Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Ravenor,

Synchronisms are the point. Here, let me turn on another channel and let's see what we get. I just turned on Daniel Boone on MeTV and the commercial immediately said, "I don't like you judging me." (4/24/15 09:14)

Now, how do you explain that? 'Lucky coincidence'?! And could that relate to this thread anymore?! No. That was a BIG sign from GOD/God-incarnate.

Carl Jung coined the term synchronicity. I assume you and everyone here is familiar with that? Synchronicity is the belief of interconnectedness, etc. Synchronism is the documented, witnessed connection through happening at the same point in time of two or more casually connected events that are nonlocal and possibly non-linear.
Or maybe because that was the commercial that was on.
You're taking things as if they're messages from God, when they're just occurances.
 
your avatar shows you with a sword
If you think my avatar is an actual picture of me then you're crazier than I thought. Don't you know a comic aardvark when you see one?

I have ordered a copy of the book and will read it. I'm assuming the first book you quoted said you had to apply the value of 15 to the letter O. I will admit to not studying gematria before this thread although I always had an interest in numerology. I have since read a number of articles and descriptions of gematria that assign a value to the letter O of either 15 or -- in the case of early English Gematria -- 14.

You claim to use Simple English Gematria so I googled it.

http://multiver.se/tools/seg/: Assigns a value of 15 to O

http://www.gematrix.org/: For English Gematria assigns a value of 15 to the letter O. By the way, you denounced this site the last time I mentioned it, and yet you advertised it on your Facebook page just 3 weeks ago as showing off your 74 theory.

http://wmjas.wikidot.com/simple-english-gematria: Gives GOD a value of 26, which means he assigned a value of 15 to the letter O.

http://landmarkbiblebaptist.net/666-888.html: Assigns values to English letters based on original Hebrew and Greek alphabets and gives O a value of 90. Of course you have already refuted this form of gematria earlier in this thread because it doesn't agree with your values.

: Same deal as the last one -- you don't support because it disagrees with you.

http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/02/gematria-tables-simple-english-english.html: Assigns a value of 15 to O.

http://rantworld.blogs.com/arcanadei/2007/02/gematria_calcul.html: Here we find a value of 50 for O. Why do people accept this when you undoubtedly think it's just wrong?

http://joshstoss.blogspot.com/2015/02/how-to-gematria-101.html: Assigns the value of 15 to O.

http://www.masoncode.com/Latin Gematria.htm: Gol durn it! Another one that applies a value of 50 to O. What's wrong with these people, right Brad?

http://www.asis.com/users/stag/englishg.html: Assigns a value of 15 to the letter O, and even goes so far as to transliterate GOD as 7 15 4.

http://arifptm.com/simple_english_gematria: This was a list of scholarly publications, mostly about Hebrew, but there were 8 that I found that dealt with the English alphabet. They all applied numerical values to the letter O. None of them used 0 as a value.

I of course did not bother with the 17 articles posted that were written by you. I did find this exchange at http://englishqabalah.blogspot.com/p/english-gematria.html to be mildly amusing:


Bradshaw Watson
said...
Simple(74) English(74) Gematria(74) The Key(74): A=1, B2, C3, D4, E5, F6, G7, H8, I9, J10, K11, L12, M13, N14, O15 or zerO, P16, Q17, R18, S19, T20, U21, V22, W23, X24, Y25, Z26 Everyone, The "English Gematria" presented on this blog is awful! I question as to whether it is intentionally wrong to misdirect the uninformed?!Simple English Gematria will give you the connect(74) between(74) a number(74) and the letter that is correct and most useful. Consider the following... Religion=74, Jewish/Judeans=74, menorah=74, Messiah=74, the king=74, ruler=74, Y'shua=74/ Jesus=74/Joshua=74/IESVS=74 (Iesous=73), Cross=74, Gospel=74, parables=74, Pastor=74, Muhammad=74, etc. Please Google 'Simple(74) English(74) Gematria(74)'. - Brad Watson, Miami, FL
May 21, 2010 6:03 AM


Bradshaw Watson
said...
Everyone, I forgot the most important example of Simple English Gematria: GOD=7_4, whereas, G is the 7th letter, a circle can be either the 15th letter or zerO, and D is the 4th letter. 7/4=July 4=aphelion. 7/4/1776 was the biggest example of the use of gematria in history. Also, the gematric sum of a word/name is 'Step 2' of gematria, 'Step 1' is very simply counting the number of letters in a word, i.e. Liberty7 Bell4, Hancock7 John4, Federal7 City4, Capitol7 Hill4, etc. The word 'God' is three letters which represent the Christian Trinity. - Brad Watson, Miami, FL
May 21, 2010 7:10 AM


