- Joined
- May 17, 2019
All these weird fags running around are ruining gay sex.
Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon
- Thread starter Hat
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2020
lol the reason people dont want to date transgenders is because not many quantify being transgender as a desirable trait for a partner. its not transphobic its just personal preference.
as for language using disability's like deaf and blind: who the fuck cares? no one gets offended by that. but the reason for using those terms that way is that its easier to understand what a term means metaphorically if it also has a literal definition. at least that is my interpretation of how our language developed back in the day. im not a linguist or anything.
as for language using disability's like deaf and blind: who the fuck cares? no one gets offended by that. but the reason for using those terms that way is that its easier to understand what a term means metaphorically if it also has a literal definition. at least that is my interpretation of how our language developed back in the day. im not a linguist or anything.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
All information has some value. In this case you could tell people that if they transition they'll be undateable, and it also suggests that the LGBT movement isn't as lock-step as they would like you to think. It would also imply some interesting yet obvious things - bisexual people being willing to date people who identify as a different gender than they where born with makes sense as they'd be attracted to the masculine/feminine traits of the tranny despite their identifying as the opposite gender. Really it implies that there are only a tiny fraction of "true believers" who actually see transexuals as the gender they identify with enough to treat them like a normal member of that gender, even among the crowd where you would expect such beliefs to be more prevalent. This includes people who don't have excuses like wanting children, since the gay/lesbian wouldn't be able to reproduce anyway.
You could read it as "trannies are oppressed!", but in reality it reads more like "Everyone is just giving them lipservice." The full article suggests this even more with Lesbians having a higher value for dating transmen than transwomen, and a large portion of the heterosexual "yes's" actually put down that they'd date both a transman or transwoman. Its obviously written as a "woe is me nobody wants to sleep with trannies!" piece throwing off the data a bit, but the conclusion is a pretty clear that only a small portion of people see them as legitimate even in the LGB part of LGBT. There where only a handful of trannies involved, but even they had responses that suggest they don't really believe it (one transmen stated that he would date other transmen and not transwoman but identified as heterosexual).
Here is the study if you want to check it out.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
My sympathies to anyone going into a gay bathhouse just wanting some dick and anal sex and having to deal with a bunch of faggots.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
Especially when he's just making it obvious that neither he nor the person who actually made the comic has any idea how white women are currently or have historically been treated in society. They forget - or willfully ignore - the way women, including white women, have been oppressed throughout history. Those white women they claim are defined by being "good" "innocent" and "pure" and whatever nonsense were literally considered to be the property of white men (like Labelle!), and in the time period they're specifying, their husbands could rape them with impunity, in many cases even kill them with impunity. Those white women were only afforded the "privilege" (in quotes because that sort of treatment is more fetishistic than privileging) of being seen that way if they adhered to the very specific gender roles expected of them, which included (but were not limited to) being the property of a man, letting him rape you whenever he felt like it, bearing as many children as he wanted even if it literally killed you, In many ways, women are still held to these same standards, including white women (how many rapes go unreported and unpunished? How many murders of women?). Pretending that white women historically were protected, especially by the white men who directly oppressed them and treated them as property and sex objects and continue to do so to this day, is beyond ignorant.
(This is NOT to say that white women have never used their privilege as white people to abuse and harm people of color. Obviously. But terms like "Karen" are literally intended to silence white women in particular, using the language of racial justice to cover up their misogyny, and keep them adhering to those gender roles - don't speak out, don't raise your voice, take what you're given, be soft and feminine and sweet at all times or else you're a "Karen" and people can enact violence against you freely.)
This really reminds me of these heinous tweets I saw ordering white women to "put themselves between POC and the police" in protests, when it is fairly well-known that white women (like all women) are regularly abused and even raped by cops.
Where's your boyfriend?
View attachment 1414081
Are Trans People Excluded from the World of Dating?
New research explores the extent to which trans people are excluded from dating.www.psychologytoday.com
Why so much rants today? Is it Walautism Night?
This "data" is so intensely manipulative, especially the presentation. There's so much implicit shaming in the table that notes the percent of people whose "inclusion matched their sexual identity". And check the bit at the end where it says, essentially, "if you're REALLY mature and REALLY intelligent you fuck trans people!"
The trancel brigade continues on.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
You mean the totally real Finnish husband who is why LaBelle is totally really in Finland right now? Who he totally really hasn't completely stopped mentioning for months for totally really good reasons rather than that he didn't actually exist?
