U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also, we're apparently going to stop using the terms blacklist and whitelist because we're all children apparently.
I swear to god, they're going to ban colours next for being racist.

I'm going to tell my company to fuck off if they want to ban such a common-place term. (I shouldn't need to, but this burgerland white guilt is stupid.)
 
I guess 80's action films and Westerns could be considered "right-wing entertainment" looking back. The themes of the corruption of large institutions, the benefits of decisive action, and the existence of a truly depraved criminal class that plays said institutions like a damn fiddle are probably just accidental byproducts of the filmmakers' desire to make the actions of our badass hero believable and fun to watch, but it's still there.

Even stuff like the original Ghostbusters and Tron had those roots. In both movies the protagonists were guys who wanted to make money based off new tech they had invented. That doesn't fly now, they rebranded Flynn as a philanthropist in Tron 2 and Ghostbusters obviously went the way it did. (Though I actually really liked the Tron sequel, it was great.)

Dunno if bringing that back would be as popular as it was before, but it would be a start. I think right wingers should invest in media that builds white men up and honors the accomplishments of their ancestors as well as the current day struggles. It would be a start anyway. Also do stuff that busts up the fake feminist paradigm set up if they want to appeal to women.

The idea of women sitting on their asses doing jackshit while t3h menz went out and hunted or worked the fields or whatever was always false. Women have been laborers and peasant workers for as long as they've been alive. Even when the middle class began to grow women still helped manage their husbands' businesses and livelihoods. Those were families that lived above shops or ranched, when herding animals you need all hands on deck even if one of them rode sidesaddle. The whole idea of a woman being a homemaker was always the providence of rich well to do women (ordering their servants around) until the advent of the Industrial Revolution and the explosion in middle class wealth it created. I think what people don't understand about the 19th and 20th centuries is how remarkable they were that a man could support an entire family on one salary while his wife had the freedom to stay home and raise their children without worrying if their family would go under if she didn't work.

The whole point of that little tirade is that the feminist paradigm was always a crock but that the right wing reactionary REEEEEEEE WOMEN SHOULDN'T EVER WORK EVER REEEEEE is equally unmoored in history. If you go out into the undeveloped world you'll find a lot of women working at subsistence levels and raising their children to do the same.

Once you understand that these things are true then you have the power to break the leftist hold over this country and finally tell people something like the truth without the associated right wing baggage and stupidity.
 
Last edited:
Probably not, since the declawing method leverages the 'horror' of white history as a bludgeon and uses the non whites living in our countries as something akin to living lightning rods of 'Look upon the non white and feel shame!'
the same thing could theoretically be made to work on pretty much every culture on the planet
but, unlike white people, most other cultures don't have a (((fifth column))) sowing the seeds of racial guilt narratives from within. that really is the crucial part in getting this sort of thing started - no arab will ever care about feeling guilt or shame for the numerous atrocities arabs have caused in the past, and any foreigner trying to tell him so will just be dismissed with laughter (or a bullet). and since arabs don't have (((professors))) working from within their societies to create an anti arab worldview, such notions will never ever take hold.
 
This is the future you democrats choose. You had Obama in office for 8 years and the power to reform the police yourselves. Remember everyone, the police is a local matter and reform is done at the local level. But nope, just fuck up the communities for the drug war and remember everyone, the police being militarized was done heavily during the Obama era. This issue was being discussed heavily back then. You just shot yourselves in the foot here as now, every dumbass local level leftie wants to change the very system that fills your pockets and less control as well for the DNC. This will hurt the democrats more as they just fucked themselves hard by pandering to the far left that opinion polls show, nobody even the precious "POCS" dont like. Only cheering this are the Bernie progressives. Good Job.

DEMOCRATIC SHILLS ON THIS WEBSITE, WAS IT WORTH IT TO OWN THAT ORANGE NIGGER IN THE WHITE HOUSE BY DOING THIS SHIEEETTTTTTTTTTT?
 
Excuse my language but

OH MY GOD TAYLOR GO FUCK YOURSELF. You lost the right to call yourself a TN-er when you went all "gay rights yay go Hollywood fuck country". People in Memphis didn't care about you, and if they do now (which I doubt) it's only because you make the songs that middle school girls like to sing to.

Also thank you for letting me know who to call to tell them to NOT do this.

Sorry for the sperg, even though I don't live in TN anymore, I still think its history is important.
 

