U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
time for the daily dose of doublethink, featuring everyone's favorite crossover guest, Corona-chan!

View attachment 1403459

Oh dear, these spikes seem to be coming after certain mass gathering events

View attachment 1403461

Waitasec, aren't those the counties in Cali with the biggest protests...

View attachment 1403460

Never fear, CNN is here to tell you that your brain doesn't work right, like fucking clockwork :story:
Do journos genuinely think we're this gullible? Or are they just feeding their readers talking points?
 
I've wondered that myself. You can say some pretty spicy shit as long as you don't start calling people niggers but that seems like the entire point for them.
to be fair, how do you expect everyday people respond to "kill all whites" graffitied on the plinth of a statue of a founding father that has just been destroyed by a mob? Exactly what "spicy shit" can you get away with because refusing to take a knee in prostration to black people and BLM is a fireable offense at fortune 500 companies?

I'd say a heated gamer moment is a pretty understandable response, but that's actually a vast minority of people amplified by the media and a further majority of that minority always settles back into egalitarianism 5 min after venting
 
Last edited:
The media would have to go back to fact based journalism.
When was that?
Yellow Journalism caused the Spanish-American War
General Sherman also has been quoted as saying
"The American press is a shame and a reproach to a civilized people. When a man is too lazy to work and too cowardly to steal, he becomes an editor and manufactures public opinion."

He also reportly viewed reporters as spies for the Confederacy
 
And because of BLM support for Martin, Brown, Floyd, Brooks, et al, I can't help but think "what did this person do to get them selves killed for their own actions"

It's a sad story, but when the police came to investigate him after someone said he looked suspicious (I mean wearing a ski mask late at night in August is strange. He was also flailing his arms around "dancing" because sperg.) When they tried to talk to him a bit he freaked out and did basically sovereign citizen sort of stuff where he said they had no right to talk to him or stop him and he was leaving. They tried to hold his arm, and because he was "introverted" or autistic, he jerked away.

Basically acted autistic and uncooperative around the cops for no reason, since he'd done nothing wrong. He probably had a bad reaction to the sedatives, since he didn't die from the cops he died sometime later at the hospital.

I mean, I'm autistic as hell and hate being touched, but if a cop grabbed me, I'd still realize I need to cooperate with the person with the license to kill. You pick your battles.

This is the exact situation that comes from blacks training their young to resist authority and that the cops will kill him. They basically made it happen. I had white friends get the police called on them for walking at night. If they decided to go fight the cops instead of talking to them, I think it wouldn't have gone much better except for the traquilizer allergy.
 
Last edited:
It's a sad story, but when the police came to investigate him after someone said he looked suspicious (I mean wearing a ski mask late at night in August is strange. He was also flailing his arms around "dancing" because sperg.) When they tried to talk to him a bit he freaked out and did basically sovereign citizen sort of stuff where he said they had no right to talk to him or stop him and he was leaving. They tried to hold his arm, and because he was "introverted" or autistic, he jerked away.

Basically acted autistic and uncooperative around the cops for no reason, since he'd done nothing wrong. He probably had a bad reaction to the sedatives, since he didn't die from the cops he died sometime later at the hospital.

I mean, I'm autistic as hell and hate being touched, but if a cop grabbed me, I'd still realize I need to cooperate with the person with the license to kill. You pick your battles.
The reason why I am skeptical is that
Martin: "We was a good boy who didn't attack Zimmerman and just had candy" -> Zimmerman has injuries indicating that Martin attacked him, shoved him to the ground (and IIRC) was bashing his head in the side walk

Brown: "Hands up don't shoot" other then lying witnesses means attacking a police officer who was inside a police car.

Floyd: "The police chocked him to death" - > ME states that he had no injuries showing that, and that he died from a heart attack and being high off drugs

Brooks: "He sleeping in his car and then was shot in the back" -> he was pass out drunk driving a car, fraught off two police officers who were nice to him when they tried to arrest him, went for the officers duty belt stole a taser was running form police and turned around to aim and shoot the taser as he was running.

Granted all these deaths in some way are tragic (as all death is), but these people consciously made bad decides that directly resulted in their deaths. These are the types of people BLM defend, and although yes the scummiest of the scummy have rights that should be protected for the good of all society, you can't claim officer brutality when the officers (and one civilian) were not the ones to kill him or acted in text book justified self defense.

