- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
And yet Stephie wore the hat anyway.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet Stephie wore the hat anyway.
You see Stephie is ironicly wearing it. Witch is better and totts different than wearing it for reals. That or those evil terfs forsed her to wear it or else they would have beaten the poor transgurl black and blue (like an african american and a police).And yet Stephie wore the hat anyway.
"Womanhood is defined by wherever i agree with your opinions or not"Repost
View attachment 1381716
View attachment 1381717
From previous comic's comments
View attachment 1381722
Trust a troon to go to a women's march and make it all about himself.Repost
View attachment 1381716
View attachment 1381717
From previous comic's comments
View attachment 1381722
As I pointed out in another topic, these Black trans women are usually whores who died as whores do: violently.View attachment 1380142
View attachment 1380144
Don't forget to donate![]()
Two Black Trans Women Were Killed Over 24 Hours This Week
After the reported murders of Dominique “Rem’mie” Fells and Riah Milton, activists call out a “swirling vortex of transphobia.”www.them.us
View attachment 1380149
why is there a new harry potter bookView attachment 1382840
And this website also made lots of JK Rowling articles
![]()
Harry Potter Saved My Life. J.K. Rowling Is Now Endangering Trans People Like Me
As a YA author, I know books save lives. I also know how dangerous and painful Rowling’s transphobia is for millions.www.them.us
![]()
Everyone Besides Daniel Radcliffe Who Condemned J.K. Rowling's Transphobia
“These times are hard enough without YOU, a wealthy white woman, tweeting transphobia from your mansion,” said Munroe Bergdorf.www.them.us
![]()
J.K. Rowling’s Pen Name Is Also the Name of an Anti-LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapist
It’s very likely a coincidence, but Rowling has yet to comment on the unfortunate connection.www.them.us
![]()
Is J.K. Rowling Transphobic? A Trans Woman Investigates
The most insulting thing about J.K. Rowling's transphobia is how mundane it is.www.them.us
I don’t trust Stephie’s opinion on anatomy, looking at the position of her head and hands, and the fact that her hat is so badly made that it has to be labelled.
Wow really. Female oppression doesn't have anything to do with their genitalia or female body parts. They were just people that were picked out randomly to be oppressed and it is just a coincidence that that is the only thing that distinguishes female from males hmmmmmRepost
View attachment 1381716
View attachment 1381717
From previous comic's comments
View attachment 1381722
To be fair, it's not like sexual dimorphism among humans extends beyond genitalia. We all know males don't tend to have wider shoulders and larger upper bodies than females, while females don't tend to have larger pelvic cavities (and thus wider hips). We all know females don't have mammary glands while males do not, and we all know men don't have prostates while women do not. Nope, sexual dimorphism only extends to genitalia, which we can mutilate to somehow turn you into a woman (but God help you if you want to go back, because we can't do that. It's sort of a once and for all kind of deal, so get it while you're young!)Wow really. Female oppression doesn't have anything to do with their genitalia or female body parts. They were just people that were picked out randomly to be oppressed and it is just a coincidence that that is the only thing that distinguishes female from males hmmmmm
It's not like women don't discuss important rights involving their female body's either like abortion. They're just there to talk about their pussy, leaving poor troons to be oppressed once again![]()
Wow, JK Rowling is apparently transphobic enough to become multiple people.
Every Oh Joy Sex Toy comic is shit. They let lolcow Glitched Puppet do two of them.
Children's comic artist, everyone!
Christ, what is that image? It's like the chart equivalent of one of Labelle's comics. It is awful on every level. I don't know what point it's trying to make, and it looks about as bad as black text on a neutral background can look. If I were viewing this image in a vaccum I'd assume this was some sort of anti-SJW propaganda, but apparently Labelle felt the need to repost a "SJW Contradictions" infographic on his own. It doesn't even have any contradictions, just random snippets of semi-related jargon.
Why, William? Why would you post this as though it HELPS your case?