U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has america lost it's mind ?

View attachment 1365386

Yes.
Simpsons did it!
Bart_Worried_About_the_Statue_(The_Telltale_Head).png
 
You don't need some quasi-legal "designation" to arrest people who have been openly committing crimes and posting videos of it on social media. You just need to tell the feds to round them up and the U.S. Attorneys to charge them.

Which they've already been doing for days.
Blessed be the glowniggers scraping evidence from this thread for arrests and cases. Give us another Eric Stanton to laugh at!
 
If you have to destroy reality to establish your truth, you are the enemy.

Perfectly said, and it applies to every minor or major untruth these psychos "believe," e.g. men can be women, obesity is healthy, communism is freedom, words are violence, rent is theft, feminism is humanism, Islam is peace, etc., etc., etc.
 
My inbox is getting flooded with retarded articles like "all white people are racist no matter what" and all manner of digital diarrhea that comes from the minds of those stuck in 7th grade special education mentally or literally.


We may have to scrap most of this recent generation of 18-28 year olds and just have older fucks run things awhile longer until less retarded kids can be born.
Just look at all the "celebrities" on Twitch and social media who cry out somebody needs to be institutionalized because somebody doesn't 100 percent suck their boyclit and criticized their content for being derivative of more successful streamers. Fuck them all.
At the next twitchcon give them gfuel samples that sterilizes them forever. In fact when Twitchcon is full, launch the whole convention center into the fucking sun.

I had one of these fucks demanding I immediately sign up for betterhelp and go in for 72 hours when I pointed out how they completely copied the screen layout and wardrobe of another streamer. Screeeeeeeee screeeee scree. I can say is they also look like a more rat faced kiked out clone of Caitlyn Dever with a flatter, horrible cellulite ass.
 
Last edited:
Let’s be honest guys, Christopher Columbus was pretty fucking based.
View attachment 1365371

Every Time they write about Columbus they make up more and more shit, I can not wait till a paper comes out linking him to Hitler or insisting he performed the beta version of the holocaust.
More good news,
1. Rioters have rammed cops with cars multiple times so keeping a rifle trained at the driver keeps them from ramming you.
2. the fucking brains on this main, insults the cops, is openly antagonistic and wont follow their orders. I love his response, "what are you going to do shoot me again" Said by man who should of been shot to death.
 
He's one of those that wants to aggressively roll back the restrictions on all Canadians. He basically wants the average Canadian to be able to buy AK's and drum magazines in stores again.

Anyway, I miss anything fun while I were asleep? Has the CHAZ run out of food yet?
1591789385086.jpg
Please find it in your heart to donate as much soy milk as you can

You know they're never gonna leave. Because they know things aren't bad here. Or even if the think things are bad, they sure as hell don't think they're worse than Africa. They wanna act like africa is a paradise and wear their little robes and little hats like Congo Princes, but they'll never go there, let alone live there. Because they know that they can't scream "OPPRESSION!" at a child soldier with a rusty AK-47 and guilt them into compliance.
 
Those who were open borders now build shitty walls to hide in. Never mind police have helicopters, sniper rifles and thermal vision.

And that's if the opposition is feeling generous by not sending in the National Guard who have much more amusing toys.
Maybe they trust the politicians to be too concerned with optics, and those are just to stop some imaginary legion of /pol/ tards which is totally going to get their coon shootin' boogie on any day now.
 
Society used to tell me that all life is precious, now society is telling me if I die, it's my own fault, ok
Unless if I'm a nigger, that is, then hopefully I may be paraded along the country with a golden casket.



