U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Portland officials send federal government cease-and-desist letter calling for removal of courthouse fencing

Portland authorities are calling on the government to remove fencing around a federal courthouse amid ongoing protests or face legal action, according to a recently published official letter.

The “illegally” installed concrete and metal barriers “are both unpermitted and represent a hazard to the traveling public,” said a letter sent with a cease-and-desist order to a federal official Thursday. Among other things, they block a bike lane, according to the document, published online by Willamette Week.

“Unidentified agents of the federal government have placed unpermitted fencing and jersey barriers in the city’s right-of-way outside of the Hatfield Federal Courthouse,” the letter states. “The fencing and barriers in the right-of-way create a hazard for Portlanders by blocking the bike lane on SW Main, which is the premiere bike facility into downtown Portland.”

Failure to remove the fencing would violate city code and administrative rules, “and will be subject to fines and potential legal action,” said the letter.

A spokesperson for the U.S. General Services Administration, which received the letter from Portland's transportation head and its chief deputy city attorney, did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request seeking comment.

The fencing was erected Wednesday to protect the courthouse in downtown Portland, according to Willamette Week. But it has since become a focus of protesters' attention after nearly two months of demonstrations, which at times have devolved into riots.

Since its installment, demonstrators have attempted to tear it down, throwing fireworks over the perimeter. In at least one instance, they lit a large fire between the barrier and the courthouse, according to social media and reports.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-oregon-protests-fencing-courthouse

"The poor innocent widdle protestors are just trying to walk up to the courthouse with those weapons, explosives, and torches, and the mean old feddy weddy fascists are violating the poor dear's widdle rights by blocking their path with that evil hate fence."

Live ammo, please.

Can the Feds bill Portland for the Marshals time, injuries, et cetera? Since Portland is clearly instigating this by having the police stand down?
 

1595630171215.png


These faggots live in their complete own reality, detached from any and all outside info. They exist only to eat, shit, and cry on twitter.
 
Last edited:
When this is over Trump should relocate that court to another city. Let Portland lose the economic and tax benefits as well as status.

The one good thing about covid19 is that it has forced lots of companies to move to a work from home environment. Lots or normal people no longer have to put up with this bullshit because of work and will leave.
 
Portland officials send federal government cease-and-desist letter calling for removal of courthouse fencing

Portland authorities are calling on the government to remove fencing around a federal courthouse amid ongoing protests or face legal action, according to a recently published official letter.

The “illegally” installed concrete and metal barriers “are both unpermitted and represent a hazard to the traveling public,” said a letter sent with a cease-and-desist order to a federal official Thursday. Among other things, they block a bike lane, according to the document, published online by Willamette Week.

“Unidentified agents of the federal government have placed unpermitted fencing and jersey barriers in the city’s right-of-way outside of the Hatfield Federal Courthouse,” the letter states. “The fencing and barriers in the right-of-way create a hazard for Portlanders by blocking the bike lane on SW Main, which is the premiere bike facility into downtown Portland.”

Failure to remove the fencing would violate city code and administrative rules, “and will be subject to fines and potential legal action,” said the letter.

A spokesperson for the U.S. General Services Administration, which received the letter from Portland's transportation head and its chief deputy city attorney, did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request seeking comment.

The fencing was erected Wednesday to protect the courthouse in downtown Portland, according to Willamette Week. But it has since become a focus of protesters' attention after nearly two months of demonstrations, which at times have devolved into riots.

Since its installment, demonstrators have attempted to tear it down, throwing fireworks over the perimeter. In at least one instance, they lit a large fire between the barrier and the courthouse, according to social media and reports.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-oregon-protests-fencing-courthouse
Good, fuck the bikers. Those hipster fucks think they own the road.
 
Look at those names. Wyatt Ash-Milby , Caleb, Cameron, Taylor, Marnie. One can just hear the Privilege.
I mean, yeah.

Edp1VgQU8AEsyhP.png



People look at this creature and think "homeless derelict" but zir lives in a $600k house and has a hipster job.



EdqTx06U0AE8HSy.png
baileyq.png

baileyq2.png

It is some manner of troon I cannot tell which type.
Edp358qUEAQgb0f (1).jpg
 

Attachments

  • Edtzkv7U8AA_w1A.png
    Edtzkv7U8AA_w1A.png
    19.9 KB · Views: 74
Portland officials send federal government cease-and-desist letter calling for removal of courthouse fencing

Portland authorities are calling on the government to remove fencing around a federal courthouse amid ongoing protests or face legal action, according to a recently published official letter.

