🐱 Republicans move to delegitimize anti-white supremacy group

CatParty


'This resolution is an attack on our definition of hate groups in order to excuse the Trump administration's history of working with those who malign entire groups of people.'
Aug 24, 2020, 10:00 am

Kahron Spearman

Ahead of its convention, the GOP has produced a resolution that delegitimizes the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), indirectly aligning itself with white supremacists.

The Republican National Committee has approved the resolution at its meeting in Charlotte, North Carolina, refuting the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “legitimacy to identify hate groups.”

The RNC says the group, founded in 1971 to combat “hate, intolerance, and discrimination through education and litigation,” now “puts conservative groups or voices at risk of attack.”


The resolution appears to stem from a “violent attack” on the Family Research Council, a fundamentalist Protestant activist group, with an affiliated lobbying organization. In the RNC’s document, the group is noted as a victim of the SPLC: “WHEREAS, The Family Research Council suffered a violent attack due to its support of the traditional family, which the SPLC has deemed as hateful.”

The brief resolution then notes the legitimization of the non-profit anti-hate group under the Obama Administration, including an alleged “ability to provide input to the Department of Homeland Security,” which “put conservative groups or voices at risk of attack.”

Finally, it accused the SPLC of being a “radical organization, and that the federal government should not view this organization as a legitimate foundation equipped to provide actionable information to DHS or any other government agency.”


The SPLC and CEO Margaret Huang would respond with a statement, and tweeted: “This resolution is an attack on our definition of hate groups in order to excuse the Trump administration’s history of working with those who malign entire groups of people—including #BlackLivesMatter, #immigrants, #Muslims and the #LGBTQ community — with dehumanizing rhetoric.”


“The resolution comes at a moment when Trump will argue at the Republican National Convention that he will combat hate and bigotry,” it continues. “In addition to this resolution giving comfort to hate groups, we have recently seen other evidence of hate groups and extremists making inroads into the Republican Party. Some in the party welcome QAnon into the GOP’s fold. The indictment of Stephen Bannon in recent days is a reminder of the extremism that he sought to embed in the Republican Party. And the SPLC has shined a light on OANN’s Jack Posobiec, a reporter at Trump’s favorite ‘news’ network, who is aligned with white supremacy and has used his platform to further hate speech and propaganda.”

“Now, Trump and the GOP are doubling down with QAnon and partnering with hate groups that are seeking to muzzle anyone who stands in their way of furthering their agenda and hurting communities that we care about.”

“But we’re not going to back down from calling out white supremacists and hate groups or pushing back against their dehumanizing rhetoric.”


In an investigation of OANN’s Jack Posobiec, SPLC senior investigative reporter Michael Edison Hayden wrote, “Jack Posobiec’s extensive ties to white supremacists should serve as a wake-up call for anyone who hasn’t made the connection between Trump’s MAGA movement and hate.”

Some are calling the indictment overdue, accusing the SPLC of grift.


Like the SPLC, others noted the GOP’s willingness to accommodate hate groups and the conservatives’ cleaving along the lines of outspoken rhetoric.


Writer/activist David Hogg (@stareagle) tweeted: “White supremacists and hate groups are the mainstream of the Republican party. Moderate Republicans are now the ones being driven away by the extremists.”
 
The SPLC is a Fred Phelps-esque racket of getting rich off lawsuits and calumny. Their own founder was booted for racism and sexism.
Why is this Fag even included? shouldn't he be getting therapy and not trying to fight for a cause?
His daddy's a Glowing One and they're trying to keep his long-expired 15 minutes of fame on life support.
 
"The GOP doesn't support far left groups who slander them 24/7. DAS BAD! AND RAYCISS! REEEEEE!"
The only "Conservatives™️" that are allowed in this country, according to them, are the Bushes, McCains, and other pushovers that will fold like a cheap suitcase the moment they cry "Nazi! Racist! Sexist! Fascist!"

Liberals aren't used to being actively defied.
 