Society tells people that is virtuous to not lie, but be honest, to help, rather than cause deception, goodwill instead of malevolence. When you're equipped with just those, it's good for a person(man) to die, ok
How dare he, to follow societies wants, and feel betrayed for being cast out after doing that, which was expected of him.
Every society has more spirituality-minded guys like you who hate lies, selfishness, deception, malice and all that shit and it's those guys putting out ideas you're disillusioned with in attempt to shovel out some shit from their shithole. USA doesn't value niggers as anything other than bargaining chips. Nobody gives a shit if you feel betrayed and it won't do anything but make you feel miserable, just let it go man. Me feeling pity for you (and I do, really) won't do anything either but give me a bad mood. We're hurting ourselves more by stressing about the crisis than hurting those who caused it. And you really don't want a society that tells people altruism is evil and selfishness is good and all that Objectivism idiocy.

Humans have improved their surroundings, but not themselves - they are still the animals as you describe.
Humans are frequently worse than animals. Very few animals torture for fun or put smaller species in cages. Elephants for example are very intelligent (I remember the story of an elephant in India who didn't obey human's order to drop a log into a crevice; turns out there was a dog sleeping there and possibly Dumbo realized it would kill the dog - and humans kill them for absolutely useless ivory. Dumbos also fear skittering critters like spiders - who doesn't, right?)
Anyway... humans veeery slowly adapt by reproduction to technology (think alcohol metabolism, ability to not get diabetes from grains - which NA Indians almost always got when they intergrated with USA), the problem is reproduction is way too slow, addiction to Twitter or videogames is one symptom of this and honestly I don't care much about all that moral blahblah. Misplaced sense of compassion or justice can do more damage than cold indifference.


Makes one wonder why the patriarchy ever took off. Men ought to have continued competing(killing) with each-other for the glorious prize of having your seed pass on to the next generation. Why, what a great existence for me.
Read the Bible, not as a religious text but interpret it as a curious work of philosophy. St. Paul might sound like a dick when talking of women but think why he came to his conclusions. Patriarchy took off independently in many places because it's the most stable form of society and also very efficient for breeding (i.e. replacing numbers after plagues, famines or wars). It's not a matter of whenether women should make hard decisions, it's matter of women not liking that very much due to their nurturing nature and being far more valuable than men when it comes to reproduction rate: you kill a guy, his wife can still bear a child with other guy, you kill a girl, her husband can't bear a child with other guy.
And I hate this competition thing - but there has to be some kind of genetic quality control and competing (killing) is the only one our civilisation can afford for now.

Ever seen that movie with Alec Baldwin plays in Glengarry Glen Ross ? The most successful guy there was like that, basically.
Bad. This is an artifact of cruel natural selection and I don't like that but please understand it's a two-edged problem. You can't have improvement without deviation from norm and that will manifest both ways. For every Einstein there will be a Richard Roma and you can't fix that evil without breaking good at the same time.

Eliot Rodger was a good-looking, eloquent young man, who was studying in college and had a nice car. He did everything that was asked of him, yet it wasn't enough. How long should have he competed? What was the price? It's his fault for not measuring up, huh?
Humans are sexually attracted to this (in rough order): attention, charisma, appearance, physical/mental fitness, passion, self-confidence/ability, ambition, uniqueness, respect, social standing, money. Elliot the Unlikely expressed no attention or respect to women (you like dangerhair feminists who openly loathe you?), no charisma (you'd want this condescending faggot as a roomate?), mediocre appearance (cute face but a manlet), no passion (can you name any hobbies of his?), no self-confidence (nobody like complaining), no ambition aside from having a girlfriend. Elliot's flaw was his vice, if you're looking for sex - you can pay for it (and sex gets pretty boring after a while, what then?), if for relationship - you don't need sex for that. Elliot's other flaw was feeling worthless and thinking validation from others is the golden bullet. The fact Elliot killed people proves to me he was a selfish person at heart, the same kind of sociopath you wouldn't like I presume.
Except I wasn't talking about sexual debauchery with a single woman, I was talking about partnership. I don't understand how it's going to die off, save for some cataclysmic event, where in such an event, even harborers of good genes, a substantial number of them will surely perish.
Even physical constants like Pi change very slowly over time. Tech advances at such speed human nature is helpless, Twitter is such a shithole because humans aren't fit to use it for their benefit. Sooner or later either civilisation destroys itself with technology (be it sterile overindulgence or nuclear total war or overpopulation) or forces tech to stop progressing. If you want partnership then I really have no idea why you need a woman for that - if she really is as shallow as incel ideology describes, she wouldn't understand you enough to relate to you anyway.

