- Joined
- May 4, 2020
We should save that in our back pocket for when we reach the space era and only if giant space bugs decide to piss us off.Why stop there? Lets go FULL Starship Troopers. I'd support that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We should save that in our back pocket for when we reach the space era and only if giant space bugs decide to piss us off.Why stop there? Lets go FULL Starship Troopers. I'd support that.
The Dems are trying to lower the voting age to 14? First I hear of it.Remember that the Democrats are trying to decrease the voting age to 12-14. Since they want socialism so badly, they are hoping that they'll get it, as long as they appeal to the youth. Since it's mostly the youth, (who don't know anything about economics,) that wants socialism to be implemented.
Which why would I agree to let people that aren't even an adult, nor contributing to society, tell me what's best for the economy. All it is, is pandering.
Right now Biden is only running against Trump because the Democrats knows that he is absolutely no good at anything other than being a human puppet.
That's not a bad argument. The average age of financial independence is steadily crawling towards 30, and given people only get a taste of the real world and how politics truly work once they leave their parents' basements, I'd vote for upping the voting age to 25.On the contrary, they should raise the voting age to at least 25 with an exception for anyone in the armed services. Clearly our society has held off adulthood longer and longer as we coddle our youth. Most 20 year old people have no fucking clue what they're doing at the ballot box and should not be making any decisions for our nation, states, or localities. Let alone an 18 year old.
Unless they've signed up and are willing to die for the rest of us. Then you can vote.
Do you want a plebeian revolt? Because that's how you get a plebeian revolt.Service guarantees citizenship. Perhaps land ownership should too, as it means you have a solid connection to the area and have everything to lose.
What are a bunch of limp wristed soy drinking tofu eating faggots gonna do?Do you want a plebeian revolt? Because that's how you get a plebeian revolt.
Become a very loud voting block unscruplous politicians use in order to erode our rights.What are a bunch of limp wristed soy drinking tofu eating faggots gonna do?
Damn you dumb nigger. Rights didn't prevent nigger chimpout every 5 years.Do you want a plebeian revolt? Because that's how you get a plebeian revolt.
A bit more seriously, I don't think land ownership as a requirement is viable. There is simply too many people and too little land in the modern era. There would be no way to actively work for the right to vote for every citizen, which is just a recipe for revolt. Service, on the other hand, is open to everyone and thus there is a way for anyone to gain the right. So no revolts, as those motivated to change the system are able to take part.What are a bunch of limp wristed soy drinking tofu eating faggots gonna do?
Well, they took over that small area in Seattle and within two days the homeless people stole all of their food and the tranny-feminist leader of the "CHAZ" was accused of sexual assault (Reset the clock), admitted that he was a "serial abuser" and fled the zone. I can't remember where I read that, though; probably the riot thread. Point being: Their mini Utopia didn't even last half of a week.What are a bunch of limp wristed soy drinking tofu eating faggots gonna do?
Now that bodycams hamstring false accusations, the far-left says "the data" proves that they don't reduce rates of police brutality. I wonder why they make that argument?That's one reason I've always thought cop bodycams were the greatest idea ever, It would not only show video evidence of real instances of police overreach, it would also hamstring false accusations of cop malfeasance by suspects. Doesn't stop selective editing of footage by the media, but it's still a win-win.
Can't wait to see the excuses they'll try to come up with to get Biden to avoid live debates. Or, if they can't find a good enough excuse, how are they going to hide Biden's teleprompter.
Imagine if the MSM tries to run a livestream debate and forgets to turn live chat off, causing it to get overrun with shitposters telling them to get Jim on.I suspect (and kind of hope) that what they're going to try to do is demand the debates not be held in person so Biden can do it from his home, so they can give him the answers ahead of time, record his best takes for each one, and replay those while pretending that it's all live. Then, they're going to try their damnedest to bury anybody who realizes that they did this, which will be just about everyone.
Well, they took over that small area in Seattle and within two days the homeless people stole all of their food and the tranny-feminist leader of the "CHAZ" was accused of sexual assault (Reset the clock), admitted that he was a "serial abuser" and fled the zone. I can't remember where I read that, though; probably the riot thread. Point being: Their mini Utopia didn't even last half of a week.
𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴...!
𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎 𝑂𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒
𝐴 𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑠
View attachment 1364686View attachment 1364688View attachment 1364689View attachment 1364690
The plot thickens - they just got raided by hobos and got all their food stolen.
View attachment 1365107
This timeline is amazing, lmfao.
I suspect (and kind of hope) that what they're going to try to do is demand the debates not be held in person so Biden can do it from his home, so they can give him the answers ahead of time, record his best takes for each one, and replay those while pretending that it's all live. Then, they're going to try their damnedest to bury anybody who realizes that they did this, which will be just about everyone.
Yep. It was this exact video.By any chance do you have the footage of the incident?
Do these hypothetical polls for a Generic Democrat take turnout into account? Seriously, I know I keep harping on this, but it's incredibly easy to say you're going to vote for somebody and somewhat more difficult to actually take the time to actually go out and do it. A literal empty suit isn't what I consider inspiring.I dunno...
If there's one thing I've kind of learned, leftist policies are all great on the theories, but fall apart as soon as you have to start implementing. Thus you get polls like "everybody loves socialism" and then people voted out of office when you actually have to raise the taxes to pay for it.
Now while I'm drunk, I could swear there was something like this in the pollings back during the run up where a "generic" democrat would beat trump, but actual specific democrats running wouldn't. Repeating the motif that people were more in favor of their concept of a dem politician than the actual people on offer.
IF this is true, then their only hope may be to lean into it and keep Biden hidin' and let people vote for the concept he represents to them than the actual policies and details he's going to implement.
What is that he's waving over their radios and guns? A cellphone or some kind of frequency analyzer?Yep. It was this exact video.
Do these hypothetical polls for a Generic Democrat take turnout into account? Seriously, I know I keep harping on this, but it's incredibly easy to say you're going to vote for somebody and somewhat more difficult to actually take the time to actually go out and do it. A literal empty suit isn't what I consider inspiring.
That's Trump's theory.What is that he's waving over their radios and guns? A cellphone or some kind of frequency analyzer?
It looks like a phone running the camera and recording.What is that he's waving over their radios and guns? A cellphone or some kind of frequency analyzer?
Shoving him to the ground for stating his opinion is a massive overreaction.That's Trump's theory.
Personally, I just think he was waving at the cops and trying to argue that the guns were unnecessary, and the cops were rightfully having none of it.