Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
So the counterpoint for Rowling is an actress of a side character who's only noticable trait is being the manic pixiegirls young sjw masturbated over?
It's for nothing as the mob is going after her too. She dared to not try to destroy Rowling with more ferocity. Check for her name in Twitter, people are mad at her too.
 
The only solution for this is for Rowling to debate Brianna Wu live on channel 4.

I was thinking more along the lines of J. K. collaborating with Graham Linehan on a sitcom about two troons and a curmudgeonly Irish TERF living in a share house somewhere in London. Also on Channel 4, obvs.
 
Last edited:
Don't worry, The Wheel of Time is getting an Amazon series made. They sure as fuck aren't patient enough to read the books but they will watch the series what with its unreasonably diverse cast and probable misinterpretation of the story's undertones.

They made the biggest bitch in the series black. Thanks, assholes.
 
I have a theory.

Men transition into women so they can claim an additional social status.

I hear complaints about the "patriarchy" but men are infiltrating female spaces with this trend. With more privileges than naturally born men OR women.

Wouldn't THAT be privilege or sexism?

Or am I overthinking this?
Wasn't it always obvious that trans is an easy way for the hated "white cis man" to jump directly to the top of the diversity stack?
I agree with this, especially with troons that don't even try. Mags Visagio comes to mind. No real talent, but everybody will celebrate him as a great writer because he's "trans". Especially with "non-binarys" because they don't even bother wearing make up and a wig. Just demand to go by They/Them and insta-victimhood.
 
Rowling's article is well written and she makes solid points. I liked how she pointed out that transgender people who don't want to partake in the 2 minute hate are also being hurt by this as well.

over on troon twitter they're calling it a nazi manifesto. IMO it's not long enough to be a manifesto but whatever. They're really desperate to hate her.
 
She's a villain. You're meant to hate her. You're supposed to like the living embodiment of borderline personality, tho'.
Elida is an antagonist not a villain, she was "Trying" to help but was such an egotistical cunt that her helping managed not to help very much.
 
Don't worry, The Wheel of Time is getting an Amazon series made. They sure as fuck aren't patient enough to read the books but they will watch the series what with its unreasonably diverse cast and probable misinterpretation of the story's undertones.
Main actor will be black whereas the main character on TWoT is a redhead.
 
I have a theory.

Men transition into women so they can claim an additional social status.

I hear complaints about the "patriarchy" but men are infiltrating female spaces with this trend. With more privileges than naturally born men OR women.

Wouldn't THAT be privilege or sexism?

Or am I overthinking this?
No, feminist Mary Daly has already observed that transgenders are Frankenstein monsters, patriarchal power gone mad.

So there is no link between gender identity with mental health after all? What a relief; we can defund transgender-specific health services now.
 
I suppose no use starting a new thread for this, since its a Rowling sperg:


What the white supremacist roots of ‘biological sex’ reveal about today’s transphobic feminism

sk-2017_04_featured_listing_mobile.jpg
Amrou Al-Kadhi, the author
In the most significant anti-racism demonstrations in generations, the chickens are finally coming home to roost after centuries of unbridled white supremacy.

That it's all happening against the backdrop of a global pandemic that has disproportionately killed BAME people is even more significant.

Yet, as the inequity of capitalism and its inextricable link to white privilege are brought into focus, JK Rowling instead devoted her enormous Twitter platform to discussing the use of gender-neutral terms last Saturday night.

The timing of her social media tirade is telling. In the context of a collective reckoning with how our economic, political and social systems have dehumanised black lives for centuries, it seemed the fantasy-writer turned billionaire had decided an equally pressing issue was making grand claims about the estimated 1 per cent of the population who identify as trans.

Transphobia is tethered to the malign structures of white supremacy. So, as we harness this political moment to dismantle centuries of inherited racism, we also have a duty to understand its relationship with the kind of discourse that is, quite frankly, making life hell for trans people.