If This guy was acting the way reported I don't blame the officers for trying to get him to stay still (people doing quick random movements can be the death of officers, Ive seen many bodycam and carcam footage showing that), and if he died in the hospital from a recation to a drug that is not the officers fault either.
 
And because of BLM support for Martin, Brown, Floyd, Brooks, et al, I can't help but think "what did this person do to get them selves killed for their own actions"
I said it once, I'll say it again.

They took two legitimate cases of police brutality (Floyd, Taylor) and sensationalized it to nothing with these falsified stories where the "victim" was in the wrong.

It's approaching to the level of being desensitized. I doubt they even CARE about the victims.
 
When was that?
Yellow Journalism caused the Spanish-American War
General Sherman also has been quoted as saying
"The American press is a shame and a reproach to a civilized people. When a man is too lazy to work and too cowardly to steal, he becomes an editor and manufactures public opinion."

He also reportly viewed reporters as spies for the Confederacy

The moment I knew without a doubt that journalists are lying sociopaths is that month or so back in 2017 when I actually paid money to subscribe to WaPo just to shitpost in the comments.

They personally despise people like me because they know their lies and gaslighting don't work on me and people like myself. They cannot stand being disobeyed.
 
The reason why I am skeptical is that
Martin: "We was a good boy who didn't attack Zimmerman and just had candy" -> Zimmerman has injuries indicating that Martin attacked him, shoved him to the ground (and IIRC) was bashing his head in the side walk

Brown: "Hands up don't shoot" other then lying witnesses means attacking a police officer who was inside a police car.

Floyd: "The police chocked him to death" - > ME states that he had no injuries showing that, and that he died from a heart attack and being high off drugs

Brooks: "He sleeping in his car and then was shot in the back" -> he was pass out drunk driving a car, fraught off two police officers who were nice to him when they tried to arrest him, went for the officers duty belt stole a taser was running form police and turned around to aim and shoot the taser as he was running.

Granted all these deaths in some way are tragic (as all death is), but these people consciously made bad decides that directly resulted in their deaths. These are the types of people BLM defend, and although yes the scummiest of the scummy have rights that should be protected for the good of all society, you can't claim officer brutality when the officers (and one civilian) were not the ones to kill him or acted in text book justified self defense.

If This guy was acting the way reported I don't blame the officers for trying to get him to stay still (people doing quick random movements can be the death of officers, Ive seen many bodycam and carcam footage showing that), and if he died in the hospital from a recation to a drug that is not the officers fault either.
I think its sad that if the men weren't arrested or apprehended at all, and actually successfully got away and even killed the police, no one would blink or care about them at all. Even BLM only cares for blacks who are no longer alive, not alive blacks.
 
I said it once, I'll say it again.

They took two legitimate cases of police brutality (Floyd, Taylor) and sensationalized it to nothing with these falsified stories where the "victim" was in the wrong.

It's approaching to the level of being desensitized. I doubt they even CARE about the victims.
The issue with BLM is even if they take legitimate cases (Floyd is iffy based on info I have seen, Taylor I won't comment on as outside of the media narrative I haven't heard or seen anything on), they take (way) more non legitimate cases which harms their entire stance. Its the Boy who cried wolf or chicken little. They scream and scream and scream at best, riot at worse which also hurts any legitimacy they may have.
 
I said it once, I'll say it again.

They took two legitimate cases of police brutality (Floyd, Taylor) and sensationalized it to nothing with these falsified stories where the "victim" was in the wrong.

It's approaching to the level of being desensitized. I doubt they even CARE about the victims.
They might as well rename themselves Black MARTYRS Matter
 
Why is it so difficult for Whites to stand up and demand, "Stop the anti White violence and racism?" No mention of "Niggers or Hitler" is necessary.
Whoa ho ho, slow your roll there Herr Goebbels. "Anti-racist means anti-white" is an old white supremacist meme. You're dog whistling when you write or say the phrase "anti-white". You have to look at context, like with "all lives matter" or "it's okay to be white". Those are things that Nazis say to other Nazis to signal how Nazi they are... but we're onto them! Ignorance is no excuse.

