Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

They don't have to change their votes to Trump. She's just another reason for more of them to stay home than would have done so if the choice were someone else.

Yup. They're traditionally a... if you will forgive the phrasing... quite lazy and unenthusiastic voting block anyway. If they don't get to vote for a man with the same melanin content they do the majority just won't bother (especially if the weather's cold this year). All the media guys better huddle and make sure nothing new comes out on streaming that week and nothing good's on live TV that day or the black vote might not show up at all.
 
Last edited:
I may not be an avid supporter of either party, but I find Democrats insistence of "TRUMP IS SO SCARED OF X" really cringeworthy and annoying given he doesn't give off the impression of someone easily scared (though the only time was when he was near an eagle that one time which was justified).

Not saying Trump is fearless (no one is), but to put scared as a label for him really doesn't work as there is no real visual of Trump being scared of another person.
 
View attachment 1511420
Does "everything" Trump "says" get put in scare quotes by ABC?

I guess since he's apparently the fucking antichrist
View attachment 1511424

EDIT:
https://archive.vn/HaGBh
Well these news articles are from Australia which is the same country that banned airsoft guns because they actually think they promote mass shootings and they're even more cucked than the UK at this point.
Isn't Kamela Harris the state prosecutor that heavily punished black men for victimless crimes of drug possession? Isn't she literally everything the Democrat useful idiots hate about law enforcement and Republicans?
This is correct. Kamala Harris did indeed has locked up a bunch of black people for just smoking weed when she was the Attorney General of California and it's funny that they're praising her when she previously locked up black people for chilling out by smoking weed and lock them up with murders in the many prisons in California and I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) she was also smoking weed (in secret of course) when she did this then.
 
Last edited:
Just what I wanted. End times spats are more fun than butting heads with Reformed/Calvinists. Great people to have at your back, but Methodists are something like the arch-nemesis and if the argument goes poorly for them, they do have a tendency to burn people at the stake.

Catholic guy isn't technically wrong, there is a strain of thought that there isn't one specific antichrist, it's more like an archetype that pops up. Obama's a better example than Trump, but neither really fit. Trump's not looking to be worshipped, Obama is, but he's just a narcissist and an empty suit. He just wants the asspats, I assume something about daddy issues.
Oh boy! Let's have a religious war right now over interpretations of the antichrist!

Somewhat more seriously (I am a drunken robot after all), I have seen a Catholic point out that per some verses, there are multiple antichrists in the world - thus why he loves to constantly call Trump "a dime-store antichrist."
I always thought the AntiChrist was supposed to be Jewish (either by heredity or by faith) since he is called the Messiah by the Jews at one point. Kinda hard to call a Gentile the descendant of King David.
 
I may not be an avid supporter of either party, but I find Democrats insistence of "TRUMP IS SO SCARED OF X" really cringeworthy and annoying given he doesn't give off the impression of someone easily scared (though the only time was when he was near an eagle that one time which was justified).

Not saying Trump is fearless (no one is), but to put scared as a label for him really doesn't work as there is no real visual of Trump being scared of another person.
It's simple projection. Every time a leftist prattles on about how Drumpf is scared of something, it's because that leftist is probably terrified of that thing, or something very similar.
 
Biden has effectively lost the election by appointing Kamala Harris as running mate. It's pretty obvious that by putting it off for so long, DNC was searching for literally anyone BUT her to slot into the position. Apparently, no-one else was biting.

If you're a responsible person, you will wear a mask.

Yes.

if you are not wearing a mask, you are not allowed to enter any non-restaurant establishment.

Yes. In fact, I find it bizarre why restaurants are exempt from this. Literally every other country has made food delivery or drive-through a popular alternative option if you absolutely must have McDonald's instead of cooking at home.

If you don't wear a mask, you may be subjected to a fine of up to $500.

Not unusual considering the fines you get for endangering public health in other cases.

If you do not wear a mask, you will be considered an active threat to public safety, and may be subjected to incarceration and prosecution.

Might be overboard but while the pandemic lasts, I can at least see the logic there even if it's a bit excessive. I think it should really only be put into effective in very high-threat areas, like is being done in Australia.

There are currently discussions that will require people to wear masks inside their own homes.

Not really. Been proposed once and then shot down because it's stupid.

All of this, of course, is predicated on even being allowed outside of your house for non-essential reasons. There are places that are still on lockdown. When they went out to protest, they were called bioterrorists, publicly scorned by their local governments, social pariahs for daring to put their right to earn a wage and buy food over 'public health'.

