Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Twitter done did it again.
1598216817700.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Confused Doggo, Dededon't and 23 others
Shaka Brah said:
Note how they never say why. It's just against the rules and Trump is doing X or Y, but no explanation of how they got there.
Click to expand...
"Rules about civic and election integrity" -- I think it's quite clear. He is calling into question the integrity of mail in voting, which has been deemed by corporate censors to be a form of voter suppression, which is against ToS. I'm pretty sure he's been hit by this before by Twitter. We have literally reached the point where Democratic talking points are treated as beyond question.

It's incredibly blatant partisan censorship, considerably more blatant than I ever thought they would go for -- it seems easy enough to do their election interference far more subtly. At this point I kind of suspect that it's to bait Trump into section 230 fuckery, given both he and Biden are eager to do so. And that's assuming they aren't just collaborating behind the scenes to compromise on some "bipartisan" 230 reform that censors any actual resistance (along with a lot of collateral damage including the Farms) in exchange for more RINO tokenism on social media.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Donny Cheese, Flexo and 16 others
Tismguide said:
"Rules about civic and election integrity" -- I think it's quite clear. He is calling into question the integrity of mail in voting, which has been deemed by corporate censors to be a form of voter suppression, which is against ToS. I'm pretty sure he's been hit by this before by Twitter. We have literally reached the point where Democratic talking points are treated as beyond question.

It's incredibly blatant partisan censorship, considerably more blatant than I ever thought they would go for -- it seems easy enough to do their election interference far more subtly. At this point I kind of suspect that it's to bait Trump into section 230 fuckery, given both he and Biden are eager to do so. And that's assuming they aren't just collaborating behind the scenes to compromise on some "bipartisan" 230 reform that censors any actual resistance (along with a lot of collateral damage including the Farms) in exchange for more RINO tokenism on social media.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be too surprised if after the elections (just to not have any negative side effects or a surprise bump for Biden by doing this) that they get smacked with losing their right as a forum if Trump wins. Seems like something he'd do, and he is petty enough to wait and spend time to fuck with others.

Dude built around and made a woman's life hell with noise for one of his hotels when she refused to sell if I remember the story right.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Circular Tyrant, spiritofamermaid, JohnDoe and 4 others
School of Fish said:
Well I'm going to be honest here. The only reason why the words "Under God" is in the 'Pledge of Allegiance' and even the motto "In God We Trust" is also on the U.S Dollar was because back in the 1950's the Soviet Union had conducted many anti-religion purges to promote 'State Atheism' and when this happened when the U.S Government (more specifically the Eisenhower Administration) approved of both of these things where 'Under God" was then added to the 'Pledge of Allegiance' and the words "In God We Trust" would also be added onto U.S. currency later on as a form of protest towards the Soviet Union's human rights abuses anyway.

To be honest, I personally don't want these things on any official government programs on the count that the U.S. Constitution (the First Amendment) that states that the government cannot promote any religion or even let alone create state sponsored religion by the way. Now while politicians are able to express their beliefs (they have the right to do so) to me they shouldn't really be allowed to pass laws to promote God, Shiva, Allah or any other deity and belief system officially into the government anyway.

So even with this said, I'm sure the only actual reason why the Democrats are doing this is now is to simply spite Donald Trump and his supporters on the count that they're going full communist (as much as most of them want to deny it) in recent years at this point.

The best way I can describe the 'Nation of Islam' is that the Nation of Islam is to Islam what Mormonism is to Christianity anyway.

Now I'm sure most people here should know about the 'We Wuz Kangz' meme but for those that are living under a rock then allow me to explain then.

So the Nation of Islam basically has their own wacky creation myth that makes Scientology almost look less stupid in comparison anyway.

The origin myth (according to the Nation of Islam) goes that where many centuries ago a race of intergalactic demigod black people then came to Earth and established the first functioning civilization. So one of these alien black people was a super scientist black man named 'Yakub' and he was the one that created that white people but Yakub found his creation way too dangerous as they could threaten the rule of the black man so Yakub locked away the white people in caves in Europe but the white people escaped from their cave prisons, they started an uprising and overthrew the black man, and then they took civilization away from the black man for themselves and then they started to rewrite history to make it appear that it was white people that made the notable historical achievements then.

Now I wish I was making this up but this is what the Nation of Islam actually believes and it's beyond parody at this point.

It's the reason why stupid stuff such as this stupid song even exists then.

This whole 'Afrocentrism' thing is only bullshit. The ancient Greeks were not black, Ancient Egypt was not a black civilization, the Samurai of Japan were also not black, Mozart was not a black man, the Israelites were not black nor was Ancient Israel a black civilization either, a lot of the big thinkers from the 'Age of Enlightenment' were not black, William Shakespeare was not black, Beethoven was not a black man, and also name me at least one example of a black civilization in Africa that was on par with Ancient Egypt then. That's what I thought.

