Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Step Away From The Melon]

What "things"?

How can this tard be so dumb? Truly disturbing to think that children are subjected to this monstrosity of a human as a mother.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

She has an autist's blindness to complex and nuanced meanings and statements. She's a literalist in all things. And she's none too bright, which adds another difficulty to her ability to understand what other people are saying.

 

[Toasty]

She has an autist's blindness to complex and nuanced meanings and statements. She's a literalist in all things. And she's none too bright, which adds another difficulty to her ability to understand what other people are saying.

I too have noticed a tendency for her to not understand sarcasm, and to not understand obvious jokes as jokes. Even when explained.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Anything that's been said to you in this thread. Lmao. It's words on a screen nigga just close your eyes like holy shit.

This comment shows your ignorance

Have you ever taken the time to even read the Cyberstalking statute?

Judging by your response, NO.

She has an autist's blindness to complex and nuanced meanings and statements. She's a literalist in all things. And she's none too bright, which adds another difficulty to her ability to understand what other people are saying.

I too have noticed a tendency for her to not understand sarcasm, and to not understand obvious jokes as jokes. Even when explained.

I'm not a sick fuxk like you all. I don't talk like a morally depraved person and don't play your games

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I'm not a sick fuxk like you all. I don't talk like a morally depraved person and don't play your games

Yeah, because talking about how you reek and only wash your coochie while saying viruses are 4th dimensional spirits isn't depravity

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Yeah, because talking about how you reek and only wash your coochie while saying viruses are 4th dimensional spirits isn't depravity

That's right, it's not

And for the record, never said I reeked

 

[Toasty]

Can you explain the "fuxk" thing please?
My auto correct just nearly caught fire on that one.

 

[LoverofPi]

That's right, it's not

In fairness, it's more insanity and stupidity than out and out depravity.

And for the record, never said I reeked

You don't have to. It's something we can logically deduce from what you have told us about yourself.

Can you explain the "fuxk" thing please?
My auto correct just nearly caught fire on that one.

I assume she's decided saying fuck is a bridge too far, so she's spelling it wrong on purpose so she's not technically swearing.

 

[Cedric_Eff]

That's right, it's not

And for the record, never said I reeked

Lmao, you probably reek like cat shit.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Lmao, you probably reek like cat shit.

Don't forget the mixture of rancid BO and essential oils.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'm not a sick fuxk like you all. I don't talk like a morally depraved person and don't play your games

Says the person who enjoys rape.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Says the person who enjoys rape.

I never condoned sexual assault by random strangers

"A recent study suggests that rape fantasies are most prevalent among women who are the most erotically open and adventurous, who feel most comfortable daydreaming about sexual situations way beyond what they’d ever want to experience"

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201508/why-do-women-have-rape-fantasies

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

I never condoned sexual assault by random strangers

"A recent study suggests that rape fantasies are most prevalent among women who are the most erotically open and adventurous, who feel most comfortable daydreaming about sexual situations way beyond what they’d ever want to experience"

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201508/why-do-women-have-rape-fantasies

Tabloids are always true and informational, perhaps we are all wrong and should love being raped in the ass

 

[lamp]

Have you ever taken the time to even read the Cyberstalking statute?

Judging by your response, NO.

Again, if anyone here is falls under cyberstalking, it’s you.
None of us keep track of your location. You willingly share it with us.
No one keeps track of your location to harm you.
No one uses your location to threaten, harass, or intimidate you.
While speculations about you have occurred on this forum, that is not the same as libel.

Spoiler: 18 U.S.C. § 2261A:

Title 18, United States Code, Section 2261A is the federal stalking statute. Section 2261A(1) covers in-person stalking and Section 2261A(2) covers cyberstalking— stalking that occurs using Internet or telephones—as well as stalking that occurs using the mail. Section 2261(2), originally enacted as part of the Violence Against Women Act of 2005, has two main provisions—Subsections (A) and (B):
• Both provisions require that the defendant act with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person.
• Both provisions also require the use of the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce. Usually this element is met with the use of the Internet.
• Both provisions also require that the defendant engaged in a course of conduct, meaning more than one act.
Subsection (A) further requires that the course of conduct places the victim in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, the victim, the victim’s spouse or intimate partner, or to an immediate family member of the victim. Subsection (B) requires instead that the course of conduct causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to the victim or the victim’s immediate family.

You, on the other hand:

-Claimed you had all of our locations on a wall or other vertical structure with the intent to install fear, create uncertainty surrounding our safety, and harass us.
-Threatened to dox us and hire someone to find our IPs with the intent to install fear and/or harm us.
-Claim to have our IPs and use such information in a manor to attempt to threaten, harm, create uncertainty around safety, install emotional distress, or manipulate us.
(For example, you have expressed to me that you “know where I work and know where I live.”)
-Told someone in this thread that you were going to find them and show up at their door.

Somethings that may not fall under cyberstalking but most likely cyberthreats:

-Explained in detail how Marshall is going to “beat us black and blue,” or how he will hurt us in general.
-Threatened to sue, SWAT, and /or other forms of government interference without proper cause.
-Threatened us with supposed screenshots and/or other bits of information. (I.e. claiming you gave screenshots of everything bad we’ve said/done in an attempt to install fear and/or extort us later.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Again, if anyone here is falls under cyberstalking, it’s you.
None of us keep track of your location. You willingly share it with us.
No one keeps track of your location to harm you.
No one uses your location to threaten, harass, or intimidate you.
While speculations about you have occurred on this forum, that is not the same as libel.

