Yeah, found it. The
Miller test can be used to determine if speech/expression can be classed as obscenity and prohibited.
The three criteria are:
- Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
- Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law,
- Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Point 1 is pretty much a given. On point 2, Nick manages a double-play: his masterpiece combines both sexual conduct
and excretory functions. Unfortunately for him, this probably doesn't constitute enough artistic value to swing point 3 his way - even when also including the possible scientific interest in questions like "how can that be so small?" and "was there ever a person more disgusting?"
tl;dr I'm not a lawyer, but I'd bet that Nick's...video creation...would be classified as obscene.