Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Hey @BoxerShorts47 which /pol/ do you prefer? 4chan's or 8chan's or a different imageboard?
I haven't been on the 8chan version. I use the 4chan version time to time. Right now I'm trying to get my own thoughts sorted out so I haven't used /pol/ in a while. But /pol/ definitely represents the grassroots right.

Slightly off topic but I don't see a future for the posters on this website. Either they have to join the right, like I did, or join the left, the SJWs, like @GethN7 These people are repeating pre 2012 rhetoric and the only reason those ideas were popular was because they were forced onto the population by the media, universities and population. Now that those ideas are considered bigoted (e.g. colorblind), they will have to either toe the new SJW party line or go full dissident. So I feel like I'm stuck in a time bubble, America ~10 years ago when I speak with these forum members. Everyone else has moved on, on /pol/ or twitter and these people are stuck in the past. Really makes it clear to me how most people are NPCs, are sheep that will repeat the party line because they don't want to be socially shammed or punished.
 
I haven't been on the 8chan version. I use the 4chan version time to time. Right now I'm trying to get my own thoughts sorted out so I haven't used /pol/ in a while. But /pol/ definitely represents the grassroots right.

Slightly off topic but I don't see a future for the posters on this website. Either they have to join the right, like I did, or join the left, the SJWs, like @GethN7 These people are repeating pre 2012 rhetoric and the only reason those ideas were popular was because they were forced onto the population by the media, universities and population. Now that those ideas are considered bigoted (e.g. colorblind), they will have to either toe the new SJW party line or go full dissident. So I feel like I'm stuck in a time bubble, America ~10 years ago when I speak with these forum members. Everyone else has moved on, on /pol/ or twitter and these people are stuck in the past. Really makes it clear to me how most people are NPCs, are sheep that will repeat the party line because they don't want to be socially shammed or punished.
Unlike you sheep I picked one of two options. Heh, think for yourself kids.
 
I haven't been on the 8chan version. I use the 4chan version time to time. Right now I'm trying to get my own thoughts sorted out so I haven't used /pol/ in a while. But /pol/ definitely represents the grassroots right.

Slightly off topic but I don't see a future for the posters on this website. Either they have to join the right, like I did, or join the left, the SJWs, like @GethN7 These people are repeating pre 2012 rhetoric and the only reason those ideas were popular was because they were forced onto the population by the media, universities and population. Now that those ideas are considered bigoted (e.g. colorblind), they will have to either toe the new SJW party line or go full dissident. So I feel like I'm stuck in a time bubble, America ~10 years ago when I speak with these forum members. Everyone else has moved on, on /pol/ or twitter and these people are stuck in the past. Really makes it clear to me how most people are NPCs, are sheep that will repeat the party line because they don't want to be socially shammed or punished.
I'm an enlightened centrist with no strong convictions. I bet you feel really foolish now. don't you faggot?
 
I haven't been on the 8chan version. I use the 4chan version time to time. Right now I'm trying to get my own thoughts sorted out so I haven't used /pol/ in a while. But /pol/ definitely represents the grassroots right.

This was a pic about a 4chan's /pol/ meetup in New York. Pretty diverse. Would you be fine with that image showing that community that represented your grassroots?
1591724633529.png
 
I haven't been on the 8chan version. I use the 4chan version time to time. Right now I'm trying to get my own thoughts sorted out so I haven't used /pol/ in a while. But /pol/ definitely represents the grassroots right.

Slightly off topic but I don't see a future for the posters on this website. Either they have to join the right, like I did, or join the left, the SJWs, like @GethN7 These people are repeating pre 2012 rhetoric and the only reason those ideas were popular was because they were forced onto the population by the media, universities and population. Now that those ideas are considered bigoted (e.g. colorblind), they will have to either toe the new SJW party line or go full dissident. So I feel like I'm stuck in a time bubble, America ~10 years ago when I speak with these forum members. Everyone else has moved on, on /pol/ or twitter and these people are stuck in the past. Really makes it clear to me how most people are NPCs, are sheep that will repeat the party line because they don't want to be socially shammed or punished.

You still think I'm a liberal because I said I'd be willing to humor people who aren't assholes?

That's not being a liberal, that's called acting like a decent human being.
 
This was a pic about a 4chan's /pol/ meetup in New York. Pretty diverse. Would you be fine with that image showing that community that represented your grassroots?
View attachment 1363522
Yes. We're very diverse. Most people are racist tribal, they want a border, a neighborhood that looks like them and kids that look like them and they can judge other groups by their characteristics too. Look at the Dave Chappelle show. He mocks white people. He sees a difference between us and black people.

Many interracial people have problems with their identity like Britney Venti.

Implict Bias Testing shows that both whites and blacks have a strong bias against interracial couples and and I would argue that even multiracial people show a slight bias against multiracial.

