U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's happened before quite recently during the Yellow Vest protests in France like a year ago (wonder if that shit is still going on). The idea was that since Frogs are mandated by law to have a yellow vest in their vehicles everyone can join in.

I even recall a counter protest version where they were using red scarves, but it was quickly forgotten cause who the fuck has red scarves? Less accessible to the majority than a cheapo yellow reflective vest.
I actually considered bringing them up in that exact section, but I admit that I'm not particularly well-versed in the Yellow Vest protests, so I left it out for safety's sake.
 
Watching this thread is like being strapped to a seat and getting hypno-indoctrinated deathwatch style, except i'm not watching battle brothers get overwhelmed, i'm watching defenseless, often aging white people get folded into pretzels at the whims of the mob. I'm watching small business owners losing their livelyhood because tankie retards think insurance covers for rioting beyond giga-chains like Cattlezon and Goymart. I'm sitting here strapped to a seat being forced to watch this great country get despoiled night by night and no lasting, strong solution will be viable unless it finally escalates to martial law and turner diaries extended edition.

I'm going to end up crafting an AR and some 500 plates in minecraft and patiently wait at this rate.

Most of these "defenseless aging white people" literally asked for this. Decades of modern civilization has destroyed their ability to feel danger. They can't appreciate the fact that they live in a place where they aren't getting robbed, raped, or shot every day.

Guy in the yellow shirt has a Libertarian porcupine. What the fuck happened to the Libertarians? They're a mess, and they're simping for the communists.

All of the smart people realized libertarianism is retarded and realized that you cannot have freedom without security. All that's left now are the dumb people.
 
So tonight could be interesting. It could go 2 ways.

1. People are shocked by the violence and the rioting is dialed back.

2. People double down and the rioting and violence intensifies. (IMO this is the more likely option after last night.)

Kenosha is going to be rough for the next few days.
I'm putting my money on door number 2. They dont have the big brain thunks necessary to even consider removing their foot from the pedal before they scream off the cliff.
They're going over the edge no matter how many bodies they leave behind.
 
Okay, I'll admit I jumped the gun. I have a strong association with the "everything glows" attitude and NatSocs, probably a carryover from my time on /pol/. In addition, I probably fucked up my previous post and failed to make it clear that it was a jab and not myself going sieg heil. I apologize and respectfully disagree with your apparent stance on the percentage of glowies that make up the armed individuals opposing the rioting.

I have no idea what the percentage of glowinthedarks is, but when you have a group of people running around destroying shit, and people firing into crowds of people who look like they're going to run around destroying shit, everyone involved is likely engaged in illegal activity, and would be wise not to wear "I'm a criminal" flair. Whether to avoid jail time or to not blow their cover, I can't say.

I'm glad I went with a neutral response. Your aryan definitely came off as crazy nazi shit to me.
 
I'm gonna fucking powerlevel cause I'm pissed. I'm a big paleontology nerd and love museums and want to work in one some day. Rioters tried to burn down the Dinosaur Discovery Museum in Kenosha because of some random dude died. That museum has thousands of irreplaceable specimens that would have been lost if the fire spread. If you're gonna riot, why attack an already struggling natural history museum? They also destroyed the DINOSAUR statues outside the museum. Are dinosaurs racist now? I guess fucking so

They really do hate any kind of history that isn't communist revisionism or "We Wuz Kangz" Afrocentrist Wakanda bullshit.

I guess hating dinosaurs can be added to the list of common traits the Woke Left has with the old Religious Right.

The shooter got doxed pretty quickly - just a 17 year old kid, as mentioned previously.

And I’m sorry, but imagine getting killed by this little dude. Must be the ultimate humiliation for those BLM attackers.

For the record, and judging by the footage, I do believe it was self defence, and honestly good for the kid. He did well, and has more balls than most people.
But I just can’t get over how dorky and adorable his pictures are.

As optimistic as this sounds, him being a minor could work out in favor for him and the overall optics, especially if Tucker airs the video evidence on his program and gets it out into the wider mainstream. I honestly think part of why the Covington boys were so successful in their actions is because they were minors and it's bad optics for even the usually immune Woke Left, so CNN and Washington Post immediately decided to settle once they knew it had a good chance of actually making it to court.

