Netflix's "Cuties" - The Preteen Sexual Objectification Equivalent of "Funny Games"

10 years ago, people were saying that legalizing gay marriage would start slippery slope of degeneracy that would result in trying to normalize pedophilia and sexualize/exploit very young children.

Many, including myself, scoffed at such an idea. It felt like a false equivalency and irrelevant to the discussion.

Well...here we are in 2020. Exposing kids to sex and having them twerk in a movie is awesome! And you're a bigot if you don't agree!

This may be so obvious it isn't worth posting, but the problem here isn't the legalization of gay marriage. It's the fact that the people who pushed for gay marriage didn't care about gay marriage. They cared about defining themselves as people who "fight" for "social progress." And so once they had gotten what they wanted with gay marriage, they had to find something else to "fight" for, and since there's virtually nothing left in the West on the civil rights front (because the West is insanely tolerant), they started hyperfocusing on tiny issues and flat out making problems up to "solve." They absolutely cannot exist unless they're proving constantly to everyone else how "compassionate" and "opposed to the status quo" (lol) they are.

In other words, if the "social justice" types actually appreciated the social "progress" they claim to want so badly when they get it, this wouldn't be happening. These people are the problem, not the legalization of gay marriage itself. (Not that I don't have a few issues with fag marriage. Like, don't get me started on the way they got it legalized...)
 
IM not the one auditioning 11 year olds and asking them to twerk.
And you arent going to stop all other 11 year olds getting 'auditioned' either.

Bingo.THat way she can accuse everyone that dont like the show antisemite.

Oh I remember you, you're the nihilist.

Though can someone tell me, why Jewish keeps on appearing in influential positions pushing some sort of pro-pedo thing? I know Jewish people are more genetically prone to certain mental disorders. I wonder if that includes pedophilia. I doubt a study would be done, since it would be branded anti-semitism.
 
Though can someone tell me, why Jewish keeps on appearing in influential positions pushing some sort of pro-pedo thing?
Is this for real? I mean actual Judaism is pretty conservative and would not let you sex without marriage.
They might be pedos that are trying to use Antisemitium shield to deflect accusations.
I know Jewish people are more genetically prone to certain mental disorders. I wonder if that includes pedophilia. I doubt a study would be done, since it would be branded anti-semitism.
Yeah we need a study. But confusing race with religion does not result in accuracy. Any race(nigg/gook/shitskin) can be Jew.
 
Current like/dislike ratio

screen 2.png


They've also updated their description for the thing yet again. They're trying to damage control but more than enough damage has been done at this point I think.

Fan the flames enough and I think we could be looking at 500,000 dislikes soon.

Also the petition now has over 90,000 signed.

screen 3.png
 
I hate this.
>"It's okay for them to sexualize real life kids like this, it's just for authenticity for this coming-of-age drama!"
Okay and? You're still putting kids up on display to be sexualized. You think pedos are going to watch this film and not get off to it? You think that the supposedly "deep" story is gonna stop them from whacking off to legally sanctioned, softcore CP?
Honestly, if the movie is showcasing how bad sexualizing minors is that great. I doubt it will be free of questionable material but I haven't seen it(and won't). The issue is not the content of a movie that hasn6come out yet, the issue is the blatant sexualization of children in advertising that is already out there and seen. Its blatant pedopandering and nobody cares about the movie. Netflix paid for it, they should take the loss and not host it America. That's a wish and a dream since it's most definitely going to be snuck in on September 9th.
French director Francois Truffaut once said that there was no such thing as an anti-war film.

Now, you might be able to think of examples that you think definitely showcase the brutality and horrors of war, etc, but I think his point remains in a more general sense. In trying to make something condemning 'x', you run the risk of coming off as supporting 'x'. And even if you do succeed, there will nevertheless be some lunatic sitting at the back of the theatre metaphorically jacking off to the torture porn on screen, and walking away from the movie with his beliefs unchanged.

I think a similar thing applies here, except replace 'war' with 'the sexualisation of children' and 'metaphorically jacking off' with 'actually jacking off'.
 
Uzaki is a 20-year-old college girl and just viral mudslinging at this point. The same circus animals that screamed "all bodies are beautiful!" over Abby denied short stacks exist to yell "pedophilic male fantasy!" at a foreign import they can't control. The natural response has been to parade her in front of them until they drown in candy bars.

This, though. If this isn't a pedophilic male fantasy then it's to an absurd degree of bad taste—although you cannot tell me with a straight face perverts aren't gonna jerk off to it. At the very least, as the eve of this election hinges on actual murder, it was a very, very bad idea for Netflix to wheel this out. Any time would have been bad, but now? How does a billion dollar company have the dumbest PR people working for them?
 
The satire is these are same people who want to censor anime, fanservice, manga for body image & slap stick & loony toons & old movies /games/books(pre-2000 ).

Agree anything under the lgbtq flag fair game to protected at all cost .
You haven't figured it out yet?

They don't want women to be the sexual ideal, so they promote ugly freaks

Now in that void that's left, they put children.

Feminism was the vehicle for pedophilia to roll in on.
 
You haven't figured it out yet?

They don't want women to be the sexual ideal, so they promote ugly freaks

Now in that void that's left, they put children.

Feminism was the vehicle for pedophilia to roll in on.



We're going down the rabbit hole....

Shulamith "Shulie" Firestone (January 7, 1945 – August 28, 2012)[2] was a Canadian-American radical feminist, writer and activist. Firestone was a central figure in the early development of radical feminism and second-wave feminism and a founding member of three radical-feminist groups: New York Radical Women, Redstockings, and New York Radical Feminists.

