U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

[Local Fed]

Didn't even notice the authors names when I posted that.

Non-ironically the first thing that I looked for lmao.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

Reminds me a bit of some of the shit I hear about the supposed "real" reasons for why china is amping up the saber rattling schtick as of late.

If what I hear is true then they are not doing it because the national leadership actually thinks they can stand up to burgerland and friends or even the pajeets in an actual war, they are doing it to appease their ultra-nationalist boomer population who react to absolutely fucking everything by screeching for nuclear genocide against any country that they think has insulted china, and there are enough of these specimens in low-medium levels of power to make the Hundred Acre Wood gang leery of stamping it out like they do any other social movement that threatens them, since it could wind up inspiring some rival in the politburo to try and make a move by co-opting the crazy nationalists.

Ofcourse this kind of thinking would wind up reinforcing and further radicalising this segment of the population since it would see itself being directly catered to, so even if there is actual logic behind this its a really fucking stupid strategy in the long term. But then when has something being damaging in the long term ever stopped third world dictatorships from pushing their populations into perpetual states of jingoistic warmongering fury in order to secure short term support?

Problem is that the old "spend decades pushing ultranationalist propaganda on the population and then doing dumb shit on the international stage to appease this army of angry retards you created" thing tends to wind up blowing up in everyones faces the moment someone in the halls of power thinks they can get away with "just a little unprovoked military strike/invasion" to satisfy national ego and save their political careers, assuming that the outside world will just roll with it without any real consequence, even when absolutely fucking anybody with even a basic idea of geopolitics could tell that this shit is going to result in absolute carnage and/or humiliation.

Dont believe me? Look at what happened with argentina when its dictatorship decided that bongland would be cool with them violently annexing its inhabited territory during the twilight of the cold war and a year before election season.

In the eyes of out of touch authoritarians looking to cash in on nationalist demagoguery, you dont have to actually stand a chance of winning a war with the country you attack, you just have to convince yourself that it will be too much effort for the ones you attack to offer any resistance, even when they have every imaginable reason and motivation to bring their full power to bear and gleefully kick the shit out of you. If you question how people so clueless could wind up in charge of a dictatorship, I remind you that every authoritarian regime is built off the idea that the population does not have the will to oppose you, and thus its natural for those on top of this system to assume they could pull this shit on other countries.

The "Real Reason" is China's suffering job losses for the first time since the 1970s and people are pissed. The old authortarian rulebook says start bopping your neighbours on the head with a stick to rally nationalistic sentiment against "the other". The Falkands and Kuwait are two modern examples where diplomats (soon dismissed from their posts) gave the impression the home government didn't really give a shit what happened. Even before the war preparations were being made, cowardly admirals and other tongue wagging cowards said that the Navy and military couldn't hope to retake the Falklands. Thatcher told them to go fuck themselves both in private and public, but was at least polite enough to not name names.

If Churchill said it was good then that's even more of a reason to throw it in the dumpster.
I don't take anything that drunken zionist shill says with any degree of seriousness, especially not considering what he did to Dresden and Gallipoli.

We should've bombed Dresden flatter. It was on a major railway junction supplying the Eastern Front and was also sent as a message to Stalin who a lot of people (Churchill especially) suspected would just try to keep barreling through Europe when they reached their lines (The fact Allied planes were shot at by the Soviets was just further proof). Don't fuck with us because the RAF will keep going until it's rearranging the concrete piles.

Anyone else notice she has like, those really fricken wide eyes that make you feel uncomfortable and make you give people a wide berth?

Well, this should be fun.....
View attachment 1432574

There you go folks, the face of the Black Lives Matter movement summed up with absolute perfection.


A skinny ass white girl with hair colour from a bottle.

 

[AnOminous]

There you go folks, the face of the Black Lives Matter movement summed up with absolute perfection.

Even these clowns know a pretty (or at least acceptable) dead white girl sells better than some loser who has had no career unless a criminal career or a drug career count.

 

[Superman93's Bitch]

What did Tucker say tonight? That the rural USA is going to see more people moving there? As long as there's cable/fiber internet I'm in.