Finally, took long enough for this to happen. The SPLC is so blatantly one-sided, I don't know why anyone took it seriously. Here's a list of what they track as hateful ideaologies:

ANTI-IMMIGRANT
ANTI-LGBTQ
ANTI-MUSLIM
BLACK SEPARATIST
CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
GENERAL HATE
HATE MUSIC
HOLOCAUST DENIAL
KU KLUX KLAN
MALE SUPREMACY
NEO-CONFEDERATE
NEO-NAZI
NEO-VOLKISCH
RACIST SKINHEAD
RADICAL TRADITIONAL CATHOLICISM
WHITE NATIONALIST

Personally, I love how there is Radical Traditional Catholicism(you know, that totally widespread radical religious sect) and Anti-Muslim, but no Radical Islam section(cuz the religion of peace never hurt anybody). What a fucking joke.
 
Finally, took long enough for this to happen. The SPLC is so blatantly one-sided, I don't know why anyone took it seriously. Here's a list of what they track as hateful ideaologies:

ANTI-IMMIGRANT
ANTI-LGBTQ
ANTI-MUSLIM
BLACK SEPARATIST
CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
GENERAL HATE
HATE MUSIC
HOLOCAUST DENIAL
KU KLUX KLAN
MALE SUPREMACY
NEO-CONFEDERATE
NEO-NAZI
NEO-VOLKISCH
RACIST SKINHEAD
RADICAL TRADITIONAL CATHOLICISM
WHITE NATIONALIST

Personally, I love how there is Radical Traditional Catholicism(you know, that totally widespread radical religious sect) and Anti-Muslim, but no Radical Islam section(cuz the religion of peace never hurt anybody). What a fucking joke.
Radical Traditional Catholicism is just people who (sometimes rightly) complain about the Mass being prayed in the vernacular instead of Latin. It's a debate between them and more mainstream, "conservative" if you will, Catholics such as myself, for whom the Latin Mass is not readily available, and have to make do.
 
Finally, took long enough for this to happen. The SPLC is so blatantly one-sided, I don't know why anyone took it seriously. Here's a list of what they track as hateful ideaologies:

ANTI-IMMIGRANT
ANTI-LGBTQ
ANTI-MUSLIM
BLACK SEPARATIST
CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
GENERAL HATE
HATE MUSIC
HOLOCAUST DENIAL
KU KLUX KLAN
MALE SUPREMACY
NEO-CONFEDERATE
NEO-NAZI
NEO-VOLKISCH
RACIST SKINHEAD
RADICAL TRADITIONAL CATHOLICISM
WHITE NATIONALIST

Personally, I love how there is Radical Traditional Catholicism(you know, that totally widespread radical religious sect) and Anti-Muslim, but no Radical Islam section(cuz the religion of peace never hurt anybody). What a fucking joke.

Where's Orthodox Judaism? They've absolutely caused more hate and violence than radical Catholics.
 
Finally, took long enough for this to happen. The SPLC is so blatantly one-sided, I don't know why anyone took it seriously. Here's a list of what they track as hateful ideaologies:

ANTI-IMMIGRANT
ANTI-LGBTQ
ANTI-MUSLIM
BLACK SEPARATIST
CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
GENERAL HATE
HATE MUSIC
HOLOCAUST DENIAL
KU KLUX KLAN
MALE SUPREMACY
NEO-CONFEDERATE
NEO-NAZI
NEO-VOLKISCH
RACIST SKINHEAD
RADICAL TRADITIONAL CATHOLICISM
WHITE NATIONALIST

Oh, "hate music". Thank god, the SPLC is moving to get the n-word removed from all the lyrics in today's music.
 
Fucking YAWN!!! We know what the SPLC is. We know you like to have your bully pulpit and tar people with it. We know the SPLC doesn't give a fuck about racism or hate in general, because your willing to completely water down the whole concept while begging for change. We get it. And by change I mean spare.

So is this the time where we divine the chosen meaning of the word 'hate' as used by the SPLC? Or should we change the definition of racism again? And once we have a pout about how people don't like that we can go on to discuss how without said changes, you can't draw links to Donald Trump and these would-be hate groups. Its almost as though being a pro Trump group gets you listed as a hate group. Of course the SPLC would never, ever, be that indiscriminate. They've certainly never been successfully sued for similar indiscretions.

What's up with the ACLU? Lookin' at you, Buddy.
 
Back