- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
I think that is the issue with angry reviewers in the first place, they don't actually review their points of interest with any credibility. They just mindlessly bash certain properties of a medium that are usually well known as being of poor quality. The entire M.O. is not to contribute to the medium itself, but to regurgitate and self promote their own brand of "humor". When they milk every last "bad" point of interest, then they force their humor into their videos. Little do they know that what made them funny in the first place originated with what they would criticize, and because their was no real creative contribution in the first place, they mistake their own brand of humor as the driving force of their popularity. Hence the unfunny story arcs and watered down nonsense people like Linkara create.
On tgwtg in particular they are often bad for spending more time describing the events and story in whatever it is they are reviewing than actually talking about their opinion and why they liked/disliked a thing.
AT4W was never much more than a lets read with the odd snarky comment. For people who were so smug about being 'critics. they did very little analysis beyond cheap jokes and memes.