Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

Then be quiet.
here we. this the other face of liberals. you claim to be compassion. but then you say really offensive things. this is why i have no respect for you liberals. you play nice guy, you try to manipulate people into feeling sorry for you and then you stab them in the back when you feel confident. you're blocked. I'm disgusted by your behavior.
 
In an IRL debate, you cannot do many of these bad faith tactics. In an IRL debate, you'll have to admit that people regularly break age of consent laws. Or that these laws don't protect kids, they basically force them into toxic high school relationships. You guys aren't addressing these points. You're just trying to misrepresent me as promoting pedophilia. These tactics won't work IRL.

Also I don't care what non whites think. I'm not a liberal.
Repeating something over and over again doesn't make it correct.
 
here we. this the other face of liberals. you claim to be compassion. but then you say really offensive things. this is why i have no respect for you liberals. you play nice guy, you try to manipulate people into feeling sorry for you and then you stab them in the back when you feel confident. you're blocked. I'm disgusted by your behavior.

You are supposed to be a Filipino, that means you are not, by definition, Caucasian/White. That's not cruel, that's fact.
 
Thing is, you can't block people in an IRL debate.

I think you'll find out pretty quickly that people of all persuasions (black, white, gay, straight, woman, man, left or right) are going to be raising the same points we are right now.

You need to debate those people, even if they are arguing in "bad faith", when the time comes. Or youre just going to be stuck yelling at people in a forum

He's utterly hopeless. The mixture of views is such that he will only ever get niche support. If someone is advancing a platform, the easiest way to do it is to simplify it and pare it down until just the key points are covered. The more complex you make it, the less likely you'll find a match in the audience.

Something important to keep in mind about the way the internet and modern-day "debating" works: nobody ever actually persuades anyone of anything. If someone has a pre-existing belief, chances are, nobody's going to change it. Changing that belief means admitting they were wrong. Nobody has the balls to do that.

"Debates" on the internet are not a means of persuasion. They are a means of discovering who holds the same beliefs you already have, so you can form cliques with them.

Now, let's see what @BoxerShorts47 has to offer.
  • White Nationalist
  • Traditionalist
  • Racist
  • Sexist
  • Pedophile
It's inherently contradictory. Most people hate pedos, but few as vehemently as the first two. There just isn't enough overlap between any of these groups.

If you want to try and persuade people of the rightness of your views, you have to pick one goddamn thing or you'll never get anywhere.

In an IRL debate, you cannot do many of these bad faith tactics. In an IRL debate, you'll have to admit that people regularly break age of consent laws. Or that these laws don't protect kids, they basically force them into toxic high school relationships. You guys aren't addressing these points. You're just trying to misrepresent me as promoting pedophilia. These tactics won't work IRL.

Basically everyone I know - centrist, liberal, republican, extreme right, extreme left - thinks that wanting to fuck someone under 18 is pedophilia. You aren't the only mong who's tried this. I've seen plenty. Most people actively make fun of people like you who try the "but ephebobobobophilia" excuse. It doesn't work. You will never win. You will never convince 99% of the population that it's acceptable for grown men to fuck teenage girls. Give it up, dipshit.

Also I don't care what non whites think. I'm not a liberal.

Are you such an egotistical twat that you think that people just miraculously freeze in time when you aren't paying attention to them? Or, put another way, if a colored person expresses a political viewpoint in a forest, and @BoxerShorts47 isn't there to hear them, do they make a sound?

Yes, they do. And just because you don't give a shit about their thoughts and their desires, that doesn't mean that they stop existing.
 
He's utterly hopeless. The mixture of views is such that he will only ever get niche support. If someone is advancing a platform, the easiest way to do it is to simplify it and pare it down until just the key points are covered. The more complex you make it, the less likely you'll find a match in the audience.

Something important to keep in mind about the way the internet and modern-day "debating" works: nobody ever actually persuades anyone of anything. If someone has a pre-existing belief, chances are, nobody's going to change it. Changing that belief means admitting they were wrong. Nobody has the balls to do that.

"Debates" on the internet are not a means of persuasion. They are a means of discovering who holds the same beliefs you already have, so you can form cliques with them.

