U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

[By Yaniv's Beard]

Unfortunately the thread is locked now.

Fyi:
Hartley Sawyer, the actor who plays a role in the series 'The Flash' got fired a few days ago because Skai Jackson tweeted about him on 5 June.
I guess his acting career is over.

https://twitter.com/skaijackson/status/1269017350730211329

http://archive.md/HuRKs

View attachment 1371228 View attachment 1371227 View attachment 1371226

Hartley Sawyer fired from 'The Flash' due to offensive tweets

Resurfaced old tweets allegedly posted by actor Hartley Sawyer prior to joining The CW series "The Flash" have resulted in him being fired.

edition.cnn.com

http://archive.md/wip/FjaEg

View attachment 1371189

She stopped doxing on the 6th of June because a lot of her tweets got reported, she doxed at least 2 times the wrong person and people pointed
out what consequences it might have and that she could be sued over it. It seems that she came to her senses and realized she went too far.
The next 2 days or so she still acted tough but that was to save face for her crazy followers, she didn't dox anymore. At the same time she got called a cyberbully
It took a few days before twitter reacted and on the 8th of June her twitter account was blocked for 12 hours.

View attachment 1371203

It seems that she wants to forget what she did because from then on the doxing stopped and she's tweeting about other random things.
Even MSM stepped in and acted as she's a hero and did the right thing.
View attachment 1371248

Imo her acting career is also over. Especially if this doxing will have severe consequences: (wrong) kid gets beaten up, suicide, getting sued, ...
More than 100 of her tweets got archived and from now on she will always be reminded about it.

http://archive.md/https://twitter.com/skaijackson/*

View attachment 1371255 View attachment 1371256

On top of that she doesn't seem to have a strong personality (my guess BPD) and she's very easy to troll.

View attachment 1371254

Yeah, I knew about Sawyer. Everything in that thread is basically still readable if you want to get information off it.

Thread's locked down, it was my fault, I made it too dry, and it wasn't funny enough. It was comprehensive, but there weren't a lot of reasons for her to have her own thread beyond the fail doxes everyone else tried to get of her. But the dox I got myself is accurate and I confirm the dox in the OP of that thread.

 

[Made In China]

Libertarians have proven to be toothless cucks.
"Sorry, your first amendment rights stop when you enter someone else's property. Oops. The bank just banned me from any and all credit, and now I'm being kicked out of my home. Oh well, at least it wasn't Uncle Sam."

I've seen a libertarian who was given a "yes/no" option for whether or not he wanted to censor a small joke for a game. His job was not on the line, he didn't have anything to lose, and everyone would have forgotten about it after a week. He chose to censor himself, then immediately afterwards he makes a blog post whining about censorship in a really annoying "I think I am the only adult in the room" kind of tone. I swear libertarians are even more sanctimonious and insufferable than SJWs.

 

[Cast Iron Pan]

The first one is

Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

The second is the Chicago gang that tortured the autistic boy in 2016 I think it was, maybe 2017.

I'd also like to add the Witchita Massacre, where 2 black men slaughtered a bunch of white people in Witchita "for no reason".

Don't know the link to the third one though.

Baltimore day care worker pleads guilty to smothering baby to death, gets 70 years in prison

Day care worker Leah Walden, 24, pleaded guilty Tuesday to murdering a baby girl last year at the Rocket Tiers Learning Center in downtown Baltimore and was sentenced to 70 years in prison.

www.baltimoresun.com

Reese, who was 8 months and 19 days old, suffocated to death May 23, 2017. Surveillance cameras inside the day care center captured the crime.

Walden had told a co-worker, “Girl, I’m frustrated … I’m sick of this little bitch. I hate this little bitch … She makes me want to punch her in the face.”

What does Greta want?

I think she's been clear on the subject.

 

[The Last Stand]

A rich, White, Swedish girl is in a panel on "What It's Like Being Black in America."

Really, nigga?

 

[Video Games]

Go to blacklivesmatter.com, click on the donate thing. Take a look at the group that the donations are going to, and then look them up on opensecrets.org.