I’ve already been looking in a few particular states.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Shitshow going down in NYC. Rioters blocking Lincoln Tunnel, getting run the fuck over, cats sleeping with dogs, total madness.

https://twitter.com/RuschellBoone

Archived
https://twitter.com/RuschellBoone/status/1280672779227090948
https://archive.vn/wip/cQlzW

"Get his license plate! Get his license plate! Fuck you!"

Who are you going to call? The police?

 

[Juan's Sombrero]

 

[Wy4M]

So let's say Trump wins in November. Let's say people get really sick of this shit and want it all to stop. Is that going to be enough? The people who allow this stuff have a habit of not changing anything and doubling-down, even tripling-down. All we have of the LA riots in 1992 are some videos and stories. Now we have photos and videos of everything all the time, and the general public can see the horror first hand even though they aren't there. When will enough be enough? DeBlasio doesn't give a shit, The city council of Minneapolis doesn't give a shit, the mayor of Seattle doesn't give a shit, none of the big cities give a flying fuck about any of it. Who can bring them in line? It seems the only way to get them to do anything is to inconvenience these leaders with the same violence and activities they allow to be committed to the rest of the public.

They don't care about their own people.
Here's the plan: Create race tensions / destroy as much as possible, also the economy / people will lose faith in the president & blame everything on him.
Due to that they will vote democrat.

I know that it sounds like a 6 year old came up with this idea but it seems that's the way they're going.
And yeah, you can't make an omelet without breaking some eggs so once in a while you sacrifice a few of your own.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
It's interesting to see how these words were trending over a 4 year period: Black Lives Matter, BLM, racism
Both in 2016 and 2020 you see peaks 4-5 months before the elections.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2016-01-01%202020-07-08&geo=US&q=black%20lives%20matter,blm,racism

(didn't want to archive)

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Same search terms but only for the past 3 months, I also added some major happenings; you can see how they match with those search terms.
It also shows that the lines are flattening. Any idea what is needed to make them go steeply up again?

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%203-m&geo=US&q=black%20lives%20matter,blm,racism

Edit - Added 4th July event to image.

 

[DumbDude42]

I don't really get the hero worship. Tucker talks like a fag and he's rich so why do all of these alt right alpha chads love him so much?

alt right dont love tucker. tucker is loved mainly by boomer conservatives.

 

[Slimy Time]

Archived
https://twitter.com/RuschellBoone/status/1280672779227090948
https://archive.vn/wip/cQlzW
View attachment 1435167

"Get his license plate! Get his license plate! Fuck you!"

Who are you going to call? The police?

This guy is minding his business when drives into a protest/riot. People block or crowd his vehicle, he's watched he past weeks, doesn't want to be hurt/have car damaged. He panics or decides to gtfo of there and drives over someone. These people forget that a vehicle is a weapon, it was the first thing I was told when I took driving lessons. You screw up driving, you kill people, yet these protestors keep standing in front of vehicles and keep wondering why they get run over.

 

[Forgetful Gynn]

alt right dont love tucker. tucker is loved mainly by boomer conservatives.

 

[DumbDude42]

DeBlasio doesn't give a shit, The city council of Minneapolis doesn't give a shit, the mayor of Seattle doesn't give a shit, none of the big cities give a flying fuck about any of it. Who can bring them in line? It seems the only way to get them to do anything is to inconvenience these leaders with the same violence and activities they allow to be committed to the rest of the public.

not the same violence and activities. that can't work.
you think you can organize a violent right wing mob and march it to the house of some mayor or governor? your entire party will get crushed by SWAT teams, arrested by riot cops, convicted on federal terrorism and hate crime charges, and thrown in prison for 80 to 200 years.

no, these people will NOT be brought in line, and they will NOT be voted out of office either, because they have successfully engineered local demographics to the point of pretty much guaranteeing one-party rule.

the only way these individuals could ever lose their position is though the barrel of a gun

 

[Balr0g]

So, basically, the only thing a white person can do to end their participation in the oppression of POCs is to kill themselves. That's literally the only way to get these people to fucking shut up.

How is this training not racist? This is painting people as bad guys SOLELY based on skin color. The training is even encouraging white people to end their relationships with other white people. Absolutely sickening. These people want to control every facet of our everyday lives.

If the Democrats keep encouraging and/or applauding this kind of shit, they are going to lose the vast majority of the white vote. Book it.

Not to mention "if you're Arab, Jew, German, Finnish" or whatever you are white. What the actual fuck? So who is the good one then? Africans? South-Americans? Corona chan needs to step up and sweep harder.

