Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

I thought the SRS procedure was designed to remove the testicles, not place them in the chin?
 
Via professor Joe Lavery, who added "fuck privacy":
fuckprivacy.PNG
...comes this article from troon Phil "Ana" Valens:
DyiD1v4U0AEpOI4.jpganavalens.jpg

Public Sex is at the Heart of a Queer Culture War [Archive]

Choice excerpts:

As radical queers go toe-to-toe with burgeoning purity culture...[public sex is] one of the most complex issues the LGBTQ community deals with... “Why is sex supposed to be invisible? Is sex so deadly, hateful, and horrific that we can’t permit it to be seen?...Are naked bodies so ugly or so shameful that we can’t survive the sight of bare tushes or genitals without withering away?”

“Public sex is on the wane because urbanites, gay and straight, are so caught up in the economic-boom mindset that we’re willing to trade community and shared public life for any semblance of a guarantee (clean parks, open sidewalks) that our urban futures will be just as tidy and controlled as the recent upward march of the S&P 500,” Schwartz writes.

“I would have sex in stairwells, out-of-the-way streets, the botanical garden, wherever I could get half-privacy...[but] there are plenty of places to [fuck in] public where people want to watch!”

Jordan, a queer nonbinary millennial who practices a mixture of public sex and outdoors sex, said he doesn’t think “anything is off-limits” for public sex"...[he calls] public sex..."an act of rebellion to exist sexually where we’re told not to.”



Peace out, prudes. I'm off to build community and engage in "shared public life" by buttfucking at the botanical gardens.
 
Last edited:
Lingerie is something used in the modern world as a representation of female sexuality, yes, as are a lot of other things involved in modern female sexuality. Women wear makeup to feel sexy; women do a lot of things to feel sexy. Those who says that they wear lingerie as their primary turn on means that it is a fetish for them.

Personally I don't understand a lot about the "autogynephilia," especially the period fixation as that can be... very painful. I'm sure a TERF posting here will very gladly kick a troon in the balls repeatedly for a week to simulate the experience.

Are you sure that the women who told you that they have a lingerie fetish are being genuine and not just having a joke at your expense?
 
Wtf is this useless argument which keeps happening. Women aren't the same as AGP because they live their entire lives as women and don't get aroused at being called miss or getting catcalled because its arousing or other such "validation". Its simply not comparable.
The lingerie fetish is also moot as it's about clothing itself than being sissyfied or whatever. Often its related to the feeling of exposure/indecency, the material itself etc.
Real women generally don't worry about proving they are women.
 
Baby, not even 4 months old, used as prop to suck a Troon's fake nipples to validate his gender feels.

It's not a fetish though!


View attachment 1456236
Where's the child's mother whilst this shit stain was getting its jollies? Absolutely disgusting, that poor kid.

Whilst I can laugh at most of the monstrosities in this thread, this one just sickens. Yeah I know, rate me autistic.
 
Via professor Joe Lavery, who added "fuck privacy":
View attachment 1456178
...comes this article from troon Phil "Ana" Valens:
View attachment 1456176View attachment 1456177

Public Sex is at the Heart of a Queer Culture War [Archive]

Choice excerpts:

As radical queers go toe-to-toe with burgeoning purity culture...[public sex is] one of the most complex issues the LGBTQ community deals with... “Why is sex supposed to be invisible? Is sex so deadly, hateful, and horrific that we can’t permit it to be seen?...Are naked bodies so ugly or so shameful that we can’t survive the sight of bare tushes or genitals without withering away?”

“Public sex is on the wane because urbanites, gay and straight, are so caught up in the economic-boom mindset that we’re willing to trade community and shared public life for any semblance of a guarantee (clean parks, open sidewalks) that our urban futures will be just as tidy and controlled as the recent upward march of the S&P 500,” Schwartz writes.

“I would have sex in stairwells, out-of-the-way streets, the botanical garden, wherever I could get half-privacy...[but] there are plenty of places to [fuck in] public where people want to watch!”

Jordan, a queer nonbinary millennial who practices a mixture of public sex and outdoors sex, said he doesn’t think “anything is off-limits” for public sex"...[he calls] public sex..."an act of rebellion to exist sexually where we’re told not to.”



Peace out, prudes. I'm off to build community and engage in "shared public life" by buttfucking at the botanical gardens.
This argument is so historically illiterate and/or intellectually dishonest.

If 'Queers' are no longer having public sex so frequently, it's almost certainly because they now have other choices. No need for a culture of covert public toilet hookups or cruising parks for a quickie among the dog turds. That, combined with surveillance and phone cameras everywhere. Now only the most reckless or deviant among us are having public sex regularly because dignity.

