Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Toasty]

I know who you are. Melinda, I have some useful information for doxxing @Deadpool

Your name is John Doe and you carried me up that building in Wales the other day after we herded goats together. @TamarYaelBatYah

View attachment 1457818

That picture is hawt

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

And where did you get the idea that his ex wife did not attack him first?









Not that I believe anything Karl_der_Grossness says. He could just be lying like the demons in his head

Besides the obvious gaslighting I see here, just throwing the term Schizophrenia around inappropriately while people guess who you are just makes you look even dumber

One things for sure though: you are just a bunch of sick fucks!

Because he pled guilty to it. Which can only mean one of 2 things. 1) He did it exactly the way they sai he did.
2) He lied to the court upon pleading guilty,and thereby is a de facto liar whose word is good for nothing.

 

[cjöcker]

just checked my tracking number yesterday.

post it or you're full of shit

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Marshall's estranged wife didn't show up in the middle of the night with a rifle, Marshall did. That shows a willingness, and possibly a definite plan, to engage in violence. Marshall's wife didn't smash her phone with that rifle, Marshall did. Marshall's wife didn't start strangling Marshall, but Marshall certainly started strangling his wife.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Because he pled guilty to it. Which can only mean one of 2 things. 1) He did it exactly the way they sai he did.
2) He lied to the court upon pleading guilty,and thereby is a de facto liar whose word is good for nothing.

Or a plea bargain was coerced out of him

Once again you show your ignorance of the way the legal system works

Marshall's estranged wife didn't show up in the middle of the night with a rifle, Marshall did. That shows a willingness, and possibly a definite plan, to engage in violence. Marshall's wife didn't smash her phone with that rifle, Marshall did. Marshall's wife didn't start strangling Marshall, but Marshall certainly started strangling his wife.

Incorrect facts. He never showed up with a rifle, nor did he smash anything with a rifle, and neither did he strangle anyone.

The only liar is you.

And possibly his ex-wife. She was on drugs the night she reported anything to police. She was on drugs when she was took the stand. If his lawyer had any skills instead of sexism she would have motioned to impeach her testimony.

Dude, you're harping on a break up that happened 4 and a half years ago with a woman that already has remarried. Move on loser. You can't try someone in a court of law for the same charge twice.

Get a life you need serious therapy

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Or a plea bargain was coerced out of him

If he had to go with a plea bargain, it still means he either:

A. Did it, is guilty, but it too much of a sissy for a lengthy sentence or punishment so he fessed up
B. Is really dumb and easily manipulatable so he took it without understanding like a gorilla
or
C. Attempted to lie his way out of it but plead guilty when he realized it wasn't working

Regardless of situation it makes him look like a loser, if you're in court for domestic violence charges you aren't gonna look good in any capacity

Gotta congratulate you for being well on your way to 10k neg ratings, you're only a few hundred away! Not sure if any other retards have hit that high but being so despised yet posting so frequently for months on end is impressive

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Or a plea bargain was coerced out of him

Once again you show your ignorance of the way the legal system works




Incorrect facts. He never showed up with a rifle, nor did he smash anything with a rifle, and neither did he strangle anyone.

The only liar is you.

And possibly his ex-wife. She was on drugs the night she reported anything to police. She was on drugs when she was took the stand. If his lawyer had any skills instead of sexism she would have motioned to impeach her testimony.

Dude, you're harping on a break up that happened 4 and a half years ago with a woman that already has remarried. Move on loser. You can't try someone in a court of law for the same charge twice.

Get a life you need serious therapy

No, retard. That is EXACTLY how the legal system works. The second you plead guilty, you are GUILTY. Melinda's analysis means less than nothing. If you lied to the Court, then you are a liar. No room for equivocation or secondguessing. Unless you can prove he was tortured into a confession like a couple niggers here and there.

Also, if she "took the stand" then there was necessarily a trial. Did he change his plea at trial when he saw it all going south? What an utter piece of garbage he is. If he wasn't guilty, he should have had the integrity to argue as much, and see where the cards fall. And this is the "man" you hold up as a paragon of virtue? What a disgusting little shitball.

Also: "You can't try someone in a court of law for the same charge twice." . Nobody is trying himin a court of law. He's being held to account in the court of public opinion. And certainly any govt agency can hold him to account ON THE BASIS of his admitting a domestic battery.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

And certainly any govt agency can hold him to account ON THE BASIS of his admitting a domestic battery.

No they can't that's a violation of my 5th Amendment rights, as well as his.

Unless you can prove he was tortured into a confession

Ya don't say?!

then there was necessarily a trial

That's called a Hearing dummy

That is EXACTLY how the legal system works

You're an idiot who doesn't even understand basic law like owning a gun is legal and not "child abuse and neglect"

Morelikely that famous philo-semite EnochPowell.