The idea of open borders + race mixing is unnatural and that's why it's hated by so many people from diverse backgrounds and heritages. Everyone knows this is disgusting but the liberals brainwash people into thinking diversity is a moral good rather than self genocide. They equivocate racism or tribalism with hate. That's just total bullshit. Most of us don't hate foreigners and have no problem working with foreigners. Anti racism is the new religion and in 50-100 years, people will view it as a religion and think people were insane for ever believing this non-sense.

You still think I'm a liberal because I said I'd be willing to humor people who aren't assholes?

That's not being a liberal, that's called acting like a decent human being.
You're not being a decent human being. You are lying to society. Pretending that these men can be women. Indulging their lunacy. And setting a bad example for kids that don't understand what is occurring. You're a coward with no morality or vitality.
 
You're not being a decent human being. You are lying to society. Pretending that these men can be women. Indulging their lunacy. And setting a bad example for kids that don't understand what is occurring. You're a coward with no morality or vitality.

I'd rather socialize with a polite tranny than your bitchy ass IRL. At least the former knows how to be polite in the first place.
 
You're not being a decent human being. You are lying to society. Pretending that these men can be women. Indulging their lunacy. And setting a bad example for kids that don't understand what is occurring. You're a coward with no morality or vitality.
of course it's a real world
I'm cisgendered because I identify with the gender that I was assigned at birth
feminists are not cisgendered because they don't identify with the female gender
they hate female gender norms and want male gender norms.
so feminists are not cisgendered, they are pre-op transgenders and that means they don't speak for all women
they don't speak for cisgendered women.


yep.
a lot of teenage crime including drinking and drug usage is because of movies
likewise a lot of teens steal cuz hollywood or rap music says it is "cool" to steal.
:thinking:
Dude are you a terf or a TRA?
 
Feminist propaganda. Totally contradictory. You feminists put sex end into elemtnary school at age 10-11 to sexualize the kids to have sex as pre-teens or teenages (young adults). What is the difference between a 15 yr old that consents with a 16 yr old vs a 20 yr old? Still sex. Still consent.
You're trying way too hard at this trolling thing.
 
The idea of open borders + race mixing is unnatural and that's why it's hated by so many people from diverse backgrounds and heritages. Everyone knows this is disgusting but the liberals brainwash people into thinking diversity is a moral good rather than self genocide. They equivocate racism or tribalism with hate. That's just total bullshit. Most of us don't hate foreigners and have no problem working with foreigners. Anti racism is the new religion and in 50-100 years, people will view it as a religion and think people were insane for ever believing this non-sense.
So hold up, to sum it up, your issue with diversity isn't actually working with people of different backgrounds, but rather just race mixing and that's it? And I assume white genocide would be caused by race mixing?
 
I don't think you can ban it, just like you cannot ban ephebophilia with age of consent laws. But I think the culture should discourage it. I think we all realize that the higher a women's body count is, the most likely she won't be wifey material.

Lower age of consent.
Discourage sex before marriage through the culture
This creates a culture that's better for marriage formation.
The way USA was ~100-150 yrs ago.

Again to repeat, age of consent doesn't stop 14 yr old girls from having sex. They are still pressured into sex by media/culture "omg you're soo prude." The only effect is it basically guarantees they'll have sex with young boys in pump and dump relationships rather than be put on a path to marriage. We've already had this conversation on /pol/. We went back and forth and heard all the arguments and the community consensus was age of consent should be lowered. From my POV, you missed the debate and you're stuck in the past, repeating failed feminist propaganda. Either you don't care or you don't want to fix issues like the birthrate and marriagerate collapse.


1. Look you have to make a cutoff somewhere. Puberty is the biologically correct answer. According to the data, for many women that's around age 12. So you're denying science when you say age of consent is 16 or 18.

2. Age of consent has consequences: women think that all men are pigs because they're attracted to sexually mature women. You're trapping women into pump and dump teenage relationships.

3. Your idea praying is non-sense because age of consent laws still require consent. Not rape, not Praying. What is the difference between a 15 yr old consenting to sex with a 16 vs a 21 yr old? Still sex. Still consent.

To make sure we're clear, you're still advocating for teenage sex and for sex before marriage and teenage pregnancy, but you just want to limit that to 1 or 2 years older than the girl. Wow soo brave. Give me a break.
You subhuman retard,did you just really say that by not lowering the age of consent women are forced to have casual sex even though I explained how teens can get married if they want to? You are so autistic and dense. Also why do you assume that Im for teen pregnancy and teen sex? You making up positions about me that I never said I held so you dont have to admit you are exceptional.

Can you write your manifesto,start a youtube channel and go IRL alredy? Not only you are retarded,you are also shit at debating and I want to see you try this IRL.
 
Back