I can't access the actual text of the resolution because I keep getting a server timeout - they must be crashing - but CNN, that isn't the brightest, said:

The council will start a yearlong process "of community engagement, research, and structural change to create a transformative new model for cultivating safety,"

which means really not much will happen in practice, just reacting as idiots to calm the natives
 
But guns don't matter without people willing to do shit; and Americans have continuously, and consistently pussed out every. Single. Time.
From the guys on the ground I've known and talked about with this, everyone's got a line that, if crossed, they feel merits lethal force. So far, It'd be hard for any of us to point to anything in particular and say "yes! That definitely merits lethal force en masse". It's embarrassing how they constantly talk about revolting or 'fighting back' or "I'm not gunna put up with this shit!" but when you have a wife and kids, stakes in the community, the nuclear option is not one exercized freely. So far things aren't bad enough for us that we'd feel the need....yet. It's inching there. The old saying used ot be something like"If they're going door to door and dragging innocent people out of their homes, it's time."

Now that's a hard line to parse, something I think is intentional. With social media we can demonize anyone with the right series of tweets. No one will care if the guys is "racist" from his twitter feed's jokes 30 years ago, they'll say he deserved it.

For a lot of us it's less a "We" and more a "My". Arms are the claws of man, and everything is entitled to self-defense. If we haven't been presented with life-threatening force for me and mine, even if property is at stake, it's not on the table.

There's the tacit understanding here that being goaded into knee-jerk reactions could very well provide the spark needed to start the registry and kickin' down doors, that's why they've constantly tried to paint firearms owners as backwards, racist, psycho's living far away from society plotting to overthrow the gov't.

And well done buying over there. I will say, the stores over in the UK are really something. It's so odd how the class breakdown is diff. though. I feel much more aristocratic in your shooting sports than I do stateside. Then again Purdey is over there too. I can't afford their cartridge cases, let along a car-priced over/under.
[/QUOTE]

I think this has a simple solution the right has not done yet in fear of being considered glowies. The right needs to start forming militias. Groups that learn from antifa in the sense to be careful about communication, and to have multiple chapters. The difference though is that it would be reactionary. No attempts to incite shit, plans to create places similar to CHAZ, and no being idiots and caring guns all around willy nilly. I hate the donald puppets that gloat of tranny conservatives, but i would accept them enough to join them in a local militia like this. All online right wingers just try to decide what is the ideal political system in debates, acting like they are trying to form a new country without realizing you need to win a revolutionary/civil war before that.
 
I can't access the actual text of the resolution because I keep getting a server timeout - they must be crashing - but CNN, that isn't the brightest, said:

The council will start a yearlong process "of community engagement, research, and structural change to create a transformative new model for cultivating safety,"

which means really not much will happen in practice, just reacting as idiots to calm the natives
They're gonna have bigger problems considering all the rebuilding they have to do (for whichever businesses choose to even stay if they can even rebuild), reestablishing supply lines and dealing with an upcoming second phase of the virus...which they have less resources to deal with now that they did 3 weeks ago.
 
I'll call it now: They'll have a grossly weakened policing capability, leading to a complete tailspin of "racist white flight" because people don't want their kids murder/death/kill'ed on the way to school. No matter how many guilt-placing articles buzzfeed runs, the drive for physical security is stronger, especially when so many criminals understand the myriad loopholes in the new system to be exploited to successfully carry out profitable illegal crime. Perhaps org. criminals step in to provide some stability for the sake of better environmental conditions for them, but the economic damage will be done and security takes a nosedive.

THEN they'll start talking about stepping up gun control for the average citizen by trotting out weeping criminals' mothers about how unjust it was that someone was "allowed" to "slaughter" their sweet, sweet boy just because they found him in their 12 year old daughters' bedroom window at 2 in the morning. Which will terrify even further the law-abiding, worsening the situation. All the while they'll likely point to fewer arrests for citizens of color, proving how non-racist the new system is and how equitable it is that they're arresting just as many whites as blacks, but street-level folks and those watching social accounts will see too apparently that crime is worse than ever. Enjoy getting fired for talking about your car break-in over the weekend, your boss heard your terrible hate speech and you're never gonna work in this town again.

Maybe they crack down for a while by leaving it to county or state police apparatuses to take care of the beat, maybe they do go super crazy and build their own S.S. squads to enforce laws...
 
I think this has a simple solution the right has not done yet in fear of being considered glowies. The right needs to start forming militias. Groups that learn from antifa in the sense to be careful about communication, and to have multiple chapters. The difference though is that it would be reactionary. No attempts to incite shit, plans to create places similar to CHAZ, and no being idiots and caring guns all around willy nilly. I hate the donald puppets that gloat of tranny conservatives, but i would accept them enough to join them in a local militia like this. All online right wingers just try to decide what is the ideal political system in debates, acting like they are trying to form a new country without realizing you need to win a revolutionary/civil war before that.
This is an excellent idea, my fellow Whites. If you're interested, call (801) 579-1400 and ask for Agent Johnson. We're building a big Igloo and we need your help!
 
