Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

View attachment 1460757
Sorry for not having the article link or archive, I only saved the screenshot.
https://archive.vn/GTAqx

Here's the article.

I think they postponed the National Convention to August, but a delay for the convention shouldn't cause a delay in picking a VP. Giving the voters just 3 months to digest whoever is going to be VP, and likely next president if Biden gets elected, makes me suspect they got someone they really don't want people to look too hard into. It's amazing that we are less than half a year from election day and we still have no idea who Biden is going to have in his adminsitration. Even Trump had gotten a few key supporters at this point like Sessions, Carson, and Flynn
Hillary didn't announce her running mate until July 22.

I have gotten into some outright fucking autistic arguments with people from my previous friend group over the term, "people of colour." They're just calling them coloured people. It's the same fucking thing, it's not any better or any different, they just switched the fucking words around but they refuse to hear it. If I said, "coloured people" they would lose their goddamned minds and in at least one case take a swing at me but if I said, "people of colour" then VICE shows up to give me a dick-shaped medal that I assume I'm supposed to shove up my ass for their latest news article.

I seriously do not fucking understand the difference. It's like insisting that I can't call an Asian man a 'rice picker' but if I call him a 'picker of rice' I'm being politically sensitive and a good ally. I don't fucking get it.
Its mind games. All part of control. Its why Antifa and BLM have the names they have. It makes people who don't agree with or dislike these groups look like the worst type of people. At least on the surface. But the schools haven't taught critical thinking in forever. I went to a private school and mostly learned Critical Thinking from the skeptic atheist youtube community.
 
Last edited:
He's going to bait them into berating him for wearing a mask, making it clear you just can't win with them.

It's a reusable cloth mask and we've known since the very beginning that they don't work. At all. It's all virtue signaling, but this gives a good photo and tweet to gaslight idiots on the left who will criticize him for being anti "science."
 
I have touched on the term before, and why it bothers me.

"Person of color" is just "colored person" rearranged. When I hear people advocating for "safe spaces" for "persons of color", this is what I'm reminded of:

View attachment 1460968

Yes, signs like this existed during segregation. How did we go back to terms like this in the 21st century? It was used as the same context as "nigger" or "Negro", to demean somebody because of their skin color.

And yes, I mentioned "Negro" based on the Roger Stone interview where he referred to a Black person as a "Negro" on the radio. I have as much right and reason to be offended with "person of color" as the N-word.
Not to mention that it serves the exact, same fucking purpose. It classifies the entire world as "People who are white, and people who aren't." Hell, I'd go so far as to say it's worse because at least the original terminology only applied to black people, this new one is roping in everyone who isn't white. You don't even get your own fucking classification anymore, you're just "not white."
 
"Coloured person" is bad because it has connotations of racism, segregation, and Jim Crow.

I already mentionned it in another thread but it might be worth to mention it again. While the term isn't ok in the United States, in South Africa, the term "Coloured Person" or "Coloured People" have a different meaning, it designed people of mixed race who mainly are in the Western Cape. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coloureds
 
I have touched on the term before, and why it bothers me.

"Person of color" is just "colored person" rearranged. When I hear people advocating for "safe spaces" for "persons of color", this is what I'm reminded of:

View attachment 1460968

Yes, signs like this existed during segregation. How did we go back to terms like this in the 21st century? It was used as the same context as "nigger" or "Negro", to demean somebody because of their skin color.

And yes, I mentioned "Negro" based on the Roger Stone interview where he referred to a Black person as a "Negro" on the radio. I have as much right and reason to be offended with "person of color" as the N-word.

Let me just put my tinfoil hat on for a second

This has always bugged me as well as the constant reinforcement that we should use the term nigger to refer to ourselves. I to some extent believe the people in power (Jews/Whites/Politicians/Elites/aristocrats pick any combination you wish) to some extent know they have put black people back in chains. To some extent it's true our people are stuck in welfare, grow up in single parent homes, are fed gang culture, are taught being educated about anything but race is not black, and are often part of school systems that can not teach them. We are this way because we've excepted program after program from people claiming to be our allies that hurt our community. To some extent we removed our chains but put them back on when we were told they were a fashion accessory. The fact that person of color is used is a way of mocking us and showing how much control they have over us. All they had to do is re-arange the words and they can call us the same thing we fought against only a few years ago. It's also why I think nigger is considered such a hurtful word but is encouraged to be used among my people, it's a reminder that we are still slaves but sold to us as a form of empowerment.