You absolutely can buy food. It's an "essential reason". Earning a wage? For many jobs, online work is available. For essential jobs, like truck delivery, still available. And if the US had a proper welfare system like, I dunno, everywhere else, then we wouldn't have such a problem over this.

In addition to wearing a mask, you must now also get tested for coronavirus every two weeks.
If you are not tested or fail to provide your papers in time, you may be furloughed from your job until you are found compliant.
If you do not provide papers, you may be fired.
If you do not obtain papers, you will not be hired.
If you do not keep your papers on your person, you will not be allowed into establishments. If you do provide papers proving you are 'clean', you must still wear a mask, or else risk being fined. After all, you took that test three days ago. You could have been infected between then and now.

Literally none of those are anything more than health safety measures. It's a standard pandemic playbook. Trying to play that off as an actual infringement on rights akin to how every goddamn alphabet agency and major corporation on the planet can freely spy on what you do on the Internet (and nobody gives a shit anymore because its old news) is idiotic, especially with the last sentence implying that reasonable concern over possible infection is silly. Your point about mandatory vaccines is the only one that is reasonable. That is in fact, stupid and not really helpful as opposed to an actual cure.

This is not a hypothetical slippery slope. This is what is happening and measures that have actually been discussed. This is the response to a disease that has a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu but has been turned into a weapon of terror to enforce more and more compliance, both from government mandate and social stigma. Fauci has suggested making most of these requirements -- social distancing, reduced capacity, mask wearing, limited gatherings -- permanent.

It actually doesn't have a lower fatality rate and in fact they are quite high anywhere that doesn't have proper pandemic measures in place and isn't actively trying to bury the actual numbers. Not sure why this myth persists so much. You take mild concerns over possible overreach - and turn them into blatant fucking stupidity and inane sperg-outs over preventative measures...for a goddamn pandemic.
 
The Jews will do anything to destroy civilization, you should know that by now.
Depending on how you take it, the wording could be allegorical for a Pope or other leader of the Church. A lot of supercession rhetoric maps the hierarchy of believers, in olden times represented by the Apostolic Church, as the new Israel.

I know it's kind of popular in Protestant and some radical Catholic groups to believe that a future Pope will be the prophesied Antichrist because of his unique ability to teach false doctrine specifically to believers.
 
Biden has effectively lost the election by appointing Kamala Harris as running mate. It's pretty obvious that by putting it off for so long, DNC was searching for literally anyone BUT her to slot into the position. Apparently, no-one else was biting.



Yes.



Yes. In fact, I find it bizarre why restaurants are exempt from this. Literally every other country has made food delivery or drive-through a popular alternative option if you absolutely must have McDonald's instead of cooking at home.



Not unusual considering the fines you get for endangering public health in other cases.



Might be overboard but while the pandemic lasts, I can at least see the logic there even if it's a bit excessive. I think it should really only be put into effective in very high-threat areas, like is being done in Australia.



Not really. Been proposed once and then shot down because it's stupid.



You absolutely can buy food. It's an "essential reason". Earning a wage? For many jobs, online work is available. For essential jobs, like truck delivery, still available. And if the US had a proper welfare system like, I dunno, everywhere else, then we wouldn't have such a problem over this.



Literally none of those are anything more than health safety measures. It's a standard pandemic playbook. Trying to play that off as an actual infringement on rights akin to how every goddamn alphabet agency and major corporation on the planet can freely spy on what you do on the Internet (and nobody gives a shit anymore because its old news) is idiotic, especially with the last sentence implying that reasonable concern over possible infection is silly. Your point about mandatory vaccines is the only one that is reasonable. That is in fact, stupid and not really helpful as opposed to an actual cure.



It actually doesn't have a lower fatality rate and in fact they are quite high anywhere that doesn't have proper pandemic measures in place and isn't actively trying to bury the actual numbers. Not sure why this myth persists so much. You take mild concerns over possible overreach - and turn them into blatant fucking stupidity and inane sperg-outs over preventative measures...for a goddamn pandemic.
Oh, it's retarded.
 
Biden has effectively lost the election by appointing Kamala Harris as running mate. It's pretty obvious that by putting it off for so long, DNC was searching for literally anyone BUT her to slot into the position. Apparently, no-one else was biting.