Excuse my language but

OH MY GOD TAYLOR GO FUCK YOURSELF. You lost the right to call yourself a TN-er when you went all "gay rights yay go Hollywood fuck country". People in Memphis didn't care about you, and if they do now (which I doubt) it's only because you make the songs that middle school girls like to sing to.

Also thank you for letting me know who to call to tell them to NOT do this.

Sorry for the sperg, even though I don't live in TN anymore, I still think its history is important.

Taylor Swift is a twit, but I'm not surprised she's encouraging this. A hot second ago the woke types were accusing her of being a Nazi/White Supremacist wet dream because she's blonde, blue-eyed, and... They like her music, and she didn't tell them to fuck off loudly enough? IDK, it was a while ago and it's not like they need a good reason to call someone a Nazi.
 
And where's your castle doctrine that would ever let you defend yourself with your gun? Your gun is worthless for self defense in your country.
No, it works perfectly fine for self defence since the guy would still be dead and I would not be. What happens afterwards is basically entirely not relevant since I'd still be alive and the other person would not be. As to the law itself, legally I am absolved of the need to 'weigh up the pros and cons' in the 'heat of the moment' and I do not have to wait to be attacked in my own home. I can also legally kill another person in my own home if I feel that I am in peril (even if it's demonstrated that I was wrong in hindsight.) so long as I don't disable and then execute the man.

Don't get me wrong it's a shitty and ambiguous and retarded law when it should be 'Man in house when he shouldn't be is fair game.' But it's not really that limiting. There have been only 11 prosecutions of people defending themselves between 1990 and 2011; of those I can actually recall the two big ones off the top of my head, one of them involved a man ambushing the intruder (deemed okay), knocking him out (deemed okay) dragging him into the garden, throwing him in a pit and then setting him on fire (not okay); and one where some pakis let the guy get away, and then beat him until he was retarded at a later date.


Well gun owners didn't pussy out when we kicked you out of our country.
So like what? Two instances in the last 240 years? (I'm counting the civil war) Irelands been kicking off with their shit for like 800 years like clockwork. Every time something weird happens in Stormont I'm itching to ring my friends and be like 'Hey, you guys need a place to hide while Sinn Fein are doing the thing again?' because they have a chimp out like potato niggers are wont to do and start planting bombs like flowers every fifty years or so. Hell I think the IRA murdered a journalist like a year ago.


But if you mean some /pol/tard fantasy about some kind of mass uprising of gun owners taking over the country by force and mass murdering their political opposition, otherwise known as a "civil war", no that's not happening anytime soon. If ever in my lifetime. 99.9% of gun owners aren't /pol/tards. The fact of the matter is that gun owners in America tend to have families and jobs, that is, they actually have something to fight and live for. That means: 1) Not going to urban cesspits where they don't live and don't have connections to, to shoot looters and subsequently go to prison for the rest of their lives. 2) Staying at their homes and neighborhoods to defend what they do have from looters and rioters. There's plenty of images and videos the past 2 weeks of people doing just that. The places where gun owners live have been peaceful.

First off:
c84.png

Secondly, then they're not actually using them then are they? That was in fact my entire fucking point; gun owners in America don't do shit when the government pushes them. They just go to their homes, and they run away. Is that the smart choice? Hell yes! They'd get their shit dropped in if the government ever actually 'came' for them because no cunt would support them. They'd just arrest you guys in waves every couple of years, or slowly erode your laws. But that's the point of what I was saying. The guns don't matter, it's the will to actually tell the government to fuck off when they step on you instead of just putting up with it.

Your entire response sums up the fucking problem; you guys don't care about the cities and seem to literally have a 'I just wanna grrrriiillll!!' mindset about everything; it doesn't matter if you defend your slice of suburbia, or your nice rural utopia because the nigwashing is still coming. The cities are bad yes and don't go to them, but that doesn't mean they will stay in the cities; the US border force was flying out somalians to fucking maine for christs sakes. The whole argument I was making was that the guns aren't relevant to changing a government and resisting tyranny, because they don't work unless the people using them are up for going to war with the government, and most simply aren't. It was not 'Why don't the boogaloo happen REEEEEEEE!!!' because I'm not a fucking retard.

And lastly this is really just a "let me tell you about your country" argument. There's been plenty of estimates that put defensive gun uses in America at well over 1 million per year. That's not pussying out.
No, that's you conflating defensive uses of a firearm with action against tyranny which is what was being discussed. I'm not 'telling you about your country' I'm telling you that when the government has done shit people didn't like and gun owners went out trying to look all scary, the government did it anyway, and the gun owners didn't do shit with their guns. A firearm is a threat of violence, and brandishing it in protest of the government is not a fashion accessory, it is you telling the government that if they do not back down you will be using violence against them.
 
