Kevin Gibes / Kathryn Gibes / TransSalamander / RageTreb / The Green Salamander - "Am hole:" The epitomized Twitter MtF you thought was just a myth! Donate to his Transformers toy fund today!

[Cpl. Long Dong Silver]

I don't necessarily disbelieve that a young boy dressing as a woman or being dressed as one for fun by his elder siblings or whatever is true. Happened to me when I was a kid, just wanted to know how it felt I guess. Found it funny, laughed a bit and that was that. Which I guess makes it harder for me to believe that a troon would somehow awaken to their perversion from it. I didn't know what sex was at the time, and I felt no particular way about it other than "haha me in girl clothes this is funny ok let's stop now". Maybe if Kevin was actually dressed as a woman as a kid, he would have realized there's nothing special about it too, instead of growing up to be the poster boy for degenerate scum.

I have to agree that putting on girls clothes once as a kid =/ troon.

Kevin's lack of a father and being raised on the internet played a far larger role than going kid drag once with his sister.

 

[Pork Soda]

Cute gamer girl!
View attachment 1479553

Our boy is famous and modest about it
View attachment 1479558

Do you ever stop laughing long enough to think about the reality of how pathetic he is? That having a couple thousand followers is everything to him? Twitter is his life. I grew up on the internet too, but my obsession with being noticed died as I got older; it didn't get worse. That just ain't natural.

Also it looks like he shit himself in that cockeyed smug little photo there. Teehee, Mistress is coming to clean me up soon, but until then I have to marinate uwu Goddess!

 

[illhavetwo]

The fact that he doesn't even remember it strikes me, too - isn't 4 a bit young to develop a paraphilia? I could be wrong.

This guy talks about having it since he was 5. I think before puberty it typically manifests as a fascination and thrilling enjoyment.

 

[Swerf'n'Terf]

This guy talks about having it since he was 5. I think before puberty it typically manifests as a fascination and thrilling enjoyment.

Alternative possibility: confirmation bias. How many little boys love playing princess dress up but never give it deeper meaning as adults because their sexuality doesn't involve imagining themselves as women? One of the troonologists (can't remember if Blanchard, Bailey or Zucker), described AGP as an inherent orientation which if true, wouldn't develop as a result of external stimuli.

It seems likely in Kev's case, given that he doesn't even remember it.

Edit: think I misunderstood your comment as 'started at age 5' rather than 'apparent at age 5'.

 

[Syntaxion]

Alternative possibility: confirmation bias. How many little boys love playing princess dress up but never give it deeper meaning as adults because their sexuality doesn't involve imagining themselves as women? One of the troonologists (can't remember if Blanchard, Bailey or Zucker), described AGP as an inherent orientation so it wouldn't develop as a result of external stimuli.

It seems likely in Kev's case, given that he doesn't even remember it.

Source on that?

Despite having all human genes mapped, we haven't even found a gene (or set of genes) that influences sexual orientation - let alone fetishes.

It seems impossible for a fetish like AGP to be in-born, because it's based on seeing yourself as a women (i.e through gender norms like wearing dresses or makeup)

As a baby, especially before birth, you simply don't know what males and females are, let alone understanding gender norms.

A(n unborn) baby has no concept of male, female, or how either act within society - so how can they inherently have a fetish for it?

Gender norms aren't inborn, therefore neither can AGP because it needs a society to first tell the invididual what's expected of either gender.
I mean, gender norms themselves are "external stimuli" since they aren't inherent neither, so why would AGP be?
How can something, culture based, be inborn?

How would a baby be interested in wearing dresses and makeup, if the baby doesn't even know what either of those are? And how would that work for other cultures?

If it were inborn, would an English baby (born with AGP) but grows up in Scotland then, not have AGP? (with kilts being for men and all)

It would be like saying a fetish for high heels is inborn; that would obviously be impossible, when high heels are a modern, cultural invention that has no genetic aspect

 

[Misaki Nakahara]

Sure
View attachment 1480213
archive

Every tranny has this exact same fucking story. It's up there with "I always played as the girl character in videogames" in terms of trans coming-of-age clichés.

 

[Old Fart]

I think that, when a tranny claims their fetish stems from early childhood, it's either (a) a false memory, or (b) deliberate retconning ("lying"), or (c) a true memory, but with (a) and (b) taking the lion's share, like 98% or so.

Take Jon (Slingblade) for example, who claims memories from the age of three or so. You might perhaps have memories of burning your hands that far away, but of dressing-up events? No.

 

[Swerf'n'Terf]

Source on that?

Despite having all human genes mapped, we haven't even found a gene (or set of genes) that influences sexual orientation - let alone fetishes.

It seems impossible for a fetish like AGP to be in-born, because it's based on seeing yourself as a women (i.e through gender norms like wearing dresses or makeup)

As a baby, especially before birth, you simply don't know what males and females are, let alone understanding gender norms.

A(n unborn) baby has no concept of male, female, or how either act within society - so how can they inherently have a fetish for it?

Gender norms aren't inborn, therefore neither can AGP because it needs a society to first tell the invididual what's expected of either gender.
I mean, gender norms themselves are "external stimuli" since they aren't inherent neither, so why would AGP be?
How can something, culture based, be inborn?

It's one of Benjamin Boyce's interviews with one of the specialists I mentioned. Can't remember which one but when I get a chance to check myself I'll let you know, and the vids are here if you are interested (1, 2, 3, 4). Christ, let's see if I'm up to explaining the hypothesis...

Spoiler: An attempt

The argument is that AGP is an inverse sexuality, meaning it focuses inwards instead of outwards, and interprets sexuality through the opposite sex. Both opposite of what they would be normally. If you believe that homosexuality can be inborn, then this can be too.

