Kelly Lenza / LividLipids / softbodytendermind / ass_child / photopotamus - "Radical body liberationist”, Intentionally Repulsive, Uber woke middle-aged SJW influencer wannabe, doxed her former therapist for getting WLS, ate her way to heart failure

[stupid frog]

This should be classified as child porn. I get it, sometimes parents have pictures of Little Brilee's First Bathtime! in the family photo album somewhere, but the minute somebody publicly posts nude images of their children over social media, the authorities should step in.

I agree. She keeps doing it, she's done it with the naked child as focus (ie. the snow picture) - action should be taken.

But it won't be, because we're the only ones who give a fuck. How sad.

 

[DelicateMageflower]

These idiots don't understand how perverts operate. They don't kidnap children and photograph them in their basement. They take photos that you upload and pass them around. You may think that picture of little Johnny dancing in the tub is cute and funny but would you still think its funny after its been circulating around every pedo ring in the dark web?
This is basically distribution and it needs to be stopped.

Not only is it reckless, but you're also taking your kid's autonomy away from them. It's not like the old days where embarrassing bathtub nudes or similar are in a photo album that you hope to God your mom doesn't pull out to share with your first love interest.

Now it goes all over the internet and everyone can potentially see it and it never goes away. A four year old has no fucking say in what tard mom posts online, and it's shitty of Kelly to be so fucking selfish and oblivious.

 

[US Marine Hyde]

I have feeling a lot of parents do this on Instagram. I just found an account of a family that posts even more upsetting naked pics of their kids, than Kelly does. The account is Queerlittlefamily. They are mutual followers with a very questionable page called boys_as_girls. It seems these parents must be really oblivious to make connections with those kind of pages considering they are going to post photo of their own child. The Queer Little Family pages is public as well.

That QLF page is rage inducing. It’s a lesbian couple that just had their second child, and the woman who runs it is insane. Non-binary, of course, openly mentally ill (BPD, depression, OCD, anything a doctor will call her basically) and most of the account is her bitching about things not being inclusive. Because heaven forbid her wife’s pregnancy not be about her! Postpartum recovery and support is too gendered. Keep in mind that the non-binary maniac was not the one who actually carried the baby and thus is not actually recovering from anything. Her wife is.
And yes, lots of naked pictures of her son. Oh, and the newborn has “she/they” pronouns. Just from skimming the page I hope the wife takes the children and leaves.

 

[brooky]

That QLF page is rage inducing. It’s a lesbian couple that just had their second child, and the woman who runs it is insane. Non-binary, of course, openly mentally ill (BPD, depression, OCD, anything a doctor will call her basically) and most of the account is her bitching about things not being inclusive. Because heaven forbid her wife’s pregnancy not be about her! Postpartum recovery and support is too gendered. Keep in mind that the non-binary maniac was not the one who actually carried the baby and thus is not actually recovering from anything. Her wife is.
And yes, lots of naked pictures of her son. Oh, and the newborn has “she/they” pronouns. Just from skimming the page I hope the wife takes the children and leaves.

Christ, I hope this isn't another Hart family in the making.

 

[JambledUpWords]

Cow crossover:

 

[Dorsia.Reservation]

That QLF page is rage inducing. It’s a lesbian couple that just had their second child, and the woman who runs it is insane. Non-binary, of course, openly mentally ill (BPD, depression, OCD, anything a doctor will call her basically) and most of the account is her bitching about things not being inclusive. Because heaven forbid her wife’s pregnancy not be about her! Postpartum recovery and support is too gendered. Keep in mind that the non-binary maniac was not the one who actually carried the baby and thus is not actually recovering from anything. Her wife is.
And yes, lots of naked pictures of her son. Oh, and the newborn has “she/they” pronouns. Just from skimming the page I hope the wife takes the children and leaves.

There really needs to be a "thank you for reading that, so I didnt have to/horrifyingly informative" rating on here.

After @Fullmetal Autist 's exposure of Desmond's Instagram "fans" in the Desmond is Amazing thread, I couldn't take anymore child abuse and child exploitation via Instagram.

Their have been actual FBI agents (who work on cp and sexual crimes against children), that have said...pedo's use everyday Instagram posts as almost a kind of cp collectors cards they share amongst each other.

That kelly has noticeably framed her public IG posts to include the nudity of her children, especially someone that claims to be a photographer (there are ethics and consent in photography) and that has spent the last 3 months on social media mooing about the exploitation of black people (I guess exploitation doesn't extend to kellys white kids) is really beyond words.

She is just waiting to be called out on it so she can play the victim card, Tess has done the same thing with her son.

 

[Rescuetoast]

There really needs to be a "thank you for reading that, so I didnt have to/horrifyingly informative" rating on here.

After @Fullmetal Autist 's exposure of Desmond's Instagram "fans" in the Desmond is Amazing thread, I couldn't take anymore child abuse and child exploitation via Instagram.

Their have been actual FBI agents (who work on cp and sexual crimes against children), that have said...pedo's use everyday Instagram posts as almost a kind of cp collectors cards they share amongst each other.

That kelly has noticeably framed her public IG posts to include the nudity of her children, especially someone that claims to be a photographer (there are ethics and consent in photography) and that has spent the last 3 months on social media mooing about the exploitation of black people (I guess exploitation doesn't extend to kellys white kids) is really beyond words.

She is just waiting to be called out on it so she can play the victim card, Tess has done the same thing with her son.

That’s my big issue. She’s a professional (ish) photographer, she knows how to frame a shot and how to be aware of what’s in the background. She just doesn’t care. Not one bit.

