Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[BoxerShorts47]

Oh? And what proactive steps are you taking to save the wh*toid race?
Please don’t tell me it’s still just awareness raising online. Remember, if you aren’t ACTING and FIGHTING for your convictions, you’re a fucking limp dicked cuck!

first step is to raise awareness. second step is to deal with counter-attacks... 3rd step profit???

"The truth?" I have said so many times before and I'll say it again, just to drive it a little close into your tiny, incel head that none of what you say is credible and you're ascribing fantastical opinions that we have never stated to hold. For someone who complains so much about strawmen and bad faith, you're awfully good at building them yourself. All the more astonishing is your short-term amnesia regarding them. I shouldn't be surprised, your upbringing and autistic character are illuminating enough already.

Even the UN admits they want to resettle non-whites into white nations.They call it replacement migration. You're insane if you think you can replace your native populations and maintain the same society, let alone a functional govt. Have making whites 60% of USA popolution from 90% made USA more stable? No. So why would this nation become better if whites become even less of the population. Clear you have an unconscious bias against whites, all your policies are implcitly anti-whtie and yoy have no compassion for white people. Either you're a non-white or you're a standard self-hating liberals with 0 in-group preference.

 

[HumanHive]

first step is to raise awareness. second step is to deal with counter-attacks... 3rd step profit???

So you’re not just a cuck, you’re a coward who wants other people do the hard work for you?

 

[Lonely Grave]

Even the UN admits they want to resettle non-whites into white nations.They call it replacement migration. You're insane if you think you can replace your native populations and maintain the same society, let alone a functional govt. Have making whites 60% of USA popolution from 90% made USA more stable? No. So why would this nation become better if whites become even less of the population. Clear you have an unconscious bias against whites, all your policies are implcitly anti-whtie and yoy have no compassion for white people. Either you're a non-white or you're a standard self-hating liberals with 0 in-group preference.

Now you're the one being a conspiracy theorist. You're making leaps in logic without basis or proof. Just because the UN has agreed on this principle does not belie a sinister intent. Perhaps you should look at the reasons why the immigration is happening rather than trying to blame policy that came as a reaction in it. Oh wait, you don't even want to talk about such causes because it highlights the exact same reasons you migrated. Too late, Boxysharts, you've long undermined your position and no amount of shit-slinging and doubling-down will salvage it.

 

[Zonga]

"The truth?" I have said so many times before and I'll say it again, just to drive it a little close into your tiny, incel head that none of what you say is credible and you're ascribing fantastical opinions that we have never stated to hold. For someone who complains so much about strawmen and bad faith, you're awfully good at building them yourself. All the more astonishing is your short-term amnesia regarding them. I shouldn't be surprised, your upbringing and autistic character are illuminating enough already.

There's a reason this is all so boring: most alt-right trolls actually don't care about logic, rules, or whatever. There isn't actually a "game" being played, in the sense that either side could conceivably win by making the right "move". Instead, what you have are people dedicated to destroying any "game" that they come across, until no one can ever win at anything.

This is considered better than actually trying to win at anything, because cowardice doesn't want to risk losing anything. (See Umberto Eco's treatise on ur-fascism).

Basically, this kind of trolling is a projective reaction to nihilistic despair, dedicated to making everyone else as hopeless and despondent as the nihilist.

And as long as you continue to engage, you continue to pour dopamine into the process, which means you continue to get boring, tedious, marginally destructive behaviors coming out of the process.

Which isn't actually "fun" for anyone any more than the end stages of a raging heroin addiction are "fun", but since the dopamine loop is secure, the behavior isn't going to stop. (And since all the social and intellectual signals have been crafted into an unassailable closed loop of tiger-blooded WINNING, you won't even get the participants admitting that they aren't having fun.)

 

[BoxerShorts47]

So you’re not just a cuck, you’re a coward who wants other people do the hard work for you?

cuck = coward. same idea.

Now you're the one being a conspiracy theorist. You're making leaps in logic without basis or proof. Just because the UN has agreed on this principle does not belie a sinister intent. Perhaps you should look at the reasons why the immigration is happening rather than trying to blame policy that came as a reaction in it. Oh wait, you don't even want to talk about such causes because it highlights the exact same reasons you migrated. Too late, Boxysharts, you've long undermined your position and no amount of shit-slinging and doubling-down will salvage it.