 

[JohnDoe]

the only way these individuals could ever lose their position is though the barrel of a gun

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

not the same violence and activities. that can't work.
you think you can organize a violent right wing mob and march it to the house of some mayor or governor? your entire party will get crushed by SWAT teams, arrested by riot cops, convicted on federal terrorism and hate crime charges, and thrown in prison for 80 to 200 years.

no, these people will NOT be brought in line, and they will NOT be voted out of office either, because they have successfully engineered local demographics to the point of pretty much guaranteeing one-party rule.

the only way these individuals could ever lose their position is though the barrel of a gun

That reminds me of a meme then a Bitchuter posted on one of Styx's vlogs on Bitchute.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rIGd7eNNpS3c/#comment-4983904935

 

[NyQuilninja]

Who are the ceo's of those companies and what does their early life look like?

Jew of some flavor probably Zionist
https://www.webfx.com/blog/internet/the-6-companies-that-own-almost-all-media-infographic/

 

[IcyHotStuntaz]

the demographic change in the USA is (practically) irreversible and there will be a permanent democrat majority starting in the early 2040's that will last for as long as civilization does. That's the thing that should keep you awake at night, not Trump winning and delaying the inevitable by a relatively infinitesimal period of time. This battle was lost decades ago, probably over a century ago.

I'm fully aware that I'll have more rainbows inbound for this reply than an average episode of My Little Pony.... but... if there is one slight demographic hope for the coming generations, it's conservative latinos. They tend to be religious and family-orientated and beyond the very flimsiest definitions of "POC", aren't historically known to get too buddy-buddy with blacks. If there is a power-vacuum waiting to be filled in the next decade, it's for a legit based / conservative / populist Mexican on the national political stage.

 

[Archeopthryx]

By the 2040's I'd figure that I have already laid the ground work for the country to take over the #1 spot in world economics while ramming a steel rod through China's ass. English would probably be still the primary language of economics because it's so goddamn useful like spreading peanut butter on my tits and having bitches lick it off.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Google's decline into uselessness was the biggest blackpill for me, before all this started.

Spoiler: oldfag being old

I'm old enough to remember when there were a dozen equally viable search engines on the web, and what each of their quirks were, and finding exactly what you want was an actual skill. You had to learn how to search, with booleans and specific punctuation marks, none of this user-friendly natural language stuff. (In fact, natural language was a feature of AskJeeves.com, to let normies get in on searching without boolean logic.)

Lost to time are Yahoo's categories, a manual process of sorting every submitted site into broader categories of the entire web. Yes, there were actual people doing this sorting; there was a manual web form to submit your site for consideration, which I went through multiple times, with varying results. And some search engines had blind spots--they didn't index the hacker sites, or inner pages of portal sites, or porn, or BBS archives, or certain webrings. They weren't quite slanted, but processes like Yahoo's categories would skew how information looked to their users.

The simple genius of Google's original PageRank algorithm is that it categorized the entire Internet, automatically, using link references as a proxy for usefulness. That was brilliant back in the Web 1.0 days, for its elegance as well as its total efficiency. Google's spiders indexed the entire web, a feat that many thought was technically impossible.

But the most important thing was that it let a skilled user find anything, without restriction or skew. I can't describe to newer users how liberating the change was after having to scan through 5-10 pages of results on other sites. And it let content sites grow without authoritative connections; if enough people liked your stuff and linked to it, you became the authority. If the truth was out there, you could find it.

Obviously this system was gamed over the years, and Google has always declared they change the algorithm constantly to avoid spam and top-of-results hijacking. But a searcher could still tweak out the results you wanted... until recently.

The blackpill came when I was feeling nostalgic one day, and searched for some old 2000-era sites I knew had been indexed and archived by Google. And they're gone. The listings don't come up, no matter how many ways I try to reference them. Some of these were old Geocities pages, but others were small useful hobbyist sites, the kind that flourished before Wikipedia sucked up all reference material into its festering maw.

Shortly after that Google search results started looking the same, page after page, for issues I knew had two controversial sides. I won't say it was a person going in to make ideological tweaks; it might just be the way the algorithm favors "trusted sources", who conveniently all engage in groupthink. But 15-20 years ago the top contrarian opinion sites would make it onto the first page, because their concentration of links told Google it was notable.