Related: I came across an article about the word "racism" in the Atlantic today.

https://www.theatlantic. com/ideas/archive/2020/06/dictionary-definition-racism-has-change/613324/ [breaking the link just because]

The author notes that the way that the word is used doesn't match the dictionary definition, but instead of concluding that Twitter is fucking retarded, he reasons that the definition of "racism" should be updated instead. It is all very tedious and not really worth skimming, but he did make this interesting observation:

some spear chucker I dunno said:
This is why, more and more, white supremacy is easing out racism. It was only a matter of time, and dictionaries should be on notice.

It's true: white supremacy (the term) is trending upward, so there can be no mistake that we're not talking about prejudice in a general sense, we're after one specific group of people. How do you phrase your argument then? Anti-racist is becoming more popular as well. You're not anti-anti-white supremacy or anti-anti-racism, are you? Perhaps anti-white supremacist will eventually be shortened to anti-white for convenience; probably saying "I toldja so" at that point won't help anything.
 
I guess the issue is the weird mix Bernie has when it comes to supporters, but then again Trump is the same in terms of me being unable to get a good read.
It is a weird situation you have alt-right types who will vote for Trump despite calling him Zion Don and likewise you have communists that vote for the bern despite calling him a cuck for not wanting full revolution now. They really are alike in some weird ways.
I think this can be for two reasons other than some big conspiracy of them working together.
1) is that Bernie is not very Attack oriented. He tries to play friend with everyone so much that it hurts his chances with the DemocRats. Tulsi was very attack oriented in the debates, really driving home injustices carried out by her opponents. She seems to get off on making them have to face their previous actions. She is also effective as Harris was said to have dropped due to her, and Pete was nearly killed from my point of view. He was lucky to have been able to escape that confrontation with a random outlandish statement.
Bernie seems to go more off on what he wants to do rather than really attacking a person. While I can see your point, I believe there is also room to say that he is just kind of a nice guy, maybe too nice, and really lacks many Attack strategies that do not involve policy.
I mean he's attack oriented when it's an acceptable target:
Trump: Yes
Repubs: Yes
Random white people who don't know what it's like to be poor: Yes

Hillary: No
Biden: No
Dems: No
whipping boy.png

https://archive.ph/FY3dW
I mean I'm not the only one left scratching my head as to why Bernie can't bring himself to level criticism at his own side. The guy is clearly capable of being a total asshole so why does it always go one way?

Also please tell me you didn't fall for the "Kind Granpa Bernie" schtick. You know that's a media work right? That's why we got garbage like this:

D'awwww. He's wif his widdle grandson. He's not an unrelatable loon just look at this HEARTWARMING video. My god my eyes are going to roll outta my head. This was all in reaction BTW to the story that kept coming up about bernie being a deadbeat dad that would rather organise protests than keep the lights on and the fridge full for his young son.

Yeah what a nice guy....
 
Yeah, it seems like he just has a Chris-chan esque freakout with the cops. Even his last words are a rambling mess. I am being serious about the "seems autistic" thing. Chris-chan never fought an actual police officer, right? Just like, mall security, but this was basically what the outcome would have been.

I really wouldn't be surprised if he committed no crime besides resisting the police, but then it went to the point where that was in itself, a crime.

The turning off of cameras is suspicious, but he really needed to rein in his impulses in a dangerous situation.

Have any sovereign citizens gotten themselves killed for refusing police orders and then fighting? I mean, I don't think people care enough to remember their names, people mostly just laugh at them when they suffer rather than deify them.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
time for the daily dose of doublethink, featuring everyone's favorite crossover guest, Corona-chan!

View attachment 1403459

Oh dear, these spikes seem to be coming after certain mass gathering events

View attachment 1403461

Waitasec, aren't those the counties in Cali with the biggest protests...

View attachment 1403460

Never fear, CNN is here to tell you that your brain doesn't work right, like fucking clockwork :story:

Nature's on our side. :)
 
"Around blacks, never relax."

Some Aesops remain evergreen.

One winter a Farmer found a Snake stiff and frozen with cold. He had compassion on it, and taking it up, placed it in his bosom. The Snake was quickly revived by the warmth, and resuming its natural instincts, bit its benefactor, inflicting on him a mortal wound. “Oh,” cried the Farmer with his last breath, “I am rightly served for pitying a scoundrel.”

Moral


0031mansnake.jpg
Point taken, but most truly generous, good-hearted people also aren't imprudent dipshits who take hostile venomous reptiles into their homes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back