Black Lives Matter takes donations through ActBlue Charities, but that doesn't mean that its donations go to ActBlue itself. As far as I can see, ActBlue Charities is a resource that directs electronic donations to left-leaning organizations through its platform.

Feel free to correct me on this if anyone has any further information, but it seems reasonable to me that a liberal organization would use a liberal payment processor for their donations.

 

[GethN7]

I find it creepy that all of these adults are trying to get Greta blacked. Even her parents are pushing for it.

What does Greta want? Does she have her own thoughts and opinions anymore? The environment she has grown up in has probably melted her brain stem.

I'm willing to believe at least some of her climate change opinions may indeed have been her own, but past that she's a puppet on strings, especially for this BLM stuff.

 

[All Cops Are Based]

This shit is Orwellian as fuck. Genuinely, the hard censorship of any dissenting viewpoint around this is more terrifying than literally anything else happening right now. The entire population of America could get coronavirus and it wouldn't be as fucked up as this shit. People are out there mindlessly chanting slogans and repeating the Approved Lines and shit, even people I would previously have called reasonable people that I could have a fun political debate with.

I feel you. Careful with the C word (censorship), though. The second you use it anywhere but here, leftoids trip over themselves to WELL AKKKSHHUALLY about how it's technically not censorship, because it's private corporations and angry mobs doing the deplatforming, not the government.

Then immediately after defending the sanctity of corporations being able to silence people, they go right back to pretending to be big critics of capitalism and corporatism. It's so tiring.

 

[Otterly]

Black Lives Matter takes donations through ActBlue Charities, but that doesn't mean that its donations go to ActBlue itself. As far as I can see, ActBlue Charities is a resource that directs electronic donations to left-leaning organizations through its platform.

Feel free to correct me on this if anyone has any further information, but it seems reasonable to me that a liberal organization would use a liberal payment processor for their donations.

Look at the link below: any unclaimed donations after 60 days go to act blue:

quote: “
Re-designation of Contributions
In the event that a campaign or committee (a) fails for 60 days to cash a check from ActBlue which includes your contribution (after ActBlue makes repeated attempts to work with the campaign to ensure all checks are cashed), or (b) affirmatively refuses a contribution earmarked through ActBlue, your contribution will be re-designated as a contribution to ActBlue. Contributions to social welfare organizations which are similarly not cashed or are affirmatively refused will be kept by ActBlue and used generally to support its social welfare activities.
Contributions to charitable organizations which are not cashed or affirmatively refused will got to ActBlue Charities.”

Is the Black Lives Matter Organization a Money Laundering Scheme? | M…

archived 10 Jun 2020 08:38:59 UTC

archive.is

I assume they are bound by FOI requests? It would be informative to ask:

1. over the last x years how much money has been donated to actblue via this mechanism.
2. How much of the money donated in the name of BLM has been donated by this mechanism?
3. Which payers have affirmatively refused ?

 

[Rohan Davey]

EVEN IN DEATH I STILL SERVE.



Oh boy, I remember this. 13 years ago when people got scared about a "North American Union" replacing Canada, USA, and Mexico these exact rail lines were part of the plan. This map is just missing the east-west line in Canada, and the line that was supposed to run from Alberta straight through to Mexico.

You mean the Organization of North American Nations (ONAN)?

 

[Wy4M]

The neoliberals safe to say, have lost control of their golems, that is for sure. This will hurt the neoliberal left more than the right wing.

I agree. Black people can use "You're white so you have to shut up/step aside" as a valid argument to win a discussion or make a decision
On top of that antifa/lefty's have so much white guilt that they fully agree and will call others to order if they don't.

They also turn a blind eye against the looting of stores or plundering/burning houses of innocent people. If you mention the latter to a lefty
they'll call you a fash/racist/nazi.

Raz from Chaz is very good example. He shows off with his money, his bling-bling and guns, glorifies violence and thug life yet you're not allowed to
criticize him. If you do then you're a racist and you get silenced. Currently they even hide both his past and justify his current behavior.

