Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Never happen. Most of them have been coached so heavily into natural doublethink that they have no problem, say, calling for the cops to be disbanded and outlawed and then whining that the cops won't help them when they need it.

The re branding to CHOP from CHAZ is a pathetic attempt to shift the blame by saying "We aren't really autonomous, so we STILL demand public services help us out, even as we stone them on the way in and out, because, well, it's a protest zone, what'd they EXPECT?!"

As sickening as it is funny. Just proves these kommie kids not only won't learn, but they actually CANNOT learn, having sacrificed logical thought as "problematic". Whatever happens, they will move all the pieces around until they are blameless and everyone else is the racist problem. They can't imagine an alternative. And when it finally fails, they'll go home having learned nothing except that "mean old outsiders and MAGA secret agents ruined everything, we were Soooooooooo close to success, another 10 minutes and the rest of the world would have copied us and we'd all have fully-automated luxury space communism at last, oh well, vote vote vote ! Bernie can still win!"
 
Never happen. Most of them have been coached so heavily into natural doublethink that they have no problem, say, calling for the cops to be disbanded and outlawed and then whining that the cops won't help them when they need it.

Watching the riot thread kind of proved this, I can't name the number of times rioters/protestors pissed off the wrong person and screemed to call the cops when the person showed it. My favorite was when they chucked rocks at some guys car, he came out with a bladed weapon chased them down, and their chants went from abolish the police to call them.
 
To be fair, the PBS lady said "Kung Flu" first.

That said, why even say it?

I guess this is a nothingburger given everything else is going on. Have fun.
President Trump's great skill is controlling narratives and manipulating the media apparatus. Look at the image in this post here:
This is the primary reason why the media at large hates President Trump's rallies. Rallies give President Trump direct access to the American media landscape and the American people. With a two-hour presentation in Tulsa, President Trump has set the media tone for the entire week. Now you might say that a lot of these stories are negative, but coverage is coverage and there is only a limited amount of it available for everyone.

So the talking heads will spend time every day this week talking about "Kung Flu" and doing deep dives into its origin. I'm sure a few interns will put together neat segments on martial arts as well to try to educate a public that they have total disdain for. They'll discuss the crowd size at the Tulsa rally all week as if it is some kind of win, not realizing that they are undermining their own Kung Flu narrative at the very same time. People will notice this. On the tail of these shootings and general lawlessness the media will discuss Eric Trump maligning looters and rioters as the scum that they are; the media will try to pump up lawless thugs. People will notice this. And President Trump's remarks on "slowing down" testing will be discussed in heated three, four and five-boxes from CNN to MSNBC to FOX News Channel.

And this was all at the expenditure of two hours of President Trump's time. Any deviation from this will be to discuss more statues and monuments being torn down or to talk about more lawlessness perpetrated by leftist criminals; all while President Trump remains restrained and does not unleash the hounds because he is a law and order Executive and will wait for local leaders to ask him for help, as is the protocol.

Meanwhile, nobody will be discussing Joe Biden in any great detail. The only way to change this is for Joe Biden to announce his VP pick this week. Maybe this forces his hand, maybe not. But outside of that or Joe Biden having a stroke, President Trump has taken over the news cycle with his Tulsa rally. And that is why the rallies are so important to his campaign. Also his supporters are very energized by last night's performance. I've been asking around my circles that support President Trump or are inclined to lean in the President's direction. They thought last night was amazing and feel better than they have in a long time. I imagine President Trump himself is also pretty energized now that he can do what he loves once more.
 
There was a simple solution; take all of the armed retards out of there, clear everyone the fuck away with no exceptions, and let the police secure the area and the route in. The EMTs could have done their job and saved this person's life, but No Lives Matter, not when they can be used to serve a political purpose. This person didn't have to die, but no one knows how anything works anymore, and their ignorance caused the death of their "friend."
I mean the simple solution was to not be commie larping retards, but they get what they fucking deserve. Speedrunning a communist country... I can't wait for the gulag phase.
 
AB23520C-DEF7-4C78-B799-4FEFEB35ED4D.jpeg
So where did those campaign funds go, Bernie?
 
President Trump's great skill is controlling narratives and manipulating the media apparatus. Look at the image in this post here:

This is the primary reason why the media at large hates President Trump's rallies. Rallies give President Trump direct access to the American media landscape and the American people. With a two-hour presentation in Tulsa, President Trump has set the media tone for the entire week. Now you might say that a lot of these stories are negative, but coverage is coverage and there is only a limited amount of it available for everyone.

