U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Most conservatives just want the rules applied fairly and neutrally, the dobulestandards on most tech platforms are infuriating, "Hurr Durr Pedo was stopping a mass shooter" is fine but "Kyle was clearly acting in self defense here is proof" is not.

Right - I'm saying that's not going to happen. Basically ever, unless the generation currently getting abused by hippies floods into tech and displaces the ones that were getting abused by televangelists and nuns.

Because "we don't allow content regarding mass shooters" or something is a statement that you might think is pretty straightforward and easy to apply evenly to both sides of the aisle... until you realize that the entire workforce regards Kyle as a mass shooter. And there's no real business incentive to be "neutral." It's just a more solvable idea to make a space specifically catered to conservatives that admits it's going to have a conservative bent, but which still goes after your usual morons that post their autistic neonazi shit everywhere. Facebook is never going to be even-handed.
 
I doubt that will wake them up. People think stores like Wal-Mart and Kroger are 3-D printers who make everything they sell inside the store. Average city folk cannot comprehend the sheer logistics it takes to make sure their fat asses can get that bucket of fried chicken.

These people will starve to death because they won't know where the food actually came from.
Reminds me of the interviews in which PETA pussies point out unironically that we shouldn't kill animals for meat when we can just buy it at the grocery store.
Maybe off-topic, but obligatory.
attachments-20.png
 
Here is a question, why does the world have to kowtow and care that some black person got killed by police in the US? Why does it matter to Europe and Asia that people have tried to have BLM shit in Japan from what I heard and you have this shit going on in the UK?

What is it about black people that the world has to fucking cater to them?
People who don't live in the US have heard about US race relations from exactly one source: Hollywood. It's quite literally all they know about the issue. Every few months Hollywood churns out another movie about the plight of the negro and people half the world away have no reason to believe they're being lied to so they just accept it. This is by design.
 
Indianapolis Twitter was trying to shitstir over Nataysia Williams' death, pointing out that a black woman died but leaving out that a black man shot her. Melvin Hall has been charged with her murder.

I was pleasantly surprised that Indy radio station WIBC 93.1 called the riot shit out. I got to the point of not trusting them because thay are SO conservative they often push an agenda so hard the topic of converation falls off the table. The have redeemed themselves by calling out mayor Joe Hogsett for his inaction. To this day he will not even mention the riots, as though they didn't happen. One would think the Coronavirus took human form and broke windows and set fires downtown.

Non-riot Indianapolis adjacent thing, bunch of missing kids are being found. Qanon would be proud.

In other news, Ohio seems pretty based this morning.
 
Right - I'm saying that's not going to happen. Basically ever, unless the generation currently getting abused by hippies floods into tech and displaces the ones that were getting abused by televangelists and nuns.

Because "we don't allow content regarding mass shooters" or something is a statement that you might think is pretty straightforward and easy to apply evenly to both sides of the aisle... until you realize that the entire workforce regards Kyle as a mass shooter. And there's no real business incentive to be "neutral." It's just a more solvable idea to make a space specifically catered to conservatives that admits it's going to have a conservative bent, but which still goes after your usual morons that post their autistic neonazi shit everywhere. Facebook is never going to be even-handed.
Which is why the US doesn't need Trump (don't get me wrong hes the best we got right now), it really needs Theodore Roosevelt 2, some one willing to trust bust and break up the megacorps to bring compititon back in to the US Market, If Facebook/Google/Apple/MS/et al wasn't able to buy out and/or other wise destroy any competition that may keep up, Facebook et al would be more neutral in terms of applying the rules equally or people would jump to new platforms al la Friendster -> MySpace -> Facebook -> Current stagination of the internet.
 
Right - I'm saying that's not going to happen. Basically ever, unless the generation currently getting abused by hippies floods into tech and displaces the ones that were getting abused by televangelists and nuns.

Because "we don't allow content regarding mass shooters" or something is a statement that you might think is pretty straightforward and easy to apply evenly to both sides of the aisle... until you realize that the entire workforce regards Kyle as a mass shooter. And there's no real business incentive to be "neutral." It's just a more solvable idea to make a space specifically catered to conservatives that admits it's going to have a conservative bent, but which still goes after your usual morons that post their autistic neonazi shit everywhere. Facebook is never going to be even-handed.

The Silicon Valley companies squash their own employees dissent too. There is a significant number of people working at Silicon Valley companies who are not radical leftists, especially companies that have teams that are remote and thus not based in SF. But much like general society, a fringe group of 15-20% + the leadership who want to virtue signal dictate the company culture for everyone else.
 
No wonder this one got memory-holed: the sergeant hasn't even been charged, as he allegedly shot Garrett after Garrett pointed his rifle at the vehicle, and other protestors banged on and threw stuff at the car.

I haven't found anything to confirm this, has he really not been charged? So Daniel never saw the inside of a jail cell? Good news if true.
 