For those who missed it on the other page:Seems @TamarYaelBatYah better smarten the fuck up before she gets some retribution dumped her way:

I'm going to make something clear here. When the FBI told me to leave Melinda alone, I listened and haven't contacted her since. My only interaction/involvement with Melinda since that time has been "reacting" to her kiwi farms posts as well as posting about her (but not communicating with her in any way) with my one and only profile on kiwi farms, xtamarlover. I have shared a few things on here about her, but much I have kept concealed still. So I just want to say this. Any attempts by her to involve me legally in any further litigation, I will post all the email and facebook correspondence she had with me in 2019, as well as post the names of her children on kiwi farms. in other words, if she tries to sue me again or if I get another visit from the FBI. I've been leaving Melinda alone. So if she harasses me with a lawsuit or further visits from FBI when I haven't done anything, then I will have no reason not to post these things. I have not once ever mentioned her kids names on this site nor to anyone here out of respect for her children's privacy. I have respected Melinda by not contacting her or interacting with her ever since I was instructed by the authorities to leave her alone. The baseless accusations that various users are me need to stop. If its empty statements then ok feel free to call any random user me if they want. But if there is any actual further harassment of me by Melinda, then I will be forced to respond by data dumping the conversations I had with Melinda.

Oh, and Melinda? You canguarantee if you fuck with Carlson because you think he's me, I'll give him my full info to give to the cops (who can't do a goddamed thing tome to begin with)

This is called BLACKMAIL and it's illegal in all 50 states. I won't even have to hire an attorney, the FEDs take care of that

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

dumb shit

Don't you have kids that should be suckling on your flaps or something, calm the fuck down and be a parent lmao

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

No they can't that's a violation of my 5th Amendment rights, as well as his.





Ya don't say?!






That's called a Hearing dummy






You're an idiot who doesn't even understand basic law like owning a gun is legal and not "child abuse and neglect"



This is called BLACKMAIL and it's illegal in all 50 states. I won't even have to hire an attorney, the FEDs take care of that

ALL WRONG> And of course any govt agency can use a proven conviction against him. CPS, and anyone else. He's a convicted wife batterer.he ADMITTED to it.

And Carlson has every right to release conversations he had with you. It's not blackmail even by the most lunatic standards. You better be careful with your accusations, Melinda. You could end up in Court over those. Maybe even in jail. The system does not exist to provide cover for vexatious litigants and grifters like you. It was designed to protect the rights of honest folks with good intentions. Judges despise people like you.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

@Null , really hoping you ask the Judge to dismiss this bullshit with prejudice and move to have her declared a vexatious litigant.

 

[Null]

@Null , really hoping you ask the Judge to dismiss this bullshit with prejudice and move to have her declared a vexatious litigant.

really hoping you stop posting 20 times per page, learn how multiquote works, and stop arguing with a schizophrenic for weeks at a time because you've just got to prove to everyone you're smarter than a literal retard

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

ALL WRONG> And of course any govt agency can use a proven conviction against him. CPS, and anyone else. He's a convicted wife batterer.he ADMITTED to it.

And Carlson has every right to release conversations he had with you. It's not blackmail even by the most lunatic standards. You better be careful with your accusations, Melinda. You could end up in Court over those. Maybe even in jail. The system does not exist to provide cover for vexatious litigants and grifters like you. It was designed to protect the rights of honest folks with good intentions. Judges despise people like you.

You're full of ignorance about the law, nothing you just said is accurate. You think you can speak on behalf of a government agency or a judge, the notion is so ridiculous, you just look insane!

Your stupidity is not even worth my time

And this is the "man" you hold up as a paragon of virtue?

Says the person who admitted he was going to engage in an orgy in Big Stone Gap, VA.

Say, isn't that a crime in Virginia?

really hoping you stop posting 20 times per page, learn how multiquote works, and stop arguing with a schizophrenic for weeks at a time because you've just got to prove to everyone you're smarter than a literal retard

Joshua Moon, whose hiding out in Serbia because he's too afraid of facing anyone.

You couldn't even finish high school. Please, by all means, scribble down a ridiculous response to a judge showing your stupidity.

 

[Null]

Joshua Moon, whose hiding out in Serbia because he's too afraid of facing anyone.

You couldn't even finish high school. Please, by all means, scribble down a ridiculous response to a judge showing your stupidity.

It took you 4 years but you've finally come to terms I don't live in Florida anymore. Your weird obsession with my education is cute.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

You're full of ignorance about the law, nothing you just said is accurate. You think you can speak on behalf of a government agency or a judge, the notion is so ridiculous, you just look insane!

