- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
Google translate needs to hire you to write an english to autism program.
ContraPoints / William Nicholas Parrott / Natalie Wynn Parrott / Nykytyne2 - GamerGhazi Cannibalism Victim, Youtube "Intellectual"
- Thread starter Mariposa Electrique
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
"I am a tranny hall monitor who is STILL on Reddit, checkmate Nazis!"
HonestJohn2376
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
That's because women almost never do. It's a troon thing, mostly stemming from them being hentai addicted speds and furries. Contra doing it to fit in with his ilk.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Every day I thank my luck to have never had to work with a troon.
Probably because they don't work.
Probably because they don't work.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
That's classic Goth Dad, he accuses literally everyone on Reddit who disagrees with him of being a Natsee. I have posted about him before here on KF but in case you didn't read that, he's a life-long psychiatric patient, openly admitted he was institutionalized. He's a certified crazy person but Reddit are using him to effectively violate the privacy rights of their users in their place, because if Reddit themselves did what Goth Dad is currently doing for them - which is secretly datamining and politically profiling unsuspecting Reddit users behind their backs with no prior consent obtained - they would be legally liable under international law for violating the privacy of their users. So they use a crazy person like Goth Dad to violate the privacy of their users, because if Goth Dad with his psychiatric track-record ever gets arrested for this he can easily plead insanity and avoid jail. Unlike Reddit themselves who are knowingly and intentionally letting him get away with all this.
As for the claim that /r/GenderCritical was up to its nose in Natsees, Goth Dad knows that's total bullshit, but he knows that no one is going to challenge him to show his work (he can't, because he has no evidence and it's all made up baseless charges). I went to that site where you can generate associational network maps for subreddits and generated the network map for /r/GenderCritical. Most of their redditors simply came from other feminist and LGBT subreddits:
The claim that /r/GenderCritical was supposedly up to its nose in Natsees from far right subreddits is a blatant fucking lie.
That Wordpress blog is in no way representative for what was being posted on the subreddit. /r/NeovaginaDisasters was not by trannies for trannies. It was mostly TERFs and anti-gay neocons grossing one another out with screengrabbed pictures of and textual descriptions of botched bottom surgeries (mostly cropped from other trannie subreddits or social media), occasionally of top surgeries as well.
Later the TERFs opened up their subreddit to trannies themselves so that they could post their personal accounts about their botched surgeries. Trannies explained to the TERFs that they needed to go their subreddit to post their testimonials because all the other trans subreddits began banning transpeople who wanted to talk about botched surgeries, especially in the context of trans regret. The troon doctrine is that if your surgery is botched, you just get more surgery to fix all the issues caused by the previous surgery. According to the troon cult are not allowed to regret being trans "just" because you went through a botched surgery (that's how demanding and cruel these cultists are). I also remember reading that the mods of the trans subreddits were snitching trannies who spoke out about their botched surgeries to doctors who had made their clients sign a NDA (as these surgeons sometimes do to cover up their Frankensteinian results).
Goth Dad hated /r/NeovaginaDisasters because he's a pre-op trannie who believes that bottom surgery will magically cure all his mental issues. He hates anyone who insists otherwise and shows that bottom surgery isn't some magical cure for mental illness.
Lastly, I find it very telling that out of 2000+ subreddits getting banned, the only one that Nyk saw fit to mention was /r/GenderCritical. A lot of /r/ContraPoints early redditors actually came from /r/ChapoTrapHouse but Nyk apparently doesn't care that the subreddit that supplied him with most of his early troon fans and chasers is no more. Nyk's Tabby Minx the Trantifa character was based on the type of far left troons that frequented /r/ChapoTrapHouse.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
GenderCritical was exactly what it described itself as: gender critical feminists. I didn't like them but they were the furthest thing from Nazis.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
because narcissists are very good at hiding their true nature in the beginning. Once they’ve succeeded into getting you to be in a relationship with them, is when their mask of sanity comes off. It sucks that I got fooled twice, but now I know their tactics and behaviors, I know what to look out for.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
I won't lie, I hope Jeffree Star goes out with a bang by doxxing not just his make-up enemies but literally the whole of Youtube, including Nyk and the rest of trans Youtube. Left, right, centrist, apolitical, I bet he has a lot of juicy doxx on all of them LMAO. Remember that one time Nyk was trash-talking Jeffree and Shane on his Livestream back in 2018? Saying that they were "the gay aristocracy of Youtube"? Nyk never did that again. In fact, he recently said that he wanted to cover his whole body in tattoos "like Jeffree Star". Hmmm, I wonder why Nyk changed his tune on Jeffree... maybe Jeffree slipped into Nyk's DMs and had him listen to an audio file of someone in pain, just like he did with Blaire.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
In today's age any talk of a "feminine penis" is a good sign something is amiss.
Last edited:
HonestJohn2376
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
Our wannabe lawyer friend has another goof.
Super Hans
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
It wouldn't surprise me. The Far Left had gotten extremely intellectually lazy due to complete control of academia and mass media for more than a half century, so it makes sense that they'd think a functional mongoloid with no self control is some kind of paragon to emulate.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
LMAO, Buck Angel talks about the Opulence controversy here: "I got attacked for being on ContraPoints' video... I said just make sure you spell my name right."
Calculus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2018
Extremely late, but since videos are slow these days, I finally got around to watching Nick and Blaire’s debate.
Nick appeared to really be looking at things from a philosophy standpoint and not a science one. He seemed to have the opinion at one point that it was taking hormones that turned you into a woman. Knowing what we know now, this would agree with him having the “old” trans mentality that he was a man but is now a woman. It also makes sense that he didn’t want a psychological analysis before he started taking hormones because in his mind he was not a woman then. I’m curious what was the turning point to make him decide to take hormones.