The “illegally” installed concrete and metal barriers “are both unpermitted and represent a hazard to the traveling public,” said a letter sent with a cease-and-desist order to a federal official Thursday. Among other things, they block a bike lane, according to the document, published online by Willamette Week.

“Unidentified agents of the federal government have placed unpermitted fencing and jersey barriers in the city’s right-of-way outside of the Hatfield Federal Courthouse,” the letter states. “The fencing and barriers in the right-of-way create a hazard for Portlanders by blocking the bike lane on SW Main, which is the premiere bike facility into downtown Portland.”

Failure to remove the fencing would violate city code and administrative rules, “and will be subject to fines and potential legal action,” said the letter.

A spokesperson for the U.S. General Services Administration, which received the letter from Portland's transportation head and its chief deputy city attorney, did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request seeking comment.

The fencing was erected Wednesday to protect the courthouse in downtown Portland, according to Willamette Week. But it has since become a focus of protesters' attention after nearly two months of demonstrations, which at times have devolved into riots.

Since its installment, demonstrators have attempted to tear it down, throwing fireworks over the perimeter. In at least one instance, they lit a large fire between the barrier and the courthouse, according to social media and reports.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/portland-oregon-protests-fencing-courthouse
HAHAHAAH THEY CALL THE BARRIERS WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO PREVENT HARM GETTING OVER THE FENCE AS "HARMFUL", AND "ILLEGAL" BUT CHAZ TOOK LIKE A MONTH TO TAKE BACK OVER AND WAS A CRIME RIDDEN SHITHOLE IN THE FIRST 3 DAYS OR SO. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP.

Conservatives literally need to wake up and fight back. There's literal marxist jewish pedophiles within in the U.S. Government who HATE America and what it stands for and Conservatives are just saying "Hey, that's unjust! Don't you know how many ANARCHISTS will burn down the building behind the barriers? Y-you can't do that!" Or something to that level. They literally need to learn that Democrats DO NOT CARE about them and will bend over for these BLM trannys to appease them so they can get more voters. They are literally Charging the Police with Police brutality in a fucking RIOT situation, removing gear from them, and are issuing C&D'S to take down their only line of defense. Next thing you know, they will take tasers from them, and probably some of their Lethal weapons aswell.
 
I mean, yeah.

View attachment 1471103


People look at this creature and think "homeless derelict" but zir lives in a $600k house and has a hipster job.

Yeah OK, but meh?

1595630743044.png

I'm thinking someone else's house (parents, inherited, bf, whatever).

Edit - Looks like parents to me:
1595632103067.png


Dad:

Mom:


I know there are exceptions, but my thesis is that these are white middle-class losers who aren't very bright, so I am going to select evidence to confirm my bias.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, Portland but we can't take down the fences at this time. You see, this is a crime scene, and is part of an ongoing investigation into attempts by several suspects to burn down federal property and assault federal law enforcement officers.

Once our investigations are done and any related defendants are prosecuted, then you can have free use of your right-of-way.
 
My favorite part of this is Mason Lake blaming the feds. :story:

"Someone doesn't want ME here! Must be the feds because no other explanation exists in Portland! Warrrrr criiiiiimeeess!"
View attachment 1470981

Here's the REAL fed you guys! Guys? ....guys?
View attachment 1470982

What an unimaginably cucked individual.
"My problems are NEVER my fault."

Ultimately, this entire summer of rioting can be pinned down to people never accepting fault for their self-inflicted problems. The same people that want accountability from cops want no accountability or consequences for their own actions.
 
Here's the lawyer who cried sexual harassment for being "groped" when the feds tackled her rainbow tutu-wearing ass for resisting arrest then quickly mumbled "well maybe not" when no one really fell for it.


Edf3iOxUwAIFIQs.jpg


Edf2LMWU0AAtXdw.png



They took down her page on her law firm's site, don't know if she was suspended or if they are just trying to cover for her, but there's the archive.

kris.png


kris1.png


kris2.png


Looks like this is probably her husband.

kris3.png


 
Currently reading through the Judge's opinion. Going to post some things that stand out to me as being of interest. The judge, for the purpose of his legal analysis, is approaching it as IF the minivan arrest was an actual unlawful arrest.

As its second example, the State has offered a video, which it states has been circulated heavily online, and which appears to show an individual being seized without any verbal explanation from officers. Potter Decl. [ECF 6] ¶ 6 (citing to, Sen. Jeff Merkley, Twitter.com, https://twitter.com/SenJeffMerkley/status/1283852273089683464). The video shows the seizure but does not show any context for what preceded it. It therefore does not speak to probable cause one way or another because it is equally plausible that the individual was an innocent bystander or that he had committed some criminal act just before officers seized him. There is simply no way to know on the record before me, and I am not permitted to assume one way or the other. It is not, for purposes of this opinion, evidence of an arrest that lacked probable cause.

