U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't see it posted the past couple of pages


A clearer, full version of the video has been released.
chuck_danger58_20200807_093023_0.jpg
 
Deep down I'm still libertarian and value freedom as essential. I no longer see technology and a society any bigger then a village compatible with that.

Plus smaller the group the easier it is to replace the leader if they ve gone rotten. Where now it's just easy for them to lie and hide.

well, it's a Human imperative to value freedom - it's normal; the concept that a fascist wants a jackbooted orwellian society with no personal freedoms contradicts history, reality, and the fact that strangely unfitting people like John F. Kennedy waltzed into Nazi Germany and had just a fantastic fucking time - issue is, you have to balance freedom with security and obligation; if you feel you have no obligation to the society around you in any sense, then I'm not sure 'libertarian' is the best title for you, and traditional anarchism is best fit.

Well fuck me, I agree with a Nazi, (no offense intended Evo).

About the Village-State (or well the City-State), it kind of worked for Greece in the classical era, but with today's population I don't think it would work too well, as places like NYC will either invade the former subburbs and rural areas to support its population for food and the like, it would lead to more conflict, not to mention that is kind of at the point of philosophical Anarchy and Philosophical communism (in terms of "local communties make the decision on things").

The thing is BLM does have stances that are supported by a majority of blacks, such as accepting homosexuality and trans, which the black community is by and large against. If a good number/majority of black people openly are hostile to BLM (and not just "homophobia/transphobia" stuff, normies might start to realize BLM is a sham.

none taken, I'm a nazi.

BLM is largely opposed by the majority of blacks in terms of it's way-out-of-left-field (pun unintended) leftist social theories, but the general concept of an 'oppressive' social structure holding black folks back or that black folks are generally incompatible with much of what's around them isn't alien to many black people - sure, a lot of regular black people don't like this shit but the truth is the amount of black folks engaged in ghetto bullshit is a lot more than a 'tiny fraction' by a large margin.

for one to see a change in the sympathies to rioting, the sympathies to indignant black-rage-in-perpetuity, black culture has to drastically be changed - and despite the fact that many niggers don't have a fondness for transsexualism and shit like that, it doesn't change the fact that things like 'dykes n studs' have become absolute fucking celebrities amongst a good chunk of the black community and they don't, in any sense, acknowledge the cognitive dissonance there - blacks in the street now are absolutely fucking nothing like the blacks in the street of the 90's, for example, which hated faggots with virulence.
 
Didn't see this posted yet. And the story has likely been lost in the Chicago shuffle since 2020 is moving at light speed. Some autists found one of the faggots pointing a gun at motorists at the "blm checkpoint" in Indianapolis:

Jonathan Howe
Owns CityDump Records, LLC.
Instagram is @iconmixedit (account is now protected)
View attachment 1509605
Look at that dumpy, faggy-looking wigger soy. Hilarious!
 
Well fuck me, I agree with a Nazi, (no offense intended Evo).

About the Village-State (or well the City-State), it kind of worked for Greece in the classical era, but with today's population I don't think it would work too well, as places like NYC will either invade the former subburbs and rural areas to support its population for food and the like, it would lead to more conflict

A collapse would reduce the world population.

If I recall correctly nazis (such as evo) believe in a concept called
Lebensraum.

The only difference between me and evo is a difference in how to acquire it. One believes using the nation state's military to acquire more land and I believe in removing what keeps the population hi. Take tech out of the equation For a couple years and you will have a culling and a lot more living space as a result.

As for conflict. That's the entire point. Humanity only progresses via conflict. Thats if I recall a common talking point of facists and nazis. I agree. Those who cannot fight are useless and a liability to themselves and to their community.
 
How is this not cause for lethal force by the driver?

If someone stops my car with a gun I assume its a carjacking and I'm responding with my legally carried firearm. And by responding I don't mean waiving it around, I mean actively putting lead on target.
Of course the narrative being spun by the terrorists is that the truck was trying to run over the innocent widdle protesters, nearly hitting a human shield child. Sure the truck was on the wrong side of the road but I get the feeling that the driver was trying to avoid splattering some garbage, but the garbage kept jumping in front of the truck.
If the driver is reading this - Next time if you floor it through these lumps I for one will not judge you harshly.
 
The end goal is create a situation where you can defend your self or fight back without severe repercussions. Only in a collapse would there be enough disruption to those fueling this woke crap and make an even playing field. I'm not anti tech. I'm against those who currently own it and how they wield it.

That's the best game plan I can think of for those who are against woke capitalism.

Rate me dumb, rate me autistic or whatever. But now you got a plan.