Unless there's something that's truly damning in his social media (like actual Alt-Right or Nazi stuff, not just generic Blue Lives Matter stickers) then I think this kid has a fighting chance of being let off the hook since he's legally a minor and does not look threatening. He probably also has a clean record.

I know I'll get bombarded with rainbow stickers and blackpill doomer comments from the usual suspects like the traditionalists, the wannabe ChiCom, and the wannabe towelhead for saying this is a possibility. It's still a big of a longshot, but given he's a minor he could walk on this one if he's in front of a sympathetic local judge (since the charges will likely be at the state level)

Antifa and BLM will still be gunning for him and trying to make his life a living hell if he does get lucky enough to walk. But he's got something that Zimmerman didn't have and Fields sure as fuck didn't have. First is that he's a minor and probably has a clean record, and the second is the insanity of the riots and the hard evidence of the videos. The MSM will try to memory hole it, but a court is less likely to ignore that kind of evidence after all this bullshit.

The doomers can try more of their active measures and demoralization blackpill idiocy, but the fact this is a teenager acting clearly in self-defense is a point in his favor. George Zimmerman was an asshole and a sped in his own right even before Trayvon while James Fields was openly a self-identified White Nationalist and it's difficult to tell if he was trying to get away in a mad panic or if he was wanting to intentionally ram his vehicle into the crowd if we're going on the video evidence alone.

This is the kind of shit that can get a lot of normies to fully turn on BLM and Antifa, especially if you can get the word out enough before they can really memoryhole it and maintain the status quo of Anarcho-Tyranny. Archive everything and try to send the evidence to the right kinds of people.
 
Listening to the radio NPR ugh on the way to work this morning and they're giving just the facts ma'am. Guy was being chased and he shot some people. Then BBC came on (NPR plays a lot of world service because they're too broke to fill the air 24/7 with their own programming) and it was the same. They cant spin this one the way they want because there's video of everything.
 
ON WISCONSIN! ON WISCONSIN!
So proud of my home state this morning, fuck the optics. If that dox is real (it looks like a different person to me too though) and the shooter is only 17, that may help him too. Seems unlikely they would charge him as an adult for a self-defense scenario, but that may be too optimistic.

Looks like the narrative they are going to run with is starting to form.

View attachment 1548585

I have reached a point of indifference where the part of this tweet that bothers me most is “automatic weapons” because these commies want to steal our guns and do not even know the basics about them.

I think the social media bubble these people live in has shrunk. Two leftists I know blocked or deleted their Facebook. And I blocked a third person for being too fucking retarded.

That whole campaign to "cut off family members who are conservative" back firing on them something fierce.

You love to see it. My circle has reduced by probably 90-95%. Said it before in the thread and I will say it again, I am a petty bitch and any of the people who cut me off for wrongthink will never get help or sympathy again. They do not deserve it.
 
Is there footage of the first shooting- the one of "shoot me, nigger?" dude? The second shooting is pretty clear self-defense to me but if the first one is no good then the kid is fucked anyway.

I'm late on this, but this is sound advice.

Never let someone tourniquet a limb unless there is massive continued bleeding. It's a good way to force that limb to be amputated.

Apply pressure and covering with a clean gauze and seek the nearest emergency room immediately.

That was the thinking 15 years ago. The evidence from military medicine learned in the sandbox is contrary to it and is now bleeding over into civilian emergency medicine as well. There is almost zero risk of amputation due to TQ usage if it is under 2 hours. With a gaping wound like that, it is far better to put a TQ on early than to wait and see how much bleeding develops as the blood vessels dilate subsequent to the adrenaline.
 
The shooter got doxed pretty quickly - just a 17 year old kid, as mentioned previously.

And I’m sorry, but imagine getting killed by this little dude. Must be the ultimate humiliation for those BLM attackers.

