Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Chicago mayor caught acting as many would predict when asked to do something better about keeping the city safe.

View attachment 1363308
















The aldermen said parts of the Back of the Yards and Brighton Park neighborhoods in his ward had become “a virtual warzone.”


“We can’t expect our police, and I don’t fault them at all, to be able to control this,” he said. “Half our neighborhoods are already obliterated. It’s too late.”

Lopez said he feared looters would eventually start targeting homes after ransacking businesses throughout the city.

“Once they’re done looting and rioting and whatever’s going to happen tonight, God help us, what happens when they start going after residents? Going into the neighborhoods? Once they start trying to break down people’s doors, if they think they’ve got something,” he said.

“We know that people are here to antagonize and incite, and you’ve got them all pumped tonight, today. They’re not going to go to bed at 8 o’clock. They’re going to turn their focus on the neighborhoods. I’ve got gang-bangers with AK-47s walking around right now, just waiting to settle some scores. What are we going to do, and what do we tell residents, other than good faith people stand up? It’s not going to be enough,” Lopez added.



When Lopez finished talking on the conference call, Lightfoot declined to respond, and tried to move on to another alderman, but Lopez demanded an answer.

“It’s not something you ignore. This is a question that I have,” Lopez said.

That’s when the call turned profane.

“I think you’re 100% full of s***, is what I think,” Lightfoot said.

Lopez was infuriated.

“F*** you, then. Who are you to tell me I’m full of s***?” he said. “Maybe you should come out and see what’s going on.”

The mayor vehemently denied protecting downtown at the expense of the neighborhoods.

“If you think we’re not ready, and we stood by and let the neighborhoods go up, there’s nothing intelligent that I could say to you,” she said. “That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. I understand you want to preen.”

“Mayor, you need to check your f***ing attitude. That’s what you need to do,” Lopez shot back.

At that point, several other aldermen interjected in an effort to calm nerves, with one alderman telling Lopez, “Ray, cut it out, please. Calm down, please.”


This is seriously one of the more insane things to come out of this. Lot of leaders have the spotlight on them for the first time. Really makes you question how the fuck these Democrat lead cities haven’t burned down already
 
This is seriously one of the more insane things to come out of this. Lot of leaders have the spotlight on them for the first time. Really makes you question how the fuck these Democrat lead cities haven’t burned down already

Oh by the way, the day the conference call took place, 18 murders happened, which started at 1 AM that night, making that weekend the most violent weekend that city had in decades.


The mayor didn't even blink.
 
The more stupid these riots get, the more I suspect we might see a sweep given how most people hate the idea of not having police and hate rioters and their enablers even more. In the DNC's flailing and enabling of these shitheads, they are setting themselves up for a '72 ass ruining. It's also very apparent they forgot about the Wu Flu narrative. That latter note with their support of the NEETs of ANTIFA being able to assemble is horrifically starting to show that the tinfoil suggestion I had was right; and it was just an excuse by the DNC to try and nuke the economy.

I hate tinfoil, I fucking hate when this thread gets to tinfoil, and yet this is where we're going. We're going towards the DNC actually being so fucking mad and retarded over them not winning four years ago they tried to nuke the economy and enable riots.

I wonder what stupid idea they're gonna pull when Hillary's September date comes in?
I've said for awhile now that 2020 is the year the Democrats put in a serious effort to burn America to the ground rather than risk letting Donald Trump be elected over it again.
 
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.

I dunno, if Biden keeps doing shit like this he might very well.
 
This is seriously one of the more insane things to come out of this. Lot of leaders have the spotlight on them for the first time. Really makes you question how the fuck these Democrat lead cities haven’t burned down already
Maybe the cops were just holding it all together. I wonder why all the police brutality is in blue cities, maybe it's because their leaders are batshit insane and the cops just have to take whoever they can get to deal with the high crime rates that result from such mismanagement.
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.
Polls are laggy, they probably still reflect that time when the news cycle was dominated by Trump fleeing into the bunker and doing jack shit about this stuff. If Styx is to be believed they don't really matter for election predictions until the debates, which is when independents start to solidify their preferences.
 
Last edited:
Trump Donates all his pay to charity: Snopes says FALSE
(he keeps $1.00 of it.)
Curiously enough, even if the articles have a little bit of bitchiness to them and try to pull the, "Well so far he's done it!" card, Snopes actually does keep track of where his paychecks are being donated, and even Politifact rated his statement that he wouldn't be accepting a salary as a "promise kept."
 
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.
People thought Walter Mondale had it in the bag. Especially after the first debate. Then this happened:
1984 election.png


Its still too far out to tell what the outcome of the election will be for this year.
 
Last edited:
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.
It probably won't.

Supposedly they were overpolling Democrats again (and I stand by overpolling meaning including them as too large a % of the poll).

