Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Yeah, I know what the true believers will say, but to be fair I did say 'consistent'. It still works from a rational perspective, obviously won't work on the terminally irrational.

Incidentally I'm in the UK, where misgendering is a crime on par with human trafficking and yet the Conservative govt have been clarifying the Equality Act as regards womens' and transgender rights, literally murdering trannies with logic and reason. Hate speech laws will always be embarassing here, but as long as you're not impolite we seem to be tempering some of the excesses, very slowly and quietly.

Setup:
1.png


2.png
3.png

Edit: A tale of delusion in three parts:
5.png
4.png
6.png
 
Last edited:
FWIW, I know a lot of terfs who hate FTTs because the FTTs are batshit crazy, and also because FTTs are actively doing tremendous harm to women's rights, in part by acting as Trojan Horses, as in Gavin Grimm wanting to force her way into boys' bathrooms, which is much more palatable to the general public than equally pervy boys wanting to force their way into girls' bathrooms. Both are of course happening.
 
Do Snapchat stories count?
View attachment 1469218
“Whaaaaat you mean you’re not a natal woman with delicate and feminine features?? Never would have guessed!”

jeez

They act like it's some tremendous secret and no one can tell. Like sorry Veronica but your square shoulders, nonexistent hips and ring size 9 fingers gave all that away.
 
Last edited:
I'm a lil exceptional and didn't quite understand what the infamous @BoxerShorts47 was trying to get at when he said "moat and bailey" in his containment thread over at the general discussion, but was too embarrassed to ask so sincere thanks for the clarification.
:pinetar:
I know how that feels. For years I had only seen the term being used in spoken word so I had no idea how to spell it. So... you're welcome!

Conservatives are largely under the impression (like the general public largely is as well) that troons are all homosexual, so they support them because it means that all those icky nasty gays are just straight people "trapped in the wrong body", and letting them transition theoretically means that their relationships will at least appear straight.

IOW transgenderism allows conservatives to pretend that gay trans people are just "broken" straight people and they support transition because it allows the gays to live their "true lives" as defective heteros.
I think you're reading far too much into it.

Conservatives aren't fighting any harder against trannies than they are against gays because they know they've already lost in the court of public opinion when it comes to any LGBT issue. The only ones who are still going hard at it are the bible-thumpers who were elected by bible-thumping constituencies. Anyone who has to appeal to a moderate constituency knows that the moment they try to push back in any way, they'll get showered in accusations of -ism and -phobia that the public is being conditioned to consider worse than murder accusations.

It's political expediency. The public mood is just not right for anyone to publicly push against troons. Not yet, anyway. Public opinion swings very quickly these days...
 
I think you're reading far too much into it.

Conservatives aren't fighting any harder against trannies than they are against gays because they know they've already lost in the court of public opinion when it comes to any LGBT issue. The only ones who are still going hard at it are the bible-thumpers who were elected by bible-thumping constituencies. Anyone who has to appeal to a moderate constituency knows that the moment they try to push back in any way, they'll get showered in accusations of -ism and -phobia that the public is being conditioned to consider worse than murder accusations.

It's political expediency. The public mood is just not right for anyone to publicly push against troons. Not yet, anyway. Public opinion swings very quickly these days...

I don't really agree, and I don't think I'm reading into it at all. Iran is an overwhelmingly conservative country that mandates transition for homosexuals - and if the gay/lesbian refuses to do it, the state murders them. A massive number of the parents transing their kids are conservative as hell and many if not most will openly admit that they "were afraid (kid) was gay" but are oh so very happy they're a "straight trans" kid. There's also a fairly sizable population of ftms who all have the same story: They came out to their conservative families as lesbians and suffered rejection and abuse, but when they came out as "straight transmen" they were accepted and celebrated. The trends are very, very obvious.

Also, seriously, where do you live that conservatives don't care about gays anymore? Just because they're not trying to get anti-sodomy laws put back on the books doesn't mean that they don't hate gays and lesbians still.
 
I know how that feels. For years I had only seen the term being used in spoken word so I had no idea how to spell it. So... you're welcome!


I think you're reading far too much into it.

Conservatives aren't fighting any harder against trannies than they are against gays because they know they've already lost in the court of public opinion when it comes to any LGBT issue. The only ones who are still going hard at it are the bible-thumpers who were elected by bible-thumping constituencies. Anyone who has to appeal to a moderate constituency knows that the moment they try to push back in any way, they'll get showered in accusations of -ism and -phobia that the public is being conditioned to consider worse than murder accusations.

It's political expediency. The public mood is just not right for anyone to publicly push against troons. Not yet, anyway. Public opinion swings very quickly these days...
That's kind of the scary thing, the TRA crowd being seen as analogous with other LGB people in regards to political opinion. Once the TRAs push too hard and everyone's peaked all at once, who's to say actual normal gay people aren't going to be targeted because they're "associated" with TRAs?
 