To me, Rowling appears to be arguing that transgender people are erasing the fact of biological sex. The idea that transgender people are an ideological cult on a mission to vanquish the very idea of sex is a common argument in certain circles. But before we examine this ridiculous claim, let us first consider where the limited idea of binary sex came from. Again, the recent protests are an important backdrop. On Sunday, the statue of Edward Colston, a slave trader responsible for exploiting around 80,000 African lives, came crashing down in Bristol. And so starts the process of unchaining Britain from the rotten legacy of colonialism.

While our nation’s deluge of period dramas imagine the age of Empire as one of dignified excess and seductive aesthetics, brushed under the carpet is the fact, for instance, that both the British-caused Great Famine of 1876-1878 and the Indian famine of 1899-1900 are estimated to have killed up to 10 million people each. Notwithstanding such racial genocides, British colonists exported with them strict binary classifications of sex.

The British Age of Enlightenment prized itself on scientific rationality, including with it strict taxonomies of racial and sex categorisation – i.e. your biology meant you were strictly male or female, and there was a rigid hierarchy of race superiority (with whites at the top). And so, Britain’s cannibalisation of the rest of the globe simultaneously erased rich non-Western trans histories.

Take, for instance, the transgender Hijra people of India, who, prior to British imperial rule, were exalted in their communities, tasked with important legal duties like collecting taxes and duties; in 1864, Britain imported its 1533 Buggery Act, which directly criminalised Hijra people and reduced them to second-class citizens. It was only in 2019 that this colonial law was rescinded. This obliteration of well-established transgender communities was replicated across the Global North; European colonists, when invading the Americas, pointed to the transgender Two-Spirit traditions of its indigenous people as proof of their primitivism.

History aside, transphobic arguments must also be debunked head-on. Transphobic "feminists" contend that sex is finite and binary. As they see it, you are born male or female by sex, so whatever gender role you subsequently inhabit is entirely irrelevant (i.e. biological fact is the only thing that has meaning). But the idea that gender can be determined by pure biology erases the infinite social, emotional and psychological forces at play when it comes to a person’s gender.

As Rowling argues, there is such a thing as biological sex (you have male or female sexual organs, or in the case of intersex people, a combination). But this, too, is infinitely more fluid than biological essentialists pretend to make out. Transphobes often point out that you’re born with either XX (female) or XY (male) chromosomes, which are encoded into every cell in the human body; yet, there are many "biological females" who have XY chromosomes, and vice versa – some are, in fact, born with three sex chromosomes, like XXY, XXX and XXY (and would never know).

What about hormones? Again, the science debunks the kind of empirical certainty many transphobes invoke – many "biological males" produce more oestrogen than "biological females," and vice versa.

Transgender people reveal that all bodies are different, and in contradiction to Rowling’s apparent claims, have never called for the eradication of sex-based protections and reproductive rights. In actual fact, trans people are only trying to expand the understanding of sex so that society may better accommodate their needs. Is that really so terrible?

This essentialising of gender and social identity to what reproductive organs you possess is the logical endpoint of transphobic feminism – and it hurts everyone. It reduces womanhood to the mere possession of ovaries, and, much like the scientific taxonomists of British imperialists, violates anyone who doesn’t conform to simple binary presentation. In the process, there is a concerted effort to exclude trans people from single-sex spaces, leaving an extremely vulnerable group even more vulnerable (41 per cent of trans people have experienced a hate crime in the last 12 months). Even cisgender people are feeling the brunt – butch lesbians increasingly report that they are harassed in female changing rooms, a result of transphobic dogma that seeks to police what is "correct womanhood."

Transphobia has its roots in the systems of colonial supremacy that sought to wipe out gender variance across the globe. At its core is an obsession with power, of determining the strict definition of woman, and a callous anti-intersectionality that refuses to accommodate a whole breadth of social minorities.

Transgender people, far from the "army of hunters" they are painted to be, are in fact the hunted minority – they have always been here, and they are just trying to live.
 
Back