How can something, culture based, be inborn?

AGP itself isn't culture based, the desire is to be the opposite sex. The trans movement has deliberately confused things because of all the newspeak, but remember sex is male/man and female/woman. Gender is masculine and feminine, and that is the cultural aspect, and changes over time and across the world. High heels are coded as feminine now but they weren't always, e.g: men's shoes 18th century. By that logic, an AGP would be aroused by wearing a skirt but not a kilt, even though they are basically the same garment, because one is understood by society as masculine and one as feminine.

I can see how it makes sense as a theory, even if I'm not expert enough to have a strong opinion on it. This is getting off the topic of Kev now though, so let's take any further discussion to deep thoughts on trannies.

Either way, Kevin's a filthy perv (literally) and completely lacks self awareness. I'd take any stories about how he came to be trans with a pinch of salt, and a bucket of bleach and a wire brush.

Edit: Bailey discusses here. Additional Blanchard article.
Edit 2: @Syntaxion12 by 'inherent' I didn't necessarily mean 'born that way'. Under this theory it could develop in puberty and then be a permanent part of that person's sexuality.

 

[Sonya-chan]

Sure
View attachment 1480213
archive

Proof he doesn't talk to his sister, because she would confirm what really happen (and i'm pretty sure it's just a random story that has nothing to do with cross dressing but kev's cumbrain have to put his fetishes all over his memories.)

 

[Syntaxion]

It's one of Benjamin Boyce's interviews with one of the specialists I mentioned. Can't remember which one but when I get a chance to check myself I'll let you know, and the vids are here if you are interested (1, 2, 3, 4).

Christ, let's see if I'm up to explaining the hypothesis...

Spoiler: An attempt

The argument is that AGP is an inverse sexuality, meaning it focuses inwards instead of outwards, and interprets sexuality through the opposite sex. Both opposite of what they would be normally. If you believe that homosexuality is inborn, then this can be too.



AGP itself isn't culture based, the desire is to be the opposite sex. The trans movement has deliberately confused things because of all the newspeak, but remember sex is male/man and female/woman. Gender is masculine and feminine, and that is the cultural aspect, and changes over time and across the world. High heels are coded as feminine now but they weren't always, e.g: men's shoes 18th century. By that logic, an AGP would be aroused by wearing a skirt but not a kilt, even though they are basically the same garment, because one is understood by society as masculine and one as feminine.

I can see how it makes sense as a theory, even if I'm not expert enough to have a strong opinion on it. This is getting off the topic of Kev now though, so let's take any further discussion to deep thoughts on trannies.

Edit: it's Bailey, here. Additional Blanchard article.

Interesting articles thanks! but tbf I'm not convinced, there simply is no gene or set of genes for sexuality or fetishes.

The thing is, I don't believe homosexuality is inborn neither, just like anything sexuality related, it's something that you get in your youth/around the time you start puberty (since there's no genes for that neither, but fyi I'm not saying homosexuality is choice - i'm only saying it isn't inborn)

On top of that, AGP is rare and is virtually non-existent in history; if it were genetic it would be more common.

The fact that AGP is much more common nowadays, in the Western world, and rare everywhere else and rare in history proves that there is no inborn aspect to it.

Also, if it were inborn it would have to be hereditary. Yet it's not common for it to run in a family. Hell, the fact that it's so overrepressented among men imo proves it isn't inborn. Unless it's a gene expression that's specific to men

Especially when so many with AGP "come out" in their later years. Babies obviously don't have a fetish, they don't even understand the concept of male and female; so how would they have a fetish for being the opposite sex, when they can't even comprehend those concepts?

There's just no scientific basis for AGP being inborn, Bailey and Blanchard aren't geneticists, they're a psychologist and sexologist.

But I agree, this is kind of offtopic so let's leave it.

 

[Tomssu]

Oh yes! Please do.

archive

 

[RonRiot]

Oh yes! Please do.
View attachment 1481902
archive

Jesus Christ. Why not have it printed out and bound in the skin of your severed wanger while you’re at it? Talk about cursed books. Wretched indeed are those who dare read from the Necronomicock.

 

[Shrekking Crew]

I too cannot wait for the sequel to Am Hole.

Still Hole.

 

[James Howlett]

Oh yes! Please do.
View attachment 1481902
archive

Dont worry Kevin, we got your greatest hits right here under one roof.

 

[BoobWhiskers]

Dont worry Kevin, we got your greatest hits right here under one roof.

The sad thing is, he tweets SO MUCH that it probably WOULD be more efficient to just gather up the receipts from here.

 

[Boris Blank's glass eye]

Dont worry Kevin, we got your greatest hits right here under one roof.

No tweet will ever top the famous "Am Hole" - and that's a quality it shares with its author.

 

[Mr. Bones]

No tweet will ever top the famous "Am Hole" - and that's a quality it shares with its author.

I cannot wait to see how Kev proves you wrong

 

[Boris Blank's glass eye]

I cannot wait to see how Kev proves you wrong

I'm almost afraid to ask, but which part?

 

[Spastic Colon]

Kev needs to enjoy being "Am Hole" while he can. We all know it is just a matter of time before he is officially "Was Hole" because once he realizes that "hole sex" is even less enjoyable than anal, he's just going to give up on the dilation and that sucker is going to close right up.

Is it just me or did that last photo of Kev look like he tried to doctor it to make himself look better? His face looks too smooth for that to be a #nofilter selfie. Of course, it's all for naught considering he didn't even bother to crop the photo to disguise his receding hairline, but it does look like he at least tried to look a little prettier for Mr. Triangle Dick.

 

[Mr. Bones]

I'm almost afraid to ask, but which part?

No tweet will ever top the famous "Am Hole"

That part