Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Crunchy Leaf]

Exactly. They're projecting hard. Most terfs were supporters, until they peaked by being exposed to all the various ways that trannies are fucking crazy. I'd say that if troons "met their enemy" they'd also realize they're nothing like they paint them to be, they're just people who don't think men are women by saying so and vice versa. Then I remember they'll still want to "bash the fash" for stating a biological fact. They also don't realize how telling people to "just speak to a trans person" constantly backfires since most of them are not well adjusted to say the least.

Gay acceptance works because the general public knows gay people that are fine. Trans acceptance works because the general public knows very few troons. The more troons the worse it’ll get.

 

[Kirkorov]

Reddit has now banned the sub r/JoanneRowling, which was created 3 weeks ago, predating r/Gendercritical being banned. It was a forum created for Rowling fans who were banned from a main sub for wrong think.

But r/RapeKink is still up and doing fine.

 

[Vapewizard]

Most terfs were supporters, until they peaked by being exposed to all the various ways that trannies are fucking crazy.

That's what makes the "Actually listening to trans people" argument so hilarious. I used to be a total handmaiden myself until I saw a huge "Why won't lesbians date me but Bi women will?" incel manifesto on tumblr written by a troon called Plaidos. That post made me raise an eyebrow and eventually led me to reading the replies by radfem blogs and everything just clicked.

 

[DumbDude42]

Gay acceptance works because the general public knows gay people that are fine. Trans

no
gay acceptance works because it has ben forced down society's throat for half a century straight, to the point where disagreeing with it gets you unpersoned and your life destroyed forever
the situation is very similar to the troon menace we see today, it just happened slower

 

[remiem]

"I hope that with the shutdown of GC they'll be forced to meet their enemy, and realise we're nothing like they make us out to be". And they'll probably realise that troons are even worse than they initially thought.

I wonder if they realize that by shutting down these online meeting spaces and thus preventing themselves from being able to identify their terven enemies they actually make these born women who're sick of shit far more dangerous. When you silence people you radicalize them. History is rife with those who become more endeared to a cause when pushy assholes try to take away their ability to support it. Their victories on the internet are nothing at the end of the day. Women's suffrage happened before the internet so if they think by shutting down online communities they've had a victory they're dead wrong because instead of complaining about it on the internet now with that doing very little for their cause, the women who're truly angry will begin to meet in a offline context and their voices and anger will grow. The louder those voices grow the more followers they gain and troons do nothing to help themselves.

IMO. GC had problems. While I agree with some of their content any time I browsed a thread in there it'd often devolve into this thinly veiled women superior-men bad rhetoric that would turn me off from the subreddit. There's no way they're going to get more natal women on board with their cause when they're on the constant man hating train because a lot of the fence sitters or people who don't give a shit at this point are heterosexual women who don't want to hear someone talk about how because X man did a bad thing and was a typical male means all men who follow traditional male roles ( their husbands and boyfriends) are bad.

Both sides have problems. Troons are fucking nuts but GC and intense Radfems need to deal with their own movement problems or 'troons' will win because the average heterosexual woman, the silent majority, is not gonna ride or die for anti-man rhetoric.

 

[PBJ Sucks]

I wonder if they realize that by shutting down these online meeting spaces and thus preventing themselves from being able to identify their terven enemies they actually make these born women who're sick of shit far more dangerous. When you silence people you radicalize them. History is rife with those who become more endeared to a cause when pushy assholes try to take away their ability to support it. Their victories on the internet are nothing at the end of the day. Women's suffrage happened before the internet so if they think by shutting down online communities they've had a victory they're dead wrong because instead of complaining about it on the internet now with that doing very little for their cause, the women who're truly angry will begin to meet in a offline context and their voices and anger will grow. The louder those voices grow the more followers they gain and troons do nothing to help themselves.

IMO. GC had problems. While I agree with some of their content any time I browsed a thread in there it'd often devolve into this thinly veiled women superior-men bad rhetoric that would turn me off from the subreddit. There's no way they're going to get more natal women on board with their cause when they're on the constant man hating train because a lot of the fence sitters or people who don't give a shit at this point are heterosexual women who don't want to hear someone talk about how because X man did a bad thing and was a typical male means all men who follow traditional male roles ( their husbands and boyfriends) are bad.

Both sides have problems. Troons are fucking nuts but GC and intense Radfems need to deal with their own movement problems or 'troons' will win because the average heterosexual woman, the silent majority, is not gonna ride or die for anti-man rhetoric.

Now that I think about it, they may have done transphobes a favor, because I got turned off the gc group pretty fast by all the man hating bs. They had plenty of good conversation too but that was just too much. So that particular group isn't there to look like morons anymore. I don't want to be a terf if that's who they are, so I am content to be a transphobe.

 

[JoJo's Bizarre Abortion]

J.K's Twitter has become a magnet for the worst and most degenerate members of Twitter's rancid troon colony. Ranging from standard furfags, to paraphilias, to professional woman beater "Felon Fox".

