Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

They are well aware of how pissed people are
Screenshot_20200820-125802_2.png
 
They are well aware of how pissed people are
View attachment 1534379

I mean I guess it's technically possible they made this "outrageous" on purpose as viral marketing. It would hardly be the first time something was marketed as "wow look how disgusting and wrong this is! Consoom it to piss off polite society!"

Wasn't that basically Grand Theft Auto's marketing gimmick as far back as the early 90's?
 
Become? I wasn't aware it ever was anything other than promotion of oversexualization of everything by people with zero personality traits beyond their fetishes, fantasies and sexual preferences.
The earliest pride parades had NAMBLA openly marching, but it was just a march and the rest of the LGB realized they were bad optics and booted them in the 80s. This early connection has been pretty well memory holed.

Into the early 00s, it wasn't really that bad but you had the T creeping into prominence over time. Things got more degenerate over the last 15 years, with pedo shit coming in in the last 3-5.

Again, there's plenty of normies who have heard of pride but may well have never seen it or know just how extreme it has gotten

A Senegalese Muslim girl is the protagonist. Why do I feel like this is going to have a drawn out genital mutilation scene?
Please don't give them any ideas
 
I mean I guess it's technically possible they made this "outrageous" on purpose as viral marketing. It would hardly be the first time something was marketed as "wow look how disgusting and wrong this is! Consoom it to piss off polite society!"

Wasn't that basically Grand Theft Auto's marketing gimmick as far back as the early 90's?
I see this as playing with (literal) fire. I wouldn't be surprised if a building got bombed over this
 
This is a bot. My company uses something similar and it's all written in this same kind of ambiguous stilted semi legalese.

The responses, while certainly in legalese and non committal, appear more relevant to the person talking than a bot can typically do. Seems more like a human reading the replies, and submitting canned/pre-written responses that fit.


1597947763491.png1597947807472.png1597947892908.png

1597948095623.png1597948150535.png

1597948341671.png
https://twitter.com/netflix/status/1296486375211053057
1597948480824.png
 
Last edited:
This can only mean that the fabric of reality is being manipulated yet again by pigroach luck. When Darksydephil gets MeToo’d by a preteen or is caught with CP open on stream, the cultural climate will have shifted just in time for him to be forgiven so he can go on streaming.

Lets be real DSP could cornhole a nine year old boy on stream and get the case dismissed for some reason.
 
Users still complain about the "religous right" and yet this is where we are in the current year.

Even the news articles make it sound like users want this censored and are neutral. This is abominable and shouldn't have been made in the first place.

Complain all you want about the religous right but this would never happen in my ideal ethnofash (jewless) state.
 
This is a bot. My company uses something similar and it's all written in this same kind of ambiguous stilted semi legalese.
Doesn't matter. That is an official endorsement of pedophilia. "Are you for or against raping children?" is not a question that warrants careful consideration. You just say "No!" because everything else is just a "Yes." in so many words.
 
Back