Samuel.K.Vincent
said...
The simplicity of your system is of course appealing; it is the play of a Child. Here is what you have done: By incrementing each letter by one, you have effectively reduced the span Set, thus tightening the Ring of correspondence and increasing the number of entries for each correspondence, since Words are now mapped to a smaller subset of Numbers. Effectively, the 20 - 80 interval will contain 90% of the words in the English language if you are adding up entries of numbers between 1-26. In this Way, you Will be Able to find a correpondence between most Words - since All you are doing is adding Numbers between 1 and 26, Four, Five, Six or Seven times, etc - depending on the length of the Word. You've found a correspondence between Jesus, Mohammed etc. It might just as easily have been Christ (which is one or two less, I believe) as most words would be: The point being that most series of letters will be mapped into this value range seeing as you've effectively reduced the span of your system. In this Way, you Will never find Formulae or a Name to correspond to phenomena we have direct experience of: 333, 418, 666, 718, and So On, which are Numbers too high in value to be mapped by your System (One would Need words 30 to 50 letters in length to break the 500 mark). 74 is an Idea. 740 a manifestation. Verify that under the key Jesus Christ = Christianity = 404 = Cactus=Accurst with C soft, and in glyph form represents the destruction of the 4, as 414 represents the surrounding of the 4. When C hardens, the Formula becomes 431, a Prime which = Water of Life = Thanksgiving. I think the point here is that a cactus Jesus and an accurst Christian should harden up his C at the very least, and break out of his 20-80 prison. No One Here to mislead You; You are doing a Fine enough Job of that On your own. Thanks.
May 21, 2010 10:56 AM


Bradshaw Watson
said...
Sam & Everyone, Every 1st year design & engineering student is taught that "simpler is better - simpler is stronger, more effective". NASA Astronauts have been training in the same jets for 40 years because according(74) to Story Musgrave, "It can't be designed any simpler". Leonardo da Vinci said, "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication". Albert Einstein said, "Theories should be simple(74) and have beauty(74)". Einstein also said, "Simplicity is divine". For you to attack a system - anything - for portraying the ultimate in simplicity is incredibly ignorant! You refer to Simple English Gematria (SEG) as "my system" - very wrong! A=1...Z=26 is a code that has been used by some Freemasons for centuries - since English started to appear. SEG is all over the Internet - Google it. It's also come up several times in pop culture in the last few years, i.e. movie "The Number 23", "Batman Returns", children's TV programs, and fictional/non-fictional books. You even completely missed 'Step 1' of Simple(6) English(7) Gematria(8) where counting the number of letters in a word is utilized and YES, I've been successfully teaching this to children, but it went over your head! Your comment continues with some serious rambling nonsense and "accurst Christian". Explain that. You appear to be selling a book that you've written and it has upset you when someone comes along and proves that your system is either wrong or certaintly not as effective as another! My suggestion is for you to admit it to yourself and either revise your book or start all over again. A=1, B=2, C=3... - Brad Watson, Miami, FL (mene mene=74)
May 21, 2010 12:56 PM