IQ 115+ foresight = conspiracy theory. Okay. You're stupid or a coward and you rather cling to your equality anti-racism religion than face reality. Your equality diversity utopia will never exist and you'll plunge your nation into ethnic conflict. That's all you're doing.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Boxcar, why haven't you answered my question?

 

[Lonely Grave]

There's a reason this is all so boring: most alt-right trolls actually don't care about logic, rules, or whatever. There isn't actually a "game" being played, in the sense that either side could conceivably win by making the right "move". Instead, what you have are people dedicated to destroying any "game" that they come across, until no one can ever win at anything.

This is considered better than actually trying to win at anything, because cowardice doesn't want to risk losing anything. (See Umberto Eco's treatise on ur-fascism).

Basically, this kind of trolling is a projective reaction to nihilistic despair, dedicated to making everyone else as hopeless and despondent as the nihilist.

And as long as you continue to engage, you continue to pour dopamine into the process, which means to continue to get borind, tedious, marginally destructive behaviors coming out of the process.

Which isn't actually "fun" for anyone any more than the end stages of a raging heroin addiction are "fun", but since the dopamine loop is secure, the behavior isn't going to stop. (And since all the social and intellectual signals have been crafted into an unassailable closed loop of tiger-blooded WINNING, you won't even get the participants admitting that they aren't having fun.)

I've never wanted to win this, I just want to watch Boxysharts suffer as people clearly more articulate and intelligent dumpster him and highlight his autism even further. It's also sweet vindication on my anti-pinoy stance.

IQ 115+ foresight = conspiracy theory. Okay. You're stupid or a coward and you rather cling to your equality anti-racism religion than face reality. Your equality diversity utopia will never exist and you'll plunge your nation into ethnic conflict. That's all you're doing.

When have I ever said that I support your equality/inclusiveness utopia? Nice fucking strawman Boxysharts, I live in a integration-successful nation where the answers to this question have long been answered. And do you know what that is? It's that people will move whenever they wish - firm immigration policy and a dash of old-school nationalism is enacted to control it results in a division-less state where nobody gives a shit about this issue. Hating browns and other incompetents is a personal hobby and nobody cancels you for holding it, since even the browns agree that they have their flaws.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

I've never wanted to win this, I just want to watch Boxysharts suffer as people clearly more articulate and intelligent dumpster him and highlight his autism even further. It's also sweet vindication on my anti-pinoy stance.

cope.

 

[Zonga]

cope.

As you can see, there isn't any "suffering" going on, because boxershorts47 has already edited out any part of their worldview that would allow them to notice that they've "lost" an argument. That's what's so cringe about this whole mess; you're beating on someone who has literally intentionally decided to make themselves too retarded to notice when they're being successfully mocked.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

As you can see, there isn't any "suffering" going on, because boxershorts47 has already edited out any part of their worldview that would allow them to notice that they've "lost" an argument. That's what's so cringe about this whole mess; you're beating on someone who has literally intentionally decided to make themselves too retarded to notice when they're being successfully mocked.

funny how you can understand the meta context but you don't see yourself as the one who has lost the debate, you refuse to admit that diversity = ethnic cleansing white people. That's all your promoting. There is never going to be a post-racial utopia. It's interesting, I was never part of the new atheism community, I never debated moralfags but you anti-racism zealots are far far worse. You're drowning in your religion to point of not even being able to see reality.

I've never wanted to win this, I just want to watch Boxysharts suffer as people clearly more articulate and intelligent dumpster him and highlight his autism even further. It's also sweet vindication on my anti-pinoy stance.


When have I ever said that I support your equality/inclusiveness utopia? Nice fucking strawman Boxysharts, I live in a integration-successful nation where the answers to this question have long been answered. And do you know what that is? It's that people will move whenever they wish - firm immigration policy and a dash of old-school nationalism is enacted to control it results in a division-less state where nobody gives a shit about this issue. Hating browns and other incompetents is a personal hobby and nobody cancels you for holding it, since even the browns agree that they have their flaws.

Non whites don't like living in a white nation. They feel psychological pain not having politicians or actors or representatives that look like them. No such thing as an successful integrated nation, all show signs of self segregation.

 

[Lonely Grave]

As you can see, there isn't any "suffering" going on, because boxershorts47 has already edited out any part of their worldview that would allow them to notice that they've "lost" an argument. That's what's so cringe about this whole mess; you're beating on someone who has literally intentionally decided to make themselves too retarded to notice when they're being successfully mocked.

