cop.
The trans kid craze makes me think Munchhausen by proxy is more common than previously thought.
The MbP mothers who seriously hurt or kill their kids are rare but get a lot of attention when they're caught, but the trans kid thing makes it look like there are many more relatively benign cases of MbP where the moms are looking for reasons why their kids are special and then use that specialness for attention.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
Also, these 'battles' are fought mainly on the internet, so people who are juggling work and family and aren't living in their parents' basement don't know anything about that. Powerlevelling a bit: until 3 years ago, I knew nothing about this kind of transactivism, then a Canadian, lesbian friend of mine complained about it during a chat. I explained the situation to a few friends (in my country transactivism isn't at these levels YET) and they were horrified. My father refuses to believe that males who identify as females will take the place of real female athletes in sports, and that instances where it already happened won't last long.
Then you have TRAs insisting that the majority of people are accepting: they are 'accepting' (aka: they aren't protesting) because they have no idea of what transactivism asks for.
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2015
The release of oxytocin in mother and baby is touch dependent. IIRC there are a number of studies on this. The trigger for the mutual release of oxytocin in both is mutual touch, which is why neonatal and paediatric health folks place so much importance on doing skin-to-skin/kangaroo care.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2019
I'll never forget the films I saw in college decades ago about the orphanages in Romania. There were so many babies and so little staff that the babies were lucky if they even got held just while feeding and that didn't happen often. Touch mostly occurred during brief bathings. Some babies literally died from lack of touch.
There's tons of pretty solid scientific literature on the ways, means and needs of bonding touch, talk and eye contact.
The human body is a pretty miraculous thing, especially relative to birth. The insanity of willingly trashing your own, let alone your child's body, is so woefully disturbing to the soul.
I think the concept of a rise in MunchausenbyProxy among MommysofTroons is apt, filtered through newscience and Selfies.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
mulliganfarmer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2016
It would be really interesting to figure out the relationship between attachment and later transitioning. One thing I really noticed over the years I worked with children is that once they built a bond with you they'd really start to 'echo' you in a lot of ways, not just copying putting on lipstick or pretending to cook but modelling the way you dressed, speech mannerisms, any trend you're following, hobbies you show them, all of it playing a part in developing their own sense of self.
By that extension, kids who had attachment disorders tended to latch on to fictional examples of human interaction to model themselves on, which was why the likes of Sesame Street and Mr Rogers were such a huge phenomenon because they modeled a 'normal' that the kids weren't getting from their home environment. Harry Potter was a series that started when a lot of this gen of young adults were kids and grew with them into adulthood, and Harry was a neglected kid who turned out to be the chosen one, what attachment-starved kid wouldn't latch onto that? When most people run across someone they admire saying something stupid, they're disappointed but they get on with their lives, but when your identity is so tangled up in this piece of fiction I can well imagine they'd be hysterical.
Look at who the transitioners model themselves on, it's hardly ever their mothers or cool aunts or favourite school teacher, it's their sisters, the girls in their friendship groups and the subset of girls they found attractive, all personalities that they projected themselves onto because they didn't develop their own. When a guy I used to be good friends with transitioned he would try to copy our voices, the way we dressed and all of our interests in a way that was really grotesque, and very sad in its own way. If he'd had a strong defined personality of his own he could have been happy with his body the way it was, but not only did he destroy that body he cut himself off from his family, alienated his friends and tanked his support group.
By that extension, kids who had attachment disorders tended to latch on to fictional examples of human interaction to model themselves on, which was why the likes of Sesame Street and Mr Rogers were such a huge phenomenon because they modeled a 'normal' that the kids weren't getting from their home environment. Harry Potter was a series that started when a lot of this gen of young adults were kids and grew with them into adulthood, and Harry was a neglected kid who turned out to be the chosen one, what attachment-starved kid wouldn't latch onto that? When most people run across someone they admire saying something stupid, they're disappointed but they get on with their lives, but when your identity is so tangled up in this piece of fiction I can well imagine they'd be hysterical.
Look at who the transitioners model themselves on, it's hardly ever their mothers or cool aunts or favourite school teacher, it's their sisters, the girls in their friendship groups and the subset of girls they found attractive, all personalities that they projected themselves onto because they didn't develop their own. When a guy I used to be good friends with transitioned he would try to copy our voices, the way we dressed and all of our interests in a way that was really grotesque, and very sad in its own way. If he'd had a strong defined personality of his own he could have been happy with his body the way it was, but not only did he destroy that body he cut himself off from his family, alienated his friends and tanked his support group.
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Yes, it would be. I am a complete amateur when it comes to any of these subjects, but on many topics that are sensitive you are relegated to Internet discussion forums because nobody else will touch a subject or aspects of it - especially not the very people who the public looks to to address these questions, professionals, as they have a professional reputation to lose. Brainlets like myself have to resort to spectulation and our own research to get any honest, truthful answers. So, I am just throwing this in the mix, not being sure how this piece fits into the puzzle (pun intended) or not.
