Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Screenshot_20200706-131503_Facebook.jpg
 
White guilt is just the progressive form of the white man’s burden. They actually look down on minorities by having lower expectations for them. When I see white guilt posts on social media, all I can think of is this:
View attachment 1430218
The SJW mentality, ironically, is to sanction the kind of behavior that was once seen as the White Man's Burden to eradicate. England in that graphic is further up than the States, but now they are in the lead for making excuses for dumb barbaric behavior like FGM, child marriage and breast ironing. Because of "culture" that we must not arrogantly interfere with or some shit.

Another thing I noticed is that the SJW types REALLY hate it when you have experiences that they don't. The WORST thing you could have is life experiences that make them feel inadequate. Even slightly. If you have things you've done that you are proud of, or, God forbid, you did things that made a difference in other people's lives, SJW's and their hanger-ons fucking HATE you. I mean, with a burning passion. If you strive to actually be a better person (according to society, not their 'be better racist' shit) it seems to fucking infuriate them. Like you personally showed up and pissed on their birthday cake. I could go on a full metal sperg aboutit, but I think we got enough typey typey here.
Why? I would have thought that actually doing stuff would give you bragging rights. Is helping people white saviorism now?

I'm with other people on the whole "can I touch your hair?" story from black women. I've never seen this happen and never considered asking anyone to touch their hair, regardless of race. It would just be rude and creepy.
Children do it. Mostly to other children, though. I imagine these heinous microaggressions that are such a burden were actually just curious toddlers being toddlers, but if you leave out the who-did-it, the SJW imagine the white woman Karen that they currently consider to be the root of all evil.
 
I didn't think the violent, misogynistic lyrics in rap music were meant to be taken seriously, myself, just as the violent, misogynistic lyrics in blues music were never meant to be taken seriously.

"But what if Little Timmy takes it seriously?" is the eternal cry of the moralist, and it never makes sense or punishes the "right" people.

Only an idiot of the highest order thinks the story of a song or the narrative of a genre is a command to EMULATE it without thinking.

A story as told through the lyric of song is not necessarily one you should agree with, disagree with or even notice if you don't want to.

Just because I sing along to Skynrd's Saturday Night Special doesn't mean I think it's a good idea to buy a cheap handgun at a pawn shop and blow someone away over a minor slight, nor do I agree that the solution is to ban all guns (which is what the lyrics say at the end)

It's a song about the way impulsive recklessness can end lives, to me anyway. That's not the only interpretation, but the idea that anyone who hears it is instantly going to say "you know, I didn't think murdering a guy over losing a card game was okay, but man, it just sounds so cool when you put it to music, that it's clearly the right thing!" is stupid beyond words.... bad things happened before pop music.

The discography of humanity is FULL of that entire genre of music, about people throwing their lives and the lives of others away in barroom fights, lover's spats and petty wounded pride. The reason it's a common refrain of song is because it's something that's inherent to the human condition throughout history.

It's just more of this curious tendency of leftists to assume that listening to any cohesive narrative at all is tacit agreement with the opinions it expresses at best and an unstoppable crusade-like zeal to carry out and recreate the ficticious in real life because "the song said so" at worst.

It's why they think mentioning Hitler in any way other than expressing joy he's dead causes real Nazis to pop out of the ground like dandelions.

They honestly think saying ANYTHING, even sterile fact, about something they don't like causes you to fall under it's magic spell.

"Hitler was bad, he was evil, he was racist, he uh, was born in 1899 and.... oh no! I didn't mean it! I .... I.... I. .. arrrrhhghghghghh!!!! SEIG HEIL! SEIG HEIL! SEIGH HEIL! "

Yes, they actually BELIEVE that, which is why censorship to them isn't bad, it isn't even good, it's a MORAL IMPERATIVE like putting out a burning building or plucking a child from a fast moving river.... to them, any ability to disagree will only lead to death camps..... strange how they can't seem to see that death camps also result from not allowing disagreement, too. So far, they're only eDeath Camps where your career, voice and opinions are murdered online, but the underlying sentiment is the same;

Agree with the pre selected right answers as determined by your betters or be cut from society.

So that's why they believe in "If just one person takes it seriously, it all must go" when the logical position would be "If one person takes it seriously, THEY need help"




Why? I would have thought that actually doing stuff would give you bragging rights. Is helping people white saviorism now?

Because it ruins the SJW narrative that your place in society is baked-in from the start and only by joining them, the enlightened and woke, can you overcome this. NOTHING can move you up the progressive stack if you aren't woke.

And like how religion holds you can't save your soul through good deeds, only trough the grace of God and accepting him as your savior? SJWs want you to be subservient to them and accept them as your social savior, consequently, doing good deeds to advance in society is selfish, wrong, and, worst of all, unlike the question of faith, can be proven to work on the mortal plane. You CAN earn more money, build a business, build a family or just move beyond where you were born WITHOUT the overt help of 3rd parties. But to the SJWs, that's a rejection of their help and a refusal to bend the knee to their wishes, and if you won't fail without them, as they believe is ordained by the right side of history, then they must MAKE you fail to put it all "right".
 
Last edited:
Actually pretty based. The alleged link between videogames and movies and violent behavior has been thoroughly debunked, but there is a clear link between the culture of rap music and the proliferation of wannabe gangbangers in black communities. Blacks glorify the worst of themselves and it's those people who are most likely to succeed in the "rap game" over people who actually do the right thing. Criminals, abusers, etc. are lauded. If you shoot a cop or shoot a neighbor you're "hard."

