Didn't quote or tag. I must be doing well.
otaku, I have no idea what you're rambling about.
Welcome to our world.
First of all, tell me how you define orthogenesis and how it apply here?
I've said it repeatedly: unilinear evolution. In regards to its theory in nature - the invalid one - the evolution proceeded in this way due to an innate drive by each creature, causing its offspring to be more inclined to achieve this goal. Thus, a horse that wishes to run fast will bear children genetically designed to run faster than it; evolution oriented in one direction. Selective breeding is humanity's method to artificially produce orthogenetic evolution by only allowing breeding through creatures that exhibited the desired traits. Thus, a horse that didn't run as fast as its parents wouldn't be allowed to make a thoroughbred, and a dog that wasn't as fast as its parents wouldn't be allowed to make a greyhound.
Both methods achieve the same result, so I used the terms interchangeably when addressing you. You seek unilinear evolution of humanity, thus require either a natural or artificial orthogenesis.
your comparison to homosexuality is crazy, since that is a sexual orientation. you don't just engage it in cause it's a taboo. that's insane.
Follow along Holden. I even explicitly prefaced it with "Proof: the same thing happened before, though predominantly
more for emotional reasons." Casual experimentation exists even to this day, and the taboo element only heightened the feel. However, the comparison was more to how even religious dogma couldn't stop homosexual activity and the genes necessary to create homosexual people from being passed on through the generations - the latter of which being the main reason I invoked this as opposed to St. Valentine, who allegedly married couples in secret after marriage was outlawed for the good of war. Your r-type individuals will find a way as well.
also, i never said that sex among worthless women and idiots would be banned, just that these would be the rags of society.
Then your society collapses even sooner. With the majority being "rags" by your own admission and their tendency to reproduce more quickly and in greater numbers, a social uprising wouldn't be far behind. Be it the Underground Railroad or The Bolshevik Rebellion, the outcome would be your society's fall, especially since you allowed a genetic predisposition to violence into the mix.
As for rape apes, that could be handled by giving sufficient protection to women and killing rapists.
You took execution off the table. This also fails to provide an explanation for this impure child's fate. It simultaneously fails to address women who - due to conditions such as down syndrome, drugs, or overall naivete - aren't even aware they've been raped. Furthermore, the only way to genuinely remove rape from the equation is The Ludovico Technique, but my mozg skazats a grahzny bratchny like you can't pony that raskazz and only viddied that sinny for the groodies and ultra-violence.
When it comes to children of sluts, they could also be made into sex workers.
Even if their children are male?
"promiscuous men are a social normality. "
They wouldn't be in this society in terms of breeding.
Then why is there a prostitute class?
