U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
That chart forgot to include Asians and Joos. They also make. Latinos and Blacks take.


It will probably keep going until December, tbh. The riots are still going strong.
Asians yes, Joos ehhhhhh. They don't normally get welfare no, but they're not particularly well known for paying for anything they can avoid paying for. Taxes included.
 
The MSM though did 24/7 coverage the George Floyd video. Ellison suppressed the bodycam footage knowingly. George Floyd was patron saint of the US after a few days. They knowingly created the conditions for a chimpout, and then co-opted it. The Democrat Mayors and Governors stood by and did nothing. Seems top to bottom astroturf to me.

The MSM is groupthink incarnate. They would be negligent if they didn't show such a sensational video on repeat, night after night, and milk it for ratings.

Ellison is a slimy prosecutor, and suppressed the evidence because he wants to win a case.

Mayors are local. They have to be in tune with their residents, and in Minneapolis/Portland/Seattle, their residents are fucking nutso leftists. I'm not surprised they bowed to woke ideology, but I don't think they realized how far that ideology would go. Or how long the riots could continue.

BLM had an existing network that could be activated if they got a new cause, and so did Antifa. One provided the crowds for the other to hide in, but not necessarily by design. You saw the conflict play out in the first week of CHAZ; their lack of compatibility is the whole reason it got renamed to CHOP.

NLG added logistics and support, like they always do. Big Tech looked the other way when their favored side started abusing their platforms.

Soros probably dumped money in the mix, but his main contribution was the weak DA's. Soros doesn't plot, he's rich enough and autonomous enough to twist systems how he wants them, then let conditions play out.

None of these actor's decisions require coordination with the other actors.

The only people I think strategized at the national level was the Democratic National Party, who saw all these pieces clashing together and decided "hands off, I don't wanna touch that". They were fresh off the primaries, trying to unite a party, and all they needed to do to enable it was to not come out and condemn it.

The world isn't run by 13 bankers sitting around a table rubbing their hands, half the world is just stupid.
 
What the fuck? Why is everyone trying to spin doctor this when you can just watch the video and see what really happened? Do they think nobody can cross reference what they say about the incident with what was recorded on the footage? Who the fuck are these people and what grade of crack are they smoking?

Like I've posted before, we've entered the age of too much information.

People thought that once news was decentralized away from the old legacy media giants in favor of the internet, nobody would hold a monopoly on the flow of information anymore. And while that's true to some extent, it's left us with no authoritative voices we can trust in a sea of hundreds of thousands of sources of info. In the face of that much data, people get overwhelmed and default to whatever fits their preconceived ideas/biases. How else can you narrow down which sources to listen to? People do not have time to wade through them all.

And that's bad enough, but one of the side effects of this process is that people become less likely to look around for info outside of their comfort zones, and their algorithm-supported comfort zones get more narrow. The "news" sources know this and have figured out that they can easily get away with lying to most people. Because we're too busy to check sources. (Why else would "fact-checking" sites be a point of discussion these days?)
 
Last edited:
"If someone tried to burn down your house, would you be mad at them?"
View attachment 1554932
View attachment 1554933
View attachment 1554944

I don't get people who think gunning down violent attackers is excessive force. I'm a Y2K liberal who is squeamish about guns but if someone tried to mess with my my stuff, I'd destroy them and laugh about it.

Well destroying shit doesn't make things better for the nogs. It only makes it worse. So good job, leftist dumbfucks. Hopefully you all do get injured at the hand of your favorite victims tho so you can reflect on your internal racism making nogs burn ur house down.
 
The only people I think strategized at the national level was the Democratic National Party, who saw all these pieces clashing together and decided "hands off, I don't wanna touch that". They were fresh off the primaries, trying to unite a party, and all they needed to do to enable it was to not come out and condemn it.

The world isn't run by 13 bankers sitting around a table rubbing their hands, half the world is just stupid.

What if it's both?
9781788210782.jpg
 
Better question, if slavery is defined as a group of people unwillingly working to support another group of people, how is this not slavery?
View attachment 1554951

Man, they're all in for a shock when white people stop being enough of a racial majority to support those leeches. Suddenly all those social programs will be brankrupt and they'll have to, gasp, find jobs.
 
> Pierce Bainbridge of Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP

What do we know about these people? Are connected to the Fightback Foundation or the Covington Kid's teams?
"Pierce Bainbridge: isn't a person, but John Pierce, named partner of Pierce Bainbridge is connected to the Fightback Foundation.
 
There's a reason for this, and the democrats will NEVER aknowledge it. There is a deep seated hatred between Blacks from the Ghetto and Blacks Who Succeeded. The latter are, frankly, niggers. No not according to me. According to the LATTER group, who loath them as giving every black a bad name, and wallowing in their own misery rather than doing what THEY did and clawing their way up to the point of success and acceptance. The ones from the gheto return this, viewing them as upstarts who have no idea what its like to BE black, and view them as coons and pretenders.
so Carlton Banks trying time get into a fraternity.
 
Better question, if slavery is defined as a group of people unwillingly working to support another group of people, how is this not slavery?
View attachment 1554951


Very nice platonic ideal VNN/Stormfront 1.0 graphic... I may have some appreciation for this (not really because it's so fucking ugly, aesthetics pls) but I hope you're aware that it makes for very ineffective propaganda.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: mr.moon1488
Man, they're all in for a shock when white people stop being enough of a racial majority to support those leeches. Suddenly all those social programs will be brankrupt and they'll have to, gasp, find jobs.
It will be just like Zimbabwe. The most deluded whites will stay behind and get killed off while the others flee to greener pastures. After a while, everything will start to crumble, and just lead to another third world shithole on the map. This is assuming there's not a major awakening of whites to the reality of their situation.
 
Very nice platonic ideal VNN/Stormfront 1.0 graphic... I may have some appreciation for this (not really because it's so fucking ugly, aesthetics pls) but I hope you're aware that it makes for very ineffective propaganda.
Didn't make it just saved it. :drink: Though yeah it's ugly as fuck lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back