Props to J.K. Rowling for keeping all the troons contained in one place. No matter how many times she gets "cancelled" she has more money than all of them combined.

 

[Donovan the Man]

IMO. GC had problems. While I agree with some of their content any time I browsed a thread in there it'd often devolve into this thinly veiled women superior-men bad rhetoric that would turn me off from the subreddit. There's no way they're going to get more natal women on board with their cause when they're on the constant man hating train because a lot of the fence sitters or people who don't give a shit at this point are heterosexual women who don't want to hear someone talk about how because X man did a bad thing and was a typical male means all men who follow traditional male roles ( their husbands and boyfriends) are bad.

Both sides have problems. Troons are fucking nuts but GC and intense Radfems need to deal with their own movement problems or 'troons' will win because the average heterosexual woman, the silent majority, is not gonna ride or die for anti-man rhetoric.

There was a thread about Onionboy and people were doling up excuses for his husband wife. GC is unable to reconcile with the reality that women can be a victim of abuse and also a willing participant in abuse. Kai/Laney/Taylor or whatever she calling herself now is not a good person, just because she has a vagina doesn’t mean she’s some pure uwu helpless victim. Shit like that will repel women who have been victimized by women, which is sadly a huge portion of gay and bisexual women.

 

[PoisonedBun]

An entire pride month that will be coopted by MtFs....two! [jumps]



(Context of the meme itself: the lesbian flag was missing off of Google's pride month doodle because no one can decide on which one is 'acceptable' bc trans lesbians fucked that up too, leading to 'Drake, where's the lesbian flag?'.)

 

[Sourceress]

IMO. GC had problems. While I agree with some of their content any time I browsed a thread in there it'd often devolve into this thinly veiled women superior-men bad rhetoric that would turn me off from the subreddit. There's no way they're going to get more natal women on board with their cause when they're on the constant man hating train because a lot of the fence sitters or people who don't give a shit at this point are heterosexual women who don't want to hear someone talk about how because X man did a bad thing and was a typical male means all men who follow traditional male roles ( their husbands and boyfriends) are bad.

With all due respect, I think there's also a serious problem where people (especially men) have a tendency to read anything women write about the overwhelming amount of oppression and abuse women suffer in (both current and historical) society at the hands of men as "man-hating" or somehow a personal attack on every man on the planet, which is an unfair presumption on the part of the reader and completely misses the point of these discussions and complaints.

I didn't follow GC very closely, though I did browse some, and most of what I saw that has been labeled as "man-hating" or "female superiority" was just women discussing how the overwhelming majority of rapists and murderers of women, as well as domestic abusers are men and how that fact impacts women and women's freedom in society. And that is typically the kind of discussion that gets labeled "man-hating" in our society, because heaven forbid anyone talk about the impact of male violence on women.

Maybe I'm wrong and I missed something big on GC, but frankly "man-hating" when referring to feminists is such a massive dogwhistle at this point that I can't take that on faith.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

The problem is that there will always be conflict between lesbian/gnc/detrans/autistic women (who I would say as a group make up a disproportionate amount of feminist groups and always have) and normative feminine heterosexual women, inasmuch as the latter can’t help themselves from trying to enforce gender roles. I’ve seen posts from straight mothers talking about their 12 year old daughters trooning out and it’s clear that the mothers do not understand or respect a lack of interest in participation in gender conforming behavior. This is also why most so called ‘terfs’ are not radfems, because true radfems do not support performing feminine behavior like wearing makeup. I’ve been on their sites so I know.

 

[Sourceress]

The problem is that there will always be conflict between lesbian/gnc/detrans/autistic women (who I would say as a group make up a disproportionate amount of feminist groups and always have) and normative feminine heterosexual women, inasmuch as the latter can’t help themselves from trying to enforce gender roles. I’ve seen posts from straight mothers talking about their 12 year old daughters trooning out and it’s clear that the mothers do not understand or respect a lack of interest in participation in gender conforming behavior. This is also why most so called ‘terfs’ are not radfems, because true radfems do not support performing feminine behavior like wearing makeup. I’ve been on their sites so I know.

While I agree to a certain extent, I just want to point out that radfems typically don't have any problem with women choosing to engage in practices like wearing makeup, they just acknowledge that it is due to societal expectations and gender roles and that it isn't feminist activism. In other words, they reject that whole liberal feminism "eyeliner so sharp it could kill a man" BS. A lot of women, especially straight women who are very invested in performing/adhering to gender roles, take offense to this and think it's an insult, but it's just a statement of fact - it's not pro-feminism or "empowering" for women to perform restrictive, oppressive gender roles. That doesn't mean you can never do it, or that it's wrong to do it, but you can't do it and pretend you're doing something amazingly feminist.