I don't think we can ban it, but social pressure focused on negative black social attitudes is unequivocally good.
 
Actually pretty based. The alleged link between videogames and movies and violent behavior has been thoroughly debunked, but there is a clear link between the culture of rap music and the proliferation of wannabe gangbangers in black communities. Blacks glorify the worst of themselves and it's those people who are most likely to succeed in the "rap game" over people who actually do the right thing. Criminals, abusers, etc. are lauded. If you shoot a cop or shoot a neighbor you're "hard."

I don't think we can ban it, but social pressure focused on negative black social attitudes is unequivocally good.
I think people are more against the thought of cancelling an entire genre of music over a few problematic elements. As people pointed out, we might as well get rid of blues and country because people might take the wrong lesson from it. Idolization of gang culture is dangerous and it should be criticized and examined but censoring isn’t a way to go about it.
Personally, it reeks of bullshit coming from Janelle Monae, especially when you discover that she’s signed on to Bad Boy Records, a very prominent hip hop label. Although when did people decide B list singers would make good activists to begin with?
 
Actually pretty based. The alleged link between videogames and movies and violent behavior has been thoroughly debunked, but there is a clear link between the culture of rap music and the proliferation of wannabe gangbangers in black communities. Blacks glorify the worst of themselves and it's those people who are most likely to succeed in the "rap game" over people who actually do the right thing. Criminals, abusers, etc. are lauded. If you shoot a cop or shoot a neighbor you're "hard."

I don't think we can ban it, but social pressure focused on negative black social attitudes is unequivocally good.
The music is okay. The problem is that the musicians performing that music are regarded as role models and... yeah, it's all gangsta all the time.

I don't know whether the art can be separated from the author there, but either way the rappers at least would do youths (particularly black youths) a world of good by cleaning up their acts. 80s hair metal bands were considered "too decadent" and "harmful" even though their message being basically just "party all night". Meanwhile, rappers go around talking about shooting enemies, fighting cops and beating their own bitches both in their music and outside of it.

That's the problem.
 
I think people are more against the thought of cancelling an entire genre of music over a few problematic elements. As people pointed out, we might as well get rid of blues and country because people might take the wrong lesson from it. Idolization of gang culture is dangerous and it should be criticized and examined but censoring isn’t a way to go about it.
Personally, it reeks of bullshit coming from Janelle Monae, especially when you discover that she’s signed on to Bad Boy Records, a very prominent hip hop label. Although when did people decide B list singers would make good activists to begin with?
The music is okay. The problem is that the musicians performing that music are regarded as role models and... yeah, it's all gangsta all the time.

I don't know whether the art can be separated from the author there, but either way the rappers at least would do youths (particularly black youths) a world of good by cleaning up their acts. 80s hair metal bands were considered "too decadent" and "harmful" even though their message being basically just "party all night". Meanwhile, rappers go around talking about shooting enemies, fighting cops and beating their own bitches both in their music and outside of it.

That's the problem.
If they make it uncool to be a gangsta rapper, they can make it uncool to be a gangsta. Might as well embrace this and turn it towards the right ends, since it's the only kind of black self-critique we're likely to ever get.
 
Why the hell do these people even live in America if they hate it so much?
These are the same people who threaten to move to Canada whenever a Republican wins an election. Too bad both MSNBC and CNN will never air the footage of those black girls trampling on the American flag. Imagine the shock of liberals that BLM is anything but patriotic.
 
They have to have someone else to blame while sucking them dry for welfare or they can't survive. Also ironically blacks were sometimes turned away from frontline deployments because in the past the US Army didn't think they were competent soldiers and there was an IQ test to get in.

 
I think people are more against the thought of cancelling an entire genre of music over a few problematic elements. As people pointed out, we might as well get rid of blues and country because people might take the wrong lesson from it. Idolization of gang culture is dangerous and it should be criticized and examined but censoring isn’t a way to go about it.
Personally, it reeks of bullshit coming from Janelle Monae, especially when you discover that she’s signed on to Bad Boy Records, a very prominent hip hop label. Although when did people decide B list singers would make good activists to begin with?

Anyone want to cancel Robert Johnson because he sang "I'm going to beat my woman until I get satisfied"?

You think rap music is violent and misogynistic, like I said, blues music was just the same way. Black music's always had violent, misogynistic lyrics, but it's not supposed to be taken seriously. (So was all that stuff about the devil, incidentally.)

People would laugh at you if you wanted to cancel the blues. Why should we feel any differently about rap?
 
Anyone want to cancel Robert Johnson because he sang "I'm going to beat my woman until I get satisfied"?

You think rap music is violent and misogynistic, like I said, blues music was just the same way. Black music's always had violent, misogynistic lyrics, but it's not supposed to be taken seriously. (So was all that stuff about the devil, incidentally.)

People would laugh at you if you wanted to cancel the blues. Why should we feel any differently about rap?
I don't know what blues you listened to, but anyone who knows enough of both can say that they are by far not the same way, especially if you compare it to late and modern rap, 98% of which is "nigga nigga, bitches, drugs, guns, gangsta rulez, gonna cap me a mofo, nigga nigga, shake that booty, nigga".
 
Back