Monica Rial / Monica Jean Rial / Rialisms & Ron Toye / Ronald Toye III / rontoye3 - 5th Bulma and Ron "Pick Up the Phone or You'll Find Your Dog Dead When You Get Home" Toye

He sure has their panties in a twist somehow. It's not magic to claim to have a master's degree in some shit and then opine on it in public, and for that matter, it doesn't even take a master's degree. It's not like anyone is obligated to believe anything he says or take him any more seriously than any other reasonably articulate person expressing an opinion.

It's not like randomly psychoanalyzing strangers carries any particularly great weight no matter who is doing it.

I don't need any particularly in depth analysis to see Ron Toye is a gibbering psycho, though. I'm amazed anyone can look at that guy and think he's normal in any way. He's a twitchy, weird, creepy little dude at best and that's even if you don't know he's a wife beating piece of shit who raised a son who says nigger all the time.
How embarrassing must it be for all these Lawtwitter pinheads to build this pyramid of cards painting Ron as this misunderstood martyr, yet all it took was one therapist to cause those cards to tumble.
 
So, how farwill the LawTwitter circlejerk go with defending their poor decision of backing an obvious psycho? If one of us came forward as a professional in public relations and said they think MoRon has handled this with all the grace of a bull in a china shop, are they going to blow up the DMs of a bunch of PR consultants to try and get one to say that Ron flipping his shit all over the Internet is absolutely the best way to handle this situation?

They would see it as an escalation. I think this stopped being "a thing on the internet" and became personal for both sides. They can't be wrong on the internet because 10 years from now douchebags will be throwing this shit in their face on social media. They desperately need some kind of expert to validate their actions because they can't stand on their own.

He sure has their panties in a twist somehow. It's not magic to claim to have a master's degree in some shit and then opine on it in public, and for that matter, it doesn't even take a master's degree. It's not like anyone is obligated to believe anything he says or take him any more seriously than any other reasonably articulate person expressing an opinion.

It's not like randomly psychoanalyzing strangers carries any particularly great weight no matter who is doing it.

I don't need any particularly in depth analysis to see Ron Toye is a gibbering psycho, though. I'm amazed anyone can look at that guy and think he's normal in any way. He's a twitchy, weird, creepy little dude at best and that's even if you don't know he's a wife beating piece of shit who raised a son who says nigger all the time.

I think it two parts.

1. Kiwi's are supposed to be basement dwelling incels who hate women. Ken apparently said just enough to show he has experience in the field so therefore cannot be a basement dwelling incel. And since he cannot be a basement dwelling incel, that must mean he is a legit human being whose opinions must be respected. Of course they fail at this.

2. LawTwitter is full of technocrats. They worship any jackass that can ramble off a list of technical terms until the opposition gives up and leaves. Ken flanked them with some psychiatry and no one on the Threadnaught could immediately ramble off a bunch of psych terms to refute him.

Also, it looks like they are more concerned about attacking Ken's personal credibility rather than address his analysis. That is why they were worried about finding a doctor who would say "that is unethical." I think they know that Ken is accurate enough that any doctor show the same evidence would agree with him

I'm sure they are trawling the internet for a psychiatrist with a podcast to help them.
 
They would see it as an escalation. I think this stopped being "a thing on the internet" and became personal for both sides. They can't be wrong on the internet because 10 years from now douchebags will be throwing this shit in their face on social media. They desperately need some kind of expert to validate their actions because they can't stand on their own.



I think it two parts.

1. Kiwi's are supposed to be basement dwelling incels who hate women. Ken apparently said just enough to show he has experience in the field so therefore cannot be a basement dwelling incel. And since he cannot be a basement dwelling incel, that must mean he is a legit human being whose opinions must be respected. Of course they fail at this.

2. LawTwitter is full of technocrats. They worship any jackass that can ramble off a list of technical terms until the opposition gives up and leaves. Ken flanked them with some psychiatry and no one on the Threadnaught could immediately ramble off a bunch of psych terms to refute him.

Also, it looks like they are more concerned about attacking Ken's personal credibility rather than address his analysis. That is why they were worried about finding a doctor who would say "that is unethical." I think they know that Ken is accurate enough that any doctor show the same evidence would agree with him

I'm sure they are trawling the internet for a psychiatrist with a podcast to help them.
These nimrod nutsacks can’t come up with anything to combat Jennings’s credentials, so they opt for attacking his character...because fuck constructive criticism, we need to paint him as a crook.

And even if they found a psychiatrist for their podcast, only three people will watch it and their names are Noah Body, Noe One and Nada Thang.
 
These nimrod nutsacks can’t come up with anything to combat Jennings’s credentials, so they opt for attacking his character...because fuck constructive criticism, we need to paint him as a crook.

And even if they found a psychiatrist for their podcast, only three people will watch it and their names are Noah Body, Noe One and Nada Thang.
Does @Nontransferable count for getting clips to use against them?
 