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2017
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
That first panel... does Labelle know that Pride usually takes place outdoors? Where they wouldn't have or need elevators? I think he thinks that Pride is like an anime convention or something, all happening in a shitty hotel.
But seriously, none of these things are problems with Pride. Maybe if you want to talk about the over-commercialization, or the way so many Prides have been taken over by troons to the point that actual gay and lesbian people have been pushed out of the events... but nah, let's focus on nonexistent problems instead.
(Seriously, I get having sensory overload issues, because I do, but just... don't go? Why go to a massive party with hundreds of people if you can't handle being around people and noise? Feels very basic to me. How would they even begin to limit the amount of noise rando people make? jfc.)
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2013
It's because Labelle doesn't get that there's a difference between being welcomed and being accommodated.
You could bend over backwards to check every box on Labelle's retarded you'd still be labeled "problematic" for not having signs written in a language only three living humans still speak because it's not about inclusion, it's about always being victimized and nothing you ever do will be good enough in the eyes of a professional victim.
Huge events with tons of people are always supposed to cater to the majority so there is a clear way to distribute time, money and manpower. No one would celebrate anything in groups larger than 20 if everything had to be detailed to cater to every single person's wants and needs.
I mean, if we want to get really petty though we could all just tell Sophie "Too straight" Labelle that pride isn't about making a "straight woman" happy or giving in to her demands, it's about celebrating the rights and freedoms of homosexuals. If that makes you uncomfortable, Labelle, maybe leave it to the gays and sit at home with your husband?
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2017
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2019
You know I agree with this latest comic clearly we shouldn't be wasting police time on these people and we should making the event as expensive and as unfun as possible and then whine about homophobia as attendance numbers start dropping
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They should broadly advertise there's going to be a place full of absolute degenerates without a cop anywhere in sight, to show how progressive they are. Absolutely nothing bad could possibly happen.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
It's already as expensive and as unfun as possible... or is that just my local one?
Just a bunch of grifting troons looking for sympathy donations and straight people selling shit.
Look at that last graph lol
Even though Het women were the least likely to fuck a trans person, they put het men last, totally not trying to be deceiving
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
I know people who run Pride locally, and it’s actual work they have to put in. Have you ever tried to host any kind of event? Now, take one as large as Pride where there needs to be food, a stage, lights, sound systems, people selling stuff, security, garbage clean-up, and loads of other shit that I don’t even know about. It’s fucking hard as is, and they don’t have the time or resources to cater to every crazy troon who complains about their autism flaring up.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2016
Cops in uniform being present is what made Gay Pride parades possible in the first place.
In the 1970s in NYC gay-hating junior Mafia types tried to break it up a few times, and hooray for the cops in uniform.
Is LaBelle trying to co-opt some sort BLM/Antifa vibe because it's in the news right now? Of course she is.
In the 1970s in NYC gay-hating junior Mafia types tried to break it up a few times, and hooray for the cops in uniform.
Is LaBelle trying to co-opt some sort BLM/Antifa vibe because it's in the news right now? Of course she is.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
Cops in uniform being present is what made Gay Pride parades possible in the first place.
In the 1970s in NYC gay-hating junior Mafia types tried to break it up a few times, and hooray for the cops in uniform.
Is LaBelle trying to co-opt some sort BLM/Antifa vibe because it's in the news right now? Of course she is.
I can't wait for Billy to obsessively complain about Kier Starmer slapping down BLM because they mouthed off about Israel on Twitter.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
Is LaBelle trying to co-opt some sort BLM/Antifa vibe because it's in the news right now? Of course she is.
The "no cops at Pride" sentiment has been around for a few years now, it's not new. The idea is that LGBT people suffer from police violence and abuse regularly, so cops in uniform have no place at Pride. The fact that there are LGBT cops, or that LGBT people are also vulnerable to the rest of homophobic society and thus might need police protection is apparently irrelevant.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
It's likely too complicated of a topic, outrage mobs like a clear simple message even if they don't understand the meaning, something that can be summed up in a few words like "Black Lives Matter", "Trans women are women", "The Coco Puff monkey is racist", etc.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2016
Up to around 1970 raiding gay bars, vice squad entrapment etc.
Not in the lifetime of any cop currently on the job.