What are the options to fight against the left? I see no good answer and how should the right change tactics? I see so much doom posting going on that I don’t see anything useful.
Realistically speaking there are none, because the enemy isn't a vague concept like "the left", the enemy is the finance industry. The political "left" and the "right" are just two sides of the same coin. Controlling the thought process of a democracy is surprisingly cheap and once you have that control there isn't anything that anyone can ever do about it. If you even try to fight it you'll get deplatformed and if you keep it up then you'll have your ability to interact with the market itself revoked when the payment processors and banks refuse you service. Don't even consider using violence against this foe, for even if you do get one of theirs, there are still thousands more to dispose of and there will never be a lack of people waiting to replace each person you remove, should you even manage to get one of theirs before being caught.

Organize to force multiply? How? The instant that you try anything you will have all your lines of mass communication (social media etc) cut. If they're not cut they're being monitored. A third of those new recruits? Feds. The others? Brainwashed useful idiots masquerading as your friend and people who are more than likely just going to be a liability and blab about it to the wrong people. Need I remind you that even Special Forces couldn't manage to pull this off?
Why is the government so afraid of a right wing revolt then a left wing one?
Because the people who identify as "left wing" are doing what they were told to do. There is no "left wing revolt", it's more of a "left wing protecting the status quo while thinking they are opposing the system and being so myopic they cannot see that the system is giving them asspats the whole way"
Most of the government is so spineless that they would change like the nazis did with the soviets.
They're spineless, yes. But they know what side their bread is buttered on, and that is never going away.

It must seem like a massive run of bad luck that we've gotten this far. The truth is the game was rigged from the start.
 
What, do you expect us to put paperclips in our guns instead of buying a expenisve, half-functioning solution?
Paperclips? Real OGs use coat hangers.

And yes, "semiautomatic assault rifle" is what they call "semiautomatic rifles" in Washington.
LMAO, so would a fucking Ruger 10/22 count as an assault rifle there?
He banned the importation of firearms from Russia which totally dried up the supply of Saigas, a real AK47 made in the real AK47 factory.
And shit sticks and SKSs...man I'd kill for a good SKS but fuck that $350+ noise for a chink one. Also the thought of surplus Dragunovs hitting the market makes my pants tighten up somethin fierce
Now we can pay 800 for a fucking wasr. The new PSA AKE is good if you can actually get your hands on it. Also zastava just released a new serb Mpup import for below 900 that looks really solid, Josh could prob walk around the corner and buy one. Its a real shame kalasakaidontknowhowtospellthisshit USA didn't turn out right, that would have been a huge hit on obunga if they could make 1 good ak, (just one, sigh) to somewhat negate the russia ban.
The AK Guy on youtube has enough parts to build an arsenal's worth of AKs but I've yet to see him do anything with 'em. Make me kinda tempted to hop the border and "borrow" a few of his things...
As a less spergy aside, I found an AE Mk1 never fired for 1,500, and a 6.5mm creedmore for 1,200; so while I might be ragin, I'll be ragin about a good deal.
please die
1592001747588.png
 
I'll call it now: They'll have a grossly weakened policing capability, leading to a complete tailspin of "racist white flight" because people don't want their kids murder/death/kill'ed on the way to school. No matter how many guilt-placing articles buzzfeed runs, the drive for physical security is stronger, especially when so many criminals understand the myriad loopholes in the new system to be exploited to successfully carry out profitable illegal crime. Perhaps org. criminals step in to provide some stability for the sake of better environmental conditions for them, but the economic damage will be done and security takes a nosedive.

THEN they'll start talking about stepping up gun control for the average citizen by trotting out weeping criminals' mothers about how unjust it was that someone was "allowed" to "slaughter" their sweet, sweet boy just because they found him in their 12 year old daughters' bedroom window at 2 in the morning. Which will terrify even further the law-abiding, worsening the situation. All the while they'll likely point to fewer arrests for citizens of color, proving how non-racist the new system is and how equitable it is that they're arresting just as many whites as blacks, but street-level folks and those watching social accounts will see too apparently that crime is worse than ever. Enjoy getting fired for talking about your car break-in over the weekend, your boss heard your terrible hate speech and you're never gonna work in this town again.

Maybe they crack down for a while by leaving it to county or state police apparatuses to take care of the beat, maybe they do go super crazy and build their own S.S. squads to enforce laws...

these social pretenses collapse slowly, and then all at once as everyone realizes the normies are once again more numerous than the retards.

the only question is when does that happen? when will we know?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back