Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 63 50.8%
  • 1

    Votes: 33 26.6%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 22.6%

  • Total voters
    124
Here is my argument against concepts like lolicon. Lets say it becomes legalized this would most likely include other drawing styles such as photo realistic since the creator can say the person drawn does not exist and is just from my imagination which would be hard to prove if it were actually a real person. At that point they may as well legalize CP.

All in all Dick is being a disgusting creep.

Here is an example of photo realistic art.

231231213231.jpg
 
Here is my argument against concepts like lolicon. Lets say it becomes legalized this would most likely include other drawing styles such as photo realistic since the creator can say the person drawn does not exist and is just from my imagination which would be hard to prove if it were actually a real person. At that point they may as well legalize CP.

All in all Dick is being a disgusting creep.

Here is an example of photo realistic art.

View attachment 1522811
I mean their argument is based around that porn of X is fine, as long as the production of porn of X didn't involve the harm of any real actual person, so your argument doesn't even clock with them.
 
I thought I had better content when I started making this but then realized I didn't half way through, but finished it anyway. Still, I think it does a good job highlighting how fucking creepy the pedophile dax has decided to defend is.

View attachment 1522777















Archives of the digibro tweets:
View attachment 1522779


View attachment 1522781

View attachment 1522782

View attachment 1522786
He really is so in your face with this shit that there's no way he doesn't want actual kids. The creepy legal loli thing about the adult that looks underage was such a red flag it made my stomach turn. If it ever gets out hand enough to get him killed it won't be surprising in the least.
 
Every. Single. Time. Who couldn't see that a mile away? When the uproar or bad tweets or bad actions occur, he always slinks back to the excuse of 'It's just a joke bro' or 'It's just a character' to try to save himself. When will people stop putting up with this crap excuse?
Even if you accept the flimsy 'I was only pretending to be a retard' excuse it doesn't really work in this scenario. He wasn't just talking shit on twitter. He was doing it in defense of the degenerate he still chooses to associate with. Is choosing to have people like digi in your circle also part of the joke? This is some 4d chess joke that is beyond my pitiful intellect.
 
I like TDS but this recent shitshow is a bit much even for me.
In the history of the religious world (+2000 years) the church has been one of the biggest purveyors of pedophiles. He is also one of the art fags and we all know for a fact that all artist are complete and utter degenerates.
Nearly every large-scale study on pedophilia in the Catholic church suggests clergy are less likely to be pedophiles than the general population FYI.
 
He really is so in your face with this shit that there's no way he doesn't want actual kids. The creepy legal loli thing about the adult that looks underage was such a red flag it made my stomach turn. If it ever gets out hand enough to get him killed it won't be surprising in the least.
IMO the worst one was the only child one. Because ask yourself, why would a (then) single man who jerks off to, as he puts it "little girls getting fucked!", want to know about the financial challenges of a single man living alone with a child?
 
I think everyone is getting lost in the weeds on the question of whether lolicon should be legal or not. It's perfectly possible to think it should be legal and also think that people like Digibro and others who are into it are degenerate weirdos who should be shunned from being associated with.

It strikes me as the same sort of diversionary tactic as the whole "Ethan Ralph isn't a pedophile because she's 18" thing when people were calling him a predatory creep for dating Faith. It's a distraction from the real point that Digibro is a degenerate piece of shit and there is no real reason for Dick to keep carrying water for him.
 
I mean their argument is based around that porn of X is fine, as long as the production of porn of X didn't involve the harm of any real actual person, so your argument doesn't even clock with them.
The problem with that argument is:
Define harm. If some guy found his 4 year old daughter sleeping naked and photographed her you could argue that no "harm" was done to the child. At which point they'd have to support legalizing that too else reveal that their argument is shit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Neurotic Loser
I don't see how having a more hardline stance is getting lost in the weeds. Digi would make a perfect case study on how it feeds into those urges making the problem worse. Deep down we all know this sick freak is a danger to kids. If he didn't jack it to "little girls getting fucked" or act on his bizarre extreme ageplay fetish he might not even be in this mess.
 