Yes.



Yes. In fact, I find it bizarre why restaurants are exempt from this. Literally every other country has made food delivery or drive-through a popular alternative option if you absolutely must have McDonald's instead of cooking at home.



Not unusual considering the fines you get for endangering public health in other cases.



Might be overboard but while the pandemic lasts, I can at least see the logic there even if it's a bit excessive. I think it should really only be put into effective in very high-threat areas, like is being done in Australia.



Not really. Been proposed once and then shot down because it's stupid.



You absolutely can buy food. It's an "essential reason". Earning a wage? For many jobs, online work is available. For essential jobs, like truck delivery, still available. And if the US had a proper welfare system like, I dunno, everywhere else, then we wouldn't have such a problem over this.



Literally none of those are anything more than health safety measures. It's a standard pandemic playbook. Trying to play that off as an actual infringement on rights akin to how every goddamn alphabet agency and major corporation on the planet can freely spy on what you do on the Internet (and nobody gives a shit anymore because its old news) is idiotic, especially with the last sentence implying that reasonable concern over possible infection is silly. Your point about mandatory vaccines is the only one that is reasonable. That is in fact, stupid and not really helpful as opposed to an actual cure.



It actually doesn't have a lower fatality rate and in fact they are quite high anywhere that doesn't have proper pandemic measures in place and isn't actively trying to bury the actual numbers. Not sure why this myth persists so much. You take mild concerns over possible overreach - and turn them into blatant fucking stupidity and inane sperg-outs over preventative measures...for a goddamn pandemic.

So what are your thoughts on rounding up all the gays until AIDS goes away?
 
Are they wrong for thinking the black vote is secured? Many treat it as being a race traitor if you dare think of supporting Trump.

Democrats, and really most political strategists, have noticed the phenomena of how for Democrats the main swing voter demographic is whites versus with Republicans it's Latinos. It's why it was as weird as it was to Republicans that Trump went against illegal immigration in 2016 since they saw that as going against a major potential voting base. The Latino vote got proven more complex or at least different which fucked with a lot of these strategists' predictions, but considering Democrats haven't changed their general strategies or political positions I don't think it's unreasonable they're imagining the voting demographic groups to be the same as a few years ago.

In which case, the black vote is generally secure, and the main swing group is white voters. Kamala doesn't appeal to blacks who may have more sway in the primaries due to virtue signalling lunatics, yet when you get into the general someone like Kamala having a history of being the tough attorney general or whatever makes her more appealing to white voters who are wanting someone tough on crime at a time of riots. It won't work of course, seeing as Trump as president has been offering up the national guard to anyone that wants to quiet riots, but I think it still helps explain the logic of the Democrats picking her as VP.
This.... is not a good take. The underlying premise of your argument is that because blacks -will- vote Democrat, that means that the Democrats need not consider them in political calculas.

This is wrong for two reasons:
First, and most pressing, while blacks do vote democrat overwhelmingly... they still need TO vote to count. Not considering them, or worse picking a VP candidate that actively alienates, is unlikely to pull off more than a few percentage points of the black vote and give them to trump. This is true. What your... 'analysis' seems to completely gloss over is that they can and would more likely... simply not vote. This isn't a zero-sum game, the option of refusing to participate is there and would be used.

Second, above I mentioned that only a few percentage points would be peeled off for Trump. That's more significant than your analysis admits. In fact, you almost seem to reject the idea out of hand. Here's the thing,in every swing state but Arizona, African American's make up a sizeable minority. Even a few percentage points swapping to Trump makes for a massive gain for him and massive loss for the democratic ticket in any tight race.

So no, their vote is not 'generally secure'. Its merely 'reliably blue... if they vote'.
 
You couldn't imagine being this insane.

there's something wrong with these people.png


 
You couldn't imagine being this insane.

View attachment 1514110


"How DARE people support a political party I don't? Don't they understand we called them names? A lot of names! Really bad ones, too!"

I will admit, if you ever wanted to write a novel about religious indoctrination, madness, et cetera, watching the left the past 5 years or so has been so goddamned eye opening.
 
You couldn't imagine being this insane.

View attachment 1514110

Those mailtrucks break down like crazy. I have a friend who is a postal carrier. He is CONSTANTLY bitching about the trucks. But no, Its MAGA-boogeyman stealing the election, not a fucking tow truck driver just doing his job. Broke. Brained.
 