 

[Smug Cat]

My tin foil hat theory is that she deliberately posts pictures of her kids:
1) because she's a shitty mother and has no sense of protection over their privacy
2) because she knows at some point, someone will call her out for it, and she can make it seem like it's that person with the problem. "Oh? You think it's bad that I show my kids naked?? You're gross for sexualizing them"

I think she gets off on violating others boundaries and then acting so self righteous they can't do anything about it.

Ugh, this post brought me to a horrible realization.

Kelly is a narcissist. She may be doing this because she's getting off on violating her children in this way and stripping them of their autonomy. True narcissists are nasty. They have little-to-no empathy and display a lot of the kinds of antisocial behaviors often associated with psychopaths. A lot of child molesters are clinical narcissists, especially the ones who molest their own children. She may not be ignorant of the way she's exposing them to pedophiles, that may actually be the entire point. Like "haha, you belong to me, look at what I've done showing all these strangers your body and there's nothing you can do about it." Like an obscene power play, a roundabout method of sexual abuse.

I really hope I'm wrong. I really, really hope I'm wrong. But it's something a clinical narcissist might do.

 

[Assman]

Cow crossover:
View attachment 1519028
View attachment 1519026View attachment 1519029View attachment 1519027

"Do you think that I should have to pay for the extra costs of specialty equipment and treatment for my self-induced morbid obesity?"
Yes.

 

[Tard Repository]

Maybe she's trying to "normalize" this kind of nudity the same way she's trying to normalize being fat and intentionally disgusting?

Unfortunately, while there are still sick fucks out there that ogle and touch children, the only thing these pictures are going to start "normalizing" is a pervert's hard drive.

 

[Lady Pigroach]

Why would anyone be OK with their children wiping their pee pees and buttholes on every surface of the house? Why if they hurt their pee pees while engaged in naked combat? Watch your children Kelly ugh so gross

 

[BIG DADDY]

I bet she keeps them naked because extremely autistic people can’t stand wearing clothes because of sensory sensitivity, so to her, making them wear clothes is discrimination because of their disability*, while it is embracing their differences to let them be naked, even though not tolerating any clothing items at all is an extreme end of the spectrum thing. Kelly can never pass up an opportunity to highlight a progressive issue while making sure her kids will never learn from her how to fit into society or be normal. And of course NOT taking pics of them would be discrimination, because then you’re purposely excluding them from something because of a behavior directly linked to their autism (but actually linked to their mom’s ideology that even if an individual has problems it’s up to society to change for them, just like for fat people). It all comes back to virtue signaling in the end.

*whether or not her kids are actually on the spectrum or not is a moot point, as Kelly will identify them as such either way.

 

[Reepicheep]

 

[Dorsia.Reservation]

View attachment 1520303View attachment 1520304

Well that won't be hard for kelly since she has only ever lived in lily white places like Lake Zurich, Geneva and St Charles.

 

[gay frogs]

It's weird to me that Kelly can post her kids naked on Instagram without consequence but her gunt length titties will be censored. Not that I don't thank the zuck for that tiny favor.

(that said I am not so prudish to believe that children can't be naked in their own homes, as much as it grosses me out, being familiar with the wiping skills of young children)

 

[JambledUpWords]

 

[Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth]

View attachment 1520362View attachment 1520363View attachment 1520359View attachment 1520360View attachment 1520361

How about you fight not to eat as much instead fatass?

 

[SassyAndMorbidlyObese]

View attachment 1520362View attachment 1520363View attachment 1520359View attachment 1520360View attachment 1520361

Her eyes are so empty, it creeps me out. Lights on but nobody's home but then I read her personal thoughts and I realize that the home is rotten from the inside out.

 

[Spastic Colon]

View attachment 1520303View attachment 1520304

If people are going to cheat with mail in votes -- do you really think that a few people moving their ass to the "good" part of town to mail their votes is going to be enough to stop it? You don't actually need to do that when you can make up your own totals that sound completely plausible (because we poll people 5000 times before each election -- so they know what the numbers are going to be in each district). You cheat just enough to get your guy ahead, but not enough to rouse suspicion. Sure, there can be recounts, but if you know what you are doing, the recount won't show enough of a difference to prove that cheating occurred. This retarded plan is not going to outwit the cheaters.

I would never cheat, but I am smart enough to imagine scenarios where it could be done. And none of those would require me to "lose" ballots from black neighborhoods.

It's weird to me that Kelly can post her kids naked on Instagram without consequence but her gunt length titties will be censored. Not that I don't thank the zuck for that tiny favor.

(that said I am not so prudish to believe that children can't be naked in their own homes, as much as it grosses me out, being familiar with the wiping skills of young children)

Kids often run around naked at that age because they don't know any better. It is the parents' job to teach them about the social contract which requires us to cover up our nudity for the greater good. It also keeps them from touching their genitals or ass and wiping their hands on everything. Kids grab their crotches quite often. As a parent, she should know that. In my house, we have a rule that you can be naked as much as you want, but only in the bathroom or your bedroom. In shared living areas, you must wear clothing. It really isn't a hard rule to enforce because kids that young generally accept it.

Once her kids hit puberty, I wonder if we'll have lots of "oops, I accidentally took an embarrassing photo of my kid in her underwear" incidents. I've no doubt that Kelly will also be the kind of parent who barges in without knocking. We'll probably even get a post like that troon Zinnia Jones who just had to tell the world about walking in on his step son masturbating and how he was so cool about it. I pity those poor, poor kids.

 

[JambledUpWords]