She-Ra and the Princess of Power - sjw bad animation reboot of shera

It's fucking sad that it took an economic crisis for companies to hopefully slowly start putting the kibosh on wokeshit and actually give fans what they want.
Nah, its actually quite predictable. During an economic boom company departments can afford to waste money on lots of pointless garbage in the name of spending all their budget so they can ask for a larger budget next year.

Meaning you see a lot of BS positions like "company efficiency consultants" and "Diversity officers" being made and exist almost purely to throw money in the money pit in a way that makes the department look like its not throwing money in the money pit. When times get tough economically, departments have to start justifying costs to upper management who are desperate to get things back on track so they don't get keelhauled by the shareholders. Mysteriously these consultants and officers start disappearing around that time along with other wasteful positions in the company (which are almost always solely occupied by lazy do nothings who skated by on a good economy).
 
20200816_115506.jpg
 
If we go by statistics, only around 5% of US citizens are gay/bisexual. I usually cut this number in half or even to a third because these statistics are biased as fuck due to the heavy amount of politicization around the topic and danger-hairs who are "gay/bisexual" for brownie points when they are actually straight, but for the sake of argument I will give this generous number. Meaning 95% of people are straight, even ignoring this number we are animals whose sole existence is to mate and reproduce.

Being straight IS THE DEFAULT accept this and stop trying to paint every imaginary character as gay to validate your psychological bullshit.
 

off-topic but we've been off-topic for a couple pages now
What's the point of making stories if lunatics like this will ignore it all and make up their own (stupider) version? Even if everyone in a cartoon is straight, censors hate anything pertaining to sex and that's what sexuality technically is. Saying you're straight is a no-no too. You have to SHOW and not TELL. That's how all these newer cartoons have been bypassing the censors. They SHOW kids with two dads, they SHOW kissing on the cheeks and holding hands while blushing.

You say "you don't have to say you're gay to be gay" but clearly you do if Zuko kissing Mai in the end after becoming king didn't give you the message he likes women. Zuko can be your favorite without being gay you freak.
 
People like this desperately need real human interactions and life experiences. Christ Almighty.

I'm not even going to sit here and argue that Zuko is gay or straight. I'm just asking why has the internet fostered people that care about characters' sexuality in a children's show?
They don't. They are highly insecure and only care to validate THEIR sexuality. Which doesn't work because its imaginary characters in a children's show, but they will keep trying because its the only method they know.

That or they have not gotten over high school and just want to be desperately popular. And, like all losers who want to be desperately popular, they don't actually know what is popular and obsess over what they think will make them popular, which paradoxically makes them look even more like losers.
 

For those curious and willing to contribute their own time, this is the video where I'm having way too much fun ruffling the guy's feathers.

And, this right here is the thread. Look for it. No, it isn't Agent X. Go down and you'll spot him easily. Or, rather, he makes it too easy.
View attachment 1523830
Dude, we have an Avatar thread. Post this stuff in there.
 
The main character of the novel I'm writing is bisexual. But since that doesn't matter in the story as a whole it only comes up in a few situations where it's actually important because it's part of how the characters experiences the world. I think sexuality is actually a just tiny part of the character and if you aren't writing a story where sexuality plays a huge role (like a story for children!!!) then it should never ever be shoehorned in. Of course you can include it but only when it's necessary and don't overdo it for woke points.

Characters can have a sexuality but they AREN'T a sexuality. The same goes for race my opinion.
 
Last edited:
The main character of the novel I'm writing is bisexual. But since that doesn't matter in the story as a whole it only comes up in a few situations where it's actually important because it's part of how the characters experiences the world. I think sexuality is actually a just tiny part of the character and if you aren't writing a story where sexuality plays a huge role (like a story for children!!!) then it should never ever be shoehorned in. Of course you can includd it but only when it's necessary and don't overdo it for woke points.

Characters can have a sexuality but they AREN'T a sexuality. The same goes for race my opinion.
I'm actually flummoxed by how much these people invest in sexuality. You're right, it isn't a personality, and should nowhere near be important if they do want it to be normalized. It should just happen. I can't properly explain it, but Japanese creators like Togashi (Yu Yu Hakusho and Hunter x Hunter) actually had transgender characters in his works, but nobody cared because it felt natural and casual.
 
I'm pretty sure a lot of them are speaking from experience.
Spinnerella is not good enough, I guess.

Glimmer x Adora is at least a lot less abusive and that's coming from another brat who nearly destroyed the world.
true. But they portray Glimer as a passive victim who is somehow mistreated in the show and friendzoned when her/adora relationship was never portrayed as romantic and she basically got everything she wanted without having to sacrifice much (except her mom, but it's not like she gave a shit abt her).
They also ignore Bow, but it's understandable why (sjw have this hidden agenda with the goal to pussify black men so they keep portraying them as inferior to white women and claim they're "avoiding racial stereotypes that black men are violent". This is why we can't have characters like Blade anymore.)
 
Last edited:
20200818_135243.jpg


Holy shit, this show is supposed to span years? It felt like a few months, if that! The pacing and concept of time in this show is absolutely abysmal, my God.

EDIT: Another thought- if the Best Friend Squad are like 18 in season 1 (this was said in an interview), they'd finish out at age 21 or 22. Frosta should be fifteen or sixteen by the end, but she still looks and acts and is treated like a child. Why do the characters not look older by then, when they objectively should?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1529673

Holy shit, this show is supposed to span years? It felt like a few months, if that! The pacing and concept of time in this show is absolutely abysmal, my God.

EDIT: Another thought- if the Best Friend Squad are like 18 in season 1 (this was said in an interview), they'd finish out at age 21 or 22. Frosta should be fifteen or sixteen by the end, but she still looks and acts and is treated like a child. Why do the characters not look older by then, when they objectively should?

Budget cuts, time constraints, pure lazyness, Noelle is lying to make fanatics connect dots that aren't there.
Take your pick.

I think it's lazyness in the artstyle since most mainstream's idea of aging a character up is adding wrinkle lines, cutting/growing hair, adding scars and of course losing body parts and keeping them off. It's never the body morphing out of the mold it set itself in like real aging does. They do it in movies but I haven't seen it in TV for a while.
 
Back