Firestone was born Shulamith bath Shmuel ben Ari Feuerstein[1] in Ottawa, Canada. She was born on January 7, 1945[12] and was the second of six children and the first daughter of Orthodox Jewish parents Kate Weiss, a German Jew who fled the Holocaust,

Firestone was considered a radical feminist because she believed that the oppression of women is directly related to patriarchal western society. She was also heavily influenced by socialism and the work of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels.[17]

Although in her era of political activity, Firestone advocated for consciousness raising groups and the unity of women, she later suffered from schizophrenia,

Why is there this constant repetition. Marxism, Judaism, Feminism, Pedophilia
 

I remember this guy, Linkartoon, from another controversy. People really freak out about his drawings, but he's just another coomer artist from the pile. All the "children" he draws are fictional and heavily aged up. As far as I checked, just cartoon characters with clearly adult features. BreadOverlord here talks as if he was posting CP, when Netflix is actually doing harm to real kids here. Lmfao.
 
As soon as I saw the poster for this movie, I knew it would be here. It seems like people are conflating the Netflix poster and the movie, which from what I've read, perceives the hypersexualization of the underaged girls as horrific.

https://archive.md/2VG6r

Eleven-year-old Amy (a revelatory Fathia Youssouf Abdillah) already has an eye for petty misdeeds before falling in with the titular “cuties” of Maimouna Doucouré’s feature debut. The sweet, gangly tween is no stranger to tiny acts of rebellion that both mystify and thrill her, as if even she can’t believe what she’s getting up to in the liminal space between childhood and adulthood. Sticky-fingered (a set of prayer beads here, a much-needed cell phone there) and hyper-observant, Amy doesn’t miss a trick, characteristics that not only set her apart from her family but also make her something of a curiosity at her local school. Recently moved into a bustling French apartment building and a dizzyingly busy middle school, Amy is in state of massive transition, and that’s before the physical demands of puberty start to infiltrate every inch of her body and mind.


Doucouré’s even-handed approach to the film’s grounded first half is what makes it so moving and relatable, and despite the specificity of Amy’s story — her family, culture, background, and the contemporary obsessions that enthrall her — there is a heartening universality to her troubles. “Cuties” may have plenty on its mind, but it’s also the kind of coming-of-age story that will make any adult viewer think back to their own tween years. You couldn’t pay most people to re-live all that; watching Amy endure it on screen is hard enough. (Despite the drama of her storyline, Doucouré has a real eye for visual humor: Amy sitting quietly during a prayer service, tucked inside her headscarves as she watches a twerking video while appearing to pray, and a sight gag centered on the outrageous number of onions she’s tasked with chopping in preparation for a feast.)


Originally from Senegal, Amy’s traditional lifestyle requires that she honor her parents — and eventually, her husband — by being meek and reserved, faithful and timid. And yet Amy’s familial unit has already started to break down, propelling them into uncharted space. In the absence of her father (resolved in the film’s first act through one hell of a heartbreaking revelation), Amy must honor her mother (a haunting Maïmouna Gueye) above all. Once that part of her life changes, the diversions pile up. There’s her growing femininity, her needy younger brother, and a new interest in pop music and dancing. And there, of course, are the Cuties.
The Cuties are a budding dance crew whose leader happens to live in Amy’s building. The intrigue is understandable: Where Amy is shy, they are bold, where she is modest, they’re brash. Doucouré and her young cast believably chart the girls’ fickle affections as Amy orbits their world, from their intense adoration to their terrible ability to bully each other.


Amy eventually wiggles her way into the group by way of her stolen cell phone, offering her services as a videographer for their dancing exploits. The girls are preparing to enter a dance contest, and an appearance by their great rivals (the Sweety-Swaggs) lays out what’s the come: The Swaggs are older, more developed, more sexualized, and their moves reflect that. The Cuties certainly don’t understand that even the elder Swaggs are at the mercy of a hyper-sexualized culture and its demands, and that there’s something deeply wrong with a teenager taking her top off in the middle of dance video. Soon enough, the Cuties are unfurling their own new routine led by Amy, who remains tuned in to what’s happening around her but not what it means.


The foursome does realize that there is something here beyond their reach — new best pal Angelica balks at a move that involves lasciviously sucking on her fingers and they all seem to think their butt-bumping is silly more than anything. The audience must endure their sexualization as increasingly horrified spectators. The girls vacillate between being hyper-interested in the opposite sex (the girls push Amy to videotape a cute boy in the bathroom) and being freaked out by its actual mechanics, as in a scene in which they discover a used condom. A group of initially interested teenage boys soon recoil in disgust (and fear?) when they realize how young the Cuties are. “They’re little girls,” one of them scoffs, as the tweens jostle and preen, desperate to prove otherwise.


As Amy more fully enters the world of womanhood, “Cuties” takes on a more mystical aspect, one that’s not always earned and never fits inside the very real space Doucouré carved out for her characters. It’s an uneasy merging of the grounded and the out-there that’s never fully realized and always distracting. (That Doucouré ends her film with a one-two punch of too-obvious symbolism and the film’s most fantastic sequence is, without spoiling the details, a tremendous letdown.) The eventual consequences Amy must face are believable, built around a coming-of-age trope of suddenly being forced to reckon with her two lives on the same day. However, Doucouré muddies them with magical realism that does little to advance the storyline or Amy’s evolving character.


Although Doucouré steeps “Cuties” in emotion and experience, she abandons its grace to make crazier gestures. “Cuties” doesn’t need sudden splotches of blood or a twist that turns Amy into, at best, a young criminal. Growing up is hard enough, and “Cuties” knows that — until it doesn’t.

Whoever designed and approved the poster should be fired.
 
Last edited:
Back