Last edited:
So, how farwill the LawTwitter circlejerk go with defending their poor decision of backing an obvious psycho? If one of us came forward as a professional in public relations and said they think MoRon has handled this with all the grace of a bull in a china shop, are they going to blow up the DMs of a bunch of PR consultants to try and get one to say that Ron flipping his shit all over the Internet is absolutely the best way to handle this situation?
I can tell you right now as a business man he's done everything wrong you could possibly do hurt the situation for not only himself but the company he works for as well. Luckily they're so small no one will give a shit that an employee is making them look like shit. They do a fine enough job of that themselves. A larger corporation would sit him aside and tell him to get off the internet for awhile so his bullshit doesn't go back on them once a few customers report to them about it. If he didn't, well I would consider grounds for termination.
 
The retard who says that no one wants Vic's dead and dismisses proof that says otherwise like a fucking pussy wants proof that Ken is really a therapist.
You would want that kind of proof that would only benefit you cunts to fuck over Ken Jennings's career.
kufhjlgf.png
,jfjhfgjl.png
kjfhkjg.png


kjfgkjgkh.png
jhkfjhf.png

 
Free speech is free. Unless we disagree.

Man, reading these tweets hurts my head. I'm pretty sure those aboard the Threadnaught haven't proved their credentials, yet they are taken for their word too. So, why so adamant about one guy who gave an opinion? If he's just some dude, it's free speech, right? But no... he has prove his credentials in order to be taken seriously and for them to try and tear a man down... because they want to pass it off as something that's not protected by the first amendment. Their motives are as plain as day. The bait isn't going to work when it is ridiculous logic. There is absolutely no benefit in revealing himself to you. You guys just explained why.
 
Free speech is free. Unless we disagree.

Man, reading these tweets hurts my head. I'm pretty sure those aboard the Threadnaught haven't proved their credentials, yet they are taken for their word too. So, why so adamant about one guy who gave an opinion?

This is one of the rare cases of an actual ad hominem fallacy at work. If the guy is an idiot who is clearly talking nonsense, it should be easy enough to explain why without throwing a squalling tantrum about his qualifications, which don't even matter.
 
This is one of the rare cases of an actual ad hominem fallacy at work. If the guy is an idiot who is clearly talking nonsense, it should be easy enough to explain why without throwing a squalling tantrum about his qualifications, which don't even matter.
If Ken Jennings's opinion is so utterly worthless that it doesn't deserve to be taken seriously, why are they all making a huge fucking fuss about it? Because it's like I said earlier - all these idiots spent so much time painting a rosy image of Ron as a tragic character, yet it took only one therapist to tear that image down. The best part? Ken didn't even call Ron bad names; he just gave an insightful opinion. Now they're resorting to damage control on Ron and damage infliction on Ken.

Also, note the timing of their shenanigans: roughly a week before Vic's law firm allegedly files a response. They didn't do this two weeks ago or even last week, but they're doing it starting this week, roughly seven days before the next deadline. This is not only ad hominem fallacy, but also a premeditated smear tactic to cause distractions.
 
If Ken Jennings's opinion is so utterly worthless that it doesn't deserve to be taken seriously, why are they all making a huge fucking fuss about it? Because it's like I said earlier - all these idiots spent so much time painting a rosy image of Ron as a tragic character, yet it took only one therapist to tear that image down. The best part? Ken didn't even call Ron bad names; he just gave an insightful opinion. Now they're resorting to damage control on Ron and damage infliction on Ken.

It's pretty weird. It's like they all know Ron is an obviously fucked up, creepy dude who lies a lot. They don't think anyone who looks at this squirrelly weirdo can tell that? The question really isn't whether he's a psycho but just what kind.
 
They're still assmad about Ken attacking his credibility but NEVER his analysis and pretend to know his true identity just to mess with him for destroying their epic bs narrative of Saint Ron, yet they never provided their own identity and they're all still acting like lawyers while failing to grasp literally everything and doing the most epic hot-takes that only value the dumb defendants and do everything they can to discredit Vic+Ty+Nick (he still isn't part of the case nor will ever be LOL)+everyone else...doesn't sound like something a professional&licensed lawyer would do on social cesspools like Twit, but we have Lemwha that did sperg out about it especially the GFM that he's still obsessed with.
Can't wait for appeals, only to see more desperation by their side and especially more epic assmad damage control over something that never was and never will be a thing: their epic fanfiction-lame narrative of Saint Ron and his "reformed character thanks to help received and self-introspection". :smug:
 
I went on Facebook to view the debate about BLM between Ron and his father. I couldn't see it, but his son posted about it on his Facebook page. Whatever Ron's dad said that got him blocked, it probably wasn't as bad as his son talking about shooting and killing niggers on his YouTube channel.

"I'm a big truck driver Trump supporter get me a buckshot shoot me a nigger."
"I'm driving down to kill some nigger."

Ron Toye IV (CHUNKYMILKUWU) played a custom match of Rainbow 6 Siege called "niggers" two days ago. The kid who setup the match is his cousin. (There is a PayPal link in the description and the e-mail is artoye65@gmail.com)

1592112791528.png


 
Last edited:
So is that Ron IV gnawing on the end of a lotion bottle? That's quite an autistic tic he's got going on there.

He's just a kid still and he's a victim of his father so I really shouldn't make fun of him for it, but dear God looks like the soy runs deep in the family. Least he doesn't seem to give a shit about his dad and won't change his ways. Minus the "lol I'mma gonna beat my girlfriend" comments, his edgelord comments to trigger and tease Ron Soye with is more than we could ask for, I suppose.
 
Back