Samuel.K.Vincent
said...
This is a moot issue at this juncture, I believe; the evidence will speak for itself. However for the sake of dialogue, I will tell you that you are missing the Point entirely. This is not about constructing or engineering a System, but more about experientially mapping phenomena. We are trying to classify observable events and so accuracy and detail, and not simplicity, are what we seek. You can theorize on, generalize about, and systemize and simplify the data into any theory you may have, but that is your business. In this way you are working backwards: attempting to make the Universe fit your Model as opposed to fitting your Model to the Universe. The basic idea behind QBLH is that all Events in the observable universe (including its state shifts throughout time) seem to be engendered by a single source that reflects these "organizing energies" into manifestations that we then observe. The notion is that you Sir, can look at any object, event or person and through the varying manifestations arrive at the source of that Being. It should be sufficient to take up any object or person for study. You may very Well Take yourself for subject of Study as seems Natural to Do. Events are not equally salient so Best to Choose a Moment of significance personal or otherwise. Are you on the Street? The Street itself is a manifestation, its Name, the Value of the Letters and their sums, the shapes of the Letters themselves, the Time of Day, the Date, the colour on the Door, the Address, the Song playing in the cafe across the Street, the Number of Hairs on your Head, the Logos or Tags on your clothing and any other writing or glyph and where it is positioned on the body at the time. Is someone holding up a newspaper? Read the headline. Look, See, Divide, Add, Multiply Understand. You Will Find the correspondence extends to All planes including Number. We Choose Number to classify and list the correspondences seeing as Number naturally Orders the Events (for Ease of reference). Take yourSelf, thine Name, the name of those Men and Women that were like unto a Sky to you. Take those especially that you have united with in Love and all things that have informed your Being. The unfolding of Events and Time follow laws similar to those that govern the proliferation and growth of life - and this at all levels. Each Acorn Labours to Grow and unfold itself into an Oak. Each Oak labours to Grow Acorns and unfold itself into a Forest. Neither the Oak, nor the Acorn know any of this. And so, neither the Man, nor the Mother Know the Value of the Name they give their child or its Import and the configurations of that Conception; but Events in Time and every other perceivable detail follow that same organizing principle. Here's what you've done: added up letters in words and found that the name Jesus added to 74. So did "Jewish", and "ruler" and then so did "simple" "english" and "gematria" as does "number" "between" and "connect" as do many other words you chose to omit, as for instance: donkey, Lucifer, abominable, accursed, evil god, fiendish, horns, old goat, tempt, bitter, obedient, killing, brutal, finished, tarot, occult and approximately 13000 others. In Love,
May 22, 2010 12:43 PM


Bradshaw Watson
said...
Sam(33), Yes, "the evidence will speak for itself". Yet, it is "you who are missing the point(74) entirely." You choose to overlook the simplest system of English(74) gematria(74). I'm well aware that "this is not about constructing or engineering a system, but more about experimentially mapping phenomena." When we "try to classify observable events, and so accuracy and detail" through simplicity, "are what we seek". You accuse me of "working backwards: attempting to make the Universe fit your Model as opposed to fitting your Model to the Universe." Well, I presented a poster/one-page-paper entitled: 'Identifying True Earth-like Planets - All New Worlds Are Built On 7_4 (like Earth) or 6_4' at the NASA Conference 'Missions for Exoplanets 2010-2020' at Pasadena, CA on 4/21-23/09. Please check it out at http://exep.jpl.nasa.gov/exep_exoMtgPosters.cfm Do you realize that you abbreviate Qabalah(7) as QBLH(4)? We agree " that all Events in the observable universe (including its state shifts throughout time) seem to be engendered by a single source that reflects these 'organizing energies' into manifestations that we then observe". GOD=7_4 is 'program 1'(74) of the 'universal quantum computer". You've gone on to wrongly assume the order of my discovery of the importance of 7_4 in English gematria. When I was eight-years-old (42 years ago), I realized that GOD=704 & 7/04=July 4th and this seemed non-coincidental! About 20 years ago, I began to study Jewish Kaballa and first learned about Hebrew gematria. Did you notice my spelling of 'Kaballa'? As you know, there are many different spellings of the word that are attributed to many different teachers of Kaballa. I've chosen 'Kaballa' based on Simple English Gematria, whereas, Kaballa(7,40): it has 7 letters and adds up to 40. The #7 & #40 are the two most prominent recurring numbers in the Bible and 7 & 40 are also sacred to Muslims and Hindus. 'Kaballa' also ends with 'alla' or Allah. I'm omni-religious (Jewish/Christian/Muslim/etc.) and so is Simple English Gematria. Yes, there are many other words that equal 74 in Simple English Gematria, but that doesn't diminish it's strength or distract from the probability of its alignment. You - more than anyone - should know that in any gematric system, words and phrases can be constructed that would seem to conflict with an 'important number'. All your 'important/significant words/phrases' can be found to equal others that appear to be nonsense or evil. Right? Where did you come up with all the '74 words' including "approximately 13,000 others". What program are you using? Samuel(71) is the name of the 1st King of Israel. Moses(71) is regarded as #1 among Jews today, but 'Moses' was an Egyptian name. Do you think it a 'coincidence' that G-d(7_4) wouldn't allow Moses to set foot in the 'Promised Land'? That Joshua(74) would lead the Hebrews across the Jordan River? Samuel was replaced as king by David. 'David' may be the 'number 1'(74) Jewish(74) name today. Why is David significant in SEG? David=40 (D4+a1+v22+i9+d4). The teenage David killed Goliath on the 40th day of his challenge to the Hebrews. King David ruled for 40 years. Samuel, I feel like we're playing a poker game to see who has the stronger hand based on their gematria system. I have just 'raised you' alot! - Brad Watson, Miami, FL

By the way, I downloaded a couple of gematria calculators from different companies, neither of which used a value of 0 for O. But hey, you found one guy who agreed with you, so he's right and everybody else is wrong.