 

[Lonely Grave]

funny how you can understand the meta context but you don't see yourself as the one who has lost the debate, you refuse to admit that diversity = ethnic cleansing white people. That's all your promoting. There is never going to be a post-racial utopia. It's interesting, I was never part of the new atheism community, I never debated moralfags but you anti-racism zealots are far far worse. You're drowning in your religion to point of not even being able to see reality.

Non whites don't like living in a white nation. They feel psychological pain not having politicians or actors or representatives that look like them. No such thing as an successful integrated nation, all show signs of self segregation.

Refusing to admit to your definitions isn't losing, it's just rejecting an outlandish idea that literally nobody supports. Produce for us one intelligent person that supports your position and then the debate is valid. Otherwise, you're just talking out of your ass.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Refusing to admit to your definitions isn't losing, it's just rejecting an outlandish idea that literally nobody supports. Produce for us one intelligent person that supports your position and then the debate is valid. Otherwise, you're just talking out of your ass.

Total cope. Everyone is getting red-pilled on immigration. Everyone sees the double standards: "black lives matter" = Gospel, "white lives matter" = hate speech. You're just a center-left cunt that wants to enforce a failed 1995 vision of diversity. Cope hard newfag.

 

[Zonga]

The problem here is that this kind of cringe is actually weaponized - since boxershorts47 is no longer capable of registering how cringey they're being, they basically force everyone with an ounce of non-sociopathic empathy to either feel uncomfortable *for* them, or damage that empathy and come a step closer to sociopathic nihilism themselves. In this sense, the whole behavior-complex is like a damn zombie plague, but it's spread by trying to kill the zombies.

 

[Lonely Grave]

Total cope. Everyone is getting red-pilled on immigration. Everyone sees the double standards: "black lives matter" = Gospel, "white lives matter" = hate speech. You're just a center-left cunt that wants to enforce a failed 1995 vision of diversity. Cope hard newfag.

The irony is off the charts here. I'd like to counter with "no u" but that seems a little too high and mighty at this stage.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

The irony is off the charts here. I'd like to counter with "no u" but that seems a little too high and mighty at this stage.

Tell me, what is your solution to crush black power?

https://youtu.be/AgWQ7AAjJcg

 

[Zonga]

The irony is off the charts here. I'd like to counter with "no u" but that seems a little to high and mighty at this stage.

Well, I think it's more telling that this kind of projection is most likely to come from someone extremely insecure in their white maleness. It's the old "anti-gay Republican is closet faggot, film at 11" cliche ramped up to 11. I'm betting on cuntnigger or jewfaggot, but I wouldn't be too surprised to discover the whole thing was actually sparked by some kind of confused Asian with a micropenis who can't decide whether to go troon or keep with their alpha white Chad penis envy until they can find the right 11 year old to groom.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

Well, I think it's more telling that this kind of projection is most likely to come from someone extremely insecure in their white maleness. It's the old "anti-gay Republican is closet faggot, film at 11" cliche ramped up to 11. I'm betting on cuntnigger or jewfaggot, but I wouldn't be too surprised to discover the whole thing was actually sparked by some kind of confused Asian with a micropenis who can't decide whether to go troon or keep with their alpha white Chad penis envy until they can find the right 11 year old to groom.

ay yes the good old fashioned center-left "well if you don't like homosexuality than you must be a secret homosexual" reverse-psychology. Sorry but this trick won't work against me. Try harder.

 

[Pope Fucker]

@BoxerShorts47

Does it scare you that no woman will choose you as a mate unless she's groomed from a young age and depends solely on you to provide for her?

 

[Lonely Grave]

Tell me, what is your solution to crush black power?

https://youtu.be/AgWQ7AAjJcg

I don't even need a plan, the actions of the black community in refusing civil services like law and order are already turning the tide by bringing disrepute to the judgement of black Americans. If they want to disengage from society and 'self-regulate' then that's their loss. Just look in the A&N section every day, the decreasing prevalence of BLM as a political topic (which I ascribe to their ties to Antifa) and the fact that if the blacks even tried to claim superiority openly they'd be shut down so hard and fast that "black power" would be a taboo phrase like the N-word.

My personal theory is that the current BLM movement lacks the class to shore up the credibility that many of the most prominent black rights campaigners in the civil rights movement had. There's been no attempt at making a statesman-like approach to reform. Every case in history tells us that the triumphant and respected are usually quite diplomatic when they need to be.