Oh so he was just pretending to be retarded.

EDIT: PPP just made a video on Dax
"i cant believe i have to make a show like this"
I agree i cant comprehend whats happening. Who does this shit? who just dies on the hill of child rape after selling their soul for their brands? Why Dick? How do you outdo Ralph showing revenge porn live? What timeline are we in where we have to question Dick on pedophilia? Its not even in "it continues" territory theyve just crossed from wacky into like mexican cartel territory
 
Big brained Dax thinks him defending DigiBro's right to jerk off to loli is the same as someone living in America because the founding fathers were pedos.
kikes lying about america so they can futher their interests a tale as old as time. Hey @oddguy how does it feel being a failed e-celeb despite trying for half a decade?
Here is my argument against concepts like lolicon. Lets say it becomes legalized this would most likely include other drawing styles such as photo realistic since the creator can say the person drawn does not exist and is just from my imagination which would be hard to prove if it were actually a real person. At that point they may as well legalize CP.

All in all Dick is being a disgusting creep.

Here is an example of photo realistic art.

View attachment 1522811
My personal gripe with lolicon is that its a very American centric view. It has the highest AOC in the world and forces its local laws onto places on the other side of the world. Its like how black pete went from a beloved traditional character to a racist demon only bigots like because the US decided to make it so on a country 100000 miles away and with an entirely different language and society. By letting americans draw the line we basically fucked over billions and declared them pedos, like the french president who's relationship isnt considered weird in europe or most other places but is considered fucked up in the US.

Also why draw the line at 18, i know tons of women higher up in the bureaucracy call any guy lusting over a 25 year old woman a pedo. If given the opportunity they would raise the AOC to 30.

Imagine if China pulled the same shit and called everyone psychopaths for killing our animals before eating them.

As for US laws, just because AOC was 10 or 8 or 12 people were moral enough not to fuck women that young for the most part. When sex outside of marriage is considered as evil as killing children and you cant marry until youre 18 well that sort of renders AOC as rather useless. They only started jacking up the ages because people started normalizing fucking outside of marriage, it was considered thoroughly modern. And even then there wasnt a concrete pipeline of highschool-college-mailroom yet to establish a good age for when adulthood started. If 14 year olds could have jobs and 16 year olds could join the army why should neither get to fuck. Honestly though if the state legislatures dragged their feet until the highschool-college-mailroom pipeline got set up we might have an AOC of 25 or 21. And im sure we can all name attractive 24 year olds.

Final point on this is remembering all the bush era liberals on Myspace talking about how enlightened canada and EU and LA countries were because they werent led by the religious right and they actually trusted 14 year olds to be smart enough to have sex with whoever they wanted.
 
Last edited:
Alright.
On one hand, loli is a debate worth having. Especially if you are a Free Speech guy, it is a topic that is very prominent on today's Internet. Everyone has their own take on it, and everyone has a different idea about what to do about it. Are only fictional kids ok to draw, should people like Shadman be able to be sued for it, should Patreon monitize it again, what does it actually do to the people who view it, all of these questions are going to shape how the Internet handles itself in regards to censureship.
But, on the other hand, loli is one of the worst (legal) things to advocate for if you want to have favorable public image. Phrase even the slightest thing wrong, you're a freak who took the wrong message from Fanny Hill.
If I were Dick, I would only bring it up on the show, where you can actually prepare a concise argument that could be taken better than this Twitter nonsense. Because there is a huge difference in "Here's my position, here's reasons A B and C I hold this position" and what he's doing now.
 
My personal gripe with lolicon is that its a very American centric view. It has the highest AOC in the world and forces its local laws onto places on the other side of the world. Its like how black pete went from a beloved traditional character to a racist demon only bigots like because the US decided to make it so on a country 100000 miles away and with an entirely different language and society. By letting americans draw the line we basically fucked over billions and declared them pedos, like the french president who's relationship isnt considered weird in europe or most other places but is considered fucked up in the US.