It's stupid and is probably just a way to control language, It's no different than when Oriental was replaced with Asian. Whenever I tried to ask people why they would do that I would always get the answer "well Oriental is used to mean exotic" even though it literal refers to the orient or "Because Oriental is used to group all Asians together". There's also the added benefit that when a word inevitably is deemed racist you can now paint everyone who used the previously accepted term as racist allowing you to burn the past.
 
Can we go back to debating whether which cartoon characters would be Democrat or Republican?

I think Mr. Krabs would go for either side that gives him the most money or tax break.
Fuck it I'm doing this.

Mr. Krabs is center right, almost libertarian, Squidward is center left, and Spongebob is the progressive left. Here's a full analysis.

In the episode "Squid on Strike", Squidward decides to strike because of unfair treatment at the Krusty Krab. At first he gets Spongebob to strike with him, despite Spongebob not really being behind any of the policies Squidward wants. Squidward just knows that using Spongebob is useful to him.

Squidward starts to radicalize Spongebob behind the cause, turning Spongebob into a fervent follower.


But in doing so, Squidward realizes that the monster he's created has become a much worse threat than anything Mr. Krabs has done. In fact, the actions he and Spongebob have taken have actually pushed people more towards Mr. Krabs.


To put an end to it, Squidward an Mr. Krabs, out of the public eye, negotiate behind the scenes to come up with a solution.


What they don't realize is that Spongebob has become so radicalized that he starts doing things that will actually destroy all of them, under the guise of progress.


In the end, because of Spongebob's actions, any progress Squidward and Mr. Krabs have made is undone, everyone is worse off than before, the establishment that has been taking care of all of them is gone, Squidward's worst fears have come true and Spongebob treats it as a win.


 
Let me just put my tinfoil hat on for a second

This has always bugged me as well as the constant reinforcement that we should use the term nigger to refer to ourselves. I to some extent believe the people in power (Jews/Whites/Politicians/Elites/aristocrats pick any combination you wish) to some extent know they have put black people back in chains. To some extent it's true our people are stuck in welfare, grow up in single parent homes, are fed gang culture, are taught being educated about anything but race is not black, and are often part of school systems that can not teach them. We are this way because we've excepted program after program from people claiming to be our allies that hurt our community. To some extent we removed our chains but put them back on when we were told they were a fashion accessory. The fact that person of color is used is a way of mocking us and showing how much control they have over us. All they had to do is re-arange the words and they can call us the same thing we fought against only a few years ago. It's also why I think nigger is considered such a hurtful word but is encouraged to be used among my people, it's a reminder that we are still slaves but sold to us as a form of empowerment.

It's stupid and is probably just a way to control language, It's no different than when Oriental was replaced with Asian. Whenever I tried to ask people why they would do that I would always get the answer "well Oriental is used to mean exotic" even though it literal refers to the orient or "Because Oriental is used to group all Asians together". There's also the added benefit that when a word inevitably is deemed racist you can now paint everyone who used the previously accepted term as racist allowing you to burn the past.
And you can say you want to kill whites without anyone batting an eye, but a black man dares say he's Jewish and the oy veying hordes descend upon him. "SOMEONE LIKE YOU CANNOT BE ONE OF US!!"

Nick Cannon, Jay Z... There are just some people you can't criticize I guess.
 
Fuck it I'm doing this.

Mr. Krabs is center right, almost libertarian, Squidward is center left, and Spongebob is the progressive left. Here's a full analysis.

In the episode "Squid on Strike", Squidward decides to strike because of unfair treatment at the Krusty Krab. At first he gets Spongebob to strike with him, despite Spongebob not really being behind any of the policies Squidward wants. Squidward just knows that using Spongebob is useful to him.

Squidward starts to radicalize Spongebob behind the cause, turning Spongebob into a fervent follower.


But in doing so, Squidward realizes that the monster he's created has become a much worse threat than anything Mr. Krabs has done. In fact, the actions he and Spongebob have taken have actually pushed people more towards Mr. Krabs.


