Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Disagree, Trump is a very polarizing figure
And I disagree with you. Trump is not a uniting figure, but he's not a polarizing figure either. What Trump does so well, maybe too well, is clarify divisions.

Whether you're on the left or the right, Trump has been instrumental in finding out who is actually on your team and who you merely think is on your team.

I can't tell you how many people I've heard say they now regret supporting Romney or Rubio. Without Trump, they would never have found out how worthless they are. I used to like Fiorina. Not gonna lie, it's kinda embarrassing to say that. She just endorsed Biden a few days ago. But now I know and I likely wouldn't have but for Trump.

The same goes for the left. A lot of people thought Elizabeth Warren was a true progressive. But her snakelike behavior to try to get that VP spot kinda exposed her. She'll do anything to get that, knowing if Biden wins she'd eventually become President. Without Trump, progressives would still think of her as Bernie in a skirt (or headdress).
 
Explain me the policies that Trump Republicans have versus Establishment Republicans have.

Are the Democrats NOW Establishment or Trump Democrats?
A Trump republican cares more about the well being of US citizens than whether an immigrant comes into the country.

A Trump Republican cares more about avoiding a pointless loss of life from a foreign conflict over whether we spread 'freedom' in the Middle East or wherever else.

A Trump Republican wants reciprocal trade deals rather than any trade deal that benefits mega corporations making loads more money.

And most Democrats are corporate bootlickers so 99% of them can be considered establishment. The average Democrat would view a a poor person not feeling they should have to compete with third world workers in sweatshops as just not having a good enough work ethic in comparison those third worlders, a Trump Democrat (if there even is such a thing) would be concerned how much a soulless piece of shit they'd come across if they supported such a thing.
 
All in the space of roughly one day:
7F1C4361-CDF8-4B45-A737-8A44AA1F791B.jpeg8FB5AB1B-38B7-4746-8079-72C4823182D0.jpeg593B3C25-58D0-497A-BE70-05A143F82259.jpegA916800E-0E9E-465F-9F59-CD40C0BD7AEE.jpegDD4E6DF1-A96C-40A9-AF58-9278EA852437.jpeg483AA620-3F33-4E4E-A106-563CCA2962FC.jpeg4964989C-94CD-4CC7-95AF-A7B819E65A23.jpeg05E11AA1-77C5-42BB-BDE7-ADB0F36A49AE.jpeg
 
There we go; some funny.

The saddest strawman picture yet, and a keen example of Biden's staffers writing lines for him via an extensive method of studying Trump's own words and proving he's just a puppet who is terrified of being put out there to show his failing mind.
 
I think it comes from their unshakeable sense of moral superiority. If you think about it, almost everything in their left/right worldview can be summed as the left is morally good, therefore their positions are always based on charity. The right then must be the opposite: morally bad and their positions are based on evil.

The left wants Medicare for All because they are good people and want everyone to have access to treatment. Since the right doesn't want Medicare for All, the only conclusion they can draw is they don't want everyone to have access to treatment so all the poor brown and black people die. That's seriously what libtard regressives believe. The idea that it is possible to opposing it on practical grounds never even crosses their minds.
In Racist Screed, NYT's 1619 Project Founder Calls 'White Race' 'Barbaric Devils,' 'No Different Than Hitler'
 
Back