So the talking heads will spend time every day this week talking about "Kung Flu" and doing deep dives into its origin. I'm sure a few interns will put together neat segments on martial arts as well to try to educate a public that they have total disdain for. They'll discuss the crowd size at the Tulsa rally all week as if it is some kind of win, not realizing that they are undermining their own Kung Flu narrative at the very same time. People will notice this. On the tail of these shootings and general lawlessness the media will discuss Eric Trump maligning looters and rioters as the scum that they are; the media will try to pump up lawless thugs. People will notice this. And President Trump's remarks on "slowing down" testing will be discussed in heated three, four and five-boxes from CNN to MSNBC to FOX News Channel.

And this was all at the expenditure of two hours of President Trump's time. Any deviation from this will be to discuss more statues and monuments being torn down or to talk about more lawlessness perpetrated by leftist criminals; all while President Trump remains restrained and does not unleash the hounds because he is a law and order Executive and will wait for local leaders to ask him for help, as is the protocol.

Meanwhile, nobody will be discussing Joe Biden in any great detail. The only way to change this is for Joe Biden to announce his VP pick this week. Maybe this forces his hand, maybe not. But outside of that or Joe Biden having a stroke, President Trump has taken over the news cycle with his Tulsa rally. And that is why the rallies are so important to his campaign. Also his supporters are very energized by last night's performance. I've been asking around my circles that support President Trump or are inclined to lean in the President's direction. They thought last night was amazing and feel better than they have in a long time. I imagine President Trump himself is also pretty energized now that he can do what he loves once more.
I haven't heard any of them acknowledge he had two million plus online viewers across multiple platforms. Joe Biden gets, what, thirty thousand tops?
 
Because they're young. Your odds of dying from it are infinitesimal if you're under 55.

Daddy probably took out a second mortgage to live the good life like your average boomer anyway.

It's a self-perpetuating cycle, establishing their mode of being as the only one. Why do you think BLM wants to abolish the nuclear family? Because the common black family structure hasn't been that way since Jim Crow, and they're mad at being reminded that there might be a better way.

The black family was nuclear until the Great Society punished the family if the man married and stayed with their kids.

Isn’t Tulsa a hotspot for COVID-19 right now or aren’t they supposed to follow guidelines. I’m not from Oklahoma so I don’t know much about their situation.

The mayor lifted all restrictions so the protesters could do what they wanted.
 
It's a nation-wide policy that the EMTs will never enter an area unless the police have given the "all clear." Thanks to liability laws that decades of lawsuits have helped shape, emergency responders are constantly hamstrung by this practice and it routinely leads to unnecessary deaths. When a mass shooting occurs, for example, how many times do you hear reports of there being two or more shooters only to find out that it's just one lone whack-job?

The police have to scour every single room for those non-existent shooters just in case it's a legitimate report, and then the EMTs are allowed in. 9 times out of 10, all that means is that police are going on a wild goose chase while people are bleeding out on the floor. I'd feel bad, but this is the situation that the Soundcloud Warlord has created. In a place that's complete chaos where they've robbed ambulances for supplies and have banned police from entering, yeah, the EMTs aren't allowed in anymore. You made it impossible for them to do their jobs.

There was a simple solution; take all of the armed retards out of there, clear everyone the fuck away with no exceptions, and let the police secure the area and the route in. The EMTs could have done their job and saved this person's life, but No Lives Matter, not when they can be used to serve a political purpose. This person didn't have to die, but no one knows how anything works anymore, and their ignorance caused the death of their "friend."
I had CPR training from a retired EMT. He told us a story about how he got a call that there was a heart attack and he and the crew rolled out to deal with it. When he got there and entered the home to deal with the heart attack, another person in the house tried to rob him assuming he had the good drugs to steal (they didn't even carry narcotics in the ambulance due to previous issues like this). He had to smack the guy over the head with the oxygen canister he was carrying to avoid getting punched. Then had to have others do first aid on that asshole while he dealt with the guy with a heart attack.

After that, that neighborhood joined the list of "do not enter residences without police cover".
 
The black family was nuclear until the Great Society punished the family if the man married and stayed with their kids.
White feminists instilling the " I donts needs a man" and "niggas ain't shit" attitude among their women along with scandalous black churches and pastors pimping their communities also plays a role.
 
