Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    3,848
Women 20-25 actually do have the lowest risk of birth defects and pregnancy complications.
I'm not going to disagree that's the case, but this tends to fuel the incel mantra that a woman is only good in those years and if she dares start a life of her own that doesn't involve popping out babies she's "wasting her eggs" because fuck what a woman wants to do with her life, all women are good for is incubators, and how dare she reproduce after those set years

Do men have certain ages when their fertility rates drop? Why should women be blamed all the time if a baby has complications? For years women were blamed if a baby turned out to be a girl and its only in recent years we found that wasn't the case. Now incels want to blame women if a baby is born outside certain years too I guess.
 
I'm not going to disagree that's the case, but this tends to fuel the incel mantra that a woman is only good in those years and if she dares start a life of her own that doesn't involve popping out babies she's "wasting her eggs" because fuck what a woman wants to do with her life, all women are good for is incubators, and how dare she reproduce after those set years
that's the truth of the situation though
at the family level, and especially at the society level, late motherhood is a disaster
 
that's the truth of the situation though
at the family level, and especially at the society level, late motherhood is a disaster
That's true though. And it's a massive problem with society. All that matters is being in some nuclear family with the 2.5 kids in a house with a white picket fence and all the women is for is to churn out drones to make another nuclear family with the 2.5 kids and another white picket fence...

.. To hell with finding your own path. Want to go see the world? Get a career? Get your shit together? Well that's too bad and you should be ashamed because you're not living in the nuclear family.

If incels and mgtows stopped shitting on women and turned around and just said "hey these ideals society pushes on us is bullshit" I'd actually be all for them
 
I'm not going to disagree that's the case, but this tends to fuel the incel mantra that a woman is only good in those years and if she dares start a life of her own that doesn't involve popping out babies she's "wasting her eggs" because fuck what a woman wants to do with her life, all women are good for is incubators, and how dare she reproduce after those set years

Do men have certain ages when their fertility rates drop? Why should women be blamed all the time if a baby has complications? For years women were blamed if a baby turned out to be a girl and its only in recent years we found that wasn't the case. Now incels want to blame women if a baby is born outside certain years too I guess.
Older fathers have a slightly increased risk of having autistic children, but that's pretty much it. Otherwise a 90 year old man's sperm is just as good as a 20 year old's as long as his dick can still get hard. Any 45 year old woman gets pregnant it's almost sure to be a potato for life or stillborn.
 
That's true though. And it's a massive problem with society. All that matters is being in some nuclear family with the 2.5 kids in a house with a white picket fence and all the women is for is to churn out drones to make another nuclear family with the 2.5 kids and another white picket fence...

.. To hell with finding your own path. Want to go see the world? Get a career? Get your shit together? Well that's too bad and you should be ashamed because you're not living in the nuclear family.

If incels and mgtows stopped shitting on women and turned around and just said "hey these ideals society pushes on us is bullshit" I'd actually be all for them
seeing the world, getting a career, getting rich, is all meaningless when you look at the big picture. worrying about these things to such a degree is short-sighted egotism and comes at great cost to society and future generations.
without above-replacement birth rates, society is literally unsustainable in the most basic sense of the word: it means constant population shrinkage, it's the path to extinction. you are literally arguing for slow suicide on a nation-wide scale, all for the sake of your own self-indulgence and hedonism.
 
seeing the world, getting a career, getting rich, is all meaningless when you look at the big picture. worrying about these things to such a degree is short-sighted egotism and comes at great cost to society and future generations.
without above-replacement birth rates, society is literally unsustainable in the most basic sense of the word: it means constant population shrinkage, it's the path to extinction. you are literally arguing for slow suicide on a nation-wide scale, all for the sake of your own self-indulgence and hedonism.
Good, fuck 'em.
Imagine caring about a "nation" instead of yourself, your family, and your hometown.
 
Eventually having kids will no longer be needed.While no one knows how far off we are its inevitable that eventually they'll cure aging.Lets be honest with ourselves the more we analyse DNA and the more we get how it changes with aging the more we'll get how to delay and or eliminate this issue.And no there will not be a debate about the ethics of doing it.The moment all those billionaires are told 'you only need to keep hanging on for another 15 years and we can add 150 years' i'm certain every Elon Musk worth his salt will invest in this no questions asked.Honestly i don't know how far off we are but i do believe a lot of people alive today will live long enough to catch the Elysium era.But its gonna be a fundamentally different world from ours.People will stay at their jobs for presumably centuries so the new guy will remain the new guy for so long he might just quit his job out of boredom.Kids will be a rarity 'wow you're 18?haven't seen one in a year'.
 
this applies to your family and hometown exactly as it applies at the society and nation level
Here's the problem:
1. My genes are shit and shouldn't be passed on
2. If someone forced me to marry and start popping out Lexmaniac Jrs. because "beep boop my autism demands you live in accordance to t r a d a e s t h e t i c", I'd probably end up either a drunk or a wife-beater
3. There's ways I can actually contribute to my family and community beyond "make new citizens and consume product".