It's just fascinating to me how people can believe in such bullshit anyway.
Click to expand...
Why would you even want to claim ancient Egypt? Wasn't it a stagnant proto-North Korea whose entire literate class was consumed by the state cult, and only succeeded so long because of ideal geography for holding an ancient civilization together? They always had to rewrite history to make themselves look good, to the point that they still hadn't come up with a military tactic more advanced than "Bowl 'em over with chariots" by the time the Persians showed up and conquered them in an absurdly lopsided battle. Pyramids are impressive and all, but they're quite emblematic of this "Everything serves the Pharaoh" mentality that lead to this.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Donny Cheese, the fall of man and 8 others
Oglooger said:
It's only because of White people using triconology to turn blacks ghetto. Da Black Man used to rule Europe for 700 years until Whitey revolted due to jelousy and racism.
Fret not for Whitey's time is nigh! Global Warming is just a cope for white people to cover up the fact that they're aliens who cannot stand the Sun which is what provides blacks with their POWERS!
View attachment 1541393
Click to expand...
Omg they actually included the melanin=melatonin nonsense. There's black supremacists that think that because you can buy melatonin at the pharmacy as a sleep aid and it sounds like melanin, wypipo are abducting and killing black kids so they can harvest and consume their melanin to artificially give themselves souls or some shit.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Flexo, the fall of man and 11 others
Adamska said:
I wouldn't be too surprised if after the elections (just to not have any negative side effects or a surprise bump for Biden by doing this) that they get smacked with losing their right as a forum if Trump wins. Seems like something he'd do, and he is petty enough to wait and spend time to fuck with others.

Dude built around and made a woman's life hell with noise for one of his hotels when she refused to sell if I remember the story right.
Click to expand...
lossy-page1-250px-thumbnail.tif.jpg

You remember correctly!

I'm concerned about how effective this blatant censorship may be, especially if large scale voter fraud is the Democratic plan of record. Both sides seem to gearing up the propaganda engine to screech and challenge the result regardless of what it is, but what if the evidence is literally censored? At some point, people will see only one side of the story and conclude the other, lacking evidence, is full of shit. I know Twitter isn't real life, but this strikes me as a huge power play, and the same shady NGOs control the content policies at pretty much all the tech companies.

I'm concerned they're going to go for wide spread voter fraud and get away with it.

To be honest I never used to believe in GOP yelling about voter fraud, but the panicked censorship is doing a lot to convince me there may be some fire behind that smoke screen. Trump's tweet is just rambling fearmongering, yet rather than ridicule this they censor it [or would if it came from some nobody]?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flexo, Confused Doggo, the fall of man and 12 others
Exterminatus said:
Apparently Meghan Markle, wife of Prince Harry, has come out against Trump in a video from some conference thing Michelle Obama was doing and Piers Morgan and others have said she needs to be stripped of her royal titles for dragging the Royal Family into politics with the upcoming election.


Also apparently in her new book she totally brushes aside her connections to the Trump family and also her apparent friendship with Trump's daughter Ivanka.

Click to expand...


She already got one problematic orange man to throw away his title, his future, his heirloom guns, his home, and his family for her can't blame her for testing whether or not she can control all problematic orange men. What get's me is that she hasn't got the Diane treatment yet, at some point the queen would find a way to kill her and get her son back.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, US Marine Hyde, TheGreatCitracett and 11 others
Jigglyjogglers said:
While an interesting take, I feel like it's disingenuous. "Under God" pretty clearly means exactly what it says.
Click to expand...
It does mean exactly what it says. What it says isn't religious. It's philosophical. Belief in God is orthogonal to religiosity. There are religions that believe in God, there are religions that don't, and there are religious and non-religious people who believe in God.

"Under God" pretty clearly means that our nation is united and under the guidance and authority of a single divine being.
Click to expand...
Now you are going beyond what it says. It doesn't say anything about the guidance (or influence) of a divine being. "Under God" works just as well for deists as it does for any other monotheist. (Sorry, polyths.) I think even "authority" may be infelicitous, as authority is something that is rooted in laws or rules. "Subordinate to" might better convey the meaning. And making the nation immediately subordinate to God is not just anti-communist, it's anti- a lot of things we've tried in the past:

Imperial Cults: Emperor = god --> People
Medieval Europe: God --> King -- > People
Communist Bloc: Ideology --> Party --> People
Pledge of Allegiance: God --> People --> Government

The last one is where I want to be. No one is claiming to be a god, there's no King over us, there's no Party interpreting ideology for us. The only thing higher than the people is God, and no one can tell you what you have to believe or deny about God, or what you have to do for God. An American is free to find their own summum bonum, to figure out natural law and enact it through the government.