You remind me of the old joke about little Johnny playing in his school band. They were marching in a parade and poor Johnny found it hard to march and play at the same time, As a result, he stumbled and shuffled his way down the street as best he could while the rest of the band marched in perfect cadence. When the band passed Johnny's proud mother, she cried out "Do you see that? My little Johnny is the only one who's doing it right!"
 
KingGeedorah,

On Nestor, they speak Eqfish(6 letters, 64=E5+Q17+F6+I9+S19+H8) since their plan-it and culture was built64 on the FOD=6_4 algorithm/code.*

*Synchronism: 4/24/15 09:28 Star Trek commercial on MeTV
 
KingGeedorah,

On Nestor, they speak Eqfish(6 letters, 64=E5+Q17+F6+I9+S19+H8) since their plan-it and culture was built64 on the FOD=6_4 algorithm/code.*

*Synchronism: 4/24/15 09:28 Star Trek commercial on MeTV

Brad do you think that humans will eventually evolve into the more perfect race of the Nesators? Or will they evolve into us?

My real question I guess, who did God choose to create in his image? Humans and his own son (Jesus Christ, you). Cause i thought Nestor was like our heaven or something .
 
voiceguy,

You admit to never hearing about gematria before this thread. Yet, I AM the world's leading expert (pardon my lack of modesty) on Simple6,74 English7,74 Gematria8,74 and was the first to write on English gematria on the Internet. But your ego insists that you display your superiority over me. WOW! What an 1191980125. And if you can decode that simple cipher, that means you accept the letter O is either 15 or zero.
 
Oh, and Bradley. If I am not being reincarnated as a human (even though the Christian faith thinks Reincarnation is a load of shit), can I be a Meerkat?

field_guide_to_meerkat_2@body.jpg
 
When I divide anything by zero with my calculator, I get zero. I almost never argue with my calculator.

Of course most computers have calculators built into them. I just used mine to divide 55 by 0 and you can see what I got.

I'm not saying you should argue with your calculator, but you might at least want to have a heated discussion with it.
 

Attachments

  • calculator_Copy.jpg
    calculator_Copy.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 208
autism420,

91317914520111914725021187211411441920931191479204023142502118

Is this a fucking threat Brad? Seeing as how we here have your full name and can get your address easily, I'm thinking I should report this to your local police department.

Seems very ungodly of you. I hope the police treat you ok.
 
GOD=7_4 works in other languages and this algorithm/code is not just linguistic, i.e. 4 lunar phases of roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each. Dios is Spanish for GOD; Dios=47=D4+I9+O15+S19, etc.

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Spanish alphabet does not have a direct correspondence with the English alphabet as far as characters goes, so why are you applying the same numbers? Secondly, what about languages whose alphabets do not consist of Latin characters, or languages that do not have alphabets at all? Are Chinese speakers doomed to eternal hellfire because of their language?

I of course did not bother with the 17 articles posted that were written by you. I did find this exchange at http://englishqabalah.blogspot.com/p/english-gematria.html to be mildly amusing:

This is a fucking volcano of autism.
 
No, they don't even work that well with the King Iames Bible of 1611. Only when the modern English alphabet of 26 letters kicked in with the first revision of the KJV in 1629 did the GOD=7_4 algorithm/code produce Simple6,74 English7,74 Gematria8,74 with Jesus=74, etc.

So your entire belief system relies on a translation(modern English) of a translation(King James) of a translation(Latin) of a translation(Greek) of a translation(Hebrew and Aramaic).

And of course, nothing ever gets lost in a translation....

Brad Watson_Miami said:
GOD=7_4 works in other languages and this algorithm/code is not just linguistic, i.e. 4 lunar phases of roughly 7 days (~7.4 days) each. Dios is Spanish for GOD; Dios=47=D4+I9+O15+S19, etc.