Basic bodily functions can't be a rebellious statement because they are absolutely universal; it's nothing more than a justification for exhibitionism. Hmm, looking up exhibitionism, I see that it's a paraphilia, overwhelmingly affects men and is classed as a mental disorder. Now why does that sound so familiar...?

Baby, not even 4 months old, used as prop to suck a Troon's fake nipples to validate his gender feels.

It's not a fetish though!
I think he has rubber nipples on over his own. It's the smallest of small comforts, but at least it's not actually being made to suck his manly teats. Still fucking child abuse mind.
 
Where's the child's mother whilst this shit stain was getting its jollies? Absolutely disgusting, that poor kid.

Whilst I can laugh at most of the monstrosities in this thread, this one just sickens. Yeah I know, rate me autistic.

This is what fucks with me the most. The trans ‘community’ harbours some absolute reprobates, but the people who let children in their care anywhere near them for woke points are just as bad.

Guardians who should be protecting children that allow shit like this photoshoot to happen while screeching YAAAS KWEEN are just as complicit.
 
This is what fucks with me the most. The trans ‘community’ harbours some absolute reprobates, but the people who let children in their care anywhere near them for woke points are just as bad.

Guardians who should be protecting children that allow shit like this photoshoot to happen while screeching YAAAS KWEEN are just as complicit.

This stuff is honestly so blatantly fetishistic and pedophilic. The fact that other mtf troons aren’t trying to put this guy against the wall definitively proves that none of them are actually women and makes it harder to argue that any of them aren’t complicit in sexual predation. Mermaids, Jazz Jennings, Desmond is Amazing, Lactatia and trannies using helpless babies as sexual props... laughing at freaks is all fun and games until it turns into a black pill.
 
Are you sure that the women who told you that they have a lingerie fetish are being genuine and not just having a joke at your expense?

A lot of people in this thread really, rrally don't understand women much better than the troons do.

Women frequently seek a lot of social validation and approval; if you're in a social circle where being "sex positive" or kinky is considered mature, progressive, smart, and exciting, a woman will absolutely claim a mild kink/fetish to signal her membership in the group. (Men also signal group inclusion, just usually in different ways, since men and women tend to communicate differently.)

When a woman says she "feels sexy", what she is saying is NOT that she feels aroused by herself, nor even that she feels aroused at all. She is saying "I recognize that I am sexually attractive to men, and therefore feel confident, desirable, and have worth." If she ia aroused, she's aroused by the idea of men wanting her. Aka not self-aroused, nor aroused by het underwear itself, nor the "meaning" of the underwear. She's aroused by the idea that a man she finds attractive would also be attracted back. You know, like a normal healthy sexual human connection.

When a woman even literally says "I turn myself on", she is not being literal, you absolute acoustics. She is using a turn of phrase, a jovial metaphor, which gets social approval for being a fun confident person. Just like saying "I'm too sexy for my shirt" doesn't mean you are literally planning to strip in public.

AGPs feel aroused by the concept of fulfilling their idea of what a woman is, which is typically over-simplistic and stereotyped. This is why they're aroused by shit like breastfeeding, knitting, or wearing tampons. (It's also why their clothes are fucking tacky.) Sometimes women report a lot of confidence and satisfaction when fulfilling feminine gender roles... Wise troons will claim that's how they feel too, not aexual arousal, but spend 5 minutes on troon reddit and you can see they're lying.

(Personally I'd be okay with AGP TVs, as long as they admit their motivation and stop this "real woman" bullshit.)

By the way, it eas probably already mentioned, but "autoandrophilia" (aka women turned on by the idea of being men) was only ever theorized and never researched, because the researchers never discovered any. We obviously are now seeing a correlate of course (the fujoshis-gone-wrong). However it's worth mentioning that at least one (I think it was Blanchard) noticed the exact same thing we've pointed out repeatedly on this thread -- female troons are NOT aroused by being manly, and often don't even try to be, they avtually want to be "a gay man" specifically. Their longing and/or arousal is specifically at the idea of being a gay man. (Blanchard suggested some new term for it.) So it's interesting and worth noting there still doesn't seem to be an actual autoandrophile - females don't turn themselves on.

Also note, even lesbians don't turn themselves on, and will often be like "ew" at themselves even while buried in pussy.
 
Stay on topic you faggots.
Are you sure that the women who told you that they have a lingerie fetish are being genuine and not just having a joke at your expense?
Yeah.
how does this work?
do they legit get off on putting on a corset and stockings, then have a wank while staring at a mirror? or is it more about being dressed up to feel hot and desirable while being with their man?
If a woman wears lingerie as her primary turn on, that in fact makes it a fetish.

That whole argument between @TaimuRadiu and @horsegirl666 could be summed up with: women can be extreme narcissists. And those women are as mentally ill as narcissistic men.
 
Back