But for the most part, we live here:

Individual desires --> People --> Government

A people who don't seek the highest good will seek their own good, which means free shit by hook or crook and exploiting other people to get what you want. That's why our country is the way it is now. Our Constitution was made for a moral people, but we do nothing to inculcate morality.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Squidbot, Flexo, the fall of man and 10 others
Return of the Freaker said:
Omg they actually included the melanin=melatonin nonsense. There's black supremacists that think that because you can buy melatonin at the pharmacy as a sleep aid and it sounds like melanin, wypipo are abducting and killing black kids so they can harvest and consume their melanin to artificially give themselves souls or some shit.
Click to expand...
These fools literally believe white people are the IRL Skaven, don't they? I mean we do have advanced technology, a cutthroat corporate culture, were the first to develop modern agriculture and start an exponential population boom, and if Joseph Conrad is to be believed we used to use jitter-speak and established a balance-of-powers system just 100 years ago...
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pope Julius IV, Burned Man, Flaming Insignias and 9 others
X Prime said:
Well yes, they are weak-minded enough to talk about their (de)transitioning and homelessness on their KF profile, what do you expect?
Click to expand...

Oh man then they REALLY do need to be a citizen of the world in Somalia post-haste.
That will be super entertaining.

Robert James said:
She already got one problematic orange man to throw away his title, his future, his heirloom guns, his home, and his family for her can't blame her for testing whether or not she can control all problematic orange men. What get's me is that she hasn't got the Diane treatment yet, at some point the queen would find a way to kill her and get her son back.
Click to expand...

This is why none of you shitheads will ever be the Queen of England.

You need to think the long game. Kill her now, and your back-up heir will never stop being a whiny blubbering loser, honoring the memory of "muh megan". No, you've just got to bite your lip, minimize the damage and wait for him to wake up, realize his balls are missing and how angry that makes him, and THEN you allow the paparazzi to chase them with the camera with the hidden tire-shredding dart gun hidden in it.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick, Pope Julius IV, Confused Doggo and 14 others
Oglooger said:
I had a similar situation, but this was about the discovery of the Americas.
this fellow educated Ebanoid was telling me how White people weren't the first to discover the Americas, but the great Ebanoid King Mansa Musa, who had secret maps that pointed to the new world but was burned by white people who rebelled and didn't want blacks to succede.
I point out how Leif Erikson discovered America first and he got mad because I kept crediting white people and that Masa Musa did it first, despite good ol' Erikson being born 300 years before Mansa Musa.
He also claimed that the original natives of MesoAmerica were black because of the Olmec heads having broad noses and big lips and art of Mayans and Aztecs having dreads, despite this claims; I took personal offense when he said I don't have N-word privileges despite myself being of MesoAmerican Ancestry (1/4th Tlaxcaltec and I think Totonaca).
Click to expand...
This is one of the sadder things about black americans. Ripped from their roots and homeland, stripped of their language and culture, and historically speaking unlike almost every other people in the world, do not have any actual impact historically speaking. It's a rough spot to be in. The productive thing would be to look towards the future to build something but.. that's not happening. Idk how much you can blame them for grasping for nonexistent straws to inflate confidence.

It is hilarious that black supremacist own history has white people being superior no matter which way you slice it. It's like some weird twisted Stockholm syndrome.

Ghostse said:
I think I can answer that with an example:
Jericho was a real city. With some mmmthicc ass walls. There is no sign that the walls of Jericho ever fell, let alone during the the Jews were arriving. When walls fall, even if they are rebuilt, they leave behind evidence - shattered brick/stone, mis-matched wall sections as repairs are different, etc. (example, Troy's walls were destroyed no less than 7 times. They know because each time the walls fell, they left a separate layer of debris. They know some of the wall collapses were unexpected because you find human and animal remains under them. others there is nother material under collapsed walls, meaning people had time to clear themselves and their possesses out)
Jericho in fact shows no signs of war or trauma in the period that coincides with the Jews arrival in the area. no arrow heads, no broken weapons, no bodies, no charred wood.

So this leaves two possibilites:
- The Wall of Jericho collapsed precisely as described in the Bible. The wall collapsed so completely even the foundations were scattered, and the occupying Jews then immediately turned around rebuilt the wall using the exact same stones as before, and then did a CSI-level scrub for debris.
- The occupation of the city was acchieved through some other means and the fall of the wall was a metaphorical fall.
Click to expand...
+1 informative. Did not know that Jericho had been found and was a real city.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squidbot, Pope Julius IV, Grapefruit Soda and 6 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, Flaming Insignias, ThatOneLurker and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back