A lot of lefty people see blacks as the poor oppressed victims. 13/50 is fake news to them. I guess some big phat red pills are gonna be
shoved through a lot of throats the next coming days. And then they realize it's too late.

And I'm just eating pop corn, stay safe at home, watch live streams and laugh my ass off. I do feel sorry for the store owners and the innocents that
are affected by it.

 

[vertexwindi]

A rich, White, Swedish girl is in a panel on "What It's Like Being Black in America."

View attachment 1371280

Really, nigga?

Nigga.

Factcheck.

 

[Sperghetti]

Look at the link below: any unclaimed donations after 60 days go to act blue:

quote: “
Re-designation of Contributions
In the event that a campaign or committee (a) fails for 60 days to cash a check from ActBlue which includes your contribution (after ActBlue makes repeated attempts to work with the campaign to ensure all checks are cashed), or (b) affirmatively refuses a contribution earmarked through ActBlue, your contribution will be re-designated as a contribution to ActBlue. Contributions to social welfare organizations which are similarly not cashed or are affirmatively refused will be kept by ActBlue and used generally to support its social welfare activities.
Contributions to charitable organizations which are not cashed or affirmatively refused will got to ActBlue Charities.”

http://archive.md/Qu5O7

I assume they are bound by FOI requests? It would be informative to ask:

1. over the last x years how much money has been donated to actblue via this mechanism.
2. How much of the money donated in the name of BLM has been donated by this mechanism?
3. Which payers have affirmatively refused ?

Is it just me, or does that policy sound like an awfully good way to funnel money toward whatever organization or fund that ActBlue wants? Set up some cause, get people to donate to it, never claim the money, and after 60 days it goes to ActBlue to distribute to whatever “social welfare” or “charity” cause they please.

 

[Freedom Fries]

Hmmm You think this is all one massive money laundering scheme? I mean, think of it like this:

Step 1. Start pushing a narrative about how black people are being executed in the streets by cops. The fact that there is no evidence of this doesn't matter, its actually beneficial for later.

Step 2. Set up an organization the purports to be against that fictional threat. Give them an emotionally charged name and use lots of emotional language. Keep the actual goals and actions of the organization unclear. Connect its coffers directly to your account.

Step 3. Wait for something bad to happen, while occasionally running ads or speeches to keep your organization's name out there and in the public mind.

Step 4. When something bad happens, immediately use all the media power you can muster to spread the story. Talk about how bad it is, while also asking for donations to prevent it from happening again.

Step 5. A bunch of people and companies give you money because its an easy way to make themselves feel better about said bad thing, and to look good while doing it. They begin using the name of the organization as a mantra for protests and riots, spreading awareness of your brand and getting you even more money.

Step 6. Due to the fact that your goals and efforts are left intentionally vague, you can funnel the majority of the cash into your bank account and no one will be the wiser. The fact that the "Problem" is fictional is perfect because how big the problem is perceived to be is dependent entirely on how much air time you give it. If you want to look like you're doing good work, you just need to run good stories or shut up and let people forget for a while.

Step 7. Use your temporary social power to secure some token changes, even more money, and political clout. Finally, disavow the illegal actions people took in your name (they're not employees after all, and your website clearly has a page saying you're against illegal actions) and fade back into the general social consciousness.

Step 8. Repeat from step 3.

Step 9 (Optional): If the country or population ever turns against you, simply dissolve the organization and restart a similar one for a new "problem".

Well the DNC supposedly does have depleted coffers from 2016 and 2018. I get the feeling they can pretty much just print money, so I doubt they actually needed this. Trump's campaign did raise a metric shit ton of money over the last year though, so maybe.

When you frame the whole thing as dispossessing and lashing out at whitey (a heuristic used on the entire left and much of the dissident right for the "conservative tribe") it makes a lot more sense than anything else, so I'm gonna stick with that as the main goal. Trying to find some other reason is just going to drive you mad because nothing else fits.

