Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

So since Boxershorts hasn't responded in quite some time, I think now would be a good time to post my conversation with him. He started private messaging me after he couldn't respond to my post; mods threadbanned him from Null's "I'm getting too old for this shit".
Here's the entire thing, just for archival sake, and because I want to share his responses to the public.
Please make fun of me for this, I actually regret ever stooping down this low to having a debate with Boxershorts in the most reddit way possible.
It's cute that you kept trying to reason with him and persuade him to go somewhere else and try again with better tactics. :optimistic:

You should really have known better, we tried that ITT; both derisively and constructively, with equally disappointing results. That lad is brain-fried and in the unlikely event that he ever does "go IRL" with his platform, he'll either get lynched or met with a hail of tomatoes/eggs.

All joking aside, he's either mentally deficient or badly traumatised and his delusions of adequacy won't allow him to admit any kind of flaw in his reasoning. You were literally wasting your time with him, tbh. Ridicule him or ignore him, those are the only viable options for interaction.
 
It's cute that you kept trying to reason with him and persuade him to go somewhere else and try again with better tactics. :optimistic:

You should really have known better, we tried that ITT; both derisively and constructively, with equally disappointing results. That lad is brain-fried and in the unlikely event that he ever does "go IRL" with his platform, he'll either get lynched or met with a hail of tomatoes/eggs.
You're absolutely right, dude's not gonna listen to reason at all so it was ultimately pointless. Although it was interesting to see what the absolute best he could come up with when he was talking to someone 1 on 1, trying to apply is "tactics" in convincing them.
 
You're absolutely right, dude's not gonna listen to reason at all so it was ultimately pointless. Although it was interesting to see what the absolute best he could come up with when he was talking to someone 1 on 1, trying to apply is "tactics" in convincing them.
I'd legit feel bad for him, if not for the fact that everything he espouses is so fucking repugnant.
 
So since Boxershorts hasn't responded in quite some time, I think now would be a good time to post my conversation with him. He started private messaging me after he couldn't respond to my post; mods threadbanned him from Null's "I'm getting too old for this shit".
Here's the entire thing, just for archival sake, and because I want to share his responses to the public.
Please make fun of me for this, I actually regret ever stooping down this low to having a debate with Boxershorts in the most reddit way possible.

He has a hard-on for the past, and how things operated back then. If we ignore BoxerShorts47 being Filipino, and graciously envision him as white, he still sabotages himself. Why?

He owns no land or property, thus had no right to speak or partake in politics. Yet this guy seems to be okay with THAT rule changing, which makes him an extremist. He is, both, a radical and a hypocrite - titles he hatefully sperges about.
 
Wow, I never expected him to justify pedophilia. But then again, this thread is 200 pages long.
Yup, 200+ pages of people shitting directly in his mouth and at no point did he even approach enough self-awareness to think "Maybe I should look at my talking points from a more objective viewpoint".
Just plowed onwards, regardless...
 
So since Boxershorts hasn't responded in quite some time, I think now would be a good time to post my conversation with him.

My takeout from this is that Boxy should start his own forum, with blackjack and hookers.

The pitfall of every political extremist: "If you don't agree with all of my points and all of my solutions completely, you are on the other side"

Ah ... the whole "pick a lane and stay in it" bullshit. Possibly the laziest and most exceptional argument ever devised. The easiest way to shoot down this argument is to question which line of action to take in the event that one is driving on a highway and the lane they're currently in is closed due to roadworks.
 
Well, at least we still have BoxerBot. Who might actually be superior to the original in every conceivable way.
boxerbot.JPG
 
All joking aside, he's either mentally deficient or badly traumatised and his delusions of adequacy won't allow him to admit any kind of flaw in his reasoning. You were literally wasting your time with him, tbh. Ridicule him or ignore him, those are the only viable options for interaction.
I think there's little doubt this guy legitimately has autism, and not in the standard internet insult way.

Looks like he's finally buggered off from his thread for good. Is he still lurking quietly in the Kiwifarms bushes?
 
I think there's little doubt this guy legitimately has autism, and not in the standard internet insult way.

Looks like he's finally buggered off from his thread for good. Is he still lurking quietly in the Kiwifarms bushes?
Last active about 2 hours ago, looks like. Either he'll learn to post like a non-sperg :optimistic: or he'll keep getting threadbanned and end up back in this thread.
 
It's like some weird version of horseshoe theory. Feminist misery porn that's based on extreme strawmen of their political enemies and their faulty understanding of history is what this guy unironically wants.
Actually the original novel had Pakistan and the Taliban in mind however apparently they're the good guys now so it's about the presumed beliefs of the people that stopped those regimes.
 
Back