U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rich Evans Apologist said:
this whole time, all I needed to do to get some feminist pussy was to threaten a pregnant woman at gunpoint? TIL
Click to expand...
bro, if you're black. you can rape and kill women all day
then get killed by a cop

and all those dumb white women who were screaming about "air condition rape" and "rape is the worst" and "looking at a wamminz without permission is rape" and "the school mascot wants to rape me" will be calling you a fucking saint.

if bill cosby went on a rampage in jail, and got mowed down by a cop, you will see every screeching feminist go on about how he dindu nuttin and was a good guy after all.

they literally WANT to be victims, this is their goal in life.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Maggots on a Train v2, GloJojo, Hapax legomenon and 17 others
You're a Big Guy said:
If he actually goes to prison, how do they spin it?
'Yeah sure he was fleeing and they tried to set him on fire and tried to shoot him but... uhhh... WHITE SUPREMACIST! JAIL NOW!'
Click to expand...
A very similar thing happened to a few guys from 4chan that went to a BLM protest in Chicago years ago.
A group of 4 guy went to the protest, trolled around and then were chased away from the scene for 3 blocks. Eventually one of them turned around and fired into the crowd of persurors. However due to texts they made on their phone and on 4chan, prosecutors argued that they went there looking for a fight, so even though they fired after fleeing, their claim for self defense was invalid.
The same thing will happen here, he will be accused of going to the riot with ill-intentions, thus invalidating his right to self defense.
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: the fall of man, Lady Round Buns, Atomic Wangler and 14 others
DumbDude42 said:
no, it strengthens the case of "your honor, clearly this is a good-for-nothing troublemaker who has a history of showing up to civil unrest wielding heavy weaponry, all in the name of his twisted anti-government right wing extremist worldview"
we'll see how it plays out, but i predict that he's going to prison over this. it sucks, but i think it's the most likely outcome.
Click to expand...

No it doesnt. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury he's a troublemaker who showed up to make trouble and then the defense attorney points out ladies and gentlemen of the jury he had been at the location of civil unrest multiple times before without trouble. There would have been no trouble here had he not been assaulted with a deadly weapon TWICE.

The hypothetical prosecution argument here is when rioters riot and the police do jack shit besides protect government buildings, no one else has the right to do anything. It's illegal if they do anything but cower in their homes and it ends in trouble. Rioters have more rights and power than everyone else by virtue of their rioting. Fuck outta here with that regression to atavism.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo, Lady Round Buns, WonderWino and 8 others
DeadFish said:
In looking at it from a view of peak oil, unsustainble debt and other dwindling resources. I am also looking at it from a point of view of open civil war.
Click to expand...
Just drill more nigga. Hydrocarbons aren't rare. It's the initial capital of developing the fields that is costly. Once the price bumps up a couple bucks a barrel they sink wells like crazy because it becomes economically viable to do so. There are literally trillions of barrels of recoverable oil in the US alone. It just doesn't make financial sense to go and get it right now.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Microlab, Spasticus Autisticus, ThatOneLurker and 5 others
draggs said:
The hypothetical prosecution argument here is when rioters riot and the police do jack shit besides protect government buildings, no one else has the right to do anything. It's illegal if they do anything but cower in their homes and it ends in trouble. Rioters have more rights and power than everyone else by virtue of their rioting. Fuck outta here with that regression to atavism.
Click to expand...
well, that is exactly the position that local authorities seem to be taking, so it will probably be shared by the courts.
maybe i'm overly pessimistic, but i don't see him getting off lightly on this.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Feels
Reactions: Lady Round Buns, Granola Grenadine, Allakazam223 and 5 others

Attachments

  • IMG_20200826_160305.jpg
    IMG_20200826_160305.jpg
    80.4 KB · Views: 89
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Winner
Reactions: Bad Take Crucifier, GloJojo, Feline Supremacist and 9 others
DumbDude42 said:
well, that is exactly the position that local authorities seem to be taking, so it will probably be shared by the courts.
maybe i'm overly pessimistic, but i don't see him getting off lightly on this.
Click to expand...

Unless he asks for a bench trial or plea bargains the opinion of the court means little. The opinion of the DA matters, and then the opinion of the jury matters.

He's guilty because he shouldn't have been there it was horrible judgment sounds like a good argument but there are holes in it a good defense lawyer could drive an 18 wheeler through unless the prosecution can make a convincing case with evidence that he went there intending to get into a fracas. The 4chan idiots left evidence all over the place that they actually were looking for trouble. Maybe theyll find the same here, but if they dont that case is much harder make convincing. Juries are unpredictable though for sure.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GloJojo, Lady Round Buns, WonderWino and 4 others
Sheryl Nome said:
Yeah I don't care what that actually was, you throw something on fucking fire at somebody and thats deadly force. Get fucked.
Click to expand...
If I'm interpreting it correctly it seems like, under Wisconsin law, it would be difficult to even get the case in front of a judge as in such cases where there is a real or reasonably assumed risk of death or great bodily harm then it negates the duty to flee (which he attempted to do anyway).

Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
This might be why they're trying to manipulate things and have him charged in Illinois. I'll have to look at their legal code regarding self-defense.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: GloJojo, LateNightMuffin, Granola Grenadine and 9 others
So everyone has been very excited for some time about the NG getting involved, talking as if it will solve the issue. But will it. Just how competent and effective are the National Guard? Are they like the TA (Territorial Army) in the UK - part time soldiers who actually go on some active service in time of war. Or are they an exclusively domestic body? Do they have a lot of ex- US "real" (not trying to be pejorative here) military members? And how effective will they be allowed to be? I mean are they just going to be walking around like less well-armed police officers or will they have full arms with live ammo?

Basically, are they the "and then order was suddenly restored" scenario that people have been making them out to be?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Draza, Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back