To put an end to it, Squidward an Mr. Krabs, out of the public eye, negotiate behind the scenes to come up with a solution.


What they don't realize is that Spongebob has become so radicalized that he starts doing things that will actually destroy all of them, under the guise of progress.


In the end, because of Spongebob's actions, any progress Squidward and Mr. Krabs have made is undone, everyone is worse off than before, the establishment that has been taking care of all of them is gone, Squidward's worst fears have come true and Spongebob treats it as a win.


Nice analysis. Let me add to that: Spongebob is the impressionable one. He just does what he's told no matter unreasonable to outlandish it may be. Like being charged by your boss, Squidward refused to pay the bill but Spongebob would've happily obliged had Squidward not stopped him.

Spongebob is a useful idiot for both of them. He doesn't know about labor laws, he doesn't know unions, he doesn't know about protesting. He took Squidward's rhetoric literally, which cost them both in the episode.

That SAME episode was used for justification for the rioting going on, not realizing the fact that 1) they missed the point entirely, and 2) it's a freaking cartoon.
 
Fuck it I'm doing this.

Mr. Krabs is center right, almost libertarian, Squidward is center left, and Spongebob is the progressive left. Here's a full analysis.

In the episode "Squid on Strike", Squidward decides to strike because of unfair treatment at the Krusty Krab. At first he gets Spongebob to strike with him, despite Spongebob not really being behind any of the policies Squidward wants. Squidward just knows that using Spongebob is useful to him.

Squidward starts to radicalize Spongebob behind the cause, turning Spongebob into a fervent follower.


But in doing so, Squidward realizes that the monster he's created has become a much worse threat than anything Mr. Krabs has done. In fact, the actions he and Spongebob have taken have actually pushed people more towards Mr. Krabs.


To put an end to it, Squidward an Mr. Krabs, out of the public eye, negotiate behind the scenes to come up with a solution.


What they don't realize is that Spongebob has become so radicalized that he starts doing things that will actually destroy all of them, under the guise of progress.


In the end, because of Spongebob's actions, any progress Squidward and Mr. Krabs have made is undone, everyone is worse off than before, the establishment that has been taking care of all of them is gone, Squidward's worst fears have come true and Spongebob treats it as a win.


Nice analysis. Let me add to that: Spongebob is the impressionable one. He just does what he's told no matter unreasonable to outlandish it may be. Like being charged by your boss, Squidward refused to pay the bill but Spongebob would've happily obliged had Squidward not stopped him.

Spongebob is a useful idiot for both of them. He doesn't know about labor laws, he doesn't know unions, he doesn't know about protesting. He took Squidward's rhetoric literally, which cost them both in the episode.

That SAME episode was used for justification for the rioting going on, not realizing the fact that 1) they missed the point entirely, and 2) it's a freaking cartoon.

Interesting points, well made. Now do Harry Potter characters.
 
Let me just put my tinfoil hat on for a second

This has always bugged me as well as the constant reinforcement that we should use the term nigger to refer to ourselves. I to some extent believe the people in power (Jews/Whites/Politicians/Elites/aristocrats pick any combination you wish) to some extent know they have put black people back in chains. To some extent it's true our people are stuck in welfare, grow up in single parent homes, are fed gang culture, are taught being educated about anything but race is not black, and are often part of school systems that can not teach them. We are this way because we've excepted program after program from people claiming to be our allies that hurt our community. To some extent we removed our chains but put them back on when we were told they were a fashion accessory. The fact that person of color is used is a way of mocking us and showing how much control they have over us. All they had to do is re-arange the words and they can call us the same thing we fought against only a few years ago. It's also why I think nigger is considered such a hurtful word but is encouraged to be used among my people, it's a reminder that we are still slaves but sold to us as a form of empowerment.

It's stupid and is probably just a way to control language, It's no different than when Oriental was replaced with Asian. Whenever I tried to ask people why they would do that I would always get the answer "well Oriental is used to mean exotic" even though it literal refers to the orient or "Because Oriental is used to group all Asians together". There's also the added benefit that when a word inevitably is deemed racist you can now paint everyone who used the previously accepted term as racist allowing you to burn the past.
ehh, tbf I'm okay with "Asia" being a continent and "The Orient" being a magical land of mystery. Like how the United Kingdom is a region of a land mass but Avalon is a mythical place.
 