You couldn't imagine being this insane.

View attachment 1514110

Making actors have to stay inside alone during the quarantine really brought out the extra crazy in them when they became desperate for attention.
 
Know Your Meme users on Kamala being chosen as VP candidate for Biden going against Trump:


"A lot of people in this comment section want 4 more years of Trump. Shall we give it to him?"

"Trump so far this year has:
*Declared that he can do anything he wants as President
*Ordered the DOJ to coerce Judge Sullivan into letting Mike Flynn go (backfired spectacularly)
*Refused to stop the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic
*Gave away $8.1 billion in weapons to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and UAE.
*Is deliberately breaking the post office to keep himself in office, keeping Americans from receiving medications that can save their lives
*Sent MilSim cosplayers into American cities to sow chaos and incite protests.
*Wants to be put onto Mount Rushmore of all places

And yet you guys think he deserves a second term because of Kamala Harris? FuckYourMeme."

"Biden? Harris? Don’t care! If we vote Trump back in, we as the people of America are hopelessly incorrigible idiots!

Voting him back in would be saying that this behavior above, and more, is befitting behavior for the leader of the nation! Allowing him back in would only prove that it’s ok to act like a spoiled child whenever you want, even if you’re in charge of a country!

Whether or not he caused the problems going on right now, they happened under HIS watch! Allowing him back in would be the equivalent of accepting Herbert Hoover back in office after he caused the Great Depression.

Are Biden or Harris saints? No. Anyone who says they’re perfect are the same as anyone who says Trump is. But if you want this blasted country to have ANY hope of redemption, then you have to take a stand and denounce this president! He has proven TIME AND TIME AGAIN ON CAMERA that he has no care about you! That he has no loyalty to anyone! That he’ll gladly break any rule and shred any standard in the name of political bais!

If you got a problem with my words, don’t bitch about “Fake news” or point fingers at the other side of any of the stuff that the cultists do. Instead, PROVE ME WRONG AND THROW THAT ORANGE MAN OUT!!! Otherwise, feel free to go ahead and practice licking his boots! That’s pretty much all you’ll be good for if he wins! And if he does, you frankly deserve it!"
 
Those mailtrucks break down like crazy. I have a friend who is a postal carrier. He is CONSTANTLY bitching about the trucks.

Its because the LLV stopped production in 1994 and they were rated for a service life of 20 years.
So yes, definitely a Trump conspiracy and not simply the USPS dragging their feet on replacement.
 
Biden has effectively lost the election by appointing Kamala Harris as running mate. It's pretty obvious that by putting it off for so long, DNC was searching for literally anyone BUT her to slot into the position. Apparently, no-one else was biting.



Yes.



Yes. In fact, I find it bizarre why restaurants are exempt from this. Literally every other country has made food delivery or drive-through a popular alternative option if you absolutely must have McDonald's instead of cooking at home.



Not unusual considering the fines you get for endangering public health in other cases.



Might be overboard but while the pandemic lasts, I can at least see the logic there even if it's a bit excessive. I think it should really only be put into effective in very high-threat areas, like is being done in Australia.



Not really. Been proposed once and then shot down because it's stupid.



You absolutely can buy food. It's an "essential reason". Earning a wage? For many jobs, online work is available. For essential jobs, like truck delivery, still available. And if the US had a proper welfare system like, I dunno, everywhere else, then we wouldn't have such a problem over this.



Literally none of those are anything more than health safety measures. It's a standard pandemic playbook. Trying to play that off as an actual infringement on rights akin to how every goddamn alphabet agency and major corporation on the planet can freely spy on what you do on the Internet (and nobody gives a shit anymore because its old news) is idiotic, especially with the last sentence implying that reasonable concern over possible infection is silly. Your point about mandatory vaccines is the only one that is reasonable. That is in fact, stupid and not really helpful as opposed to an actual cure.



It actually doesn't have a lower fatality rate and in fact they are quite high anywhere that doesn't have proper pandemic measures in place and isn't actively trying to bury the actual numbers. Not sure why this myth persists so much. You take mild concerns over possible overreach - and turn them into blatant fucking stupidity and inane sperg-outs over preventative measures...for a goddamn pandemic.
I swear the conspiracy theorists are spreading. Next thing you know someone here is gonna mention Bill Gates, Agenda 21/30, Plandemic, nwo, ID2020, George Soros, Rockefeller Foundation, etc
 
Back