Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

BoxerShorts47 said:
Line by line quoting is nit-picking. It's not an effective form of communication. I'm not going to be respond line-by-line. write up your main-points and stop nitpicking minor issues.
Click to expand...

Are you illiterate?

Yes it is an effective form of communication when you want to respond to multiple parts with specific counter points. Also those "Minor issues" are talking about the overall crux of your various arguments such as: centrists are cucks, libtards bad, feminism killed western society, age of consent is feminism back in the 1600s we didn't have age of consent, women should just be baby factories, womanhood is defined only by what comes out your vagina, and other shit you've gone on about since around I'd say page 100 something of this thread. The point by point quoting is just piece mealing it so it is formatted better then trying to respond to a wall of text with a different wall of text.

How can someone who claims to have such a high IQ be unable to read line by line counterpoints without whining about it? It might be a touch inconvenient to type out compared to just quoting the whole thing, but it works better for an actual debate via text so you can understand which part is talking about your argument. This avoids misunderstandings and wasting time to correct misunderstandings.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Dead Mime, Stardust and 2 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
So same strategy the left uses to normalize all their policies ???
Click to expand...
That response makes, literally, no sense. Nothing in my response to your pathetic simpery had anything to do with liberal policy. Spouting random word salads is not a compelling argument, but seeing as how mimicry is the closest thing you can get to actually having an idea, I guess its to be expected.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Dead Mime, MarineTrainedTard, Troon Draugur and 1 other person
Zeke Von Genbu said:
Are you illiterate?

Yes it is an effective form of communication when you want to respond to multiple parts with specific counter points. Also those "Minor issues" are talking about the overall crux of your various arguments such as: centrists are cucks, libtards bad, feminism killed western society, age of consent is feminism back in the 1600s we didn't have age of consent, women should just be baby factories, womanhood is defined only by what comes out your vagina, and other shit you've gone on about since around I'd say page 100 something of this thread. The point by point quoting is just piece mealing it so it is formatted better then trying to respond to a wall of text with a different wall of text.

How can someone who claims to have such a high IQ be unable to read line by line counterpoints without whining about it? It might be a touch inconvenient to type out compared to just quoting the whole thing, but it works better for an actual debate via text so you can understand which part is talking about your argument. This avoids misunderstandings and wasting time to correct misunderstandings.
Click to expand...
Autism, dyslexia, schizophrenia...They all have an case of high IQ and trouble communicating, but dyslexia gets an pass because it doesn't causes any behavioral disorders.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Dead Mime, Zeke Von Genbu and 2 others
@BoxerShorts47 no the average person doesn’t care about those issues. The average person might have an opinion one way or the other concerning and relating to them but to say they care would imply that they campaign and it’s a deal breaking issue for them. Here’s a great example, I’m what most people call “Pro-Life” so therefor I’d like a candidate more if they were also Pro-Life. However if a candidate is “Pro-Choice” that doesn’t break the candidate for me if they’re good on other issues. If I were an elected official that had to vote on the issue of abortion and most of my constituents wanted it I’d have to vote in favor of it because I was elected to represent them not myself. That being said I’m also very Pro-Second Amendment and can’t ever vote against the lawful use of firearms or restricting them to people of sound mind and body (PS you don’t fit that bill).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Aviva's Biotech-Breakdown, Dead Mime and 4 others
Just A Butt said:
The Wonder Woman part really sold it for me.
Click to expand...
I can see why Boxy would be scared/disdainful of a strong female character, though. When you're a babyballs manlet with insecurity issues, those kind of chicks must be hella intimidating. I'd pity him if he wasn't such a repulsive pedofag sea nigger.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, MarineTrainedTard, Pope Fucker and 6 others
Stardust said:
@BoxerShorts47, at the risk of rainbow stickers, what can you offer to a woman? What can you provide for them?

And I mean you, not what mommy's credit card can afford. You only.
Click to expand...
You should already know the answer to that question.

Absolutely fucking nothing
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Aviva's Biotech-Breakdown, Pope Fucker, Dead Mime and 3 others
Zeke Von Genbu said:
Are you illiterate?

Yes it is an effective form of communication when you want to respond to multiple parts with specific counter points. Also those "Minor issues" are talking about the overall crux of your various arguments such as: centrists are cucks, libtards bad, feminism killed western society, age of consent is feminism back in the 1600s we didn't have age of consent, women should just be baby factories, womanhood is defined only by what comes out your vagina, and other shit you've gone on about since around I'd say page 100 something of this thread. The point by point quoting is just piece mealing it so it is formatted better then trying to respond to a wall of text with a different wall of text.

How can someone who claims to have such a high IQ be unable to read line by line counterpoints without whining about it? It might be a touch inconvenient to type out compared to just quoting the whole thing, but it works better for an actual debate via text so you can understand which part is talking about your argument. This avoids misunderstandings and wasting time to correct misunderstandings.
Click to expand...

Ya Thunderf00t is a real efficient debater. Line-by-line is a sign of incompetence because it misses the forest for the trees. Don't debate trees, debate forest. Always try to stay on the big picture.

Alex Krycek said:
@BoxerShorts47 no the average person doesn’t care about those issues. The average person might have an opinion one way or the other concerning and relating to them but to say they care would imply that they campaign and it’s a deal breaking issue for them. Here’s a great example, I’m what most people call “Pro-Life” so therefor I’d like a candidate more if they were also Pro-Life. However if a candidate is “Pro-Choice” that doesn’t break the candidate for me if they’re good on other issues. If I were an elected official that had to vote on the issue of abortion and most of my constituents wanted it I’d have to vote in favor of it because I was elected to represent them not myself. That being said I’m also very Pro-Second Amendment and can’t ever vote against the lawful use of firearms or restricting them to people of sound mind and body (PS you don’t fit that bill).
Click to expand...
1. You're being ethnically cleansed from your own nation through legal and illiberal immigration. The govt doesn't enforce the border or laws designed to keep a border (prop 187). You've already lost control of your govt. Do you understand this?
2. Once whites are a minority, there is no way you'll be able to keep the 2A, For all the talk about 2A protects 1A, the truth is that law abiding citizens are the type of people that WOULD hand over their guns to the govt when forced.
3. Democrats are already infringing on your right to protect yourself by saying "self-defense can escalate the issue" and charging people with crimes for protecting themselves. This is the model for the future.

If you don't support ending legal and illegal immigration and repatriating these non-whites, you won't have a nation to protect by mid century, eventually AOC will be your president. I think you need to get with the program. Center-Right talking points won't work 2020+.
 
  • Dumb
  • Lunacy
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: 6thRanger, Balanced Boomer, Be patient I have lurkism and 11 others
Stardust said:
@BoxerShorts47, at the risk of rainbow stickers, what can you offer to a woman? What can you provide for them?

And I mean you, not what mommy's credit card can afford. You only.
Click to expand...
Mealtime rants about how feminists and shitlibs are stopping him getting a job, broken semen from a "two pump chump" and babies that any merciful doctor would hit with a brick, rather than show the mother what Boxy planted in her.
 
  • Winner
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Pope Fucker, Dead Mime and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back