"get rid of your family if they think differently from you, you know i'm right [obnoxious emojis]"
"abloobloobloo i'm gonna mute this because i can't handle people calling me a cunt"

Someone said it earlier in this thread, I believe, but these kiddos are gonna be in for a rude awakening when their parents kick the bucket and they find they've been written out of the will. Hell, if they end up needing familial support in any way, they'll find out what happens when you burn bridges so thoroughly. In their self-righteous anger, they won't even think about the fact that disowning your family goes both ways.
 
"get rid of your family if they think differently from you, you know i'm right [obnoxious emojis]"
"abloobloobloo i'm gonna mute this because i can't handle people calling me a cunt"

Someone said it earlier in this thread, I believe, but these kiddos are gonna be in for a rude awakening when their parents kick the bucket and they find they've been written out of the will. Hell, if they end up needing familial support in any way, they'll find out what happens when you burn bridges so thoroughly. In their self-righteous anger, they won't even think about the fact that disowning your family goes both ways.
It's one of those "I hate you dad!" forms of rebellion, except more self-righteous and less meaningful.

I think the issue is that they think they can equate online relationships with familial ones.

In some cases, yes (i.e. if you have an awful family and heavenly best friends)- but in most cases, friends are only obliged to help you so much.
 
It's a nation-wide policy that the EMTs will never enter an area unless the police have given the "all clear." Thanks to liability laws that decades of lawsuits have helped shape, emergency responders are constantly hamstrung by this practice and it routinely leads to unnecessary deaths. When a mass shooting occurs, for example, how many times do you hear reports of there being two or more shooters only to find out that it's just one lone whack-job?
Some municipalities have caught on to this problem and started cross training a few EMTs with their SWAT teams. They aren't there to shoot bad guys or rescue casualties, just get any gunshot victims stable enough for the all clear to come down.

This is also why everyone needs a trauma kit (tourniquet, pressure dressing, and hemostatic gauze) and enough training or knowledge to keep from bleeding out.
 
'Autonomous' is literally in your name. It is CHAZ, not CHOP. CHOP is not a place. Chop is a character in GTA V, which CHAZ is resembling more and more everyday.

Also, why are warlords criticizing people for being insensitive? Is he saying that he is sensitive? Show me a sensitive warlord and I'll show you a warlord who's about to get overthrown.
View attachment 1394251
It's CHAZ when they have the big dick energy flowing through their veins to own the Orange Man.

It's CHOP when something goes bad so they can just claim "We're a protest. The authorities are supposed to be handling things."
The re branding to CHOP from CHAZ is a pathetic attempt to shift the blame by saying "We aren't really autonomous, so we STILL demand public services help us out, even as we stone them on the way in and out, because, well, it's a protest zone, what'd they EXPECT?!"
So city-journal had a really good podcast with a seattle journalist on this very topic. Thankfully they have a transcript that I can just paste below because you are seriously going to crack a rib from laughing at the truth of CHOP because it's even dumber than you supposed.

Brian Anderson: Really remarkable. What's behind this battle over renaming the area or conflict over, what's the difference between CHAZ and CHOP?​
Chris Rufo: Well, the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, CHAZ, implies that the protestors must take responsibility for governance and leadership of the area. If they want it to be an autonomous zone, they have to govern it under the conditions of an autonomous zone. And as we saw through the various people's assemblies and meetings, they were really unable to arrive at a consensus, unable to arrive at a structure of legitimate leadership. And instead of trying to go down that road and bridge the divide between the various factions, they really said, "We don't want to take responsibility for this area. We don't want to have the burden of governance. We want this to be a Capitol Hill organized protest."​
Which basically is a posture of a terminal opposition because they're much more comfortable opposing rather than governing. And the kind of unimodal pia of CHOP is absolutely deliberate. You've seen a video of the protesters celebrating the French revolutionary spirit of CHOP and then-​
Brian Anderson: Referring to the [crosstalk]​
Chris Rufo: ... making the motion with their hands of the guillotine falling down on their opponents.​
 
I'll say this for Trump. He actually loves his country. That's apparent from the way he's handled things so far; his repeated attempts to build political bridges (usually rejected) and the simple fact that he's putting himself through this at all. Some claim he does it for his ego or for wealth. But I doubt he's going to make money out of this and nobody who is driven by a need for adulation would voluntarily go through what Trump chooses to go through by taking on the media and the Deep State's lackeys. Honestly, the only explanation for Trump doing all of this is that he sees what's happening in America and is doing his best to fix it.
Interesting take on it. I certainly agree with you that he is not in it for money, but objectively I cannot overlook that there is some degree of egocentrism that motivates him.