The State’s reasoning is that counter-protesters, once they learn of seizures of protesters by federal agents, will dress up like police and go out on private missions to kidnap protesters. This despite the fact that such kidnappings are Measure 11 felonies in Oregon, punishable by mandatory minimum sentences of up to 70-90 years in prison.5 I do not discount the animosity among these groups and had I been asked to assume that something would result in fistfights, or theft, or destruction of signs, or damage to vehicles, that would have made sense. 5ORS 137.700 (listing Measure 11 crimes and mandatory minimum sentences). But the idea that seizures by law enforcement will lead to kidnappings by private parties is a bridge too far.
I put in a similar category the State’s asserted interest in preventing a spate of cases in which protesters mistakenly think the federal agents who are seizing them are actually counter-protest kidnappers. Again, there is no evidence to support such an assertion. The State has not pointed to any instance in which a protester was subjected to state violence because she believed she was resisting a kidnapping. In both instances of a federal seizure it is either admitted or clearly visible that the agents’ uniforms say “Police.” The State further admitted at oral argument that, to its knowledge, counter-protesters have never dressed up as police. Draft. Tr. at 31.

The “chilling effect” injury comes closest to satisfying the Article III standing requirements described above. It is the only one of the alleged harms that has any evidentiary support in the record. See Pl.’s Decl.’s [ECF 8-11]. At argument, however, the state seemed to assert this interest on the theory that speech would be chilled by the fear of kidnappings. This theory creates a problem under the third prong of Lujan, similar to the problem with the State’s alleged interest in Fourth Amendment violations, which requires that the alleged harm be redressable by the remedy that a plaintiff seeks. The injury the state asserts—a chilling of its citizens’ speech—is not actually redressable by the requested remedy, given that citizens could still believe they might be kidnapped even if police are required to verbally identify themselves. Apparently, the word “police” and other official insignia on uniforms has not quelled this fear among the public, and it is highly questionable whether the requested relief would do so either.

The same is true here. The state has alleged that the purportedly illegal seizures by Defendants have caused an injury to its citizens’ rights to speech and assembly. In other words, the State must show that the illegal seizures—analogous to the chokeholds in Lyons—will occur again in the future. The State could try to show, for example, that all of Defendants’ seizures are illegal, or that they are under orders to fail to identify themselves or to make random arrests without probable cause. The state has shown none of this. It has presented no evidence of any official orders or policies and has presented no evidence that these allegedly illegal seizures are a widespread practice. Despite the broad language in the complaint, Oregon has shown—at most—that this type of seizure has happened twice.7 At oral argument, when asked what evidence it could present to show the likelihood of future harm, the state pointed to the fact that Defendants have defended against this lawsuit. Tr. at 39-40. Not only is defending a lawsuit not evidence of constitutionally unlawful behavior, it is not sufficient to support the showing the state is required to make under Lyons.
 
I'd imagine many of the real laser proof goggles and glasses have a hell of a tint, which... has anyone else been forced to do night range quals with tinted goggles because supply fucks everything up? Can't see shit with tinted goggles in anything nearing a night time lighting. I'd wager that if they did put up a bunch of flood lights so the feds could see at night with those goggles, the lights would be broken fairly quickly because antifa would catch on.

Also I wonder if they make laser proof inserts for the promasks.

Wouldn't you need to cover every color? Making them, like, effectively black. I think the goggles are matched with the laser type. Unless they can specifically block the usual wavelengths.
 
Here's the lawyer who cried sexual harassment for being "groped" when the feds tackled her rainbow tutu-wearing ass for resisting arrest then quickly mumbled "well maybe not" when no one really fell for it.


View attachment 1471126

View attachment 1471127


They took down her page on her law firm's site, don't know if she was suspended or if they are just trying to cover for her, but there's the archive.

View attachment 1471129

View attachment 1471131

View attachment 1471139

Looks like this is probably her husband.

View attachment 1471147

I was thinking it might be nice to have house like that until I realize that it's worth 400K.
Here in Texas 400K will give you a nice upper middle class house with a pool, that shit looks like it's worth 50K with a mortgage of 500 a month.
 
At oral argument, when asked what evidence it could present to show the likelihood of future harm, the state pointed to the fact that Defendants have defended against this lawsuit.
So the fact that the Fed is defending them selves againts the lawsuit is suppose to be evidence of wrong doing according to the State of Oregon?
Fucking hell, did they eat lead as a child?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back