Plus you have Republicans that are pissed about Trump for various reasons like thinking he should have done more about coronavirus, done less about coronavirus, put bullets in the heads of protesters, maybe done even more about immigration, and whatever else. There's a ton of stressors that will have everyone agitated right now even if a lot of it is overblown. Like the coronavirus which thanks to the protests is suddenly not actually that big of a deal and means going to work won't kill grandma.

Thing is it'll probably take weeks for a lot of this to sink in that the protests have largely died down, that the worst of the coronavirus is dealt with, and the economy is looking like it'll recover. Trump will get viewed a lot better by non-Democrats after these stressors stop being such an issue.

Also thanks to Democrats acting like raving lunatics about wanting to defund police and demanding people apologize for their skin color, we'll end up seeing a lot of non-Democrats panicked similarly to what happened in 2016 due to the BLM race riots then, leading to a greater feeling of urgency to vote.

In addition to all this we have this bland turd in the form of Biden who is so incompetent that his own people are saying they'd rather he stay in his basement.
"People say all the time, 'Oh, we got to get the vice president out of the basement,'" McAuliffe told the "monthly breakfast" of the Norfolk City Democratic Committee. "He's fine in the basement. Two people see him a day: his two body people. That's it. Let Trump keep doing what Trump's doing."

With all the power the Democrats have, in the government, corporate world, and media, it really shouldn't be that hard to oust Trump, but they keep making strategic mistakes due to thinking the little bubbles they live in (which are carefully curated) are representative of the entire nation. They could try saying they'd jumpstart the economy with a giant infrastructure bill that Trump failed to get through (due to Democrats), but that wouldn't appeal to the far left wanting a "Green Energy" bill to do just that. Which is what happens with any potential avenue to defeat Trump, the Democrats unsatisfied with just getting a win over Trump, overreach as they try appealing to the tiniest sections of the public. I can't help but think the Democrats are stuck in this mindset because they think they only need to target key swing voters in particular demographics (same thing they tried in 2016) and treat most of their votes as guaranteed.
 
With all the power the Democrats have, in the government, corporate world, and media, it really shouldn't be that hard to oust Trump, but they keep making strategic mistakes due to thinking the little bubbles they live in (which are carefully curated) are representative of the entire nation. They could try saying they'd jumpstart the economy with a giant infrastructure bill that Trump failed to get through (due to Democrats), but that wouldn't appeal to the far left wanting a "Green Energy" bill to do just that. Which is what happens with any potential avenue to defeat Trump, the Democrats unsatisfied with just getting a win over Trump, overreach as they try appealing to the tiniest sections of the public. I can't help but think the Democrats are stuck in this mindset because they think they only need to target key swing voters in particular demographics (same thing they tried in 2016) and treat most of their votes as guaranteed.

We won't interrupt Democrats when they do a mistake. :story:

Btw, Styx vlogged on Bitchute then a vote for Biden is a vote for an oligarchic cabal and the way the Dems do actually, he got a point.
 
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.
Is it just me or did the culture war turn up to 11 this week? I mean, it was already at 10, but the cancelling and race baiting this past week has been insane. Last night HBO announced they were removing Gone With The Wind from its catalog because it's problematic. The Failing NYT, a former newspaper, fired its opinion editor because a sitting US Senator penned an op ed that 58% of the country agreed with and the SJW mob went after a Super Bowl winning quarterback.

The left is really trying to seize the moment, but as usual they're overplaying their hand. They've got to be pushing away lots of the people in the center.
 
You think Trump slipping in the polls really has all that much impact on the election, like the media constantly claims?



I just don't want us to get all overconfident and for people to not vote for him simply because they think he has it in the bag.
In addition to what other people have said, I would also like to point out that polls could very easily be assuming high turnout for Biden, and without knowledge of what turnout a given poll is assuming, said poll is of very little use, especially months away from the general election.
 
Maybe the cops were just holding it all together. I wonder why all the police brutality is in blue cities, maybe it's because their leaders are batshit insane and the cops just have to take whoever they can get to deal with the high crime rates that result from such mismanagement.
Here's what nobody wants to admit.

The higher the requirements you make for cops - the fewer cops you are going to have.

That's just a basic fact of life. The higher the requirements you set for ANYTHING, the fewer the people that are going to meet it. (And if you set the bar high enough, the people that can meet it, will also have plenty of other options available to them.)

Here's basic fact #2 of life: No matter how good/great the cop is, there's only 24 hrs in a day, and this can't be changed. If Steve Rogers, policeman, is arresting and booking mugging suspect R. Skull on main street, he's not over on JFK blvd putting a stop to the Hydra gang.

This means that when you put the two facts together, there are only so many laws the police can enforce - period.

Therefore, if you're in charge of a society (whether town or city), you have to make a choice. Either you have to reduce the number of laws to a level your high quality police force can handle OR you have to increase manpower. And if you are going to increase manpower, you're going to have to start lowering standards.

Now if you were to look at any democrat run city, which direction would you bet they went in?
 
Back