To get a feel for this, I try to look at his life before he came into politics. Or at least before 2015. He was always about his image, in business, entertainment, and on twitter. No matter what you think of the guy, you have to admit that before 2015, he did a really phenomenal job of garnering respect and fame from liberals and conservatives alike.

The Apprentice in itself was constructed to give him the appearance of a master facilitator, and the show in itself could be interpreted as a wildly successful advertisement for all things Trump.

For a while, he hosted the "Celebrity Apprentice", where celebs that mock him today were salivating and kissing the ground he walked on. The media these days will neglect to tell you this, but there were MANY LGBT and civil rights charities which he donated to, on the behalf of the winners of each challenge. Why? Because it was excellent PR and got him in the good graces of those who also stood in the limelight.

He promoted his own children to positions of authority in this show, showcasing their abilities and in a way passing on his success to them - all the while still remaining as the clear patriarchal figure within the family.

I think the biggest dig on him pre-politics was that he cut a few shifty deals, which absolved him of paying taxes for a period of many years after construction was completed.

But ultimately he was a star at PR. There was a long period of time that cmthe iconic Central Park ice skating rink was closed, with a constantly shifting date for completion. He stepped in, perhaps to make the politicians at the time look foolish, and facilitated the process so that it was expedited to completion within a year.

So what I am saying, is that I feel with Trump there is always the ego factor, and one would have to have blinders on to assume he does what he does, simply for the love of his country. I think the nepotism he has displayed in both the Apprentice and his presidency, to some degree, shows that among his highest values is his family.

I don't think he has that same passion for the rest of the American people, and I don't think that is abnormal. In fact, the past four years must have seemed sobering, to see that a grand chunk of this population is beyond fucking re.tarded.

However, that is not to say I am disagreeing with your statement completely. I think there is this unbridled need from Trump to want to be admired. Whether this does stir genuine feelings of love toward the populace is really unknown, but I think we can soundly say that he really seeks to please people. Or perhaps that is the wrong word for it. Maybe it is a need to cement his legacy as a good President. Maybe it is to acquire the adoration he had before ththe media completely villainized him.

I don't necessarily wish to go through his policies and decisions, because I think that a lot of them were made on the dime, in an effort to impress the last person who spoke to him.

I think a lot if his opinions are based on those around him, which could also explain his penchant for firing people on his staff. He will keep someone on if they guide him in the right direction. It comes down to if at least half of the population believes he is steering the country in the direct course, which coincidentally is the size of his base.

It is about whether his moves (built on the foundations of the conversations with advisors, of whom he aspires to please on a personal level) , make him receive praise or criticism from this base, and if it is not reflected upon him in a good light, he will be able to shift blame onto that person who led him wrong. It is a simple formula, but in these polarizing times, it is quite effective. Especially considering that with the two parties at each others throats, a lot more people are willing to take his words at face value, and shift the blame to the newly fired staff member.

I think this method runs people the wrong way. In a society and government that is overflowing with corruption, having to constantly shift who you bribe and scheme with to get leaks, is probably frustrating. Some people will be players in the game, and once they are found out, he really has no problem with moving onto the next person to fill that seat.

So, for those who want a TL;DR, I think that Trump is motivated by ego on three levels. To please those in his personal circle (friends, family), to be seen as an equal by those in politics (staff, fellow Republicans), and finally to secure the admiration from his base, which he had become accustomed to.

I think that if he genuinely does love America, then it is a product of his underlying goal, to be seen as a good president. He doesn't to go down as the "worst president ever", which is why the media so eagerly pushes this button. They know full well that this is something he is concerned with.

We can see his efforts on paper - with the economic dip only being temporary, with the effort he put into negotiating with North Korea, and even the launching of the "Space Force". He wants his name to be in the future textbooks that talk of the Space Force's accomplishments. He wants to not be forgotten. If he has to piss off half the population, he is fine with it so long as the other half is in awe.

After a certain point, you are so rich and famous that you want something that is genuinely immaterial. Something as simple, yet valuable, as adoration.

If you have stuck around until the end of this post, I want to add that I am not necessarily against Trump, as I feel there are some things he has handled quite well, and others he has neglected. I just try to see the situation objectively, without political prejudices, and take his actions pre-2015 (aka pre-media circus), and see what he did without being labelled as a supporter of one side or another
 
Back