Now, let's see what @BoxerShorts47 has to offer.
  • White Nationalist
  • Traditionalist
  • Racist
  • Sexist
  • Pedophile
It's inherently contradictory. Most people hate pedos, but few as vehemently as the first two. There just isn't enough overlap between any of these groups.

If you want to try and persuade people of the rightness of your views, you have to pick one goddamn thing or you'll never get anywhere.



Basically everyone I know - centrist, liberal, republican, extreme right, extreme left - thinks that wanting to fuck someone under 18 is pedophilia. You aren't the only mong who's tried this. I've seen plenty. Most people actively make fun of people like you who try the "but ephebobobobophilia" excuse. It doesn't work. You will never win. You will never convince 99% of the population that it's acceptable for grown men to fuck teenage girls. Give it up, dipshit.



Are you such an egotistical twat that you think that people just miraculously freeze in time when you aren't paying attention to them? Or, put another way, if a colored person expresses a political viewpoint in a forest, and @BoxerShorts47 isn't there to hear them, do they make a sound?

Yes, they do. And just because you don't give a shit about their thoughts and their desires, that doesn't mean that they stop existing.
Look if you aren't fighting against feminism is every shape and form
>19A
>Equal Pay
>Divoce court
>Age of consent
then you aren't helping to undo the damage that feminism has caused on western society. That simple.
 
In an IRL debate, you cannot do many of these bad faith tactics. In an IRL debate, you'll have to admit that people regularly break age of consent laws. Or that these laws don't protect kids, they basically force them into toxic high school relationships. You guys aren't addressing these points. You're just trying to misrepresent me as promoting pedophilia. These tactics won't work IRL.

Also I don't care what non whites think. I'm not a liberal.
Okay DSP. Peepul out here using lag debate tactics that would never work in an offline debate! Fuckin chads and stacys in school are mentally ill detractors, and you are an ahnest guy right?
 
Look if you aren't fighting against feminism is every shape and form
>19A
>Equal Pay
>Divoce court
>Age of consent
then you aren't helping to undo the damage that feminism has caused on western society. That simple.
Translation: if you don't agree with me then you're wrong in my book. Repeating bullshit may convince people to believe in it, but ultimately, it's still the same goddamn bullshit. No matter how many times you claim that you're not a pedophile, you're still a pedo for wanting to abolish the age of consent
 
Look if you aren't fighting against feminism is every shape and form
>19A
>Equal Pay
>Divoce court
>Age of consent
then you aren't helping to undo the damage that feminism has caused on western society. That simple.
Equal pay is an issue of performance, not of discrimination of any kind. Every meritocratic system, nation and empire knew this. By your logic we should pay you nothing for any of your efforts because you're a sad, fat, incompetent Filipino who is subservient to a white-controlled state.
Divorce court actually has roots in ancient Greece and was later championed by Orthodox Christianity because even they recognise some marriages just did not work. The ideas are not exclusive to feminism.
Age of consent has already been decisively debated against you by the merit of you having no supportable claim and the fact you actively ignore valid counter-arguments.
 
actually it is. that's how the media creates the truth. they just repeat concepts like systemic racism enough times until people believe it.

Yes, that's right. Except you seem to be under the delusion that you, one flip wignat pedo on a forum in a dark corner of the internet, are the media and that your views enjoy broad institutional support.


The trick to using that method is that you have to literally control the airwaves. As in, all of them. People are far more likely to believe ideas that have the appearance of enjoying unanimous support than they are to believe one looney on a street corner.

Guess which one you are?
 
Loaded question meant to manipulate the debate. Bad faith argument. OP is still a retard.
I do use loaded question because that's how you win debates but this isn't even a loaded question.
You must take a stand.
I''m anti feminist and I'm proud of that.

Yes, that's right. Except you seem to be under the delusion that you, one flip wignat pedo on a forum in a dark corner of the internet, are the media and that your views enjoy broad institutional support.


The trick to using that method is that you have to literally control the airwaves. As in, all of them. People are far more likely to believe ideas that have the appearance of enjoying unanimous support than they are to believe one looney on a street corner.

Guess which one you are?

agreed but it's still the same tactic. you gotta repeat ideas until they stick.
 
Back