Disaster FEMA Denies Minnesota Disaster Relief Funds to Pay For Minneapolis Riot Damages - Trump to City: DROP DEAD!



The federal government has denied a request from the state of Minnesota for a disaster declaration and accompanying financial support, to help clean up and repair fire damage from unrest following the police killing of George Floyd.

Gov. Tim Walz's office said it received the denial on Friday, eight days after Walz had submitted the request. A Federal Emergency Management Agency spokesperson said the agency had determined the damage was something local and state governments could handle on their own.

In a letter to President Trump on July 2, Walz had noted more than $15 million in damage and cleanup costs that could be eligible for federal reimbursement.

The state has estimated total damages at more than $500 million. Hundreds of buildings were looted, damaged or destroyed by fires in the Twin Cities, primarily in Minneapolis and St. Paul, after Floyd was killed on May 25.

“The governor is disappointed that the federal government declined his request for financial support from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to help Minnesota rebuild after civil unrest damaged public infrastructure and caused extensive fire damage in the wake of George Floyd’s death," Walz's spokesperson Teddy Tschann said in a statement. "As we navigate one of the most difficult periods in our state’s history, we look for support from our federal government to help us through.”

In making the request for help, Walz had noted that the financial challenge had been made even harder by the impacts on the state budget from the cononavirus pandemic. A projected $1.5 billion budget surplus in February was soon wiped out by a projected $2.4 billion revenue shortfall, he wrote to in the request to President Trump via FEMA.

In a statement provided to MPR News on Saturday, a FEMA spokesperson said:

“After a thorough review of Minnesota’s request for a major disaster declaration from extensive fire damage as a result of civil unrest in late May and early June, it was determined that the impact to public infrastructure is within the capabilities of the local and state governments to recover from. The governor has 30 days to appeal that decision.”

Tschann said Walz’s office is “exploring all options.”

The federal government's denial of the request from Walz, a Democrat, came a day after Republican U.S. Rep Tom Emmer of Minnesota sent a letter to Trump and other federal officials raising questions about the request.

While not stating opposition to Minnesota receiving federal money, Emmer asked that — in the wake of Walz's request — the Trump administration "undertake a thorough and concurrent review of my state's response to the violence."


TLDR: Trump to City - You burned this bed, you sleep in it.
 
images (24).jpeg

Looking forward to a few modern versions of this.
 
See, here's the thing. Walz and that faggot mayor pussyfooted around instead of making a decisive response to the riots when they first started. My theory is they were gambling on being able to force Bad Orange Man into sending in the big shots via Insurrection Act, which EVERY FUCKING DEMOCRAT would scream bloody murder about. They lost their gamble, and I'm pretty sure even Trump was able to see obvious bait. Now after screaming ORANGE MAN BAD it's ORANGE MAN SAVE US. Trump has practically zero reason, from pretty much any standpoint save blind altruism, to give them any help. This is AFTER the MPD chose to keep Chauvin on after he had racked up a number of documented incidents of being a fucking hothead (and I think his multiple decorations quite possibly REINFORCE that he is a glory-seeking hothead who would inevitably start a massive fucking trashfire). Every step of the way, Walz and Frey have screwed the fucking pooch, and half of it was probably to try and get an EPIC WEEN on Trump.
 
Maybe next time, don't encourage hoodrats, liberal NAMBYs and assholes to burn down your city while you sit back.

How's that "defund the police" idea working out?

I've heard the idea floated out there that the "ABOLISH THE POLICE" narrative almost immediately became "DEFUND THE POLICE" so that Democratic mayors and city councils all over who are deep in the red from decades of gibs-spending and having corona-Chan smacking them around for good measure can divert funding to things like decaying infrastructure and shoring up the gibs while also pandering to the BLM and jogger demographics about how they've "fixed the police" and "did what you asked" by taking away their money, which is as good as disbanding them, right?

It was a ploy to cover billion-dollar budget shorftalls, and get votes, at the same time.

Too bad they, as they are wont to do, forgot to look more than 5 months ahead in time and couldn't see that a lack of police would cause Detroit-level urban decay to set in overnight so that even if they were to re-fund the police departments, it'd be too late to save the lost business and tourist revenue as nobody wants to visit a hellhole violent city and after kicking out the cops, nobody is going to want to come back and work for you.

It's certainly a theory that holds water.
 
Back