This shit is Orwellian as fuck. Genuinely, the hard censorship of any dissenting viewpoint around this is more terrifying than literally anything else happening right now. The entire population of America could get coronavirus and it wouldn't be as fucked up as this shit. People are out there mindlessly chanting slogans and repeating the Approved Lines and shit, even people I would previously have called reasonable people that I could have a fun political debate with.

Are they gonna be able to cuck the tuck this way? I feel like there's enough people in support of his shit to make it worthwhile to some advertisers. He's the sole mainstream voice of reason in all this hellfire. He/Fox must have been prepared for this kind of advertiser blitz, right?

This is like the 5th time a massive and coordinated advertiser boycott has happened to him. Tough to say what effect it will have but he weathered the storms in the past without cucking (just about lost his spot to a Daily Wire/Washington Examiner type a couple(?) years ago because of a similar happening in conjunction with a coordinated hit piece attack). Pretty sure he still runs the most popular non-sports cable show and is growing his lead.

 

[NIGGER ASS PEE POOPY RAPE]

Someone I follow on Tumblr reblogged this (archive)

View attachment 1369711
View attachment 1369720
View attachment 1369721

Here's a drinking game for you, if you look through the reblogs on the original post:

Spoiler: TAKE A SHOT

• Someone says "ACAB"
• "They're just sad they can't oppress people in silence anymore!"
• You look at someone's profile, and they're 21 or younger.
• The word "pigs" or "oink" are used
• "Silence is violence"
• "KEEP FIGHTING!"
• "There are no good cops, all of them contribute to systems of oppression"
• "We don't need police officers, we have doctors, nurses, social workers that can do that job"
• Profile has genderspecial identity attached to it
• "You're going to make all the good ones quit" is met with "GOOD!"
• Someone implies that all cops are white men
• SJW word salads
• Anyone who says "Not All Cops" is called a bootlicker
• It's obvious when the person has obviously never interacted with a cop, ever, in their life

AND

Spoiler: DOWN THE GLASS

• Someone says something to the effect of "working retail is harder than being a cop"
• "We're being slandered as racists and being physically attacked and having our livelihoods threatened" is met with "aww, they're sad people don't like them!"
• "Cops spend every day murdering innocent minorities, they deserve this."

Have fun, I'm off to get my stomach pumped.

I have seen a lot of absolute dumpster fire posts on that godforsaken website, but this one- this fucking one- might actually be the worst. Part of it is the fact that it's hardcore ACAB shit with very little resistance, but part of it is just... Like, read the comments that this bitch quoted on her post.

She didn't quote officers being racist, bigoted, sexist, violent, nasty, whatever- just about every single comment she posted is a stressed-out police officer saying "Holy Christ, I am receiving hatred and abuse for something a cop I DON'T EVEN KNOW did. My spouse is terrified for my safety, my mental health is suffering, it's just not worth it anymore."

These people are actual fucking garbage.

I hope you remember this bootlicking post you made in a few years when cops are raiding your house to take away your guns because some faggot you looked at funny redflagged you. or when you're serving 12 months in jail for making an anti-semitic joke on the internet after a team of jewish lawyers finally get kiwi farms shutdown and cops are pissing in your cornbread every day. cops were not born cops, nobody is forcing them to be cops, they can take the badge off and stop being cops at any time. cops are much worse than niggers, I have absolutely zero sympathy for these pigs crying on reddit about how hard their job of beating and pepper spraying people all day is.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Its official, they got him. Dave Chappelle went after Candice Owens and its also trending on YouTube (I wonder why). Every liberal that would have been against this shit in the 1980s and 1990s apparently have now turned into the very thing they hated about the Bush years and Obama made it worse.

Dave is right, except about Candace Owens. He just doesn't realize that being right doesn't matter right now.

Spoiler: in defense of sane black men

Listen to the whole "set". He's explaining a perfectly reasonable POV on why a thinking black man would excuse the riots. But that's because he focuses on the injustice. He has a mind for the context of that injustice, and he slants things along racial lines a bit too much. Buried in there is a good point about the cop-killers being former military, and a defense against personal attacks on him and his friends.