Imitation of another one's behaviors, mannerisms, without fully comprehending significance, context, and such. Yes, that does remind me of a lot of transgender people. I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt, that early transitioners just have to get used to acting like the opposite sex, but many times their behaviors seem to be like grotesque carricatures or exaggerations of women, in the case of MtF. Then again, they often do not do a particularly good job with fitting in with their sex, either, so maybe that awkwardness makes them believe that they are not really the gender matching their sex. It provides a convenient excuse for years of awkwardness then. You can wash your hands of all those socially uncomfortable moments. Many people even seem to invent illnesses for themselves (many YouTube channels seem to center around that) so that they can offload their issues and shortcomings in life onto them.
It's likely been already brought up, but probably no debate of autism would be complete without mentiong the "extreme male hypothesis":
The extreme male brain, explained
The ‘extreme male brain’ theory suggests that autism is an exaggeration of systematic sex differences in ways of thinking.
www.spectrumnews.org
However, if the psychogenic hypotheses regarding child neglect and abuse are true, it would probably be adding insult to injury to simply say to autistic people "Well, you just have a very male brain." I also remember studies that showed a significant difference how much male vs. female infants are being held or how much attention parents pay to them. That, together with a general attitude that male infants should perhaps be treated "rougher" to "toughen them up" could have contributed a portion of why there are more autistic male children. This is not so different from the general attitude in society to tell men to "man up" and for them to not act feminine, lest they be labeled gay. Ironically, this general callousness, if true, could have increased, rather than decreased, the number of cases of males with gender identity disorder. I am just speculating, though.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
I also think an attachment to narratives that combine “chosen one” with “secret history” have something to do with it. If we accept that these folks attach themselves to fiction and fantasy in extreme ways, which they do, and look at things like HP or Percy Jackson, or etc etc, it’s all about discovering in middle school that you’re REALLY xyz, and that there’s an entire WORLD and SECRET HISTORY that’s behind it all that you now have access to. A lot of other 90s narratives are the same...lots of Gaiman particularly Neverwhere, all White Wolf RPGs, etc. Please note that I grew up in the 90s so it may be that this kind of thing didn’t start in the 90s, it’s just my frame of reference.
Anyway as has been previously discussed everywhere troons are analyzed, there really is no such thing as a troon with a personality other than troonery. Only the gay homosexual male troons have anything more than that, but even then it’s just a group shared personality ie set of traits and behaviors that they share with drag queens and flamers. It’s not a real personality, it’s a persona. Troonery is a persona. Fursona is a persona. These are all costumes. And the only people who want to wear them are empty people who don’t have anything interesting or notable about themselves.
So just as the kid is entering puberty, and other kids begin individuating and getting on the path to become more interesting instead of just another kid, there we have the boring prototroon who already didn’t fit it and was already boring, it just didn’t matter yet. But now it matters. How cool to discover you are really THE OPPOSITE SEX and did you know THE SECRET TRANS always existed and there is a whole secret history to discover? Did you? Suddenly the kid doesn’t need a personality! The kid has a persona! And since s/he lacks content and always has and always will, they assume everyone else only has a persona, too.
Anyway embrace mediocrity, it isn’t as bad as it seems.
Anyway as has been previously discussed everywhere troons are analyzed, there really is no such thing as a troon with a personality other than troonery. Only the gay homosexual male troons have anything more than that, but even then it’s just a group shared personality ie set of traits and behaviors that they share with drag queens and flamers. It’s not a real personality, it’s a persona. Troonery is a persona. Fursona is a persona. These are all costumes. And the only people who want to wear them are empty people who don’t have anything interesting or notable about themselves.
So just as the kid is entering puberty, and other kids begin individuating and getting on the path to become more interesting instead of just another kid, there we have the boring prototroon who already didn’t fit it and was already boring, it just didn’t matter yet. But now it matters. How cool to discover you are really THE OPPOSITE SEX and did you know THE SECRET TRANS always existed and there is a whole secret history to discover? Did you? Suddenly the kid doesn’t need a personality! The kid has a persona! And since s/he lacks content and always has and always will, they assume everyone else only has a persona, too.
Anyway embrace mediocrity, it isn’t as bad as it seems.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
In defense of Buffy, the Chosen One narrative is actually rather subversive in that the job fucking sucks and Buffy gradually has to completely give up her life, dreams, and innocence due to the weight of her responsibility. Basically, she has to be the person the world needs her to be at the cost of her own happiness instead of the person she wants to be.
Something a lot of troons, particularly selfish midlife crisis men, don't take to heart when it comes to their spouses and children.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
HP really subverts the CO narrative in the end, since the entire thing could just as easily have been about Neville, had Voldemort gone that way instead.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
He still keeps his dick. It is a given he is going to fuck more kids. And I hope the parents of the victims will sue the court.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
Why not skip the drugs and just identify as a non-pedophile? Easy.