Artificial wombs is the only answer I can think of, but I'm not a very imaginary person, either.
You know what's funny? Humanity will not understand that before it's too late. Shopenhauer is my copilot.
I disagree, because I see a nation as the collective will of a group of individual males (I do not think women are part of nations) pouring their tillage into one commonwealth, based usually, but not necessarily, of a common paternal heritage, where a worker has the ability to contribute and be undismissably rewarded for his efforts - reproduction being one of those rewards. The state provides the means for the implementation of such a system, but the examples you provided existed even in more "egalitarian" societies.

Since fear and injustice are motives for school/mass shooters to enact their vengeance, it can be assuredly said that the nation-state has failed them wholeheartedly.
That's a very noble mindset but life is shit and believe it or not, very noble people routinely commit atrocities because there's no other way. Guys at the top don't care about you, they care if you give them money to do nothing and get shit done only if it endangers their own position. People have no problem making babies by accident so why the fuck would the state care about people with no luck in relationships? Unless such people will become a majority of voters, they won't do shit. Besides, overpopulation is a tumor of a problem that's slowly but inevitably going out of control and you're telling me gov should make people breed even more?

Nobody thinks there's going to be a mass shooting in the grocery store they shop in or school they learn in. Mass shooters are <1% of the population so it's cost-effective to just throw them to prisons or shoot them instead of creating incentives for them to not kill. You're complaining about niggers (~5% of USA) being pampered and you want the same?
The greatest scapegoat of them all - man. Whatever he does, man must be at fault.
Please understand that I'm not putting blame but explaining the cause. Man fucked up, man should be smarter next time instead of memoryholing his failures to feel better about itself like a woman.
It's not to spoil, it's to retain female "affection" and to show off wealth. Men have a hoarder mentality, where they say "I have more stuff on my woman, and my woman's hotter than yours, that means I'm better than you, faggot".
Women have the same mentality. I'm curious why do you want a woman to like you so much since women can be and had been worse than men when it comes to sociopathic traits.
Surely, if women were better than man at social work, they would have been the leading force in human affairs for the past 8 millennia. As it turns out, it's men that have created every social institution and construct, from the creation of spoken tongue, then to its written form. From small hunter-gatherer societies to large and vast bureaucratic empires.
Leading a nation =/= administration and mutual understanding. Leading a nation = dominating people weaker than you and telling other nation leaders to eat shit and die. I'm talking secretary kind of work, where you need half a brain to not make basic mistakes and ability to charm clients. Work like engineering, where you need a lot of brain to not kill people with shoddy work and ability to be brutally honest with idiots is getting slowly replaced with automatisation.

There are no societies with female warriors.
Great, I can be expendable until the society I live in is replaced by something.
Many militaries permit women. Celts and Scythians had female warriors.
Advice: if you have a problem, thinking how to solve it is more productive than taking it personally.
You complain like a woman, no offence but maybe that's why girls are off-put.
If that hunk can provide for two partners, there wouldn't be a battle.
Inform yourself about every polygamist society ever, from the Arabs to Mormons. Ever heard about the Mormon Lost Boys? That's not healthy at all. For fuck's sake, we basically live in a polygamistic society right now but without the marriage part.
Men ought to be slaves, and there should be a few breeders who get to fuck, got it, ok
Define 'slave' cause I don't get what you're talking about. As a hermit on an island you'd still have to work to not starve.


No one is entitled to my labor.
Don't work then.
Hail men like Howard Lovecraft, who didn't give up on their dreams, just so they could be a slave to a woman. A (((woman))), no less!
H. P. Lovecraft was not the breadwinner of that relationship FYI.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back