What he isn't seeing is what Kiwi Farms sees: the mobs of lunatics demanding ideological purity. The troons who seize the mic and talk about how super important black trans voices are. The cancelling of people who hate racism but also hate riots. The co-opting by corporations and random activists. The cops kneeling and washing the feet of BLM activists. The relentless hatred of white people, not white cops. The calls for pulling down statues and $100k reparations. The excuses for Antifa, the claims of "peaceful protest!" while buildings burn in the background. The slow motion murder of David Dorn.

Several people on here have told of family members who are legitimately outraged about the Floyd video, and get sucked into supporting "BLM" in its most idealized, sanitized form. They don't realize they're signing up for all the crazy parts too. They get indignant when you try to link the riots to it, and while they don't call everyone a white supremacist, they parrot the ideology that lead up to that designation.

Chappelle isn't stupid, he doesn't fall into that trap, but he does view the violence as an inevitable expression of outrage, and has chosen not to fight against it. As an independently wealthy celebrity with the correct skin color, he has that luxury; he has that... privilege.

If you asked him about the crazy parts of BLM, he'd probably disavow it. (Give it 5 years, and he'll put out a special making fun of the foot washing.) But he can't disavow the outrage--he feels it too deeply. He's correctly identified that this is street politics, but he hasn't considered why so much of the street protests involves white people too. It's a path of thought you could probably get him to if you sat down with him and walked through the entire picture.

If there's ever going to be a chance at dialog, you have to understand the rational portions of the other side, and this is a good place to start. If you want to see what that conversation might look like, I very strongly recommend the discussion between Scott Adams and Hotep Jesus.

None of this is excusing the riots and looting. I've been cheerleader for more tear gassing than even the Seattle PD was doing; "no justice no peace" chants should be met with "no peace, no reform". But once the violence dies down, the reform still has to happen, and if you don't understand the other side you won't understand how to negotiate with them. And if you can't empathize with them, you won't recognize what they need to hear, which is different from what needs to happen.

/pol/ is gonna /pol/, but Chappelle's take isn't lunacy. It's what black sanity sounds like right now.

 

[Smug Cat]

I feel you. Careful with the C word (censorship), though. The second you use it anywhere but here, leftoids trip over themselves to WELL AKKKSHHUALLY about how it's technically not censorship, because it's private corporations and angry mobs doing the deplatforming, not the government.

Then immediately after defending the sanctity of corporations being able to silence people, they go right back to pretending to be big critics of capitalism and corporatism. It's so tiring.

Oh believe me, I know. I've had that exact circular discussion with retarded normies more times than I can count. FWIW, the most effective counterargument I've been able to pull together against leftists is the following:
- Why do we need labor laws?
- Because corporations will oppress the working class if we don't stop them
- So corporations can be oppressive if they have too much power?
- Of course
- So corporations can oppress the people if they have too much power over political discourse, and government censorship of speech isn't the only threat to free speech.
Of course you get disingenuous fuckwads going "WELL AKSCHUUUUULY" and then not rebutting the argument at all, but I've had a few people go "well- I- shit."

This is like the 5th time a massive and coordinated advertiser boycott has happened to him. Tough to say what effect it will have but he weathered the storms in the past without cucking (just about lost his spot to a Daily Wire/Washington Examiner type a couple(?) years ago because of a similar happening in conjunction with a coordinated hit piece attack). Pretty sure he still runs the most popular non-sports cable show and is growing his lead.

Thanks for giving me reason to be . I want to believe we aren't that fucked yet.

 

[SIGSEGV]

I hope you remember this bootlicking post you made in a few years when cops are raiding your house to take away your guns because some faggot you looked at funny redflagged you. or when you're serving 12 months in jail for making an anti-semitic joke on the internet after a team of jewish lawyers finally get kiwi farms shutdown and cops are pissing in your cornbread every day. cops were not born cops, nobody is forcing them to be cops, they can take the badge off and stop being cops at any time. cops are much worse than niggers, I have absolutely zero sympathy for these pigs crying on reddit about how hard their job of beating and pepper spraying people all day is.

lol calm down

 

[Jan Ciągwa]

Watching rioting BLM/Antifa dumb fucks who fail at basic everything comprehension is like playing a bizarre Call of Cthulhu game where you are the Great Old One and they are humanity trying to desperatedly forget "What SoyMan Was Not Meant To Know" (black<->black crime statistics), losing SAN points left and right (fucking screaming like toddlers) and trying to delay the awakening of The Great Trumphulhu.

