U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
tx earlier.png

Texas was on here earlier, dunno about now.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Chesk_0220 and Had
I'm generalizing processed meats as mixed meats that you'd find in McDonald's or other fast foods, even though the term isn't correct. Faux meats, with bits of real meat in them.
This is my last post on this topic in this thread because I don't want to stray too far off base. But to clarify the study I posted: you can almost equate it to a scientific shitpost. They applied a standard that no one uses in this particular field to come to a conclusion that probably isn't all that disputed. The point of said standard is "if people are properly informed on the topic, would they be likely to change their behavior?" This works for drugs because, if someone knew everything about the biochemistry involved, the drugs effects, and its side effects, whether or not said well informed individual would take said drug is a good indicator on whether to recommend it to others (note this isn't a polling practice in terms of "just tell people shit and ask what they think," but rather a gathering of experts in the field mulling over a set of relevant studies and discussing it). In this case, though, it's kinda a small-brained move in that arguing the inverse ("would well informed people eat more of this shit?") would yield the same results. There'd be no strong recommendation for that either.

If you really want to fuck with vegans, mention that there have been a good handful of societies that subsisted on a nearly carnivorous diet (Maasai and Inuits are the most famous examples) but not a single one has ever managed a vegan, or even vegetarian, diet for the majority of its population. For bonus butthurt points, mention the fact that dietary requirements actually differ on racial lines. A Hindu can go vegetarian with little concern but an Inuit would have a slew of health problems. Not to mention the "lactose" thing but I'm sure you know enough about that.
 
1598831557382.png


You are not allowed to search for Kyle on Facebook.

1598831572100.png


They really really don't want people talking about this kid. Only listening to the cathedral tell you what they need you to think you need to know about him: That he was a neo-nazi who literally went on a murder safari to hunt innocent black people in a redneck town and killed multiple people before glorious Antifa freedom fighters drove him away at great personal cost to themselves.
 
View attachment 1560112

You are not allowed to search for Kyle on Facebook.

View attachment 1560113

They really really don't want people talking about this kid. Only listening to the cathedral tell you what they need you to think you need to know about him: That he was a neo-nazi who literally went on a murder safari to hunt innocent black people in a redneck town and killed multiple people before glorious Antifa freedom fighters drove him away at great personal cost to themselves.

They very recently changed his race too. He was listed as Hispanic yesterday, today he's white

EgsDe7tXYAIWgSw.jpg
 
This is my last post on this topic in this thread because I don't want to stray too far off base. But to clarify the study I posted: you can almost equate it to a scientific shitpost. They applied a standard that no one uses in this particular field to come to a conclusion that probably isn't all that disputed. The point of said standard is "if people are properly informed on the topic, would they be likely to change their behavior?" This works for drugs because, if someone knew everything about the biochemistry involved, the drugs effects, and its side effects, whether or not said well informed individual would take said drug is a good indicator on whether to recommend it to others (note this isn't a polling practice in terms of "just tell people shit and ask what they think," but rather a gathering of experts in the field mulling over a set of relevant studies and discussing it). In this case, though, it's kinda a small-brained move in that arguing the inverse ("would well informed people eat more of this shit?") would yield the same results. There'd be no strong recommendation for that either.

If you really want to fuck with vegans, mention that there have been a good handful of societies that subsisted on a nearly carnivorous diet (Maasai and Inuits are the most famous examples) but not a single one has ever managed a vegan, or even vegetarian, diet for the majority of its population. For bonus butthurt points, mention the fact that dietary requirements actually differ on racial lines. A Hindu can go vegetarian with little concern but an Inuit would have a slew of health problems. Not to mention the "lactose" thing but I'm sure you know enough about that.
Yeah, I didn't bother to read into the specific study you posted as I've read more than enough to convince myself of what I already thought, but I was pretty big into reading about carnivore diets and things akin to it for a long while. After about the age of 25~ I decided I wanted my energy back, and I've read as much about it as I can stand to for my lifetime.

justmeat.co has a ton of useful info compiled handily, some great, some not, for anyone that's interested but hasn't taken the jump.
 
They're on every autist right-wingers radar when they contemplate moving out of their urbanized shithole.

If Californians want a more Republican area just move to Susanville or Redding, ffs. Keep the stupidity contained to your state. No need to come here to shit things up.

Ditto east coast. A right-leaning New Yorker can't fit in in Binghamton or Elmira? They have to move to some small town thousands of miles away? C'mon man.

It's a well known thing that only the big cities and certain fashionable resort communities get the libtard plague. The rest is fine. Go there.
People moving where they see fit to exist or to best raise a family is probably the most basic "right" besides breathing. Why should a Californian or anyone who hates their state's governance only move somewhere within their state? Tax laws alone are a good reason to leave certain states. Most of the people leaving California are rational people, that's why they're leaving. They're not from a different country. Fuck your interstate elitism.
 
View attachment 1560112

You are not allowed to search for Kyle on Facebook.

View attachment 1560113

They really really don't want people talking about this kid. Only listening to the cathedral tell you what they need you to think you need to know about him: That he was a neo-nazi who literally went on a murder safari to hunt innocent black people in a redneck town and killed multiple people before glorious Antifa freedom fighters drove him away at great personal cost to themselves.
I’m a pleb who has fb so I plugged in the correctly spelled name. No results for people, posts, pages etc. Spell it like Kyle Rittenhous(no e) and lots come up. Most are using the misspelling; not sure if it’s honest misspellings, trying to get around the block, etc.

Also I didn’t realize there was a Gainesville in Texas. I just knew if the Florida one. What kind of demographics are there?
 
His shitposting is about the only thing he's done that I find to be worth while. He's done a couple of things within the past 6 months involving h1-b Visas in Tennessee and some other actually pertinent things for the White working class, but aside from that he's just been the standard, middle of the road do nothing conservative, no matter how much people on YouTube try to proliferate ideas that he's done so many things that haven't been reported on. Their own lists and 4D chess arguments are still unimpressive.

But hey, for the lulz will never not be funny.
He's on track for a 49% legal immigration reduction for the year 2021 (as compared to 2016)
 
Last edited:
Nazis.

Have the blacks ever had it good in the US? Lovecraft Country from HBO (they also made weird pro-homosexual prison based free-use stuff like OZ and Larry Sanders) makes out the time it's set in, early 50's? Was awesome for blacks, but actually I don't think thats really true.

Has there ever actually been a good century, or less, maybe a decade for black people that's actually cool for blacks is my poorly defined sentence of posters intent.
Reconstruction was pretty good until the North pulled out and the KKK was in charge. First black senator in congress was in the late 1860s maybe early 1870s.

Then depending on which old head you talk to things were good in the community even though things were bad outside the community in the 50's prior to the civil rights movement and desegregation. Now everything is bad. Desegregation along with the welfare rules implemented along with everything else from the civil rights movement destroyed the black community and family. Some people think what was gained from that was worth it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back