Nice analysis. Let me add to that: Spongebob is the impressionable one. He just does what he's told no matter unreasonable to outlandish it may be. Like being charged by your boss, Squidward refused to pay the bill but Spongebob would've happily obliged had Squidward not stopped him.

Spongebob is a useful idiot for both of them. He doesn't know about labor laws, he doesn't know unions, he doesn't know about protesting. He took Squidward's rhetoric literally, which cost them both in the episode.

That SAME episode was used for justification for the rioting going on, not realizing the fact that 1) they missed the point entirely, and 2) it's a freaking cartoon.
When people talk about the increasing infantilization of the average person, I believe it when I look on Youtube and see things like "WW2 AS DEPICTED BY SPONGEBOB!!1!!" and gets over a million views. I know that its funny for a meme, but even that way, trying to simplify it to the point you're using a fucking childrens cartoon that you should've stopped watching when you were 15 and stopped being good after the movie genuinely upsets me. I was lucky enough to have a library that had the Time-Life WW2 picture books. It had plenty of words, but enough photos, drawings, and graphics that it made it understandable to 8 year old me. And at least I actually learned something.

As you said, its a goddamn cartoon. Stop trying to make political dissertations over a silly cartoon sponge who lives in a pineapple under the sea. You're not smart for doing it, and honestly, if we lived in a more rational and introspective society, or if this was America a few decades ago, you would be called a loser for being a twenty year old trying to look into philosophy via a bunch of moving drawings. And probably shoved in a locker. You know what, maybe bullying wasn't that bad.
Interesting points, well made. Now do Harry Potter characters.
Harry Potter is the worst thing to happen to literature in society since James Joyce's Ulysses.
 
ehh, tbf I'm okay with "Asia" being a continent and "The Orient" being a magical land of mystery. Like how the United Kingdom is a region of a land mass but Avalon is a mythical place.
The thing is, we still pretty much call China and Korea “The Orient” when we say “East Asia”. It means the exact same thing. And no one ever meant India or Pakistan or Bangladesh when they said “Orient”, they meant China and Sinophilic countries in the region.

So it’s just “colored” vs. “POC” again. It’s a pointless change that does nothing but give people an excuse to get bent out of shape and label someone racist if they use the wrong, outdated term.

As an aside, there are fourteen restaurants and grocery stores within ten miles of my house with the word “Oriental” in their names, so I don’t know who cares about all of this except white liberals.
 

The New York Times doxes Tucker for his Trump reporting. He suggests that Fox should dox the NYT.

What a deranged timeline.

No you guys don't get it.

"Coloured person" is bad because it has connotations of racism, segregation, and Jim Crow.

"Person of color" is good because it is a neutral descriptor of a nonwhite human being, and enjoys approval from the "top", i.e. academia, the media, high-ranking Democrat politicians, the funders of all these leftist causes, etc.

Person of color was the term used to refer to black slave owners in Haiti and Louisiana.
 

The New York Times doxes Tucker for his Trump reporting. He suggests that Fox should dox the NYT.

What a deranged timeline.

And there it is. Targeting the enemy's home rather than the enemy himself. Fuck the NYT, I hope Carlson doesn't play their game and just locks and loads when the loonies come knocking. Remember how good they're doing making themselves look bad man.

What was that quote again? Something about doxing and dead family while they laugh? That fits here.
 
And there it is. Targeting the enemy's home rather than the enemy himself. Fuck the NYT, I hope Carlson doesn't play their game and just locks and loads when the loonies come knocking. Remember how good they're doing making themselves look bad man.

What was that quote again? Something about doxing and dead family while they laugh? That fits here.

Dox editors at prominent liberal magazines -> They all live in LA+New York in the same gated communities.

And then they realize that they live next to Tucker Carlson.
 

The New York Times doxes Tucker for his Trump reporting. He suggests that Fox should dox the NYT.

What a deranged timeline.
I eagerly await the death of Mainstream media outlets. I'm not a huge fan of Tucker, but holy shit, this is just petty horseshit that pisses on the entire idea of the free press.

@It's HK-47 I hate to bother you, but where was your post about how journalists aren't the heroes they think they are? I think it's very apropos for this situation.
 
Back