For the record, and judging by the footage, I do believe it was self defence, and honestly good for the kid. He did well, and has more balls than most people.
But I just can’t get over how dorky and adorable his pictures are.
What the hell was a 17 year old doing out in a riot with a rifle anyway? Don't you have to be 18 in most states to own firearms? Although I think the shooting was more or less justified (I'm one to wait until all the facts are out there before committing one way or the other), a kid like him shouldn't be out there policing the streets.
 
Holy shit. Chunk of arm blown off.
View attachment 1548261
Sit in your rocking chair with your amputated limb and ask yourself what it was all for?
Some child abuser who ignored police orders?

In a way I feel bad for these useful idiots. Their lives are irreparably changed, and if Trump wins the cultural shift will utterly dismantle any sympathy IRL randoms would hold for his worldview...
 
As optimistic as this sounds, him being a minor could work out in favor for him and the overall optics, especially if Tucker airs the video evidence on his program and gets it out into the wider mainstream. I honestly think part of why the Covington boys were so successful in their actions is because they were minors and it's bad optics for even the usually immune Woke Left, so CNN and Washington Post immediately decided to settle once they knew it had a good chance of actually making it to court.

Unless there's something that's truly damning in his social media (like actual Alt-Right or Nazi stuff, not just generic Blue Lives Matter stickers) then I think this kid has a fighting chance of being let off the hook since he's legally a minor and does not look threatening. He probably also has a clean record.

I know I'll get bombarded with rainbow stickers and blackpill doomer comments from the usual suspects like the traditionalists, the wannabe ChiCom, and the wannabe towelhead for saying this is a possibility. It's still a big of a longshot, but given he's a minor he could walk on this one if he's in front of a sympathetic local judge (since the charges will likely be at the state level)

Antifa and BLM will still be gunning for him and trying to make his life a living hell if he does get lucky enough to walk. But he's got something that Zimmerman didn't have and Fields sure as fuck didn't have. First is that he's a minor and probably has a clean record, and the second is the insanity of the riots and the hard evidence of the videos. The MSM will try to memory hole it, but a court is less likely to ignore that kind of evidence after all this bullshit.

The doomers can try more of their active measures and demoralization blackpill idiocy, but the fact this is a teenager acting clearly in self-defense is a point in his favor. George Zimmerman was an asshole and a sped in his own right even before Trayvon while James Fields was openly a self-identified White Nationalist and it's difficult to tell if he was trying to get away in a mad panic or if he was wanting to intentionally ram his vehicle into the crowd if we're going on the video evidence alone.

This is the kind of shit that can get a lot of normies to fully turn on BLM and Antifa, especially if you can get the word out enough before they can really memoryhole it and maintain the status quo of Anarcho-Tyranny. Archive everything and try to send the evidence to the right kinds of people.
No, I think you have a good point here; I certainly hope the fact he's 17 will mean anything.

...Actually, if they still throw the book at him I think the tension will be greater than if they threw the book at an adult who did the same thing.
 
As optimistic as this sounds, him being a minor could work out in favor for him and the overall optics, especially if Tucker airs the video evidence on his program and gets it out into the wider mainstream. I honestly think part of why the Covington boys were so successful in their actions is because they were minors and it's bad optics for even the usually immune Woke Left, so CNN and Washington Post immediately decided to settle once they knew it had a good chance of actually making it to court.

Unless there's something that's truly damning in his social media (like actual Alt-Right or Nazi stuff, not just generic Blue Lives Matter stickers) then I think this kid has a fighting chance of being let off the hook since he's legally a minor and does not look threatening. He probably also has a clean record.

I know I'll get bombarded with rainbow stickers and blackpill doomer comments from the usual suspects like the traditionalists, the wannabe ChiCom, and the wannabe towelhead for saying this is a possibility. It's still a big of a longshot, but given he's a minor he could walk on this one if he's in front of a sympathetic local judge (since the charges will likely be at the state level)

Antifa and BLM will still be gunning for him and trying to make his life a living hell if he does get lucky enough to walk. But he's got something that Zimmerman didn't have and Fields sure as fuck didn't have. First is that he's a minor and probably has a clean record, and the second is the insanity of the riots and the hard evidence of the videos. The MSM will try to memory hole it, but a court is less likely to ignore that kind of evidence after all this bullshit.