Also since you're a nazi a pro collapse stance would achieve the same end to weeding out the weak who propel this leftist crap far more effectively then any gas chamber would.
This is easy to solve without ending society though. Limit intellectual property. Let everyone own Mickey Mouse. That would devastate the ruling class.
 
Deep down I'm still libertarian and value freedom as essential. I no longer see technology and a society any bigger then a village compatible with that.

Plus smaller the group the easier it is to replace the leader if they ve gone rotten. Where now it's just easier for them to lie and hide.

It's the same logic as a monarchist but reaching a different conclusion. To replace a king you just have to dispose of the royal family.. where a republic you have to destroy the entire society just to get to the bad elements.

In a tribe or village same deal except I have the option to leave if things dont work out. Or exile folks who do no one any good versus say having to lock them up or kill them under current circumstances.

Also while I admit folks are tribal at their core I dont wanna do any purges like a nazi would. A collapse would allow black people to form their own little place and I can form my own little place far away from them. As much I would like to co exist I no longer believe it's possible.

However if you cant survive in a post collapse world that more a matter of your ability to survive versus being the victim of someone elses murderous hands.

I've tried to keep my Libertarian values and stay optimistic that this shit would shake itself out with relatively little violence and we could, at some point, enjoy increased freedom and liberty as a result. However, this shit has been going on for what, 72 straight days now? That's pretty much eroded all of my previous values. I've waxed optimistic in this thread before, and I'm still optimistic that eventually we'll sort this shit out. However, I'm no longer optimistic about the interval between now and then. That interval will be violent, ugly, unpleasant for everyone involved except those rich enough to escape it entirely. The collapse is inevitable, and unavoidably negative. What comes after it is what we can make positive, if we are dedicated to it.

In short, the events of this year are forcing a lot of people to go through some very uncomfortable realizations. If others are unashamedly and avowedly tribal, why should I avoid that because other people call it 'icky'?
You could relocate vast swaths of people, certainly, if they are truly considered wholly incompatible with any semblance of civilization. But it would be costly, resource intensive, difficult and it would cost a lot of time.

And ultimately, I believe it would only delay the inevitable. If the US were to balkanize, so to speak, and each group had their own slice of land where they stayed and everyone kept eachother honest at the point of a gun, eventually complacency would set in and people would become restless and careless. Resulting in the same shit we have today, courtesy of the ever-existent cult of multiculturalism. It might not happen quickly but it'll happen eventually if you give it a chance.
 
This is easy to solve without ending society though. Limit intellectual property. Let everyone own Mickey Mouse. That would devastate the ruling class.
Expecting a society owned by rich white people who wish me dead so they can import slave labor is going be very resistant to reform. Exhibit a: current riots.

Also The media owned by same folks and use said media to keep people on the same hamster wheel as evo said isnt going be open to change let alone able to conceive what that change might be except what they re told.

Exhibit B: people still believing the riots are actually peaceful protest and the police are ones who started the violence just cause the boob tube told them so.

Only reason I advocate for post collaspe is to break the psychological conditioning the masses are afflicted with. No changes are possible until that occurs. Including your ideas of intellectual property reform.
 
Last edited:
No I dont. I cannot come up anything beyond dismantling. All I see is a threat to me cause I'm white and I foresee genocide across class lines. Also foresee environmental issues caused by industrial society. Which were migrated by lock down and reduction of human activity.

I also am concerned with genetic engineering and how that can be abused and used to oppress people.

Maybe some new ideas will form after a collapse but certainly wont while the current monolith has a hold over the masses.

Also a return to the village state would allow me be part of a local militia or military. Meaning if someone wants to hurt me cause of my views or race I would be in a position to fight back and openly so. Where now I have to beg a police man to maybe help as he stands down and lets the mob do as they please.
You are, if male and 18-45 in the US, part of the unorganized militia; in order to defend our country from threats to our liberty, you are empowered to keep and bear arms, and to peacefully assemble. While BLM depends on you being too terrified to exercise your rights (and note that stupid larpy Antifa poster a few pages back didn’t include “bullet mage” as a class), you can absolutely join a citizens’ peacekeeping force. People will hate you for it, but they already do hate you.

Just like fireworks “mysteriously” got bought up in Pahrump before July 4th, guns are getting “mysteriously” bought up by people who can predict the next step of conflict. Communities are aware.
 
you can absolutely join a citizens’ peacekeeping force. People will hate you for it, but they already do hate you.
It's not so much about whether people will hate you for it, but whether the "force" you are with is a glowy honeypot looking to arrest you, or if the National Lawyers Guild or the DA try to make an example of you.
 