Your stupidity is not even worth my time





Says the person who admitted he was going to engage in an orgy in Big Stone Gap, VA.

Say, isn't that a crime in Virginia?






Joshua Moon, whose hiding out in Serbia because he's too afraid of facing anyone.

You couldn't even finish high school. Please, by all means, scribble down a ridiculous response to a judge showing your stupidity.

Literally EVERY judge in the Western world acknowledges that a guilty plea means the accused accepts responsibilty for their actions, or else they lied upon entering the plea. Nobody buys your equivocations. They are unworthy of consideration. Certainly CPS can operate on an assumption of guilt where an accused admits guilt. Are you well?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

It took you 4 years but you've finally come to terms I don't live in Florida anymore. Your weird obsession with my education is cute.

I never said you didn't have a second home in Florida were you hide in the basement while mommy still beings you chicken nuggets and a happy meal

You are a menace to society Joshua Moon

Literally EVERY judge in the Western world acknowledges that a guilty plea means the accused accepts responsibilty for their actions, or else they lied upon entering the plea. Nobody buys your equivocations. They are unworthy of consideration. Certainly CPS can operate on an assumption of guilt where an accused admits guilt. Are you well?

And here again you STILL think you have a right to speak on behalf of people working in the legal system. You're insane.

There have been lawyers who have already written about the abuse of plea bargains. Hell, even your comrades Nicholas Rekeita admitted that.

Get a life loser. You reported me for owning a gun, a basic right secured by the Second Amendment! You're an idiot!

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I never said you didn't have a second home in Florida were you hide in the basement while mommy still beings you chicken nuggets and a happy meal

You are a menace to society Joshua Moon

And here again you STILL think you have a right to speak on behalf of people working in the legal system. You're insane.

There have been lawyers who have already written about the abuse of plea bargains. Hell, even your comrades Nicholas Rekeita admitted that.

Get a life loser. You reported me for owning a gun, a basic right secured by the Second Amendment! You're an idiot!

Can you list the ways he's a menace to society then?
Go on, tell us your delusions

 

[Spergichu]

No, retard. That is EXACTLY how the legal system works. The second you plead guilty, you are GUILTY. Melinda's analysis means less than nothing. If you lied to the Court, then you are a liar. No room for equivocation or secondguessing. Unless you can prove he was tortured into a confession like a couple niggers here and there.

Also, if she "took the stand" then there was necessarily a trial. Did he change his plea at trial when he saw it all going south? What an utter piece of garbage he is. If he wasn't guilty, he should have had the integrity to argue as much, and see where the cards fall. And this is the "man" you hold up as a paragon of virtue? What a disgusting little shitball.

Also: "You can't try someone in a court of law for the same charge twice." . Nobody is trying himin a court of law. He's being held to account in the court of public opinion. And certainly any govt agency can hold him to account ON THE BASIS of his admitting a domestic battery.

There actually is a special type of plea called an Alford Plea, where a defendant can plead guilty to a crime but not have to admit they committed it. The jist of the plea being that the defendant won't admit to committing the crime, but they recognize the case against them is too strong to refute and a jury would probably convict them if it went to trial. It's usually only offered or accepted by the prosecution in a last-ditch attempt to avoid a trial. (It's usually the case when the prosecution doesn't feel their case is 100% sound and they don't want to risk a trial and the jury siding against them, or of the crime is too unimportant and they want to do anything they could to avoid a trial) Although I'm certain Napa Valley prosecutors didn't give Marshall the option for an Alford Plea, seeing how cut and dry the case was.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Can you list the ways he's a menace to society then?
Go on, tell us your delusions

No need to waste my time typing that out. Just go on your many threads and see what tho

There actually is a special type of plea called an Alford Plea, where a defendant can plead guilty to a crime but not have to admit they committed it. The jist of the plea being that the defendant won't admit to committing the crime, but they recognize the case against them is too strong to refute and a jury would probably convict them if it went to trial. It's usually only offered or accepted by the prosecution in a last-ditch attempt to avoid a trial. (It's usually the case when the prosecution doesn't feel their case is 100% sound and they don't want to risk a trial and the jury siding against them, or of the crime is too unimportant and they want to do anything they could to avoid a trial) Although I'm certain Napa Valley prosecutors didn't give Marshall the option for an Alford Plea, seeing how cut and dry the case was.

Or seeing that it was 2 female attorneys and a female judge in what was possibly reverse sexism

Not to mention, the 2 female attorneys and the Plaintiff the DA represented (the ex-wife) all went to high school together. Tends to bias and a conflict of interest

When the Plaintiff took the stand she couldn't remember what the accusations were and they handed her a paper to read off of.

Marshall's lawyer did not use all tools at her disposable to defend her client. That is not the proper way to defend someone who is your client