In other news, Ohio seems pretty based this morning.
Reee victim blaming! Reee Cops are not people! Reee!
The Silicon Valley companies squash their own employees dissent too. There is a significant number of people working at Silicon Valley companies who are not radical leftists, especially companies that have teams that are remote and thus not based in SF. But much like general society, a fringe group of 15-20% + the leadership who want to virtue signal dictate the company culture for everyone else.
IT doens't help HR is a danger hair refuge, and HR has so much power.
 
The baizuo need an innocent victim to shower with providence so they can feel good about themselves.
At times, I think that white people getting destroyed by their own self-hatred and white guilt will be a good thing. It will fucking stop all this degeneracy and catering to blacks cause "Muh slavery"

Pol goes on about White genocide and while I do agree with them that people are influencing whites to think the way they do and pushing for white people to be wiped out. I say however that its really White suicide. They do this to themselves. Nobody else has this self-hatred and guilting.

Hell, white people pushed for the feminism nonsense that helped created all this troon shit.

Found this on another site that I found that summarizes it:

The left had created a secular hinduism where people were born into castes based on their intersectional Karma and this Karma determined your inherent moral worth. People thought it was a bit of a joke. It got ALOT of likes. But It wasnt a joke. I was serious.

These people worship black people, or more accurately, Blackness. They believe american blacks are a kind of virgin birth, born free of negative Karma and this makes them inhabit a superior moral and spiritual plane. Whites on the other hand are intersectional Dalits. There are three strains of theology amongst these people

1) Eliminationists: White karma is irredeemable. It is best if it is expunged though the soft geneocide of cultural erasure and zero fertility.
2) Integrationist: Whites can redeem themselves by having children with non-whites, giving birth to children with pure POC Karma
3) Expiationist: whites must submit to blacks, allowing themselves to be humiliated, abused and oppressed in a sacred act of penance. This will purify white karma.


There is a sexual element to this as well. White leftists have always fetishised blacks. Fanon noticed this in his works. Liberal White self-degradation in front of blacks is a performance with psychosexual dimensions, but not one from an inferior to a superior. It is in fact a demonstration of power, the way a powerful CEO may hire a dominatrix to whip him. In the end, the dominatrix still works for him and they both know it.

Thats what you saw during the riots. As one rightist put it on twitter..you peeked in the window and saw an act of consensual BDSM, where one person whips the other and when its done both get up and dance.


I find it makes much sense and fits with how whites self-flagellate themselves and want to wash black people feet. And again, does any other nation or race think like this?
 
Which is why the US doesn't need Trump (don't get me wrong hes the best we got right now), it really needs Theodore Roosevelt 2, some one willing to trust bust and break up the megacorps to bring compititon back in to the US Market, If Facebook/Google/Apple/MS/et al wasn't able to buy out and/or other wise destroy any competition that may keep up, Facebook et al would be more neutral in terms of applying the rules equally or people would jump to new platforms al la Friendster -> MySpace -> Facebook -> Current stagination of the internet.
Refute this lolbert argument against anti-trust for me: breaking up Mega Corps and further regulation leads to more lobbying. Big Biz will still continue the behavior that got them broken up, as long as Uncle Sam gets his pound of flesh.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Refute this lolbert argument against anti-trust for me: breaking up Mega Corps and further regulation leads to more lobbying. Big Biz will still continue the behavior that got them broken up, as long as Uncle Sam gets his pound of flesh.
Under current laws, I don't think I can, we saw what happened to the Baby Bells after Bell was broken up (ended up all re-merging in to each other to ultimately form what we have today: ATT, Verizon, T-mobile, Sprint, and CenturyLink. T-Mobile and Sprint just merged together.
It would require the invalidation of Citizens United and the destruction of the idea of Corporate Free speech / lobbying.

Other wise it would just require every few elections a new Trust Buster to get in to the Presidency and a congress willing to back them.
 
Firstly, they do it to themselves because they have been blasted with heavyhanded propaganda from the cradle to present that whitey is evil and needs to be removed.
Secondly, saying that all of this is just one elaborate masochistic fetish and that its actually based on a feeling of superiority to the average ghetto nog is just looping your argument back to "Everything is white supremacy" and you've put yourself intellectually in the land of confusion they want you to be in. if we apply enough reductive logic and vague freudian claims you can paint anything as huwite supremacy, aka what they have been doing for decades.
 
People who don't live in the US have heard about US race relations from exactly one source: Hollywood. It's quite literally all they know about the issue. Every few months Hollywood churns out another movie about the plight of the negro and people half the world away have no reason to believe they're being lied to so they just accept it. This is by design.
Well, that and their news outlets are just as pozzed. Honestly, the disinfo and misrepresentation of the situation is quite something by people you would figure have no skin the game but clearly do. TDS exists in media abroad.
 
Under current laws, I don't think I can, we saw what happened to the Baby Bells after Bell was broken up (ended up all re-merging in to each other to ultimately form what we have today: ATT, Verizon, T-mobile, Sprint, and CenturyLink. T-Mobile and Sprint just merged together.
It would require the invalidation of Citizens United and the destruction of the idea of Corporate Free speech / lobbying.