Also why draw the line at 18, i know tons of women higher up in the bureaucracy call any guy lusting over a 25 year old woman a pedo. If given the opportunity they would raise the AOC to 30.

Imagine if China pulled the same shit and called everyone psychopaths for killing our animals before eating them.

As for US laws, just because AOC was 10 or 8 or 12 people were moral enough not to fuck women that young for the most part. When sex outside of marriage is considered as evil as killing children and you cant marry until youre 18 well that sort of renders AOC as rather useless.

Final point on this is remembering all the bush era liberals talking about how enlightened canada and EU and LA countries were because they werent led by the religious right and they actually trusted 14 year olds to be smart enough to have sex with whoever they wanted.
the aoc discussion is kind of irrelevant here imo since its about drawings of people under aoc and that can be more universal even if the aocs are different, the issue is less having a stylized drawing not based on any real child (which i dont have the credentials or knowledge to really examine the ethics of) its that instead of letting something stay on the fringes of society, where it might not even belong but where it at most belongs, they instead want to normalize it so they can get a more stable fix. Its possible theres a pedophile who is sated and prevented from doing any further harm with these drawings but people like digibro got tired of their supply line being too clandestine and unstable and want to normalize lusting after children just so they dont have to sneak around for their cummies.

instead of taking a site ban or picture deletion in stride they instead want us closer to normalizing pedophilia so their wack off folders are more complete. its harder to take his claim that its therapeutic at face value when someone actually doing so would keep quiet and bear it instead of letting their illness be normalized. if youre trying to normalize it means you dont actually feel its an issue

edit: didnt mean to dogpile or shit on your post its just imo its irrelevant to the issue but not in an obvious way so it was harder to see why the issue is different. theres a convo about the proper aoc and american bias but not here

Alright.
On one hand, loli is a debate worth having. Especially if you are a Free Speech guy, it is a topic that is very prominent on today's Internet. Everyone has their own take on it, and everyone has a different idea about what to do about it. Are only fictional kids ok to draw, should people like Shadman be able to be sued for it, should Patreon monitize it again, what does it actually do to the people who view it, all of these questions are going to shape how the Internet handles itself in regards to censureship.
But, on the other hand, loli is one of the worst (legal) things to advocate for if you want to have favorable public image. Phrase even the slightest thing wrong, you're a freak who took the wrong message from Fanny Hill.
If I were Dick, I would only bring it up on the show, where you can actually prepare a concise argument that could be taken better than this Twitter nonsense. Because there is a huge difference in "Here's my position, here's reasons A B and C I hold this position" and what he's doing now.
its something that needs a lot more seriousness and thought than just "fuck you karen farms my friend is based"
 
Last edited:
107928784_86543.jpg
I dont care if this was drawn by a tard it's still good.
Alright.
On one hand, loli is a debate worth having. Especially if you are a Free Speech guy, it is a topic that is very prominent on today's Internet. Everyone has their own take on it, and everyone has a different idea about what to do about it. Are only fictional kids ok to draw, should people like Shadman be able to be sued for it, should Patreon monitize it again, what does it actually do to the people who view it, all of these questions are going to shape how the Internet handles itself in regards to censureship.
But, on the other hand, loli is one of the worst (legal) things to advocate for if you want to have favorable public image. Phrase even the slightest thing wrong, you're a freak who took the wrong message from Fanny Hill.
If I were Dick, I would only bring it up on the show, where you can actually prepare a concise argument that could be taken better than this Twitter nonsense. Because there is a huge difference in "Here's my position, here's reasons A B and C I hold this position" and what he's doing now.
If they want to have a lolicon debate they should get rikafag the YouTuber with no name.
Itd be even better since him and digibrony have a feud.
 
"Hide your kids" might be one of the worst ways to say a show is spicy right now Dick. JFC can you simply stop fucking up for a day?
Dick "why arent 13 year olds putting out" Masterson literally can't stop, literally Dick rn

I think he also did some call-in thing where he asked a bunch of kids sexual questions live on air but I can't find it so I could be schizo posting
DICK! stop it, just fucking stop ffs
 
Back