The doomers can try more of their active measures and demoralization blackpill idiocy, but the fact this is a teenager acting clearly in self-defense is a point in his favor. George Zimmerman was an asshole and a sped in his own right even before Trayvon while James Fields was openly a self-identified White Nationalist and it's difficult to tell if he was trying to get away in a mad panic or if he was wanting to intentionally ram his vehicle into the crowd if we're going on the video evidence alone.

This is the kind of shit that can get a lot of normies to fully turn on BLM and Antifa, especially if you can get the word out enough before they can really memoryhole it and maintain the status quo of Anarcho-Tyranny. Archive everything and try to send the evidence to the right kinds of people.

From what I’ve seen in the twitter thread about the shooting linked several pages back, he only has one citation for speeding on the freeway, regarding his record.

And I couldn’t find any white supremacist / nazi crap online about him. Just pics of him loving police and loving America.

Regarding his age, is owning a gun legal in Wisconsin for minors? Pretty sure some hunting rifles are allowed, but other than that? Depending on the law, it could prove to be a disadvantage to him.
Sure, there are sometimes stories of children using their parents’ firearms to defend against house invaders, but they’re usually spur of the moment weapons of opportunity.
Here though? Have to admit I’m a bit unclear as to whether his possession of a firearm is legal or not.
 
What the hell was a 17 year old doing out in a riot with a rifle anyway? Don't you have to be 18 in most states to own firearms? Although I think the shooting was more or less justified (I'm one to wait until all the facts are out there before committing one way or the other), a kid like him shouldn't be out there policing the streets.

To buy, yes. To possess, no. Gun culture is strong in Wisconsin as previously mentioned, so it is not out of the norm for a kid to have a rifle for hunting.

ETA: Wisconsin state law apparently prohibits possession for minors except in scenarios where an adult is present.
 
Most of these "defenseless aging white people" literally asked for this. Decades of modern civilization has destroyed their ability to feel danger. They can't appreciate the fact that they live in a place where they aren't getting robbed, raped, or shot every day.



All of the smart people realized libertarianism is retarded and realized that you cannot have freedom without security. All that's left now are the dumb people.

Obvious active measure is obvious.

Despite your demoralization efforts, I'll give you credit where credit is due about how retarded lolberts are. The only ones more retarded than the lolbertarians are communists and even then it's close. Maoists and Anarcho-Communists are the most retarded of the bunch.

What the hell was a 17 year old doing out in a riot with a rifle anyway? Don't you have to be 18 in most states to own firearms? Although I think the shooting was more or less justified (I'm one to wait until all the facts are out there before committing one way or the other), a kid like him shouldn't be out there policing the streets.

It's possible Wisconsin might have a lower age for rifles (like 16 or 17) because it's a major state for hunting and sport shooting. I could be wrong on that and I'll double check what the gun laws are in Wisconsin.

It's also possible that the firearm belongs to one of his parents or an older sibling.
 
What the hell was a 17 year old doing out in a riot with a rifle anyway? Don't you have to be 18 in most states to own firearms? Although I think the shooting was more or less justified (I'm one to wait until all the facts are out there before committing one way or the other), a kid like him shouldn't be out there policing the streets.
Yeah, makes me question the dox. Under federal law, a dealer can only sell a long gun to 18+, but there's no age restriction for a private party to sell/give/transfer to someone else. However, only four states (Alaska, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and surprisingly New York) appear to allow possession of a long gun by anyone below the age of 18.
https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/who-can-have-a-gun/minimum-age/
 
so the boogaloo guys have literal child soldiers?
EgVzqoeX0AAoXEN.jpg
 
>Cops murder in cold blood
>Leads to
>Cops getting bricked
>Leads to
>Cops letting right wing militia run wild


Gee, it almost seems like there's something in that chain of events that's entirely in your control. It's something that, should you remove it, would prevent the next event from happening. I can't for the life of me think of it though...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back