 

[TheProdigalStunna]

Dave is right, except about Candace Owens. He just doesn't realize that being right doesn't matter right now.

Spoiler: in defense of sane black men

Listen to the whole "set". He's explaining a perfectly reasonable POV on why a thinking black man would excuse the riots. But that's because he focuses on the injustice. He has a mind for the context of that injustice, and he slants things along racial lines a bit too much. Buried in there is a good point about the cop-killers being former military, and a defense against personal attacks on him and his friends.

What he isn't seeing is what Kiwi Farms sees: the mobs of lunatics demanding ideological purity. The troons who seize the mic and talk about how super important black trans voices are. The cancelling of people who hate racism but also hate riots. The co-opting by corporations and random activists. The cops kneeling and washing the feet of BLM activists. The relentless hatred of white people, not white cops. The calls for pulling down statues and $100k reparations. The excuses for Antifa, the claims of "peaceful protest!" while buildings burn in the background. The slow motion murder of David Dorn.

Several people on here have told of family members who are legitimately outraged about the Floyd video, and get sucked into supporting "BLM" in its most idealized, sanitized form. They don't realize they're signing up for all the crazy parts too. They get indignant when you try to link the riots to it, and while they don't call everyone a white supremacist, they parrot the ideology that lead up to that designation.

Chappelle isn't stupid, he doesn't fall into that trap, but he does view the violence as an inevitable expression of outrage, and has chosen not to fight against it. As an independently wealthy celebrity with the correct skin color, he has that luxury; he has that... privilege.

If you asked him about the crazy parts of BLM, he'd probably disavow it. (Give it 5 years, and he'll put out a special making fun of the foot washing.) But he can't disavow the outrage--he feels it too deeply. He's correctly identified that this is street politics, but he hasn't considered why so much of the street protests involves white people too. It's a path of thought you could probably get him to if you sat down with him and walked through the entire picture.

If there's ever going to be a chance at dialog, you have to understand the rational portions of the other side, and this is a good place to start. If you want to see what that conversation might look like, I very strongly recommend the discussion between Scott Adams and Hotep Jesus.

None of this is excusing the riots and looting. I've been cheerleader for more tear gassing than even the Seattle PD was doing; "no justice no peace" chants should be met with "no peace, no reform". But once the violence dies down, the reform still has to happen, and if you don't understand the other side you won't understand how to negotiate with them. And if you can't empathize with them, you won't recognize what they need to hear, which is different from what needs to happen.

/pol/ is gonna /pol/, but Chappelle's take isn't lunacy. It's what black sanity sounds like right now.

Honestly, Dave Chapelle's takes are pretty sane unless you are an unrepentant /pol/-tard. Including those on Candace Owens. Hear me out:

Imagine a white guy, let's say a South African boer, was lynched by an angry mob of South African blacks, and the SA government stands by them. Suddenly, a white man starts joins some left-wing news media (and let's say this guy was a conservative in the past) and says that the boer had it coming because white people in South Africa were racist in the past and this particular Boer had done some criminal things. This white man is suddenly paraded around by blacks as "muh based white man" because he was willing to shit-talk the white community (unlikely because blacks don't give a shit about woke whites, but let's just say they do.) Everyone here would call this man a sell-out, a traitor, a cuck, and everything else under the sun, and they'd be right. Because turning your back on your own people for money and clout is one of the the most low-life, venal, pathetic things you can do.

That's probably how black people view Candace Owens. She may very well be right about some of the things she's said, but honestly, to shit-talk your own community is the sign of a person with no loyalty or fidelity.

 

[Andre Richardson]

Memeology 101 exposes Raz Simione.......

As a homophobe in the past.