All the social media nonsense could be excused if the basic ability to find information wasn't compromised. But it is. And Trump's neglecting to address it, despite being the first politician to bend Big Tech to his own use, is his biggest failure.

I'd go so far as to say 2020 is the first test run of broad-spectrum information control during a crisis. Before, there were always outlets where truth could leak out, coalesce around users, and take form before anyone stifled it. Twitter itself used to be one of those outlets. Now, thanks to the concentration of the web into the hands of a few coordinated players, the entire visible internet can be manipulated at will, and the smaller pockets like KF can be safely quarantined.

We already knew 2020 would be the test run of information control during an election cycle. I guess the manipulators at Big Tech just got lucky they could test it out on multiple crises first, work out the kinks so the campaign manipulation will be even more efficient.

The first page or so of a google search is nothing but ads for me ? Even in incognito mode

 

[Fliddaroonie]

The "Real Reason" is China's suffering job losses for the first time since the 1970s and people are pissed. The old authortarian rulebook says start bopping your neighbours on the head with a stick to rally nationalistic sentiment against "the other". The Falkands and Kuwait are two modern examples where diplomats (soon dismissed from their posts) gave the impression the home government didn't really give a shit what happened. Even before the war preparations were being made, cowardly admirals and other tongue wagging cowards said that the Navy and military couldn't hope to retake the Falklands. Thatcher told them to go fuck themselves both in private and public, but was at least polite enough to not name names.




We should've bombed Dresden flatter. It was on a major railway junction supplying the Eastern Front and was also sent as a message to Stalin who a lot of people (Churchill especially) suspected would just try to keep barreling through Europe when they reached their lines (The fact Allied planes were shot at by the Soviets was just further proof). Don't fuck with us because the RAF will keep going until it's rearranging the concrete piles.






Anyone else notice she has like, those really fricken wide eyes that make you feel uncomfortable and make you give people a wide berth?



There you go folks, the face of the Black Lives Matter movement summed up with absolute perfection.


A skinny ass white girl with hair colour from a bottle.

I fucking despise the language they use. "Fallen Comrade". Right, your "Comrade" is a stupid cunt with Daddy issues, who was probably hauledup by parents who didn't slap her hard or often enough. She was suck a fucking retard she was fucking about, on a freeway, at night, in dark clothing. Her Mum should have saved the money and aborted her, seriously. If you're going to put in so little effort you raise someone that fucking dumb then just don't have a kid.

And "Night of Rage"? She was mown down by a black man. Who you raging at, exactly? Black men who own cars? Touch hypocritical, isn't it?

 

[DumbDude42]

I'm fully aware that I'll have more rainbows inbound for this reply than an average episode of My Little Pony.... but... if there is one slight demographic hope for the coming generations, it's conservative latinos. They tend to be religious and family-orientated and beyond the very flimsiest definitions of "POC", aren't historically known to get too buddy-buddy with blacks. If there is a power-vacuum waiting to be filled in the next decade, it's for a legit based / conservative / populist Mexican on the national political stage.

"conservative latinos" is a meme

blacks are significantly more conservative on every single social issue than whites, doesn't stop them from voting democrat every election.
similar situation with latinos. they're generally very un-woke on the actual issues themselves, but consistently vote blue.

why is this? because ethnicity trumps ideology every day of the week. the democrats platform can be boiled down to "take money and power away from whites, give it to none whites instead" and that's all that matters. dems will screech about TRANS RIGHTS all day, meanwhile blacks are laughing at trannies getting killed for fun all day, but at the end of the day they'll still vote dem because it's in their ethnicitys best interest to do so.
dems will screech about FUCK CHRIST FUCK THE CHURCH all day, and mexicans will keep venerating the little statue of mary and the crucifix they keep in their home, and at the end of the day they'll still vote dem because it's in their ethnicity's best interest to do so.

white conservatives and moderates are still thinking in a framework where people operate based on noble ideologies and abstract philosophic concepts, and vehemently refuse to accept the reality that at the end of the day, ethnicity supercedes all of that shit.
this unwillingness to face reality is why they are (and will remain) completely ineffective and useless, this is why they continue to just lose and lose and lose, even when they have actual institutional power like they did after 2016.