I think a lot of straight feminists can be very... sensitive about this sort of thing. Not all of them (#notallstraightfeminists?). But I have noticed a significant amount of straight feminists are very insecure because they feel the need to perform gender roles in the course of engaging in heterosexual dating norms (ie to attract straight men), but they also want to feel like "good feminists" whose actions are benefiting all women. (This is influenced by liberal feminism, of course, because libfeminism is intensely individualistic and focuses on the individual actions of individual women and the idea that anything a woman does, so long as it makes her "feel good" (whatever that means) is feminist activism and "empowering".)

Basically what radfems are saying is, "You're free to wear makeup, but we don't believe it is empowering or liberating for women to do it, and we acknowledge that the reason women feel the need to wear makeup is due to societal gender roles that are pushed on women from birth," but what the gender-conforming straight women are hearing is "You can't wear makeup, you're a disgrace to all women and you're not a feminist if you wear makeup" which is... not what anyone is saying.

 

[Der weiße Teufel]

Maybe I'm wrong and I missed something big on GC, but frankly "man-hating" when referring to feminists is such a massive dogwhistle at this point that I can't take that on faith.

I wouldn't call it man-hating, it was more along the lines of 'never try to defend men ever' (no 'not my Nigel'), straight women crying about how they cannot trust men ever again and people replying 'you are better off without them'. And maybe some salty lesbians who don't want to talk about men at all. It was all a bit stupid and sad, but probably not really hate.

Anyway, RIP GC and all. We should go back to laughing about troons, though.

 

[Lyre]

That's what makes the "Actually listening to trans people" argument so hilarious. I used to be a total handmaiden myself until I saw a huge "Why won't lesbians date me but Bi women will?" incel manifesto on tumblr written by a troon called Plaidos. That post made me raise an eyebrow and eventually led me to reading the replies by radfem blogs and everything just clicked.

It's funny, I used to be all up in arms for trans rights and shit but I kept getting more and more curious because they constantly screech about how bad and evil TERFs are but never explain why outside of "transphobia! Literally killing transwimmen! Evil!!" Et al.
So I ended up making a side blog and started sifting through "terf" blogs and shit and...well here I am now.
The terves have a lot of receipts of troons being fucking gross to lesbians/women in general/ their gross creepy child fetishes
The troons have...some women saying men can't be women. Yeah. Blah blah literally murdering them in the street, hundreds of transwimmen dying every year, whatever.
Didnt take long to peak, probably why they're so vehement on keeping people away from reading up on the "terven cult" lmao

 

[Sourceress]

I wouldn't call it man-hating, it was more along the lines of 'never try to defend men ever' (no 'not my Nigel'), straight women crying about how they cannot trust men ever again and people replying 'you are better off without them'. And maybe some salty lesbians who don't want to talk about men at all. It was all a bit stupid and sad, but probably not really hate.

Anyway, RIP GC and all. We should go back to laughing about troons, though.

That's not man-hating at all, though. Why are people trying to characterize it that way? Of course a feminist group doesn't want someone barging into every thread about rapists and murderers of women with "but my husband would never", it's honestly ridiculous that it happens in the first place. And there should be outlets for straight women who have been hurt by men to express that hurt and be validated, which is what those threads ("straight women crying about how they cannot trust men ever again and people replying 'you are better off without them'.) are all about. It's not about going "oh all men are evil and disgusting", it's a woman who has been seriously hurt and/or betrayed by a man complaining about it and expressing her wariness to jump back into relationships with men because of it, and other women assuring her that she doesn't need to be in a relationship and that it might be best if she takes a break until she's healed. Jeez. Some people are just so desperate to see "man-hating" in feminist groups that they'll just twist whatever they can tbh.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

I went to transpassing and sorted by controversial.

 

[wry wrangler]

View attachment 1421285

Imagine being the lawyer. You spend years of your life and tens of thousands of dollars on college and law school and then put in so much effort on so many cases only to get a case where the client shows up to court looking like that. Hopefully the judge had the good sense to order him to stay 500 yards away from his kid at all times.

 

[Opinion Discarded]

View attachment 1421284View attachment 1421285View attachment 1421287
I went to transpassing and sorted by controversial.

"On my way to court with my wife for a custody battle" Jesus fucking Christ.

Though he really did his ex-wife a solid, she probably doesn't even need a lawyer to win full custody anymore.

 

[Crunchy Leaf]

Imagine being the lawyer. You spend years of your life and tens of thousands of dollars on college and law school and then put in so much effort on so many cases only to get a case where the client shows up to court looking like that. Hopefully the judge had the good sense to order him to stay 500 yards away from his kid at all times.

He posted this on legaladvice yesterday.

Trailer trash tranny.

 

[Lyre]

View attachment 1421284View attachment 1421285View attachment 1421287
I went to transpassing and sorted by controversial.

Wig unstyled?
No petticoat?
No coordination?
Terrible lighting and unable to see coordinated socks/shoes?
Being genuinely horrifying to look at? A big fat fucking