Waiting to tell someone you're trans until you're literally about to have sex should be considered some sort of sexual assault. They act like it's the trans persons right to tell them whenever they want or not at all, but fuck that shit.
 
Waiting to tell someone you're trans until you're literally about to have sex should be considered some sort of sexual assault. They act like it's the trans persons right to tell them whenever they want or not at all, but fuck that shit.

Eh. It's not sexual assault unless a sexual act actually takes place, and on the off chance someone actually fails to notice a tranny before it gets its pants off, the mess downstairs makes it immediately apparent, giving the "victim" a chance to tell it to fuck off. (Pressuring them into sex at that point would be assault, of course.)

It's just a dick move.
 
I don't really agree, and I don't think I'm reading into it at all. Iran is an overwhelmingly conservative country that mandates transition for homosexuals - and if the gay/lesbian refuses to do it, the state murders them. A massive number of the parents transing their kids are conservative as hell and many if not most will openly admit that they "were afraid (kid) was gay" but are oh so very happy they're a "straight trans" kid. There's also a fairly sizable population of ftms who all have the same story: They came out to their conservative families as lesbians and suffered rejection and abuse, but when they came out as "straight transmen" they were accepted and celebrated. The trends are very, very obvious.
You know, bringing up Iran did your argument a serious disservice.

Anyway, I'm not hearing all those stories about bible-thumping parents suddenly being happy that their kid isn't gay but trans instead. Mostly they're disowning their kids, and the tale I always hear boils down to "a faggot is a faggot". Clearly, we inhabit very different social circles.

Also, seriously, where do you live that conservatives don't care about gays anymore? Just because they're not trying to get anti-sodomy laws put back on the books doesn't mean that they don't hate gays and lesbians still.
I'm talking about politicians. Specially in state-level positions, where the votes coming from overwhelmingly liberal and moderate big cities count for a lot, many of them refrain from making any inflammatory official statements about LGBT. As I said, they feel they've lost that war already.

In private, though? Plenty of gay-bashing and tranny-hating and all those wonderful things. When they're not sucking dicks in public bathrooms, anyway...
 
Oh no. Now you've done it.
Here at Wash and Smash we specialize in cleaning and destruction. This needs the former and deserves the latter.
Allow me to call out my horrors:
  • The ",,," is an indicator of a less-than-excellent education or hotdog-fingers incapable of using a cellphone keyboard
  • A commentor in the post acknowledges this person as a Juggalo. I admit I don't have the knowledge necessary to see the clue in this scene.
  • "Katie" lives with "her" dad and doesn't know the difference between "dyed" and "died". It's possible the photo on the cabinet is the OP.
  • Post history shows evidence of a special interest in trains. My autism evidence grows.
  • Messy home, unironed flag, hand-me-down cabinet with old dolls - Now we're getting into my area of expertise. This is not a wealthy family.
  • Boxes of literal trash indicating mental illness.
  • Plug-in butt-massager. The dad may be old.
  • Do not step on that floor in bare feet
In short, this house smells terrible, is unclean in many ways, and may be harboring more than one type of disease.
 
Sticking to the FTM theme today, here's some delusion from the Kayleigh Garrah-founded r/transmanlifehacks, a subreddit full of young women giving out "tips" to help each other pass. Of course, they're also telling each other they totally pass, bro. Major "how do you do, fellow men?" vibes.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.09.13 PM.png

link/archive

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.08.55 PM.png

link/archive
Do these girls know that the "femmy tiktok e-boy" look only makes them look like edgy tomboys at best?

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.09.57 PM.png

link/archive

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.10.09 PM.png

link/archive
This one is just so.... feminine, even with the eyebrows. Too bad for her.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.10.20 PM.png

link/archive
You really can't get any more butch bulldyke than this, and yet the comments are still saying "you totally pass, man!"

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.10.39 PM.png

link/archive
Some FTMs are doomed to look like stereotypical Aidens, shirt buttoned all the way or not. There's something about her eyes that gives it away, is it the lack of male brow ridge?

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.10.52 PM.png

link/archive
Again with the e-boy shit.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.11.17 PM.png

link/archive
Even after T, she still looks like a typical genderspecial Tumblr girl. I guess that's what she was going for anyway with that "nonbinary trans masc" nonsense.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.11.48 PM.png

link/archive

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.12.05 PM.png

link/archive
Getting a bit of Natalie/Milo Stewart from this one.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.12.31 PM.png

link/archive
That's the ultimate "butch lesbian soccer player" haircut, so no, you don't pass at all.

Screen Shot 2020-07-23 at 9.38.30 PM.png

link/archive
Holy shit, what an Aiden. It's always some combination of pube beard/dyed hair/tacky tattoos that gives them away.
 
Back