Nick also really seemed to not understand vaginas and thought a neovag was the same somehow. Prior to watching the video I had assumed he would never actually get one but now I’m not so sure.
There was an interesting part at the end where Shoe said sorry for how she handled moderating and both Blaire and Nick seemed confused. Shoe’s apology was classic female socialisation of saying sorry too much and another woman would have said something like “no, no, you were great”. During the debate Blaire and Nick also spoke over each other a few times and didn’t stop until they were told by Shoe, which is not typical female behaviour either. It’s bizarre they both were arguing about living as something neither of them understood.
Nick appeared to really be looking at things from a philosophy standpoint and not a science one. He seemed to have the opinion at one point that it was taking hormones that turned you into a woman. Knowing what we know now, this would agree with him having the “old” trans mentality that he was a man but is now a woman. It also makes sense that he didn’t want a psychological analysis before he started taking hormones because in his mind he was not a woman then. I’m curious what was the turning point to make him decide to take hormones.
Nick also really seemed to not understand vaginas and thought a neovag was the same somehow. Prior to watching the video I had assumed he would never actually get one but now I’m not so sure.
There was an interesting part at the end where Shoe said sorry for how she handled moderating and both Blaire and Nick seemed confused. Shoe’s apology was classic female socialisation of saying sorry too much and another woman would have said something like “no, no, you were great”. During the debate Blaire and Nick also spoke over each other a few times and didn’t stop until they were told by Shoe, which is not typical female behaviour either. It’s bizarre they both were arguing about living as something neither of them understood.
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2019
If that debate (specifically the earlier parts) does anything, it shows Nyk’s naïveté on trans issues outside of more philosophical topics. It’s no surprise he hates the videos from this era. I want to say he’s become more knowledgeable, but looking at his current behavior I don’t think much has changed.
I also kind of feel bad for Blaire in that video. You can tell she just wants to give an honest, no bullshit response about her opinions. Blaire had to step around facts so that Nyk couldn’t whine about her being transphobic.
There’s a common dissonance in academia between scientific and philosophical perspectives. It’s obvious that Blaire takes a scientific stance, and Contra a more philosophical one(although pseudo-intellectual is a better term). That’s really what a lot of the debate boils down to. Nyk of course won’t admit this, and blames it on him looking like a pasty cosplayer. Sorry Nyk, but you’re still the same anime girl impersonator you were three years ago.
BigSt@nkD!ckDad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2020
Is this troon even still relevant? Seemed like he was a flash in the pan that fizzled out quickly when,
1) His "following" turned on him for disrespecting "non-binary" folk .
2) They realized that nobody was buying the astroturfed "a troon (literally fucking who) is "deradicalizing" angry young men from the evil right wing, " narrative .
There are very fine exceptional (retarded) individuals on both sides of the political spectrum but anybody openly trying to push a "deradicalization" agenda seems to be quickly panned by everybody.
1) His "following" turned on him for disrespecting "non-binary" folk .
2) They realized that nobody was buying the astroturfed "a troon (literally fucking who) is "deradicalizing" angry young men from the evil right wing, " narrative .
There are very fine exceptional (retarded) individuals on both sides of the political spectrum but anybody openly trying to push a "deradicalization" agenda seems to be quickly panned by everybody.
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2018
Nailed it 100% Yeah Contrapoints was so off-basedtrying to apply his philosophical stuff into the ideology and it was easy to highlight how nonsensical he was being. But the funny thing is that Blaire? His beliefs are just as nonsensical but in a different way and that only a certain kind of person would be able to zone in and lock onto. and I'm pretty sure that he knows this. I said this in his thread but if he actually went through with his debare with Magdalen Berns, Blaire would've easily looked like Contrapoints did in the debate because Magdalen would've mopped the floor with him using actual Science to disprove Blaire's ideology. I mean don't you find it funny how in all the debates Blaire has had, it's only been with other men? Just saying lol
And yeah, Shoe was completely out of her element being a moderator.
I find this "Philosophy versus Science" and "Facts versus Feelings" stuff that some retards like Sam Harris, Saphiro, Dawkins or you are trying to promote to be extremely stupid, especially considering how Philosophy is literally the mother of Science.
I'd like to know how your crowd of "Naïve Realists" (that's how we call you) would define "fact" without using some sort of empirist or rationalist talk, which are both philosophical perspectives on Reality by the way.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
If you've seen Blaire White going up against RedPillBlack - which I am sure you have, you've been on this forum that long - you should know that Blaire doesn't shy away from internet bloodsports. TERF Saint Magdalen is dead, so who would you have debate Blaire today? Or did the TERF movement lose its one good debater the day Saint Magdalen died? You know Blaire put out a call for TERFs to do a bloodsports type of live debate, I guess there weren't any takers because TERFs know that Blaire is not spineless coward like ContraPoints and will not cower in a corner when challenged. Also, does Blaire's video interview with a detransitioned F2M2F woman or the video interviews with the female victims of online predators not count as "Blaire having discussions with cis women" in your eyes? Or do those not count because you only want to see Blaire fare in an openly hostile or antagonistic context? What about Blaire's videos with Arielle Scarcella or the Livestream with Rose of Dawn and Arielle Scarcella? Is Arielle not a cis woman feminist in your eyes, or does she not count because she's a trans-friendly lesbian? (Look at how Storm Ryan, Kalvin Garrah and Miss London recently all threw Arielle under the bus, backstabbing her and saying she's a TERF. Blaire would never do that.)