Why is the O in the English word for God ("God") a 0 but the O in the Spanish word for God ("Dios") a 15? Oh, yeah...Because otherwise your entire belief system would fall apart.
 
Last edited:
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Spanish alphabet does not have a direct correspondence with the English alphabet as far as characters goes, so why are you applying the same numbers? Secondly, what about languages whose alphabets do not consist of Latin characters, or languages that do not have alphabets at all? Are Chinese speakers doomed to eternal hellfire because of their language?

So your entire belief system relies on a translation(modern English) of a translation(King James) of a translation(Latin) of a translation(Greek) of a translation(Hebrew and Aramaic).

I have asked Brad numerous times to re-create his results using Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic (the languages acutally used in the Judeo-Christian bible) and he declines every time. Which leads to two possibilities:

  1. He can't, because he's not fluent in those languages (despite being reincarnated from people who spoke them) and therefore he has no authority to say his theory works, or
  2. He already knows his theory is bullshit, so he's avoiding answering the question, thinking we'll just forget.
 
WOW! What an 1191980125. And if you can decode that simple cipher, that means you accept the letter O is either 15 or zero.

No, I do not accept it. Neither does the entire thinking world except for one author whose book I just can't wait to read. All it means is that I understand how your demented autistic mind works.

Wow! Just reading that last sentence gave me a chill of pure terror.
 
You admit to never hearing about gematria before this thread. Yet, I AM the world's leading expert blah blah blah blah.
Bradley, do smoke weed? You seem like the type of dude who could use some. So how about instead of ranting like a lunatic here, you get ganja with the wind.

By the way dude, how do you feel about the church of the Wogglebug?
 
Coldgrip,

What's your level of education? You seem like the type of 11919 that could use some. When was the last time you read a book and what was it?

KingGeedorah, post: 674282, member: 5687"]Brad do you think that humans will eventually evolve into the more perfect race of the Nestors? Or will they evolve into us? My real question I guess, who did God choose to create in his image? Humans and his own son (Jesus Christ, you). Cause i thought Nestor was like our heaven or something .
There are many Earthlings that are more advanced than some Nestlings at the moment. They are a couple hundred years(?) advanced than we are but a couple hundred years ago, Beethoven was composing and who has been hipper than him since? (Ok, Stravinsky.) Don't get the impression that there are only two Earth-like planets; there are billions in this universe in the past, present, and future. But all advanced humanoid life evolved on either GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 plan-its.

We - Earthlings and Nestlings - are all sons and daughters of GOD/FOD. Nestlings want to go to the heavens ('heaven') physically and in their next reincarnation to be near Fod-incarnate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are many Earthlings that are more advanced than some Nestlings at the moment. They are a couple hundred years(?) advanced than we are but a couple hundred years ago, Beethoven was composing and who has been hipper than him since? (Ok, Stravinsky.) Don't get the impression that there are only two Earth-like planets; there are billions in this universe in the past, present, and future. But all advanced humanoid life evolved on either GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 plan-its.

We - Earthlings and Nestlings - are all sons and daughters of GOD/FOD. Nestlings want to go to the heavens ('heaven') physically and in their next reincarnation to be near Fod-incarnate.
[citation needed]

Also, Brad, the Miami police department was very sad to hear about the threat you made against me. They'll probably be contacting you soon.
 
Coldgrip,

What's your level of education? You seem like the type of 11919 that could use some. When was the last time you read a book and what was it?
I thought you were suppose to be all knowing? For a deity you certainly need a lot of help from us mortals Bradley.

I still want to know what you think about the lord and savior Wogglechrist. Is he your son? A cockroach you bonded with in your apartment and elevated to godhood? Come on dude, enlighten us.
 
RogerRabbit1988,

Jesus son of Joseph taught reincarnation (Matthew 11:14-15, John 8:58, etc.). Unity Church founders Charles & Myrtle Fillmore taught reincarnation. The early Church Fathers Clement & Origen of Alexandria taught reincarnation & taught that Y'shua taught it.

What have you done that's GOOD for GOD to grant your request of being reincarnated as a meerkat? I think of you as a rabbit - a silly wabbit.

Coldgrip,

GOD: the 'system as a whole' (all-inclusive), the 'universal quantum computer' is all knowing. God-incarnate is not nor has he/I ever claimed to be "all knowing".

You will be reincarnated as a cockroach but that doesn't mean that you can't get alot accomplished.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back