Only reason I advocate for post collaspe is to break the psychological conditioning the masses are afflicted with. No changes are possible until that occurs.
you don't need complete civilisational collapse to deprogram the masses, a change in leadership would do that fairly quickly. take control of the institutions that propagate the propaganda and indoctrination, and either switch them off entirely or turn them around to push counter-propaganda.
the issue is that "change in leadership" in a democratic-republican oligarchic bureaucracy means that you'd have to purge hundreds of thousands of entrenched ideologues from public institutions everywhere. a monumental task, impossible to achieve without completely shattering the current political system and order, but that's still a lot less drastic than complete "govt and state cease to exist entirely" collapse.
 
It's not so much about whether people will hate you for it, but whether the "force" you are with is a glowy honeypot looking to arrest you.
This. This right here. Where I live people can technically open carry but good luck not getting harrassed by the cops every where you go and getting hostile reactions by the normies when you grocery shop.

Also if I use it to defend myself according to the law expect my details get leaked and antifa showing up to my house to threaten my family.

Nope. If we going have anarcho tyranny why not remove the tyranny aspect and go all the way?
 
Also if I use it to defend myself according to the law expect my details get leaked and antifa showing
And to get put through the meat grinder by the legal system and the lugenpresse, because you'll be treated like a murderer even if obviously in the right.

And don't carry a gun you will miss if you lost it, because it is evidence, and therefore WILL get confiscated.
 
It's not so much about whether people will hate you for it, but whether the "force" you are with is a glowy honeypot looking to arrest you, or if the National Lawyers Guild or the DA try to make an example of you.

Yeah didn't proud boys become deemed a gang/terrorist group when the reality was they were just a bunch of frat boys led by a canadian con artist. Imagine joining some militia in the south feds would be wire tapping and serveiling everything if it got big enough kinda like biker gangs except nobody in the militia would be making drug or extortion money.
 
Video on whether the spike in gun sales has implications for the 2020 election

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bw1qvtYgls
https://archive.vn/wip/td0uY


Brookings reports 3 million new guns.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-f...-guns-the-spring-2020-spike-in-firearm-sales/
https://archive.vn/bn40B

A friend of mine, trying to explain US politics, once said to me 'You have to realize there's a divide between the urban areas where people want a competent government to do a lot for them and the rural areas where they want the government to leave them alone'.

Now rate me rainbows but I'd say 3 million people buying guns are essentially moving from the former group to the latter. And I suspect that talk about 'defunding the police' and the way that local Democrat politicians have hampered the response to the riots might well be a long term strategic error by the Democrats. Telling people that the police won't save them and enabling riots is almost designed to do that. Basically, if your party is about large government doing more for you, the last thing you want to do is to convince people that you're going to destroy or cripple the police, one of the few parts of the government that they grudgingly accept as necessary.

The other possibility, as a fair few people have alluded to, is that something more profound and dangerous is happening. If the cities decline into anarchy the rural areas will be just fine but anyone in those cities is screwed. I'll miss the USA if it goes down like this though, and I suspect most of the world will look back fondly on Pax Americana and wonder why they let it end. Not, come to think of it, that there'd be all that much they could have done. The people in the US you need to help don't need and probably wouldn't accept help from dirty foreigners and the people who would accept help from foreigners are not the ones you want to help.
 
Yeah didn't proud boys become deemed a gang/terrorist group when the reality was they were just a bunch of frat boys led by a canadian con artist. Imagine joining some militia in the south feds would be wire tapping and serveiling everything if it got big enough kinda like biker gangs except nobody in the militia would be making drug or extortion money.
They got deemed a hate group during the start of antifa coming up within the states, they were the most vocal and actively opposed to the group. Yes, they're all Christian frat bro's.
 
Yeah didn't proud boys become deemed a gang/terrorist group when the reality was they were just a bunch of frat boys led by a canadian con artist. Imagine joining some militia in the south feds would be wire tapping and serveiling everything if it got big enough kinda like biker gangs except nobody in the militia would be making drug or extortion money.
Reminds me of this.
384530.jpg
 
With all these luxury brand stores getting looted, can we stop acting like overpriced stuff is a symbol of status? It should have stopped when everyone could get a credit card but for some reason you still see Name Brand clothing and accessories on people in line at the food stamp office.
If anyone tries to flex with their Louis Vuitton bag, the only proper response is now "Oh? You were out looting that night? I didn't notice you on the livestreams!" and don't let them deny.
People who are well-off and classy like subtlety. Designer logos and always name-dropping said designers is a ghetto/rap culture thing. Designers nowadays have lost prestige because of pandering to hoodlums and thugs. I think old money still likes designers, but they're not flashy about. They're not going to be decked out in LV logos. It is stupid and pointless for middle class people to waste money on designer things though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back