Spoiler: 18 U.S.C. § 2261A:

Title 18, United States Code, Section 2261A is the federal stalking statute. Section 2261A(1) covers in-person stalking and Section 2261A(2) covers cyberstalking— stalking that occurs using Internet or telephones—as well as stalking that occurs using the mail. Section 2261(2), originally enacted as part of the Violence Against Women Act of 2005, has two main provisions—Subsections (A) and (B):
• Both provisions require that the defendant act with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person.
• Both provisions also require the use of the mail, any interactive computer service or electronic communication service or electronic communication system of interstate commerce, or any other facility of interstate or foreign commerce. Usually this element is met with the use of the Internet.
• Both provisions also require that the defendant engaged in a course of conduct, meaning more than one act.
Subsection (A) further requires that the course of conduct places the victim in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, the victim, the victim’s spouse or intimate partner, or to an immediate family member of the victim. Subsection (B) requires instead that the course of conduct causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress to the victim or the victim’s immediate family.

You, on the other hand:

-Claimed you had all of our locations on a wall or other vertical structure with the intent to install fear, create uncertainty surrounding our safety, and harass us.
-Threatened to dox us and hire someone to find our IPs with the intent to install fear and/or harm us.
-Claim to have our IPs and use such information in a manor to attempt to threaten, harm, create uncertainty around safety, install emotional distress, or manipulate us.
(For example, you have expressed to me that you “know where I work and know where I live.”)
-Told someone in this thread that you were going to find them and show up at their door.

Somethings that may not fall under cyberstalking but most likely cyberthreats:

-Explained in detail how Marshall is going to “beat us black and blue,” or how he will hurt us in general.
-Threatened to sue, SWAT, and /or other forms of government interference without proper cause.
-Threatened us with supposed screenshots and/or other bits of information. (I.e. claiming you gave screenshots of everything bad we’ve said/done in an attempt to install fear and/or extort us later.

Hun, you joined April 15, 2020. This goes back to March 13, 2017.

Now, go back and find ALL of the FACTS and THEN come and try telling the story again with ALL the FACTS in proper ORDER and CONTEXT.

I'll wait and give you another try before I blast what a moron you are

Go ahead, I'm waiting...

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Hun, you joined April 15, 2020. This goes back to March 13, 2017.

Now, go back and find ALL of the FACTS and THEN come and try telling the story again with ALL the FACTS in proper ORDER and CONTEXT.

Most people actually lurk here instead of posting right out the gate like a dumb faggot such as you, Melinda.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Most people actually lurk here instead of posting right out the gate like a dumb faggot such as you, Melinda.

Oh yes, I'm "dumb" for dueling back with people who declared war on my family March 13, 2017

DID YOU CATCH MY SARCASM SLOW ONE?

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Oh yes, I'm "dumb" for dueling back with people who declared war on my family March 13, 2017

DID YOU CATCH MY SARCASM SLOW ONE?

Nobody "declared war" on you or your family Melinda lmao, you outed yourself as a dumb fucking tard, then the nature of the internet manifested and here we are now. You can keep on trying to act like a victim if you'd like, it's quite comical.

 

[lamp]

Hun, you joined April 15, 2020. This goes back to March 13, 2017.

Now, go back and find ALL of the FACTS and THEN come and try telling the story again with ALL the FACTS in proper ORDER and CONTEXT.

I'll wait and give you another try before I blast what a moron you are

Go ahead, I'm waiting

Melinda, I’ve read through the thread several Like @Burmese Rice Farmer said, people lurk here before posting.

There’s no context needed for what you’ve said and done. You’ve done it unprovoked, constantly. It does not matter if someone here made fun of you, you move on. That’s not an excuse to then threaten, harass, or intimidate people.

Here are some other points:
-Marshall doxed you guys first. In his YouTube video, he flashed around a court/legal document that had your address.
-You’ve threatened people throughout this thread unprovoked. You’ve even admitted to having fantasies of killing null.
-You’ve always been obsessed with finding IP addresses and threatening people.
-You've always used Marshall as a pawn and a way to threaten the physical safety of users here.
-No one ‘declared war on your family.’ You started this thread with your own actions of continuous lawsuits and lack of understanding that people were here to make fun of the Stalker, not you. Instead, you flipped out and started threatening KF users, all of which you didn’t even know. Marshall also had videos of him admitting that he was going to send a mob of people after Null, at an address that didn’t even belong to Null.

I should also add that your actions of cyberstalking do not come in self defense, like you’re arguing. They come with malicious intent.

Also, I joined April 16th, not 15th.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

She gets Marshall to come on and threaten people, as well as boast about his violent assaults and military and martial arts training, and then she turns around and plays the 'Tee-hee, who says that was Marshall? And who says I'm Melinda?" card. It's dishonest and pathetic. I'm leaving aside the nature of Marshall's threats and boasting, which is also dishonest and definitely pathetic.