Amber the Hedgehog
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2018
Or a kid? It's not pedofilia if you are the same age.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
White cis man Jonathan Ross defines transphobia for trans people while mass-blocking prominent LGBT+ activists
Josh Milton June 8, 2020
Jonathan Ross (L) has backed JK Rowling amid a torrent of criticism for the author tweets on trans lives. (Dave J Hogan/Dave J Hogan/Getty Images/Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Jonathan Ross announced Sunday evening (June 7) that he has become a representative of the entire LGBT+ community as he sought to defend JK Rowling over her comments on trans people and define what is and isn’t transphobia.
Rowling was, in recent weeks, prosaically sharing pictures doodled by children of her new book series, The Ickabog, before she suddenly weighed in on trans folk and how, she said, they’re not “discriminated against”.
And seemingly straight from the Rowling playbook, the British TV presenter innocuously tweeted that he ate “too many brownies” before abruptly proclaiming that Rowling is “right and magnificent”.
“For those accusing her of transphobia,” the 59-year-old continued, “please read what she wrote.
“She clearly is not.”
Jonathan Ross: LGBT+ people slam comedian for defending JK Rowling.
Backlash immediately brewed against Ross, with many LGBT+ Twitter users flaying Ross for using his thumping platform to define what transphobia is.
Bizarrely, anger also turned to confusion, as some high-profile members of the LGBT+ community, including PinkNews staffers, reported that Ross had, at some point recently, blocked them on Twitter.
So, what did JK Rowling actually say and was it ‘anti-trans’?
According to trans folk who have, you know, directly experienced and are still experiencing transphobia, yes.
Rowling, 54, amid a series of cascading tinderbox issues, from the coronavirus pandemic to the Black Lives Matter demonstrations as well as less than a week into LGBT+ Pride Month, decided now was the perfect time to hit that send button and tweet about trans folk.
The children’s book author took to Twitter Saturday evening (June 6) to comment on people’s genitalia. She focused a thread on her views of sex and gender in relation to trans people that sparked fury online.
Rowling’s thread was first seeded earlier that evening, when she shared an article in Devex, the media platform for the global development community, with the headline: “Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”
“‘People who menstruate’,” she responded. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”
In the avalanche of tweets that followed, she sought to reassure her 14.5 million followers that she “knows and loves trans people” and claimed that the idea she hates trans people is “nonsense”.
“I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them,” wrote the writer.
“I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans,” she capped off the thread.
Josh Milton June 8, 2020
Jonathan Ross (L) has backed JK Rowling amid a torrent of criticism for the author tweets on trans lives. (Dave J Hogan/Dave J Hogan/Getty Images/Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Jonathan Ross announced Sunday evening (June 7) that he has become a representative of the entire LGBT+ community as he sought to defend JK Rowling over her comments on trans people and define what is and isn’t transphobia.
Rowling was, in recent weeks, prosaically sharing pictures doodled by children of her new book series, The Ickabog, before she suddenly weighed in on trans folk and how, she said, they’re not “discriminated against”.
And seemingly straight from the Rowling playbook, the British TV presenter innocuously tweeted that he ate “too many brownies” before abruptly proclaiming that Rowling is “right and magnificent”.
“For those accusing her of transphobia,” the 59-year-old continued, “please read what she wrote.
“She clearly is not.”
Jonathan Ross: LGBT+ people slam comedian for defending JK Rowling.
Backlash immediately brewed against Ross, with many LGBT+ Twitter users flaying Ross for using his thumping platform to define what transphobia is.
Aah this is exactly what the discussion needed – some straight white cidsgendered male energy! https://t.co/uM4o6PEb6u
— Jᴀᴄᴋ(@JackDMurphy) June 8, 2020
Oh yes… a straight white cis gender man telling everyone what’s considered transphobic…….https://t.co/0HJ6jalToa
— Roly West (@RolyUnGashaa) June 8, 2020
(@Tosuff) Bizarrely, anger also turned to confusion, as some high-profile members of the LGBT+ community, including PinkNews staffers, reported that Ross had, at some point recently, blocked them on Twitter.
So, what did JK Rowling actually say and was it ‘anti-trans’?
According to trans folk who have, you know, directly experienced and are still experiencing transphobia, yes.
Rowling, 54, amid a series of cascading tinderbox issues, from the coronavirus pandemic to the Black Lives Matter demonstrations as well as less than a week into LGBT+ Pride Month, decided now was the perfect time to hit that send button and tweet about trans folk.
The children’s book author took to Twitter Saturday evening (June 6) to comment on people’s genitalia. She focused a thread on her views of sex and gender in relation to trans people that sparked fury online.
Rowling’s thread was first seeded earlier that evening, when she shared an article in Devex, the media platform for the global development community, with the headline: “Creating a more equal post-COVID-19 world for people who menstruate.”
“‘People who menstruate’,” she responded. “I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”
In the avalanche of tweets that followed, she sought to reassure her 14.5 million followers that she “knows and loves trans people” and claimed that the idea she hates trans people is “nonsense”.
“I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them,” wrote the writer.
“I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans,” she capped off the thread.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
Just imagining him saying that sentence is amazing. J K wowling is not twansphobic!