Other wise it would just require every few elections a new Trust Buster to get in to the Presidency and a congress willing to back them.
This is why commies believe change is possible only via revolution and not reform.
 
Firstly, they do it to themselves because they have been blasted with heavyhanded propaganda from the cradle to present that whitey is evil and needs to be removed.
Secondly, saying that all of this is just one elaborate masochistic fetish and that its actually based on a feeling of superiority to the average ghetto nog is just looping your argument back to "Everything is white supremacy" and you've put yourself intellectually in the land of confusion they want you to be in. if we apply enough reductive logic and vague freudian claims you can paint anything as huwite supremacy, aka what they have been doing for decades.
The thing though is that leftists have said that Orcs are black people cause Orcs are said to be savage. So they are basically saying that black people are savages and yet they say that everyone else is racist. Why do you think that is? Infact, leftists have said that being on time is whiteness and white supremacy. What does this imply about non-white people or blacks?

There are reasons why some people on the net call white liberals, racists with guilty conscious.
 
Maybe it's some sort of Loophole
No, it's pretty common. For instance, colleges have police departments but they are usually cross-sworn by the local municipality, which makes them LE throughout the state. This is fairly regularly done in instances of Federal interest as well. Eases the path to charges appropriate to the crimes.
 
This case is going to be used as an excuse for more riots. Daniel Prude was a black man who was high on PCP and naked in the street. He was arrested and spat at officers, claiming to have COVID. They put on a spit hood. It seems like he vomited into the spit hood and suffocated. This video has the full bodycam footage. It puts a spin on it that the cops were to blame but if you watch the full footage that is not clear. Prude was a classic case of what cops call Excited Delirium Syndrome, aka fucking crazed nutcase on horrible drugs. It apparently took him seven days to die after the arrest. His family, who called the cops on him rather than trying to deal with the problem themselves are suing the cops, have a GoFundMe, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xON7DhhGI18
https://archive.vn/aSBAe

Part 1
View attachment 1568901
Part 2
View attachment 1568902

"LOOK AT MAH BIG DICK
LOOK AT MAH BIG DICK
LOOK AT MAH BALLS
GIMME YO GUN I NEED IT"

"LOOK AT DIS BIG DICK NIGGAH"
"I'M KILLING EVERYONE IN THAT HOUSE"

We lost a treasure that day.
Shame their hood is getting torched.
 
Which is why the US doesn't need Trump (don't get me wrong hes the best we got right now), it really needs Theodore Roosevelt 2, some one willing to trust bust and break up the megacorps to bring compititon back in to the US Market, If Facebook/Google/Apple/MS/et al wasn't able to buy out and/or other wise destroy any competition that may keep up, Facebook et al would be more neutral in terms of applying the rules equally or people would jump to new platforms al la Friendster -> MySpace -> Facebook -> Current stagination of the internet.

Yeah, the government protections that a lot of the big tech companies get are absurd and push out most competitors, but even so - even if you broke them up and fractured them, you've still got an industry whose labor and design staff are going to generally be fairly hostile to conservative positions.

It would make it easier for a conservative-focused rival to find their footing than at current, though I really think at the moment the problem is more a blend of people being unwilling to move to somewhere smaller + conservatives for whatever reason constantly trying at this "a place for everyone" idea and never really coordinating as a result.

The Silicon Valley companies squash their own employees dissent too. There is a significant number of people working at Silicon Valley companies who are not radical leftists, especially companies that have teams that are remote and thus not based in SF. But much like general society, a fringe group of 15-20% + the leadership who want to virtue signal dictate the company culture for everyone else.

There are a number of libertarians that flock to the field, as well as milquetoast democrats closer to JFK-style values. But, aye, they're rarely the sort to climb positions of HR power. They're rarely the sort to, say, send out a company email suggesting that office workers take down any material that might be seen as "misgoynistic" to some visiting high school students in an outreach program, such as Star Trek posters. It was definitely not made fun of by the vast majority of the office for how ridiculous and out of touch it was, and they definitely didn't send an unprofessional, bitchy follow-up indirectly whinging that people weren't taking them seriously.

But these are rich, privileged people that come from power and whose every waking effort is bent towards domineering and acquiring more authority for themselves. Within the confines of a corporate structure that protects them, surrounded by people who generally lean in their direction, there's not really anything you can do to purge them from the rolls. Which is hugely why I don't think any efforts to get the companies to moderate themselves will ever go anywhere - they're never going to rebuke these sacred cows.
 
+ conservatives for whatever reason constantly trying at this "a place for everyone" idea and never really coordinating as a result.
But even if Conservatives did a "libtarts fuck off" place (in violation of their own values, and echo chambers make sites quite dull, a place of centered to trolls and milking of cows has better debate then "Debate" sites these days as they are now "Be left of Mao or get banned"), they would still need to find a way to secure funding, which has been attacked by the credit card companies in the past, They would still need to deal with the "Only Nazis go there" smears, they would still need to deal with all the current shit the "a place for everyone" places have tried.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back