I'd rather find something that gives me personal satisfaction and then marry someone who gives me true joy than just pussy out and shack up with some random bitch because the huwhite race needs me or whatever, and the fact you think "throw away self-actualization and be miserable so number go bigger faster, otherwise outrageous doomsaying claim" is a counterargument shows you have the 'tism worse than me.

And if you want to be really gold-plated autist aout it: I know a guy my age who has five kids already, with a sixth on the way: he's carrying my weight.
 
this is an absolutely bizarre view of family life, but "1. i'm too retarded to be allowed to breed" is a strong argument
Family life is good when it's good. It's bad when you're shitting out kids for no other reason than "something something, muh replacement rate, the huwhite race needs more chilluns, something something".
Like I said, I've nothing against family life, I'm against this retard view that blowing your load in a pussy and producing new meatwads to make number go bigger is the only meaningful goal your life can possibly have.
 
Last edited:
seeing the world, getting a career, getting rich, is all meaningless when you look at the big picture. worrying about these things to such a degree is short-sighted egotism and comes at great cost to society and future generations.
without above-replacement birth rates, society is literally unsustainable in the most basic sense of the word: it means constant population shrinkage, it's the path to extinction. you are literally arguing for slow suicide on a nation-wide scale, all for the sake of your own self-indulgence and hedonism.
Lolwut. Our population is in the billions, we're not in any way going extinct.

If this were such a problem, the guys so desperate for reproduction wouldn't worry about age, looks, medical conditions or anything. They are choosing (which isn't bad, we're all entitled to that), but if you're choosing, you're not begging. If you're not desperate, the world is in it's billions population wise, why worry about population decrease.
 
Family life is good when it's good. It's bad when you're shitting out kids for no other reason than "something something, muh replacement rate, the huwhite race needs more chilluns, something something".
Like I said, I've nothing against family life, I'm against this retard view that blowing your load in a pussy and producing new meatwads to make number go bigger is the only meaningful goal in your life.
the reason that argument strikes you as stupid is because it's not the substance of what's being said, but rather your lazy interpretation. it's not about "making a number go bigger" -- it's about perpetuating a language, history, and way of life that you find beautiful and want to thrive. one less life now is many fewer lives in the future that will experience and pass these things on

nobody's holding a gun to your head and making you have sex, and nobody is telling you to have kids without taking steps to ensure that you're doing it right. the problem is that we socialize people to believe that having children is one valid lifestyle choice of many, equating it with less fulfilling but easier (and more profitable) alternatives. we generate people who think "kids would get in the way of my career," which requires us to believe that we're unique among all forms of life in having no drive toward having children, or that a species with high parental investment would survive if the extraordinary demands of parenthood did not come with yet more extraordinary fulfillment. you can choose to live under that belief if you want, but you'll be cheating yourself
 
Last edited:
the reason that argument strikes you as stupid is because it's not the substance of what's being said, but rather your lazy interpretation. it's not about "making a number go bigger" -- it's about perpetuating a language, history, and way of life that you find beautiful and want to thrive. one less life now is many fewer lives in the future that will experience and pass these things on

nobody's holding a gun to your head and making you have sex, and nobody is telling you to have kids without taking steps to ensure that you're doing it right. the problem is that we socialize people to believe that having children is one valid lifestyle choice of many, equating it with less fulfilling but easier (and more profitable) alternatives. we generate people who think "kids would get in the way of my career," which requires us to believe that we're unique among all forms of life in having no drive toward having children, or that a species with high parental investment would survive if the extraordinary demands of parenthood did not come with yet more extraordinary fulfillment. you can choose to live under that belief if you want, but you'll be cheating yourself

pretending that there's one surefire meaning to life or path to fulfillment that applies to 100% of humans is pretty ridiculous. not everyone is going to experience the same feeling of completion that you seem to have gotten by raising children. the majority of parents I know are not fulfilled by simply passing on their genes, and the ones that expected to be are experiencing some pretty abysmal empty nest syndrome.

there are other ways to preserve your language, your history, and your way of life that aren't entirely dependent on breeding. not everyone is capable of being satisfied by the same things you are.
 
the reason that argument strikes you as stupid is because it's not the substance of what's being said, but rather your lazy interpretation. it's not about "making a number go bigger" -- it's about perpetuating a language, history, and way of life that you find beautiful and want to thrive. one less life now is many fewer lives in the future that will experience and pass these things on
you have any idea how rebellious kids are? Whatever culture you try spreading into them they'll do a 180 degree and find them self another culture to immerse themselves into that pisses off the parent as much as possible
 
ug74xp0v07j21.png


I've heard a lot of incel talking points but "cum contains the man's personality and if you have sex with multiple men your personality will change" is a new one.

I love it when people try to sound scientific but then spout the most unintelligent bullshit imaginable.
 
View attachment 1394435

I've heard a lot of incel talking points but "cum contains the man's personality and if you have sex with multiple men your personality will change" is a new one.

I love it when people try to sound scientific but then spout the most unintelligent bullshit imaginable.

lol the personality is stored in the balls.
 
Back